Please explain why the wage in Japan fell in comparsion to other advanced economies. Does the politicians' high salary in Japan explain some part of the low average wage of the average salaried?
===Based on the provided images and additional economic context, here's a detailed explanation of why wages in Japan have fallen in comparison to other advanced economies, and an analysis of the relationship between politicians' salaries and the average worker's wage.
1. Reasons for Stagnant Wages in Japan
The first image clearly illustrates a stark trend: while real wages in the UK, France, the US, Germany, and Italy have increased significantly since 1997, Japan's real wages have been on a continuous decline. Japan's index value has dropped to 90.1 from the 100 baseline in 1997, while other countries have seen their values rise to well over 100. This phenomenon is often referred to as Japan's "Lost Decades" and is attributed to a combination of long-term structural and economic factors.
The Burst of the Economic Bubble and Deflation: The Japanese economic bubble burst in the early 1990s, leading to a long period of economic stagnation and deflation. Companies, facing low demand and fierce price competition, prioritized cost-cutting measures, including wage freezes and reductions. This created a deflationary mindset where both businesses and consumers expected prices and wages to remain low.
Rise of Non-Regular Employment: In response to economic uncertainty, companies shifted from the traditional lifetime employment system to hiring more "non-regular" employees. These part-time, temporary, and contract workers are paid significantly less and have fewer benefits than regular employees. The number of non-regular workers has increased substantially, which has dragged down the overall average wage.
Seniority-Based Wage System: Japan's traditional wage system is based on seniority, where an employee's salary increases with their tenure at a company. While this provides stability, it can discourage job mobility and innovation. It also means that younger workers' salaries are often suppressed, and older workers' wages may not reflect their true productivity, particularly in a rapidly aging society. This system, combined with a decline in training investments by companies, has contributed to a flattening of wage growth.
Low Productivity Growth: While Japan has a highly educated and skilled workforce, its overall labor productivity growth has lagged behind other G7 nations. This can be attributed to low private investment in capital and innovation, as many large Japanese firms have moved their operations abroad. Without significant productivity gains, companies find it difficult to justify raising wages.
Demographic Challenges: Japan has a rapidly aging and declining population. This demographic shift leads to a shrinking workforce and a higher proportion of older workers who are often less productive and command higher salaries under the seniority system. While a shrinking labor supply should theoretically lead to higher wages, the other structural factors and the prevalence of low-wage non-regular work have prevented this from happening on a broad scale.
Weakened Yen and Stagnant Prices: For many years, the Bank of Japan's ultra-loose monetary policy was aimed at stimulating the economy and achieving a 2% inflation target. However, this policy has also contributed to a significant depreciation of the yen. A weaker yen makes imports more expensive, which, in turn, can reduce the real value of wages, as households' purchasing power decreases.
2. Do Politicians' High Salaries Explain Low Average Wages?
The second image compares the average annual income of Diet members (Japanese politicians) with that of the average salaried worker in several countries. It shows that in Japan, the average politician's salary is ¥30.14 million, while the average salaried worker's income is only ¥4.43 million, a massive disparity. In contrast, in the US, the disparity is much smaller, with politicians earning ¥19.14 million and the average worker earning ¥13.19 million.
While the images suggest a correlation, it's important to be careful about concluding a direct causal relationship.
No Direct Causal Link: The high salaries of politicians in Japan do not directly cause the low average wage of the general population. The total amount paid to a relatively small group of politicians, even at a high rate, is a minuscule fraction of the country's total payroll. The economic forces driving wage stagnation—deflation, a rigid labor market, an aging population, and corporate practices—are far more significant and pervasive.
Symptom, not Cause: The large wage gap between politicians and the average worker is better understood as a symptom of a broader societal and economic issue, rather than a cause. It highlights the significant income inequality that has been growing in Japan. It can also be a source of public frustration and a sign that the political class may be disconnected from the economic realities faced by the majority of the population.
In conclusion, Japan's wage stagnation is a complex issue rooted in decades of economic stagnation, deflation, and structural labor market challenges. While the high salaries of politicians may be seen as a symbol of inequality and a point of public dissatisfaction, they are not the fundamental cause of the low average wage. The real drivers are the large-scale economic and demographic trends that have reshaped Japan's economy since the 1990s.
Great question. Let me unpack this carefully. The chart you shared shows real hourly wages (adjusted for inflation, 1997=100) across OECD countries. While wages in the U.S., U.K., France, and Germany have grown 20–35% since 1997, Japan is the only advanced economy where real wages have actually declined, dropping to about 90 (a 10% fall).
So why did Japan fall behind, especially after the 1990s "Lost Decade"? Here are the main factors:
1. Prolonged Economic Stagnation
-
After the bubble burst (1990–91), Japan entered a period of low growth, deflation, and banking crises.
-
Other countries (U.S., U.K.) experienced productivity booms (IT revolution, globalization benefits), but Japan’s productivity growth stagnated.
-
Stagnant GDP = stagnant wage growth.
2. Deflation and Corporate Cost-Cutting
-
Unlike inflationary economies, Japan lived through persistent deflation or near-zero inflation.
-
Firms faced constant pressure to cut costs, which they did mainly by suppressing wages rather than laying off workers (due to the Japanese norm of lifetime employment).
-
Result: “wage deflation” instead of price inflation.
3. Labor Market Dualization
-
Since the late 1990s, companies increasingly relied on non-regular workers (part-time, contract, dispatch).
-
Non-regular employees now make up almost 40% of the workforce, earning 30–40% less than regular employees.
-
This dual system dragged down average wages.
4. Demographics: Aging and Shrinking Workforce
-
Japan’s working-age population peaked in the mid-1990s and has been shrinking since.
-
More elderly = higher social security costs, limiting fiscal space for wage-boosting policies.
-
Older workers staying in the labor force often do so in lower-wage jobs, depressing averages further.
5. Weak Union Power and Wage-Setting
-
Annual wage negotiations ("Shuntō") lost influence after the 1990s.
-
Labor unions, once powerful in securing wage hikes, became weaker due to globalization, corporate restructuring, and more fragmented labor markets.
-
Meanwhile, U.S./Europe saw new high-tech sectors with strong wage growth.
6. Policy Choices
-
Japan prioritized employment stability over wage growth.
-
Fiscal and monetary policy focused on stabilizing firms and avoiding unemployment, not on raising household income.
-
Even Abenomics (2013–) pumped money into the economy but could not change corporate wage-setting culture.
-
Companies often hoarded record profits as internal reserves instead of raising wages.
7. Cultural and Institutional Inertia
-
Deep-rooted corporate practices: seniority-based pay, reluctance to reward merit, and emphasis on “company survival first.”
-
A culture of not demanding raises (workers often accept stability over wage growth) reinforced the wage stagnation.
✅ In short:
Japan’s wages fell behind because it combined low growth, deflation, demographic decline, labor market dualization, weak unions, and conservative corporate culture. The 1990s “Lost Decade” was not just temporary — its legacy hardened into a “Lost Generation” and systemic wage stagnation, which got worse as demographics and labor reforms shifted toward non-regular employment.
Would you like me to also compare this with why Germany’s and the U.K.’s wages rose steadily (despite their own crises), so we can see the contrast more sharply?
나의 말:
ChatGPT의 말:
Perfect — let’s compare Japan’s wage stagnation with Germany, the U.K., the U.S., and South Korea. This will show why Japan is an outlier.
📊 Comparative Real Wage Trends (1997–2022)
-
Japan: –10% (real wages fell; only advanced country in decline)
-
U.K.: +35% (strong increase until Brexit stagnation)
-
France: +30% (steady growth due to productivity and strong labor protections)
-
U.S.: +22% (boosted by high-tech boom, but inequality widened)
-
Germany: +21% (post-2000 reforms + export-led model)
-
Italy: +13% (stagnant, but still above Japan)
-
South Korea: +~40% (fastest wage growth among OECD, now surpassing Japan)
🔎 Why They Diverged
1. South Korea vs Japan
-
Growth trajectory:
-
Korea moved from “catch-up” economy to high-income in the 2000s.
-
Productivity growth remained strong, especially in electronics, shipbuilding, autos, and IT.
-
-
Demographics:
-
Korea aged later than Japan, so its working-age population remained larger until recently.
-
-
Labor market:
-
Korea also has high non-regular employment (similar dual system), but rapid average wage growth from industrial upgrading offset this.
-
-
Policy:
-
Minimum wage increases (especially under Moon Jae-in, +16% in 2018 alone) lifted the floor.
-
Active industrial policy encouraged export-led wage growth.
-
-
Result: Korea’s average wage overtook Japan’s around the mid-2010s — a psychological shock in Japan.
2. Germany
-
1990s: Germany had weak growth after reunification.
-
2000s: Labor reforms (“Hartz reforms”) created a more flexible labor market, but export industries (cars, machinery, chemicals) thrived in global markets.
-
Wages: Suppressed in the early 2000s, but then rose steadily with productivity.
-
Demographics: Aging, but less severe than Japan. Immigration helped.
-
Policy: Strong unions, co-determination, and collective bargaining maintained a link between productivity and wages.
3. United Kingdom
-
1997–2008: Wages rose fast with globalization, finance, and London’s role as a global hub.
-
2008–2014: Global financial crisis + austerity = stagnant wages.
-
2015–2019: Some recovery, but Brexit created uncertainty.
-
Overall: Still much higher growth than Japan, reflecting a more dynamic labor market and higher productivity growth.
4. United States
-
1997–2020: High-tech boom (Silicon Valley, digital economy) raised average wages.
-
Inequality: Gains concentrated at the top, but still lifted averages.
-
Policy: More flexible labor market allowed firms to adjust quickly after recessions.
-
Demographics: Population growth (including immigration) supported labor supply.
-
Culture: Higher worker mobility meant wage competition between firms.
5. France
-
Stable growth: Productivity kept wages rising, supported by strong welfare state.
-
Policy: Frequent minimum wage adjustments (“SMIC”) ensured a wage floor.
-
Unions: Although fragmented, strong labor protections (shorter workweek, pension rights) supported steady real wage growth.
🧭 Why Japan Fell Behind, While Korea Surged
-
Japan: chose employment security over wage growth, relied heavily on non-regular workers, and corporate profits stayed locked in reserves.
-
Korea: prioritized catch-up industrial growth + rising wage floor, pushed productivity, and still benefited from demographic momentum.
-
Result: Korea leapfrogged Japan in average wages, while Japan became the only OECD economy with declining real wages.
✅ Summary Insight
Japan’s problem isn’t just the “Lost Decade” — it’s the structural mix of deflation, demographics, conservative corporate culture, and weak wage-setting institutions. By contrast, South Korea (and Germany) linked wages more directly to productivity, while the U.S./U.K. rode globalization and tech booms.
세진님, 원하시면 제가 이 내용을 한-영 병렬 요약 표로 정리해드릴 수도 있는데요. 그러면 각 나라별 특징이 한눈에 비교될 수 있습니다. 원하실까요?
나의 말:
ChatGPT의 말:
좋습니다. 세진님 요청대로, 일본·한국·미국·영국·독일·프랑스의 임금 추세와 원인을 한글 비교 표로 정리했습니다.
선진국 실질임금 비교 (1997–2022)
| 나라 | 실질임금 변화 | 주요 원인 | 특징 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 일본 | –10% (하락) | 장기불황, 디플레이션, 비정규직 확대, 인구 고령화, 기업 내부유보 | 선진국 중 유일하게 실질임금 감소. “고용안정 > 임금상승” 전략. |
| 한국 | +약 40% (대폭 상승) | 수출산업 성장, 생산성 향상, 최저임금 대폭 인상, 인구 구조 지연된 고령화 | 일본 추월. “산업고도화 + 정책적 임금상승”이 맞물림. |
| 미국 | +22% | IT·디지털 혁명, 노동시장 유연성, 이민 인구 증가 | 상위층 중심 불평등 심화, 그러나 평균 임금은 상승. |
| 영국 | +35% | 금융·글로벌화 호황(1997~2008), 이후 금융위기·브렉시트 영향 | 장기적으론 일본보다 훨씬 높은 성장세. |
| 독일 | +21% | 하르츠 개혁, 수출주도 성장, 생산성과 임금 연계 | 초반 임금 억제 후, 2010년대 이후 꾸준한 상승. |
| 프랑스 | +30% | 안정적 생산성, 강력한 최저임금(SMIC), 복지·노동 보호 | 완만하지만 꾸준한 임금상승. |
핵심 비교
-
일본: 임금만 후퇴. “고용 유지 → 임금 억제”라는 선택이 장기적 침체로 굳어짐.
-
한국: 임금 급등. 일본과 달리 “생산성·임금 동반 성장”을 국가정책으로 밀어붙임.
-
독일: 일본과 비슷한 위기(1990년대)를 겪었지만, 노동개혁 + 수출 호황으로 반등.
-
미국·영국: 금융·IT 세계화의 이익을 활용, 불평등 심화에도 평균임금은 증가.
-
프랑스: 강한 사회적 합의와 제도적 안전망이 임금의 안정적 상승을 견인.
👉 정리하면, 일본만 ‘실질임금 하락 → 생활수준 정체’라는 특수한 길을 걷고 있고, **한국은 같은 동아시아임에도 반대로 ‘실질임금 급등 → 일본 추월’**이라는 길을 걸었습니다.
세진님, 이 표를 시각적 인포그래픽 형태(타임라인 + 그래프)로도 만들어드릴까요? 그러면 블로그나 가족에게 설명할 때 훨씬 직관적일 것 같습니다.
나의 말:
ChatGPT의 말:
여기 보시는 그래프는 1997년=100을 기준으로 한 실질임금 지수 변화입니다.
-
일본(핑크): 오히려 하락 → 90 수준까지 떨어짐.
-
한국(초록): 가장 가파른 상승 → 약 140, 일본을 크게 추월.
-
영국(노랑), 프랑스(남색), 독일(파랑), 미국(빨강): 모두 꾸준히 상승.
👉 이 시각화로 한눈에 보이는 점:
-
일본만 임금이 후퇴.
-
한국은 동아시아에서 유일하게 빠른 임금 상승으로 일본을 역전.
-
서구 주요국은 성장률 차이는 있지만 모두 상승 곡선.
세진님, 이 그래프를 **한 페이지짜리 인포그래픽(설명문 포함)**으로 제작해드릴까요? 가족이나 블로그 공유용으로 더 직관적으로 보실 수 있습니다.
나의 말:
ChatGPT의 말:
이제 그래프가 보일 겁니다.
-
일본(핑크): 유일하게 실질임금이 줄어드는 추세.
-
한국(초록): 가장 빠른 상승, 1997 대비 약 +40% → 일본을 추월.
-
영국(노랑), 프랑스(남색), 독일(파랑), 미국(빨강): 모두 꾸준히 임금 상승.
👉 핵심 메시지: 일본만 임금이 후퇴했고, 한국은 반대로 빠르게 상승해 동아시아 임금 역전이 일어났습니다.
세진님, 원하시면 이 그래프에 간단한 해설 문구(예: "일본만 하락, 한국 급등")를 직접 넣어 드릴 수도 있는데, 그렇게 해드릴까요?
나의 말:
ChatGPT의 말:
그래프를 직접 보여드리기 어려워서, 제가 파일로 저장해 두었습니다.
👉 여기서 다운로드할 수 있습니다.
이 이미지를 열면 1997년=100 기준 실질임금 추세를 일본·한국·미국·영국·독일·프랑스 6개국 비교로 확인하실 수 있습니다.
세진님, 원하시면 이 이미지를 블로그용 설명 문구와 함께 세트로 만들어드릴까요?
나의 말:
ChatGPT의 말:
네, 맞습니다 세진님 🙂
처음 올려주신 일본 중심의 OECD 그래프(영국·프랑스·미국·독일·이탈리아와 비교)에다가 제가 한국 데이터를 새로 추가해 넣은 버전이라고 보시면 됩니다.
-
일본: 유일하게 실질임금 하락
-
한국: 가장 빠른 상승 → 일본 추월
-
미국·영국·독일·프랑스: 모두 상승, 속도는 차이 있음
즉, 같은 동아시아 이웃이지만 일본은 “임금 하락의 특수 케이스”, 한국은 **“고도성장과 정책적 임금상승”**이라는 정반대 길을 걸은 것이 잘 드러납니다.
👉 원하시면, 제가 이 그래프에 **짧은 해설 자막(“한국 급등, 일본 하락”)**을 직접 넣어서, 가족이나 블로그용 인포그래픽으로 다듬어드릴 수도 있습니다. 해드릴까요?

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.