The Fate of Abraham: Why the West is Wrong about Islam Kindle Edition
by Peter Oborne (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 62 ratings
As the Cold War faded into history, it appeared to have been replaced by a new conflict - between Islam and the West. Or so we are told. After the events of 9/11 and the advent of the 'war on terror', this narrative seemed prophetic. But, as Peter Oborne reveals in this masterful new analysis, the concept of an existential clash between the two is a dangerous and destructive fantasy.
Based on rigorous historical research and forensic contemporary journalism that leads him frequently into war-torn states and bloody conflict zones, Oborne explains the myths, fabrications and downright lies that have contributed to this pernicious state of affairs. He shows how various falsehoods run deep, reaching back as far as the birth of Islam, and have then been repurposed for the modern day. Many in senior positions in governments across the West have suggested that Islam is trying to overturn our liberal values and even that certain Muslims are conspiring to take over the state, while Douglas Murray claims in his new book that we face a 'War on the West'. But in reality, these fears merely echo past debates, as we continue to repeat the pattern of seemingly wilful ignorance.
With murderous attacks on Muslims taking place from Bosnia in 1995 to China today, Oborne dismantles the falsehoods that lie behind them, and he opens the way to a clearer and more truthful mutual understanding that will benefit us all in the long run.
Product description
Review
'There is plenty of interesting material here. Most readers will probably not realise that the American navy was created as a response to the depredations of “Barbary” pirates in the early 19th century. The heart, however, of Oborne’s book...represents an admirable piece of sustained investigative journalism. For those interested in the malign impact of Islamophobia in Britain, [the book] genuinely breaks new ground and deserves to be widely read and debated.' -- Dr Philip Lewis ― Church Times
'Oborne has taken up the unpopular cause of British Muslims, who feel misrepresented by politicians and the newspapers... The popular idea that there is a "clash of civilsations" between the West and Islam has resulted in failed wars abroad and shameful persecution at home... His analysis of the web of think tanks, politicians and journalists shaping the narrative around British Muslims is certainly eye-opening.' -- Sameer Rahim ― Daily Telegraph
About the Author
Peter Oborne is an award-winning writer, journalist and broadcaster who has worked for various newspapers, including the Spectator, the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph, where he was the chief political commentator until his resignation from the paper in 2015. He now writes for Middle East Eye. He is the author of numerous books, including The Rise of Political Lying (2005), Wounded Tiger (2014) and the Sunday Times bestseller The Assault on Truth (2021). He lives in Wiltshire.
Product details
ASIN : B096SX2XSC
Publisher : Simon & Schuster UK (12 May 2022)
Language : English
File size : 2423 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
Print length : 434 pagesBest Sellers Rank: 863,755 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)366 in Nationalism & Patriotism
1,275 in Middle Eastern History (Kindle Store)
4,241 in History of the Middle EastCustomer Reviews:
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 62 ratings
Top reviews
Top reviews from Australia
There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia
Top reviews from other countries
Erik Dilling
5.0 out of 5 stars Important historical contextReviewed in the United States on 13 May 2024
Verified Purchase
Important book that puts the current western understanding and perceptions about people with the Islamic fait in a historical context.
Report
Andrew Macdonald Powney
5.0 out of 5 stars The truth behind the narrativesReviewed in the United Kingdom on 1 June 2022
Verified Purchase
Terrific book, as usual from this author: his best. At the Cold War’s end, a single ‘global civilisation’ was expected. A persecutory view of Islam was grafted on to the concept. (Now that Russia has disappointed the neoliberals’ hopes, it must be plain to just what an extent it bought into that narrative for furthering its own wars at the time.) Oborne gives us the background from the USA, from the UK, and from France. But the heart of the book (though you’d miss the point if you skipped the rest) is its fourth section.
It is here that Oborne dates to 2009 the shift from countering violence to outlawing opinion; since 2015, ‘people whose views may be mainstream or illiberal, but certainly not illegal, can be targeted as a threat to British society’ (p.289). People remain unafraid in this situation only because a long history of ‘othering’ Muslims means that they do not see that these laws can apply to anyone. Oborne gives precise examples of investigators misunderstanding cultures; he shows a ruined person made to face anonymous allegations.
This protest against the vilification of Muslims is all the more credible coming from someone reared in the world of the Daily Telegraph, the Church of England, the army, prep school and a public school. It also a cry for liberty and reason. Oborne began to write the book 20 years ago when the UK had only just transferred its Diana mania on to this first of a set of new panics; though woe betide anyone who said so at the time – even before the law was changed. ‘If you defend a witch in a witch hunt, you get treated as a witch yourself,’ writes Oborne (p.336).
It’s a very solid account. Surprising typoes, though, from Simon & Schuster – book publishers being happy now to bang out copy as fast as a daily paper.
Read less
51 people found this helpfulReport
Tshelane Sipho
5.0 out of 5 stars The Abrahamic legacy is real. Some thinkers are exploiting the legacy for political ends.Reviewed in the United States on 4 February 2024
Verified Purchase
The courage of the author in tracing the myths of Israel is a sterling job of research. Such myths have a devastating impact on human relations.
This author has been useful in analyzing Evangelical Witness in the United States.
3 people found this helpfulReport
poratlu
4.0 out of 5 stars Chasing easy headlines don’t always make us saferReviewed in the United Kingdom on 28 August 2022
Verified Purchase
Peter Oborne briefly discusses his own path in this book, but he has certainly moved a long way from being one of the leading lights of the Telegraph. This remarkable book is about our modern reaction to Islam. We might add that it is also about a more general narrowing of political debate. But while that is true, such a “home front” framing would be too dismissive of real-world consequences: of imprisonment, torture, and our alliances of convenience with dictatorships in the name of democracy.
To those criticising it for not focusing on the evils of Islamist violence, well, that’s hardly an undiscovered story. And there’s plenty of recognition of violence and wickedness by Moslems (and others) through its pages.
It starts with some fascinating and poorly-known history of recent centuries, including American wars with Barbary Coast pirates and exploitation of religious divisions in the Philippines. But this opening can get dry: the second half on modern day issues is much more personal and vivid, and readers may even prefer to start at part 4 and save the opening historical sections for later.
(I don’t want to mark down the author for this but the publisher needs to tidy up the ebook, which for instance lacks a contents page.)
Read less
24 people found this helpfulReport
Richard Van Heeswyk
5.0 out of 5 stars A man who values truthReviewed in the United Kingdom on 6 June 2022
Verified Purchase
I’ve learned so much about the history of the relationship between the West and Islam. In particular the historical relationships between Islam and the US, UK and France which provide a bedrock for understanding our contemporary situation.
Peter Oborn has to be commended for his honest search for the truth. In a way he embodies the Quranic exhortation to testify to the truth even if it against one’s friends, family or even oneself. Truth is the paramount virtue and this book shows how too many powerful and influential people put truth aside in favour of personal advancement. He shows how this discarding of the truth has devastating real life consequences on literally millions of Muslims both historically and in our present day. With actual genocides terrifyingly close at hand in India and China and with the prospect of further genocide on Bosnia, never before has keeping to the truth and returning to our common humanity been more essential.
32 people found this helpfulReport
See more reviews
====
The Fate of Abraham: Why the West is Wrong about Islam
Peter Oborne
4.17
127 ratings16 reviews
As the Cold War faded into history, it appeared to have been replaced by a new conflict - between Islam and the West. Or so we are told. After the events of 9/11 and the advent of the 'war on terror', this narrative seemed prophetic. But, as Peter Oborne reveals in this masterful new analysis, the concept of an existential clash between the two is a dangerous and destructive fantasy.
Based on rigorous historical research and forensic contemporary journalism that leads him frequently into war-torn states and bloody conflict zones, Oborne explains the myths, fabrications and downright lies that have contributed to this pernicious state of affairs. He shows how various falsehoods run deep, reaching back as far as the birth of Islam, and have then been repurposed for the modern day. Many in senior positions in governments across the West have suggested that Islam is trying to overturn our liberal values and even that certain Muslims are conspiring to take over the state, while Douglas Murray claims in his new book that we face a 'War on the West'. But in reality, these fears merely echo past debates, as we continue to repeat the pattern of seemingly wilful ignorance.
With murderous attacks on Muslims taking place from Bosnia in 1995 to China today, Oborne dismantles the falsehoods that lie behind them, and he opens the way to a clearer and more truthful mutual understanding that will benefit us all in the long run.
Genres
History
Politics
Nonfiction
Religion
Social Science
Islam
528 pages, ebook
Published May 12, 2022
Book details & editions
33 people are currently reading
472 people want to read
About the author
Profile Image for Peter Oborne.
Peter Oborne
27 books47 followers
Follow
Readers also enjoyed
Page 1 of 5
Book Cover
The Making of the Modern Middle East: A Personal History
Jeremy Bowen
4.39
1,077
Book Cover
A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the Struggle that Shaped the Middle East
James Barr
4.06
3,911
Book Cover
The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
Ilan Pappé
4.52
7,061
Book Cover
The White Ship: Conquest, Anarchy and the Wrecking of Henry I’s Dream
Charles Spencer
4.06
3,718
Book Cover
The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: A History of Settler-Colonial Conquest and Resistance, 1917-2017
Rashid Khalidi
4.51
13.9k
Book Cover
Politics On the Edge: A Memoir From Within
Rory Stewart
4.36
6,659
Book Cover
Why is this Lying Bastard Lying to Me?: Searching for the Truth on Political TV
Rob Burley
4.25
301
Book Cover
Animal Societies: How Co-Operation Conquered the Natural World
Ashley Ward
4.07
306
Book Cover
Children of the Night: The Strange and Epic Story of Modern Romania
Paul Kenyon
4.44
650
Book Cover
The General's Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine
Miko Peled
4.24
978
Book Cover
On Palestine
Noam Chomsky
4.24
7,438
Book Cover
Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of Flags
Tim Marshall
3.65
5,171
Book Cover
Checkpoint Charlie: The Cold War, The Berlin Wall, and the Most Dangerous Place On Earth
Iain MacGregor
3.93
840
Book Cover
The Ottomans: Khans, Caesars and Caliphs
Marc David Baer
3.96
971
Book Cover
Win Every Argument: The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking
Mehdi Hasan
4.08
2,161
Book Cover
The Fear Index
Robert Harris
3.53
15k
Book Cover
The Future of Geography: How Power and Politics in Space Will Change Our World
Tim Marshall
3.95
3,520
Book Cover
Vital Organs
Suzie Edge
4.38
385
Book Cover
Moneyland: Why Thieves and Crooks Now Rule the World and How To Take It Back
Oliver Bullough
4.2
5,990
Book Cover
Fake Heroes: Ten False Icons and How they Altered the Course of History
Otto English
3.99
302
All similar books
Ratings & Reviews
Profile Image for Sejin.
What do you think?
Rate this book
Write a Review
Friends & Following
No one you know has read this book. Recommend it to a friend!
Community Reviews
4.17
127 ratings16 reviews
5 stars
53 (41%)
4 stars
51 (40%)
3 stars
17 (13%)
2 stars
3 (2%)
1 star
3 (2%)
Search review text
Search review text
Filters
Displaying 1 - 10 of 16 reviews
Profile Image for Ciaran.
Ciaran
23 reviews
8 followers
Follow
May 17, 2022
*Contains Spoilers*
Oborne is a ‘conscientious conservative’, the kind of figure which seems to be so rare in British society today. Over the last few decades, he has dedicated his professional life to championing honesty, integrity and religious tolerance. In this vein, he has authored books with titles such as, ‘The Rise of Political Lying’ & ‘The Assault on Truth’.
His struggle is all the more amazing considering his long term employment at both The Spectator and The Daily Telegraph, the latter as Political Editor. Both publications have allegedly propagated Islamophobic vitriol. Notably, The Centre for Media Monitoring determined that amongst British publications, The Spectator was the most misrepresentative and antagonistic towards Muslims, whilst The Telegraph published a now infamous column comparing Muslim women in burkas with letterboxes. According to the Islamophobia monitoring organisation, TellMAMA, this column was itself associated with a 375% increase in islamophobic incidents.
To Oborne’s credit, he did not shy away from addressing questionable statements from his colleagues whilst working at these publications. Considering the views proffered by these modern-day conservative publications, it may seem bizarre that Oborne identifies as a conservative at all. He is perhaps best compared to a figure like Wilfred Blunt. Blunt was a 19th Century British political conservative, born into the landed gentry. He spent much of his early professional life undisposed to any kind of political radicalism and was fully ensconced in the British establishment. This would all change from 1880 onwards, when during his posting in Egypt he engaged with the local Islamic intelligentsia. Accordingly, he stated that this experience “affected me profoundly, and to a certain extent revolutionized my ideas”. Priyamvada Gopal explores the development of Blunt’s anti-imperialist consciousness in depth in her book, ‘Insurgent Empire: Anticolonial Resistance and British Dissent’. Here she states that, “Blunt’s personal encounters during his lengthy travels in the Middle East were clearly an important element of his evolution from poet-squire to, first, advocate of benevolent British imperialism, and then vociferous critic of British rule in Egypt, India and Ireland”. Oborne shares a similar personal development from a school boy who would shudder at tales of wicked Muslims iniquitously throwing Brits into the ‘Black Hole of Calcutta’, to a conservative journalist who began to realise that global affairs were not what he has been led to believe, and finally a champion for honesty and tolerance for the dispossessed peoples of the world. This final transformation is illustrated well in the book’s final chapter where Oborne shares his conversations with Muslims across the globe, such as Sudanese and Pashtuns, who have felt firsthand the consequences of Islamophobic Western foreign policy.
The book itself is a necessary contribution to what has essentially been a one-sided discussion. I would however like to offer some critiques. Firstly, I felt that Oborne spent too much time delving into the history of Christianity and it’s relationship with Jewish people and Israel. The purpose of this preamble was to provided context for American views on Islam that are discussed in later chapters. Still, this formed a large part of a book on perspectives of Islam and I felt it deviated from the book’s scope.
I also found Oborne’s handling of Churchill rather suspect. It is a matter of public record that Churchill had uttered racist opinions towards myriad ethnic groups during his political career, with a notable visceral hatred for Mohandas Gandhi. The BBC notes that in response to Gandhi’s hungry strike (whilst languishing in a British Raj jail for campaigning for Indian Independence) Churchill Remarked, “We should be rid of a bad man and an enemy of the Empire if he died." Churchill’s personal Doctor, Lord Moran, noted that, “Winston thinks only of the colour of their [Indian’s] skin”, whilst his Secretary of State for India, Leo Amery, noted in his diary that, “He [Churchill] hated Indians… [and considered them] a beastly people with a beastly religion.” Perhaps even more dammingly, Amery noted that during the Bengal Famine that killed approximately 3 million Indians during WWII, Churchill stated the provision of any nutritional relief to Bengal would merely result in Indians “Breeding like rabbits”. (These negative sentiments towards colonised people have been recently evaluated further in Tariq Ali’s latest book, ‘Winston Churchill: His Times, His Crimes’). Whilst Oborne dutifully acknowledges some controversies in Churchill’s record, he seems at pains to provide false balance and chooses rather spurious examples of Churchill’s reverence for Muslims (bizarrely after citing a racist book passage from Churchill regarding Sudanese Muslims, which he proceeds to reduce to an issue with a particular type of muslim). Oborne offer’s Churchill’s admiration of Ibn Saud (the Muslim founder of the genocidal monarchy of Saudi Arabia and propagandist for the Extreme Wahhabi sect of Islam) as evidence for his tolerance of muslims. I would suggest that Churchill’s admiration for Ibn Saud may have more to do with the latter filial, perhaps even deferential relation towards Britain, and a shared proclivity to socially conservative, authoritarian politics. Nevertheless, the framing of Churchill as an admirer of Islam has the rather clumsy (and perhaps unintentional) effect of attempting to rehabilitate Churchill, when such a rehabilitation is not warranted from his objective track record. It is unclear whether Oborne’s pursues this narrative strategy
because he is conscious of the divisive, highly contested nature of Churchill’s legacy and does not want to irate his ardent followers, or perhaps Oborne’s conservative upbringing and background make it hard for him to overcome ingrained admiration for the most famous conservative prime minister of his country. Whatever the rationale, I felt that false balance was introduced here (although to Oborne’s credit, this was the only incident of perceived false balance in the entire book).
Beyond these critiques, there was much to praise about this book. Firstly, Oborne chooses to address “The West’s” response to Islam by first rooting it in American, British and then French history. This contextualisation is useful when considering nuances and seeming contradictions in a global West approach to Islam. I think the inclusion of French colonial history here (using examples of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia) is a particularly strength, as this history is seldom conveyed to an English-speaking audience in popular non-fiction.
Oborne also takes a historical approach to evaluation the West’s regard for Islam. He persuasively argues that an antipathy towards Islam has been long propagated in the West (often for political expediency) from the crusading Knight Templars, through the colonising Orientalists, and finally to the imperialising Neoconservatives. He also rightly acknowledges that this narrative is not as simple as it initially seems with, for example, incidents of mediaeval Christians allying with (then considered heathen) Muslims against other Muslim, and even other Christian powers. The nuances of reality are of course inconvenient to those with an anti-islam agenda, who attempt to reduce history to a perennial battle between Islam and the West.
An interesting inclusion in this book was the discussion of the role of the ‘New Atheists’ (eg Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens & Richard Dawkins) in waging an essentially secular Jihad against Islam. There seems to be a collective amnesia on the role of atheist fundamentalists in epousing hate against theists, in particular muslims, with it rarely being critiqued in the press. As a (tolerant) atheist myself, it is something I feel our community need to address more openly, in order to overcome these divisive tendencies. Oborne also critiques the discrimination against Islam from certain elements of the French left. Whilst he caveats this by noting it was less frequent or stustained than by the (Far) Right, he draws our attention to periods of a cross-political spectrum consensus for Islamophobic sentiments. As a self-conscious conservative it would be all too easy for Oborne to slide into partisan castigations of the French Left here, however he handles the history in a sober and impartial manner.
Oborne really comes into his own in Part Four when he is reporting on the events under New Labour, the Coalition (Conservative-Liberal Democrat) and (Cameron-May-Johnson) Conservative Governments, which have governed Britain since 1997. This is logical as Oborne worked within the British mainstream media during this time, with a stint as Chief Political Commentator at The Daily Telegraph. The enormous readership and power of this publication afforded his access to political elites throughout the country.
He makes tangible the strategy of shadowy think tanks such as Policy Exchange, who promulgated a narrative of ‘non-violent extremism’ to frame all British Muslims as a potential ‘Enemy Within’, and promoted policy strategies such as ‘Prevent’ (citizen-led informing of suspected terrorists) to keep Britain’s muslims subdued. One striking quotation with regards to the Prevent Programme was that, “Over 70 per cent of Muslims in England and Wales live in ‘Prevent Priority Areas’ (PPAs), compared with just over 30 per cent of the general population. By requiring public sector workers to report people they find suspicious, moreover, Prevent effectively compels them to act on their prejudices and makes Muslims subject to majoritarian biases.” Even more disconcertingly, of the disproportionate number of British Muslims referred to Prevent, “86% of referrals to the programme were false positives – representing people who were wrongly referred. Prevent only occasionally catches the people that it wants to. Even these individuals, however, have never committed a crime. There is, moreover, no evidence that they will ever commit a crime in the future, or that they would have committed a crime were it not for being identified by Prevent.”
In Part 4 Oborne also discusses government-coordinated, ‘anti-extremism’ organisations such as Quilliam. On Quilliam, Oborne remarks, “Although Quilliam described itself as the first counterextremist organisation, it did nothing I can discern to counter right wing extremism in any country, barring the misfired stunt with Tommy Robinson [When Qulliam welcolmed with open arms the English far right figure after he quit the English Defence League]”. Instead the organisation appears to have reenforced the false dichotomy of Good Muslims vs Bad Muslims, which has being damaging for community cohesion.
Next, Oborne discredits the so called ‘Trojan Horse’ Conspiracy, where Muslims schools were purported to be attempting to turn Britain into an Islamic state. An unsubstantiated allegation, based on one anonymous letter, but a narrative that at the time the British state and mainstream media leaned into with near unanimity. Recently, The New York Times have recently released a comprehensive investigative series on the Trojan Horse Affair, which also vindicates and corroborates Oborne’s position.
A final strength of the book is Oborne’s acerbic dismantling of the false narrative of Macron as a socially liberal progressive (juxtaposed to Le Pen as his antithetical reactionary), which is so often propagated by the mainstream Western Press. Oborne highlights that in concrete policy proposal terms, the Islamophobia of Macron’s ‘La République En Marche!’ Party is on par with that of Le Pen’s ‘Rassemblement national’. A particular striking example is when Macron’s minister publicly shamed Le Pen in the French Parliament for not being islamophobic enough. The adoration for Macron and the real-time mythologising of him as a progressive hero in the media has gained hegemonic status, and thus critiquing this narrative can only cost Oborne political capital. Nevertheless, he courageously proceeds to do just that, which I think perfectly encapsulates his character.
11 likes
Like
Comment
Profile Image for Benjamin Stahl.
Benjamin Stahl
1,976 reviews
54 followers
Follow
November 19, 2022
Peter Oborne, a former conservative British journalist whose views were upended after working for years in the Middle East, has put together a thoughtful, compelling and worthy defence of the Islamic faith and its people. Without shying away from condemning the actual terrorists, hateful sects and related atrocities - not too much anyway - Oborne shines a light on the role Western civilization has played throughout history in both screwing and maligning this religion, from the Crusades, to religiously or politically motivated propaganda, to xenophobic ignorance, to our many cynical allegiances with despots, dictators and shady oil barons.
Few things annoy me more than those who wilfully overlook or justify Islam's less "socially acceptable" aspects, while at the same time lambasting the same, if more moderate forms, in Christianity. It's all just a case of your typical "enemy of my enemy" thinking, that will only result in a less Westernised and watered-down religion one day gaining a cultural foothold that will ultimately benefit traditional religious values anyway.
I loved this book (among other reasons) because I very much share Oborne's desire (he is also a Christian), for the three great Abrahamic faiths to somehow transcend their entrenched hostilities and recognise the imperativeness of our standing unique but unified for the largely common goals of our faiths, as the spiritually ambiguous future unfolds ahead of us.
audiobooks
lefty-rubbish
non-fiction
...more
1 like
Like
Comment
Christian Brunton
4 reviews
Follow
February 20, 2024
6 out of 5 if I could
1 like
Like
Comment
Profile Image for Hamid.
Hamid
423 reviews
15 followers
Follow
March 4, 2024
Not sure what I expected here. I like Oborne's journalism but do I need him to talk to me about faith interactions? Turns out, yes. This is a surprisingly strong book that essentially makes the case that:
'The "clash of civilisations" is mostly BS. Our political and media classes have villainised Muslims *and* Islam (predominantly in the UK & US). That needs to change'.
It's excellently argued with plenty of parallels drawn and with the UK on the cusp of major anti-democratic reforms designed to persecute its Muslim minority while its media and political classes say and print some of the most patently racist and bigoted things, it proves prescient and valuable.
You end the book wishing that our media had more figures like Oborne and fewer of the nepobabies tramping out barely-literate rubbish in service of the very worst our politics has to offer.
history
Like
Comment
Roland Glotzer
107 reviews
Follow
September 3, 2022
I thought that this book was brilliant. It starts with the history of Islamophobia in the US, UK and France. I found this very informative as I discovered that it predates significantly 9/11. I was also shocked about some injustices like the Trojan Horse affair and the case of Ahmed Robbani, a prisoner in Guantanamo Bay known to be innocent as he was arrested and tortured due to a mistaken identity, was due to be released but is still languishing in Guantanamo Bay. It is particularly noteworthy that Peter Oborne (the author) had a journalistic career in conservative newspapers but managed to write this very objective well researched book.
Like
Comment
Ruaridh Williams
33 reviews
Follow
December 30, 2023
Unfortunately, this book is more of an opinion piece rather than an explanation as to "Why the West is Wrong about Islam". On occasion, the book starts to explain the Western perception and compare it to Islam itself, but quickly reverts to it's 'pity me' attitude.
It's well-referenced, which may create the appearance of impartiality, but the references are all one way. It doesn't take much self-research to read the other side of the story.
The book contains interesting, and sometimes completely valid, points. However it never actually achieved what it sets out to do and at times comes across as the ramblings of the author.
A great shame 😞
Like
Comment
Profile Image for Abdul-Rahman.
Abdul-Rahman
25 reviews
Follow
January 23, 2024
This book gives a great in-depth analysis of the way the West has interacted with Islam and Muslims since its inception. It the talks about specific examples of recent events where Muslims were unjustly targeted in the West, followed by a somber walk-through of Muslim war-torn areas of the world.
I enjoyed the read and found it beneficial, but I felt it was lacking in describing the ways that the teachings of Islam are similar to the teachings of the other Abrahamic religions. I appreciated the last few pages for touching on those similarities, but would have liked more so as to shorten the distance between these three religions that are truly cousins of each other.
Show more
Like
Comment
Profile Image for Donna Holland.
Donna Holland
134 reviews
1 follower
Follow
July 15, 2022
A meticulously researched book about how we need to separate the truth from the lies with regard to how the West views Islam .This book opens your eyes to state propaganda,media manipulation and falsehoods that run deep in history . The three great monotheistic religions share a common ancestor ( hence the title ) and the author urges us all to share a common humanity with constructive pragmatic ways forward .
Like
Comment
Profile Image for Hein Htet.
Hein Htet
53 reviews
4 followers
Follow
May 5, 2023
Not bad for western mainstream liberals and conservatives. Helpful for objective fact reporting. However, As an third world far-left ex-Muslim, I believe this book has superficial approach and couldn’t reach to the roots of the problem. Yet, it’s a good book for those who are novice about politics. Too Eurocentric and superficial for someone who has interests in politics.
Like
Comment
Profile Image for Richard Hakes.
Richard Hakes
412 reviews
3 followers
Follow
July 23, 2023
I know what the book is about and I know the attitudes are in all probability correct but I feel only half the story told. East is East and West is West the only way they get on together is when there is some compromise and mutual beifit which usually means money.
Like
Comment
Displaying 1 - 10 of 16 reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment