" 1993년 일본군 위안부 동원의 강제성을 인정한 고노담화"

 이 기사에는 이런 말이 있습니다. " 1993년 일본군 위안부 동원의 강제성을 인정한 고노담화". 그 말이 맏는가 틀리는가 부터 알아보아야 하겠습니다.

---

1] 위안부 관계 조사결과 발표에 관한 고노 내각관방장관 담화 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%9C%84%EC%95%88%EB%B6%80_%EA%B4%80%EA%B3%84_%EC%A1%B0%EC%82%AC%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC_%EB%B0%9C%ED%91%9C%EC%97%90_%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C_%EA%B3%A0%EB%85%B8_%EB%82%B4%EA%B0%81%EA%B4%80%EB%B0%A9%EC%9E%A5%EA%B4%80_%EB%8B%B4%ED%99%94

--

2] 慰安婦関係調査結果発表に関する河野内閣官房長官談話 出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%85%B0%E5%AE%89%E5%A9%A6%E9%96%A2%E4%BF%82%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%BB%E7%B5%90%E6%9E%9C%E7%99%BA%E8%A1%A8%E3%81%AB%E9%96%A2%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E6%B2%B3%E9%87%8E%E5%86%85%E9%96%A3%E5%AE%98%E6%88%BF%E9%95%B7%E5%AE%98%E8%AB%87%E8%A9%B1

--

3] Kono Statement From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kono_Statement

---

Coerciveness

"Coerciveness" is the primary focus of the negotiation. Korea insisted to include "coerciveness" at the time of recruitment so that "Korean people can accept the statement" although Japan did not find such evidence.[17] Korea stated that "if the announcement by the Japanese side relied on measured expressions such as 'there was involvement of coerciveness in some cases' it would likely trigger a furor." In response, the Japanese side replied that "on the issue of 'coerciveness', based also on the findings of the inquiry conducted domestically up to then, it would not be possible to arrive at a conclusion that would distort historical facts." Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Ishihara stated that "it would not be possible to say unconditionally that all comfort women were recruited with 'coerciveness'."

Japan "continuously investigated related documents and additionally conducted search and investigation of documents in the United States National Archives and Records Administration and in other locations. With these documents that were obtained in this way as a basis, it also began to analyze hearings of military-related parties and those responsible for managing the comfort stations, as well as testimonies collected by the Korean Council, and was able to practically finish compiling the report on the study results. The recognition obtained through these series of studies was that it was not possible to confirm that women were 'forcefully recruited'."

Japan explored "expressions that demonstrate the Government of Japan’s recognition to the greatest extent possible but in a way that does not bring lingering uneasiness to the hearts of citizens of either country.” "Although reaching a definite recognition would be difficult with regards to the issue of the involvement of 'coerciveness'," Japan made a concession to demonstrate a degree of recognition by stating that "it cannot be denied that some elements of coerciveness also existed" or "conceivably there were also some elements of 'coerciveness'." on the basic standpoint that in order to build a future-oriented Japan-ROK relationship.