2025-06-14

[SPECIAL EDITION] Prof. John Mearsheimer : FIRST STRIKE BY ISRAEL - Ca...


[SPECIAL EDITION] Prof. John Mearsheimer : FIRST STRIKE BY ISRAEL - Can Iran Defeat Israel?
Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom
572K subscribers
===
Streamed live 8 hours ago

Prof. John Mearsheimer  :  Can Iran Defeat Israel? (part two)
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.


==

Transcript


[Music]
heat heat
[Music]
hi everyone Judge Andrew Npalitano here
for Judging Freedom today is Friday June
13 2025
professor John Mirshimer joins us now
professor Mirshimer it's a pleasure we
originally scheduled this to continue
uh our session from the other day when
we had internet problems but of course
since then the world in the Middle East
uh has changed what's your uh initial
analysis
uh of the Israeli attack on Iran
i think it's clearly a massive attack i
mean they're attacking in waves uh
they're attacking all over the country
uh and they've made it clear that this
is just the beginning uh so this is a
major conflict and the Israelis are well
aware that the Iranians are going to
retaliate we don't know exactly what
that retaliation looks like so you're
basically going to have a situation
where we go up the escalation ladder and
then the question becomes what does it
look like at the end when this is
finally concluded do we do do we know uh
if uh the Iranian offensive
Chris is back in his element here uh do
we know Chris the dog not not producer
Chris do we know if u the Iranian
offensive weaponry has been uh impacted
by this attack well I think there's no
question that some of it has the
question is how much uh the Iranians
have a lot of that uh a lot of those
missiles cruise missiles and ballistic
missiles hidden underground and
furthermore they're just limits to how
many of the missiles can be attacked by
the Israelis because they can only put
so many aircraft over the target uh but
at the same time uh I think it's quite
clear that the Iranians got caught with
their pants down this was a surprise
attack scott Ritter on the show earlier
today talked about this being Iran's
Pearl Harbor i think that is an apt
analogy here so I think it is clear the
Israelis did get uh more than a few
ballistic and cruise missiles but how
many remains to be seen
i just had to get up and close the door
to try and insulate us from Chris's um
expressing his opinion on all these
things there doesn't seem to be any
question about United States involvement
after reading what the president said
i'm not so sure it was wise what he said
but I'd like to read it out loud since
it's a truth social poster chris if you
want to put it up please this is the
president of the United States uh about
uh 6:15 this morning Eastern time i gave
Iran chance after chance to make a deal
i told them in the strongest of words to
just do it but no matter how hard they
tried no matter how close they got they
just couldn't get it done i told them it
would be much worse than anything they
know anticipated or were told that the
United States makes the best and most
lethal military equipment anywhere in
the world by far in caps and that Israel
has a lot of it with much more to come
and they know how to use it certain
Iranian hardliners spoke bravely but
they didn't know what was about to
happen they are all dead in caps now and
it will only get worse there has already
been great death and destruction but
there is still time to make this
slaughter with the next already planned
attacks being even far more brutal come
to an end iran must make a deal before
there is nothing left and save what was
once known as the Iranian Empire no more
death no more destruction just do it
before it's too late god bless you all
the anti-war
president saying if you don't negotiate
the way we want you to we'll kill you
either directly or through our proxy
Benjamin Netanyahu was that the way you
read that yeah there's no question about
it uh just a couple other points uh the
Times of Israel has a big story that's
easily accessible on the internet that
makes it clear that uh Trump colluded
with Netanyahu to basically bamboozle
the Iranians and make it look like there
was not going to be an attack at least
until the negotiations were finished uh
and in fact Trump knew the attack was
coming as of Monday and he pretended
that he didn't know and that in fact he
was working overtime to make the
diplomatic route work uh so he uh uh
he's in collusion with the Israelis on
this one so Professor uh Saxs your
colleague and Scott Ritter say that
Trump's behavior in this as you've just
outlined it uh renders anybody who's
negotiating with the United States
absolutely suspect about whether or not
to believe Donald Trump or anything the
United States says you agree with that i
agreed with that before these attacks
took place uh I think any country on the
planet to trust the United States is
remarkably foolish that includes our
close allies uh as well as our
adversaries right i'm sure that Vladimir
Putin doesn't trust Donald Trump as far
as he can throw him and he can't throw
him any distance because he can't get
his hands on him yeah um I wonder if
Donald Trump um shared with Marco Rubio
the dejour not de facto the dejour
secretary of state uh the American
involvement or if Mr rubio has a problem
with the truth here's what he said
tonight this is last night tonight
Israel took unilateral action against
Iran we are not involved in strikes
against Iran and our top priority is
protecting American forces in the region
israel advised us that they believe this
action was necessary for its
self-defense president Trump and the
administration have taken all necessary
steps to protect our forces and remain
in close contact with our regional
partners let me be clear Iran should not
target US interests or personnel there's
not a word of truth in the first two
sentences there is there
no he was just trying to provide cover
early on but that cover's been blown by
today let me make a general point about
what I think is going on here please do
i I think Trump has fallen into a trap
that the Israelis set what I mean by
that is I think Israel's ultimate goal
here is to make sure Iran does not get
nuclear weapons but they don't have the
capability to do that by themselves uh
so what the uh what the Israelis are
doing here with this attack is number
one they're putting an end to the
negotiations there's not going to be any
more negotiations that's meaningless at
this point but furthermore they're
drawing us into the fight uh the
Iranians are going to retaliate and we
have said that we will help defend the
Israelis furthermore this war is going
to escalate and we are going to get
drawn in trump has already made it clear
that he is standing with the Israelis
and what Trump has wanted to do was
avoid a war and he wanted to settle this
one diplomatically well there's no
diplomatic solution possible now and he
is in the war with the Iranians
the allurement to American presidents of
the opportunity to kill
people in foreign countries must be
utterly irresistible this so-called
anti-war pro peace president we're going
to play a clip in just a minute of his
uh at the time his surrogates now
members of his cabinet praising him for
being anti-war is funding the war in
Gaza even more so than Joe Biden
continues to fund an utterly losing
effort in Ukraine and now the neocons
are triumphant and the Zionists are
triumphant by dragging us into
eventually a war against Iran which has
posed zero zero threat to American
national security so much for the
anti-war president it's hard to disagree
with that i mean the only thing I
disagree with that you said is I don't
call it a war in Gaza i call it a
genocide it is and I'm I'm entirely with
you and I stand corrected chris play the
clip of uh Tulsi Gabbard and Bobby
Kennedy a vote for Donald Trump is a
vote for a man who wants to end wars not
start them
he said "I want to end the wars
and who has demonstrated already that he
has the courage and strength to stand up
and fight for peace i want to end this
surveillance and censorship
did we choose censorship or freedom
i want to protect the Constitution
i want to protect freedom of speech
history will look back on us at this
moment for the choice that we make did
we choose war or peace
every one of those statements which were
made at the Republican National uh
convention last summer has been defied
poignantly by Donald Trump from freedom
of speech ask some Muslims on the
Columbia University uh campus uh to
these uh perpetual wars
i don't disagree i don't know what else
to say yeah i mean I I did not think
Trump would turn out to be a wararmonger
but uh he has i mean what else can you
say here here he is himself
in his inaugural address January 20th we
will measure our success not only by the
battles we win but also by the wars that
we end and perhaps most importantly the
wars we never get into
[Applause]
do you think that the true purpose of
this uh attack
from the perspective of the Israelis and
maybe from the perspective of the United
States all right I'm complicating the
question but nothing's too complex for
John Mirshimer do you think that the
true purpose of this attack was to
degrade the uran the um Iranian
uh ability to enrich uranium or to bring
about regime change in Iran well I do
not think the Israelis have the
capability to uh eliminate the nuclear
enrichment capability that the Iranians
have uh certainly at the Ford uh
installation uh but e even I think at
Natans it's just not in the cards uh I
think it's only the Americans who might
and I want to underline the word might
be able to do that but I think as I said
before the attack is mainly designed to
get the Americans in the fight to end
the negotiations
uh so that we can make sure that Iran uh
does not acquire nuclear weapons in
other in other words we the United
States the other alternative route to
this end is regime change which is the
Israelis go in they uh bash Iran and the
end result is that the Ayatollas are
overthrown you get a liberal democracy
and that liberal democracy or those new
leaders uh show no interest in acquiring
nuclear weapons uh I think that's a pipe
dream i tend to believe the Israelis
understand that's a pipe dream i mean
first of all you want to look at all the
states around the world that have
nuclear weapons a good number of them
are liberal democracies the United
States and Britain and India have
nuclear weapons france has nuclear
weapons these are liberal democracies
moreover if you're the Iranians what's
the message that you take from what's
happened here whether you're a liberal
Democrat or you're an Ayatollah the
lesson is that you should have gotten
nuclear weapons a long time ago and now
you definitely have to get them in the
future because if you had nuclear
weapons this wouldn't hap wouldn't have
happened look at North Korea north Korea
got nuclear weapons kim Jong-un uh is
thriving in North Korea colonel Gaddafi
got rid of his weapons of mass
destruction program he's now three feet
under uh and look at what's happening to
the Iranians so the message is clear
here and I think that tells you that
regime change is not going to do the
trick so what the Israelis want is they
want us to do the dirty work it's very
important to understand that the
Israelis have reached the point where
they are remarkably dependent on us yeah
if you look at the weaponry that was
used against the Iranians and I think
this includes intelligence too if you
look at the weaponry that's used in the
genocide it's the Americans who provide
that weaponry and the Israelis are
depending on us to help defend them when
the Iranians uh retaliate so they are
deeply dependent on us and it's
therefore hardly unsurprising that
they're looking to us uh to solve their
problem i don't want to give you
heartburn but probably the most
pro-Israeli
pro-war
never met a war he didn't want somebody
else to fight member of the United
States Senate from South Carolina
thinks this is a game there it is on his
own account game on pray for Israel
i I don't even know how to analyze the
human mind that would uh that would say
something like that by calling it game
on this is a massive uh unprovoked
illegal
uh war crime uh attack on a sovereign
nation which the United States duped
into a false sense of security by
pretending to negotiate it with it i
think we are as culpable as the Israelis
are but that culpability is not going to
be uh redressed on the battlefield
well the fact that somebody like Lindsey
Graham gets such a prominent platform
inside of the United States tells you
how much trouble we're in right but just
to take it a step further it is
important to understand that he's just
one of many senators and congressmen who
are backing Israel to the hilt and will
back Israel to the hilt no matter what
it does he just happens to be more
viferous and more foolish in his public
performances than the others uh but he's
just one of many and as I've said many
times it just goes uh to show you the
extent to which Israel in the lobby here
in the United States basically owns
Congress right right um
do we know the nature
caused the BBC described it as
unprecedented damage on Iran's elite i I
think they're referring to the attacks
in a suburban neighborhood where many of
the uh generals
uh and um Revolutionary Guard uh senior
officials resided and they're dead
i I believe that when all is said and
done the most successful part of the
Israeli attack will be the decapitation
i mean they actually were able to kill a
significant number of Iranian leaders uh
mainly generals and they were also able
to kill a handful of nuclear scientists
but the question you have to ask
yourself is whether this decapitation
strategy will work and the fact is that
there are people uh in the second
echelon the third echelon who will be
moved up to replace those individuals
and I'm sure that in some cases the
second and third echelon people who are
moved up will be more competent than the
people they replace in some cases they
won't but the idea that this is a
paralyzing attack that will make it
impossible for for Iran to wage uh a
protracted war against uh Israel is in
my opinion wrong i think the
decapitation strategy worked in the
sense that lots of people in Iran at the
top were killed but beyond that I don't
think it's going to have much effect on
the war and we don't know of Iran's
capability to respond or to retaliate in
a massive way because we don't know how
much damage the Israeli uh assault
caused no I think that's wrong i think
they still have the capability to
respond in a massive way i don't think
that the Israelis destroyed so much of
their missile inventory that the
Iranians can't pound Israel and pound
American bases in the Middle East and uh
oil installations in the Gulf they can
do that uh I think there was some damage
done for sure how much we can't tell but
I don't think massive damage was done
and by the way you know one thing we
haven't talked about and few people are
talking about is what happens if this
war goes on uh and the Israelis hit uh
oil installations in side of Iran and
the Iranians retaliate by hitting oil
installations in the Middle East more
generally shut down the flow of oil out
of the Persian Gulf this will have
catastrophed
thank you Donald Trump
yeah well you want to say thank you
Israel uh right well Israel would be
nothing without him i Is it fair to say
the neocons are now triumphant i mean
what became of the realists what became
of the American first is the the vice
president Vance group that was on that
telegram or signal call whatever it was
uh that supposedly was arguing for
restraint they certainly didn't prevail
here
well
there's no question they're triumphant
at the moment but you want to remember
how triumphant everybody was when we
went into Iraq uh you know the first day
first week it it looks terrific but then
once the cold doucheer reality hits uh
it doesn't look so good and I don't
think you can tell a good story about
how Israel ends up with a happy ending
here uh I think that this one will not
work out over the long term so all the
triumphalism that you see today I
believe will melt away like snow on a
Mayday uh but just a quick point on what
happened to the restrainers
uh what happened to the realist so to
speak the fact is when it comes to
foreign policy in the Middle East Israel
owns us and the restrainers in the end
don't matter because Israel can do
pretty much anything it wants this is a
truly remarkable situation that most
Americans can't understand it's just
unfathomable that a small country with a
couple million people is able to get the
United States to do its bidding uh to
get unconditional support from the
United States but that's where we're at
israel can do almost anything i mean to
put a positive spin on what Trump has
done he's in a straight jacket he just
doesn't have any choice there's no way
he can really contest the Israelis
because the lobby is so powerful that if
he contested the Israelis in a
meaningful way over Gaza or over Iran
they crucify the guy here's uh Colonel
McGregor a few minutes ago june turned
out to be Iran's Pearl Harbor iran will
now react as we did in 1942
when we were caught napping what was
limited to the region between Israel and
Iran will now become regional trump's
statements after the fact are an
admission of his own level of complicity
hard to disagree with that i said before
with regard to Scott's comments uh
earlier this morning I thought the use
of the term Pearl Harbor was appropriate
here and furthermore as I said if you
look at the scale of these attacks
against Iran it's really quite extensive
uh these attacks are quite extensive and
they're supposed to go on for you know
days if not weeks and I think the end
result is you're going to get a major
war here it's you know people who are
talking about let's uh put a damper on
this let's put an end to this i mean I
think this is delusional the Iranians
simply have to respond and they have to
respond in a massive way uh and the
Israelis will retaliate and then we're
off to the races and we have 90,000
American troops according to Ritter the
vast majority of them are support
personnel not frontline uh infantry who
are almost in a semicircle uh in that
area what happens when some of them get
killed
well that will give us an incentive to
get deeply involved in the war this is
what I was saying to you before the
Israelis have a vested interest in
sucking us into the war right uh
what what they want to do is get
Americans killed because if Americans
get killed that guarantees that we come
in so the Do you think Donald Trump
understands that that his buddy BB
Netanyahu wants Americans to get killed
i I don't know exactly what he
understands uh he obviously has
acknowledged that he's thrown uh he he's
thrown his lot in with the Israelis i
mean he he's with them now right we're
joined at the hip and we're going to get
pulled in you know this reminds me a lot
of the Cuban missile crisis excuse me of
u the Bay of Pigs operation that
President Kennedy was involved in uh in
April of 1961 shortly after he became
president the Bay of Pigs operation if
you look at it was doomed from the start
there was no way it would work and when
you read about it you wonder what was
the CIA thinking when they pushed JFK to
launch the boats and to uh invade in the
Bay of Pigs well what was going on here
is the CIA understood that we would be
defeated in the Bay of Pigs operation
but their belief is that Kennedy would
then have no choice but to double down
get deeply involved in Cuba and then wh
that was the way we would overthrow the
Castro regime right so in other words
the CIA understood the initial attack
would not achieve its goal but the idea
was that you suck President Kennedy in
commitment to topple the regime in Cuba
and in this case I don't believe the
Israelis think that they can eliminate
uh Iran's nuclear capability with these
attacks it just can't be done and they
understand full well I'm sure that
they're going to enrage the Iranians and
the Iranians are going to attack Israel
but this is all good news because the
name of the game is to suck the
Americans in just as they wanted to JFK
in with the Bay of Pigs operation and
Trump has played right into the Israelis
hands and here we go and after the Bay
of Pigs JFK was so furious at the CIA he
said "I'd like to smash them into a
thousand pieces."
And then came November 22nd 1963
well there's no question that he wanted
to get rid of uh uh the head of the CIA
Allan Dulles and he did that very
quickly and he was thinking about
reforming the CIA because he understood
that it was a rogue actor uh but with
regard to the Israelis right Israel is a
rogue state and it has it ti has us tied
around its finger and it can go off and
do all sorts of things and it knows that
it can depend on us to bail them out
last question Professor Mir Shmer do you
see any uh military action coming from
any other country in the region notably
Egypt or Turkey
no I think everybody's going to keep
their heads down the last thing they
want to do is get involved in this fight
there's nobody that has the capability
to take on the Israelis or the Americans
and uh I think that uh all around the
region people regret that this attack
has taken place they see no good coming
from it quite correctly I would add uh
but they're not going to get involved in
the fight okay Professor Mayor Shimemer
thank you very much i know this isn't
your usual day or time and I know this
is your second time on with us and and
you uh you rose to our call when we
learned of these events before the sun
came up this morning thank you very much
for joining us hope you have a good
weekend and we'll look forward to seeing
you at your usual time and place next
week my pleasure Judge have a good
weekend yourself thank you thank you
very much coming up at 4:00 today the
end of the day the end of the week but
not the last judging freedom of the week
uh the intelligence community roundt
with Ray McGovern and Larry Johnson 4:00
at 4:30 colonel Lawrence McGregor on
excuse me I conflated them colonel
Lawrence Wilkerson on all of this judge
Npalitano for judging freedom
[Music]
heat heat
[Music]

==
이스라엘의 이란 공격 뭐샤이머 분석 --- 위의 비데오 내용을 요약 분석해주세요
ChatGPT의 말:

아주 잘 준비해 주셨습니다. 이제 이 자료를 바탕으로 John Mearsheimer의 이스라엘의 이란 공격에 대한 분석을 요약·정리해 드리겠습니다.


John Mearsheimer: 이스라엘의 이란 공격 분석 요약 (2025년 6월 13일 인터뷰 기준)

1️⃣ 공격의 성격과 규모

  • 이스라엘의 공격은 대규모, 다발적, 전국적 공격임.

  • 이란은 사실상 기습당했으며, 일부에서는 이를 "이란의 진주만(펄하버)"에 비유 (Scott Ritter, McGregor 등).

  • 이스라엘은 핵심 인프라와 군사시설, 지휘부, 핵과학자 등을 겨냥한 **‘참수(decapitation) 작전’**을 시도.

  • 그러나 이란의 핵심 미사일 전력 상당수는 지하에 은닉되어 있어 결정적 타격을 입히지는 못함.

2️⃣ 미국의 역할과 트럼프의 개입

  • 미국은 이 공격에 사실상 연루됨. 트럼프 대통령은 이스라엘과 사전 협의한 정황이 있고, 이를 숨기며 외교 협상을 지속하는 척함.

  • 트럼프의 SNS 발언은 거의 공개적인 협박 수준으로, "이란은 전멸당할 수 있다"는 식의 발언.

  • Marco Rubio 등의 정치인은 "미국은 공격에 개입하지 않았다"고 했으나, 이는 사실과 다름.

3️⃣ 이스라엘의 전략적 목표

  • 이스라엘은 스스로 이란 핵 프로그램을 제거할 능력이 부족.

  • 따라서:

    1. 미국을 전쟁에 끌어들이기 (proxy entrapment)

    2. 외교 협상 중단 (이란이 미국과 협상할 유인을 없앰)

    3. 궁극적으로 미국이 이란 핵시설을 제거하도록 유도.

  • 이스라엘은 미국의 군사적·외교적 지원에 극도로 의존하는 상태.

4️⃣ 레짐 체인지(정권 교체) 가능성

  • 일부 네오콘과 이스라엘 내부에서는 이란 정권 교체까지 희망할 수 있으나, Mearsheimer는 이를 **"망상(pipedream)"**으로 평가.

  • 핵 보유국 중 상당수가 자유민주국이라는 점에서, 정권이 교체되어도 이란이 핵을 포기할 가능성은 낮다고 봄.

5️⃣ 이란의 향후 대응과 전쟁 확산 가능성

  • 이란은 상당한 미사일 전력을 보유한 채 여전히 대규모 보복 능력을 유지.

  • 이란이 중동 전역의 유전과 해상수송로를 공격할 경우 세계 에너지 시장 대혼란 우려.

  • Mearsheimer는 장기적으로 이 전쟁이 이스라엘에도 해피 엔딩으로 끝나지 않을 것으로 전망.

6️⃣ 미국 내 이스라엘 로비의 영향력

  • 이스라엘 로비가 미국 의회와 정계에 막대한 영향력을 행사.

  • 트럼프조차 이스라엘의 요구에 실질적으로 저항할 수 없는 구조.

  • Mearsheimer는 이스라엘의 미국에 대한 영향력을 "거의 믿기 어려운 수준"이라고 표현.

7️⃣ 역사적 유사성: 피그스 만 사건 비교

  • 이스라엘의 이번 전략을 케네디 시절 피그스 만 침공(Bay of Pigs) 시나리오와 비교:

    • CIA는 초반 실패를 예상했지만, 미국이 결국 본격 개입할 수밖에 없을 것으로 기대.

    • 이스라엘도 유사하게 미국이 전쟁에 본격 개입하도록 유도하는 전략.

8️⃣ 지역 국가들의 반응

  • 이집트, 터키 등 주변 국가는 관망 중.

  • 이스라엘/미국과 충돌할 역량이 없고, 이번 사태에 개입할 의사도 없음.


🔎 핵심 결론 요약

  • 이스라엘은 자력으로 이란 핵을 제거할 능력이 없기에 미국을 끌어들이려 함.

  • 미국(특히 트럼프)은 이스라엘 전략에 말려들어 전쟁에 휘말릴 위험.

  • 이란은 여전히 보복능력을 유지하고 있으며, 전쟁은 장기화·확산될 가능성.

  • 중동 에너지 시장과 글로벌 경제에 심각한 파장 우려.

  • 미국 내 이스라엘 로비의 힘은 여전히 절대적.

No comments: