한국정부론 - 제6판
안병만 (지은이)다산출판사2014-09-15
아름다운 서재 18호(인문/사회/역사/과학/예술/청소년 분야 도서 2만원 이상)
정가
28,000원
판매가
전자책
22,400원
476쪽
목차
제Ⅰ편 정부에 대한 연구시각
제1장 한국과 한국정부
제2장 정부에 관한 인론적 접근
제Ⅱ편 한국정치문화의 원류와 관료제
제3장 한국의 정치문화
제4장 조선시대의 관료제
제5장 일제시대의 관료제
제6장 해방 이후의 관료제
제Ⅲ편 한국정부의 변동
제7장 정권의 변동
제8장 정부조직의 변동
제9장 통치자
제10장 정부엘리트의 변동
제11장 정당정치와 민주화과정
Ⅳ 한국정부의 동태적 분석 Ⅰ:정치체계 내적 역학관계
제12장 행정과 정치의 역학관계:개입과 중립
제13장 행정체제상의 역학관계:중앙정부와 지방정부 간의 힘의 배분
제14장 행정부와 입법부의 역학관계:입법부의 자율성과 통합능력
제Ⅴ편 한국정부의 동태적 분석 Ⅱ:정치체계 외적 역학 관계
제15장 정부와 시민사회의 역학관계
제16장 정부와 노동조합의 역학관계
제17장 한국정부와 강대국의 역학관계
Ⅵ 미래의 과제
제18장 어울림의 미학
접기
추천글
이 책을 추천한 다른 분들 :
중앙일보
- 중앙일보 2014년 9월 27일자 '책 속으로'
조선일보
- 조선일보 북스 2014년 9월 26일자 '한줄읽기'
저자 및 역자소개
안병만 (지은이)
저자파일
신간알리미 신청
서울법대를 졸업하고, 미국 풀로리다대학교에서 정치학 박사학위를 받았다. 한국외국어대 총장을 지냈다.
지은 책으로는 <한국정부론> <한국의정치> 등이 있다.
최근작 : <한국정부론>,<한국의 선거와 한국인의 정치행태> … 총 4종 (모두보기)
Elites and Political Power in South Korea
Byong-Man Ahn
In Elites and Political Power in South Korea, Byong-Man Ahn examines problems related to Korea’s political and ruling systems. He examines the Korean government in a global context and explores Korea’s cultural and political matrix. The author goes on to analyze political power, political parties and the elites in terms of their contribution to the ongoing cycle of dominance. An understanding of Korean government is developed, with particular attention paid to the unique pattern of its administrative system vis-à-vis those of other systems.
Monograph Book
ISBN:9781840649710
eISBN:9781781009598
DOI:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009598
Pages: 352
Collection: Social And Political Science 2010 and before
Buy Book In Print
Supplementary Materials
Chapter 1: Korea and the Korean Government
Byong-Man Ahn
Monograph Chapter
Published in print:29 Oct 2003
Category:Monograph Chapter
DOI:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009598.00008
Pages: (12 total)
Collection: Social And Political Science 2010 and before
Extract
INTRODUCTION Korea is marked by an exceptionally long historical continuity from the ephemeral existence of the mighty continental powers adjacent to it. Despite the glory of its history and the ethnic unity that it demonstrated against nomadic marauders, today’s Korea remains ignominiously divided into two halves, as if they had never been the bickering brothers in the family of nations. With the northern half labeled as an enigmatic and unpredictable state, South Korea is vigorously seeking to enhance its status, breaking with the hallmark of the developing countries and the Third World. Since the liberation in l945, South Korea has undergone a series of changes that have shaped the structural characteristics of the Korean government. To comprehend the recent transformation of the Korean government, it is necessary to place Korea in the context of global trends, in order hopefully to develop an objective understanding of it through comparative perspective. This chapter examines how Korea has been transformed in the global context, where it stands in terms of social and economic development and what are the geopolitical implications for Korea in the evolving world. Grasping how the government’s role has changed in relation to civil society is expected to provide the key to understanding the characteristics of political power. KOREA IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT Change and Preservation The advanced technology of transportation and communication is reducing the world into an unfenced neighborhood. McLuhan saw television as ‘the instrument that would bring about the global village’.1 The rapidly advancing frontier of satellite,...
--
Chapter 6: Shifts of Political Power
INTRODUCTION Ethnic homogeneity, the exceptionally long dynastic continuity and a universal value system characterizes Korea. Koreans have lived within the relatively stable boundaries since Silla achieved the unification of the peninsula in 668 and no significant minority of foreign origin has ever lived within the territory. From its foundation in the first century, Silla had existed for a millennium, including 200 years of Unified Silla. Such a long dynastic continuity hardly finds parallel in any other part of the world. The Unified Silla was succeeded by the Koryo dynasty (936–1392) and the Chosun dynasty (1392–1910), each lasting for nearly five centuries. The year 1910 marks the humiliating annexation of Korea by Japan, thus opening the era of colonial rule. The conclusion of the Second World War in 1945 liberated Koreans from the colonial yoke. But Korea fell prey to the Cold War with its territory divided into two halves, south and north, against its own will.1 The post-liberation was replete with political and economic disturbances that gave rise to violent shifts of political power. Transfer of power entailed stress and tension, each regime having an anomalistic ending. This chapter examines the process through which political power has shifted, as manifested in a series of Republics, from the First through the Seventh. The First Republic (1948–60) was headed by Rhi Syng Man through a sea of political and economic troubles following the transient governance under the US occupation forces, through the Korean War and the post-war rehabilitation. Rhi’s...
--
Chapter 9: The Ruling Elites
Extract
INTRODUCTION Since liberation in 1948, numerous ruling elites have paraded across the stages of bureaucracy and politics. They were burdened with state affairs, including the formulation, planning and implementation of policies. They were the chief agents responsible for decisions that affected the state’s fate. The earlier batches of elites, some still vivid in our memories for what appeared to be an invincible grip on power, have long since passed into oblivion and new generations took their places. The lapse of 50 years offers a timely occasion to examine how the generational change of the ruling elite has taken place in relation to the social and political milieu that formed temporal characteristics. The ruling elite is broadly defined as those occupying leadership positions in the three branches of power, namely, the legislative, executive and judiciary branches. Studies on the ruling elite that have been conducted previously connoted a broad concept that included the National Assemblymen,1 top bureaucrats of the executive branch,2 justices of the Supreme Court3 and other politicians held to affect the process of legislation.4 Moreover, any study that cuts across the different stages of political development and brings the ruling elite of various regimes into a single purview is virtually non existent.5 Having defined the ruling elite as comprising the three branches of power, this study attempts to advance temporary characteristics of the ruling elite, to detect any structural changes presumably related to the change of power, and to define the bureaucratic ethos characteristic of each regime....
---
Chapter 14: Dynamic Relationship between Politics and Economy
INTRODUCTION Competition is a structural characteristic of a pluralistic and diverse democratic society whose rule is based on the majority principle. Any political game that entails competition requires money and those rich in money bid fair to become the winner of the political game. The ideal of democratic politics rejects the combination of power with money because it leads to a political leverage that knows no road blocks to political goals, but the reality accepts it to the extent that money is a necessary evil in politics. It holds true that the excessive accumulation of wealth, as often noticed in open-market systems, brings the well-to-do into politics where their loud voices din out others in the formulation of policy measures. Collusion between big business and politicians tends to bias or distort the distribution of the national resources in favor of a few individuals or groups or a certain segment of the population. This trend is typified by Japan where the long-sustained political hegemony of the Liberal Democratic Party was maintained by its entrenched collusions with ‘big businesses’, with the resultant opening of the path for their heads to manipulate politics and enjoy an untrameled rise to prominence. In dealing with state affairs, political leadership is extremely wary of where the wind blows lest it goes against the grain or incurs the resentment of business interests. Premiers who didn’t heed this dictum often went to the pit of disgrace under overwhelming pressure to step down.1 Korea witnessed the advent of business...
No comments:
Post a Comment