East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute (Contemporary Asia in the World) - Kindle edition by David Kang. Politics & Social Sciences Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute (Contemporary Asia in the World) Kindle Edition
by David Kang (Author)
4.7 out of 5 stars 7 ratings
From the founding of the Ming dynasty in 1368 to the start of the Opium Wars in 1841, China has engaged in only two large-scale conflicts with its principal neighbors, Korea, Vietnam, and Japan. These four territorial and centralized states have otherwise fostered peaceful and long-lasting relationships with one another, and as they have grown more powerful, the atmosphere around them has stabilized.
Focusing on the role of the "tribute system" in maintaining stability in East Asia and in fostering diplomatic and commercial exchange, Kang contrasts this history against the example of Europe and the East Asian states' skirmishes with nomadic peoples to the north and west.
Although China has been the unquestioned hegemon in the region, with other political units always considered secondary, the tributary order entailed military, cultural, and economic dimensions that afforded its participants immense latitude. Europe's "Westphalian" system, on the other hand, was based on formal equality among states and balance-of-power politics, resulting in incessant interstate conflict.
Scholars tend to view Europe's experience as universal, but Kang upends this tradition, emphasizing East Asia's formal hierarchy as an international system with its own history and character. This approach not only recasts our understanding of East Asian relations but also defines a model that applies to other hegemonies outside the European order.
----
File Size: 1916 KB
Print Length: 240 pages
Publisher: Columbia University Press (October 14, 2010)
Publication Date: October 14, 2010
Biography
David C. Kang is Professor at the University of Southern California, with appointments in both the School of International Relations and the Marshall School of Business. He received an A.B. with honors from Stanford University and his Ph.D. from Berkeley.
--------------
Customer reviews
4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
7 customer ratings
5 star 72%
4 star 28%
Top Reviews
Akhilesh Pillalamarri
4.0 out of 5 stars IntriguingReviewed in the United States on September 17, 2013
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
This is certainly an interesting and informative work. The thesis, which focuses on the historical tendency of an East Asia with a strong China to lean towards hegemonic peace is interesting and worth serious consideration though the jury is out on how accurate it is. More than this, Kang is right to challenge the Eurocentric bias towards theories of International Relations, which is largely built on European/Western cases. The book is also interesting as history, especially the conceptualization and formation of states in East Asia, their trade patterns and the differences between states and the tribal/nomadic groups that bordered East Asia. I felt his explanation could have been stronger with regards to this last count and he could have given a more full description of these nomadic entities. The differences between the Ming and Qing could have been highlighted more. Finally, more attention could have been given to the states of Southeast Asia, their role in the East Asian system, and the nature of those states. All in all, this was a strong book nonetheless though it could have added a few things.
3 people found this helpful
HelpfulComment Report abuse
sequoiamv
4.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating information but the writing could be betterReviewed in the United States on January 2, 2011
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
This is a subject matter I'm fascinated about, so he couldn't go wrong informing me of the historical facts. My only issue is with his writing style - he repeats himself over and over again. He'll write a sentence saying the same thing two or five paragraphs down the line, after which you just want to slap him and go, "you've already said that!". The writing can also get a little long-winded, but I suppose that's a common feature of books written by academics.
As an avid history buff, the story he tells is interesting. I only had a vague understanding of inter-Asian relationships of the past, so I can say I'm a little bit more educated about the matter now. He focuses primarily on the three sinicized societies (Korea, Vietnam and Japan) plus China itself, which helps make it succinct. It's also mainly about Chinese relations with the other three, which I suppose makes sense since East Asia back then pretty much revolved around it. He gets a litte bit into the Korean-Japanese dynamic, though I would've liked more. More in-depth info on the interactions between the non-China three would've been nice, especially Vietnam's discourse with Japan and Korea.
All in all I would recommend it, and it's also comparatively short and makes for a quick read.
9 people found this helpful
HelpfulComment Report abuse
Nelson Der
5.0 out of 5 stars An outstanding narrative on 6 centuries of East Asian history ...Reviewed in the United States on June 19, 2017
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
An outstanding narrative on 6 centuries of East Asian history that Viet-Nam, China, Korea, and Japan fought only 2 wars among themselves. In comparison, the author mentioned numerous conflicts in Europe among the various states. Even in our American century (20th), we seen American blood spilled in the Philippines, WWII in the Pacific, Korea, and Viet-Nam.
Stephen B. Wickman
5.0 out of 5 stars Provacative Academic TreatmentReviewed in the United States on May 2, 2014
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
Agree with the one reviewer who criticized the style points, but readers must recall that this is an academic work and the repetetiveness is part of the style of presentation.
I ultimately disagree with much of the author's thesis, but he has anticipated many of my objections and dealt with them clearly in the text. I will not use this space to review them as I am working on a less academic "rebuttal" of sorts.
2 people found this helpful
Top international reviews
Norberto Pedroso
5.0 out of 5 stars Very helpfull for a book I am writtingReviewed in the United Kingdom on June 14, 2013
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Extremely clarifying for the fine points of the order of importance of the different tributes received by China.
A very fair view of this matter in relation to the europeans.
HelpfulReport abuse
No comments:
Post a Comment