Nuclear weapons
Treaty banning nuclear weapons approved at UN
Supporters hail step towards nuclear-free world as treaty is backed by 122 countries
Elayne Whyte Gómez, president of the UN conference on nuclear weapons, reacts after the vote.
Elayne Whyte Gómez, president of the UN conference on nuclear weapons, reacts after the vote. Photograph: Mary Altaffer/AP
View more sharing options
Shares
39,350
Ian Sample Science editor
Saturday 8 July 2017 01.53 AEST Last modified on Saturday 8 July 2017 02.55 AEST
More than 70 years after the world witnessed the devastating power of nuclear weapons, a global treaty has been approved to ban the bombs, a move that supporters hope will lead to the eventual elimination of all nuclear arms.
The treaty was endorsed by 122 countries at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Friday after months of talks in the face of strong opposition from nuclear-armed states and their allies. Only the Netherlands, which took part in the discussion, despite having US nuclear weapons on its territory, voted against the treaty.
All of the countries that bear nuclear arms and many others that either come under their protection or host weapons on their soil boycotted the negotiations. The most vocal critic of the discussions, the US, pointed to the escalation of North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programme as one reason to retain its nuclear capability. The UK did not attend the talks despite government claims to support multilateral disarmament.
Advertisement
“It’s been seven decades since the world knew the power of destruction of nuclear weapons and since day one there was a call to prohibit nuclear weapons,” Elayne Whyte Gómez, president of the UN conference, told the Guardian. “This is a very clear statement that the international community wants to move to a completely different security paradigm that does not include nuclear weapons.”
The 10-page treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons will be open for signatures from any UN member state on 20 September during the annual general assembly. While countries that possess nuclear weapons are not expected to sign up any time soon, supporters of the treaty believe it marks an important step towards a nuclear-free world by banning the weapons under international law.
“It’s a prohibition in line with other prohibitions on weapons of mass destruction,” said Beatrice Fihn at the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons in Geneva. “We banned biological weapons 45 years ago, we banned chemical weapons 25 years ago, and today we are banning nuclear weapons.” Within two years the treaty could have the 50-state ratifications that it needs to enter into international law, she said.
Previous UN treaties have been effective even when key nations have failed to sign up to them. The US did not sign up to the landmines treaty, but has completely aligned its landmines policy to comply nonetheless. “These kinds of treaties have an impact that forces countries to change their behaviour. It is not going to happen fast, but it does affect them,” Fihn said. “We have seen on all other weapons that prohibition comes first, and then elimination. This is taking the first step towards elimination.”
Under the new treaty, signatory states must agree not to develop, test, manufacture or possess nuclear weapons, or threaten to use them, or allow any nuclear arms to be stationed on their territory.
Richard Moyes, managing director of Article 36, a UK organisation that works to prevent harm from nuclear and other weapons, said the negotiations had made clear that “a substantial number of states think that killing hundreds and thousands of people and poisoning their environment is morally wrong and that this should be reflected in law”.
Advertisement
He added: “The UK, along with other states that possess nuclear weapons, has chosen to boycott these talks, but the process has shown that any group of committed and concerned states can and should take collective responsibility to reject these horrific weapons.”
Instead of scrapping their nuclear stocks, the UK and other nuclear powers want to strengthen the 1968 nuclear nonproliferation treaty (NPT), a pact that aims to prevent the spread of the weapons outside the original five nuclear powers: the US, Russia, Britain, France and China. It requires countries to hold back from nuclear weapons programmes in exchange for a commitment from the nuclear powers to move towards nuclear disarmament and to provide access to peaceful nuclear energy technology. The new treaty reflects a frustration among non-nuclear states that the NPT has not worked as hoped.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
High-quality journalism is essential intellectual nourishment
Giacomo P, Italy
The Guardian is working hard to confront and challenge those in power. I want to support that
Robb H, Canada
I appreciate an alternative to newspapers owned by billionaires. You give me hope
Fred F, UK
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all
Thomasine F-R, Sweden
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.
Become a supporter
Make a contribution
Topics
Nuclear weapons
United Nations
news
Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on Google+
Don't assume Trump is more responsible with nuclear weapons than North Korea
Anna Weichselbraun
6 Jul 2017
555Don't assume Trump is more responsible with nuclear weapons than North Korea
Could North Korea trigger a nuclear war? – video explainer
4 Jul 2017
Could North Korea trigger a nuclear war? – video explainer
US nuclear base inspection results made secret to conceal failures, critics claim
4 Jul 2017
US nuclear base inspection results made secret to conceal failures, critics claim
UK's Trident nuclear submarines 'vulnerable to catastrophic hack'
1 Jun 2017
UK's Trident nuclear submarines 'vulnerable to catastrophic hack'
UN panel releases draft treaty banning possession and use of nuclear weapons
23 May 2017
UN panel releases draft treaty banning possession and use of nuclear weapons
Jeremy Corbyn: I want to achieve a nuclear free world – video
23 Apr 2017
Jeremy Corbyn: I want to achieve a nuclear free world – video
No comments:
Post a Comment