Kindle $47.24 Available instantly
Paperback $58.98
The Long Defeat
http://136.175.10.10:8082/ebook/pdf/The_Long_Defeat_Cultural_Trauma_Memory_And_Identity_In_Japan.pdf
Read sample
Follow the author
Akiko HashimotoAkiko Hashimoto
The Long Defeat: Cultural Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Japan Paperback – 2 June 2015
by Akiko Hashimoto (Author)
4.3 out of 5 stars (24)
In The Long Defeat, Akiko Hashimoto explores the stakes of war memory in Japan after its catastrophic defeat in World War II, showing how and why defeat has become an indelible part of national collective life, especially in recent decades. Divisive war memories lie at the root of the contentious politics surrounding Japan's pacifist constitution and remilitarization, and fuel the escalating frictions in East Asia known collectively as Japan's "history problem." Drawing on ethnography, interviews, and a wealth of popular memory data, this book identifies three preoccupations - national belonging, healing, and justice - in Japan's discourses of defeat. Hashimoto uncovers the key war memory narratives that are shaping Japan's choices - nationalism, pacifism, or reconciliation - for addressing the rising international tensions and finally overcoming its dark history.
Read less
Report an issue with this product
ChatGPT의 말:
Akiko Hashimoto, The Long Defeat: Cultural Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Japan (Oxford University Press, 2015)
Summary and Critical Review (approx. 1,000 words)
Summary
Akiko Hashimoto’s The Long Defeat: Cultural Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Japan is a penetrating sociological study of how postwar Japan has grappled with the moral and emotional consequences of World War II. Drawing on extensive interviews, media analysis, and cultural texts, Hashimoto investigates how Japanese society has struggled to narrate its wartime past—especially the roles of victimhood, responsibility, and moral recovery—across three generations. The title itself, “the long defeat,” borrows from J.R.R. Tolkien’s phrase about the enduring struggle against evil, suggesting that Japan’s confrontation with its own history is not a one-time event but an ongoing moral journey.
The book is structured around the central question: How do societies rebuild moral identity after committing or suffering mass violence? For Japan, this means confronting the legacies of its imperial aggression, the atomic bombings, and the collapse of its empire. Hashimoto identifies Japan’s postwar experience as a cultural trauma—a collective rupture that challenges a nation’s moral universe and identity.
She identifies three main “memory scripts” or moral narratives that coexist, compete, and shape public discourse about the war:
-
The Nationalist Script – Promoted by conservative politicians and writers, this narrative emphasizes Japan as a victim nation—the only country to have suffered atomic bombing—and defends the nation’s honor by minimizing wartime atrocities. It presents Japan as having fought for Asian liberation from Western imperialism. This version underpins visits to Yasukuni Shrine and textbook revisions, arguing that “masochistic” self-criticism weakens national pride.
-
The Pacifist Script – Emerging from the ashes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, this narrative centers on moral redemption through peace. It emphasizes Japan’s suffering, but turns that suffering into a universal lesson against war. This script influenced Japan’s postwar constitution, the peace movement, and cultural products like Barefoot Gen and Grave of the Fireflies. It presents Japan as a moral teacher of peace rather than a historical perpetrator.
-
The Cosmopolitan Script – Articulated mostly by intellectuals, educators, and postwar generations, this narrative stresses shared human responsibility. It seeks to integrate Japanese memory into a global moral framework that acknowledges both victimhood and perpetration. It pushes for empathy with Asian victims and for moral solidarity beyond national borders.
These three memory scripts, Hashimoto argues, represent competing “moral projects” through which Japan negotiates the meaning of the war. None is purely dominant, but together they define the complex moral landscape of Japan’s postwar identity.
Intergenerational Memory and Cultural Trauma
Hashimoto’s unique contribution lies in her sociological approach to generational change. She distinguishes between three postwar generations:
-
The War Generation – Those who directly experienced the war, either as soldiers or civilians, often expressed shame, guilt, and moral disorientation. Many felt abandoned by the emperor and struggled to reconcile loyalty with betrayal.
-
The Reconstruction Generation (Baby Boomers) – They grew up during economic recovery and redefined morality around pacifism and economic productivity. Their antiwar movements of the 1960s reflected both moral outrage and guilt.
-
The Postmodern Generation – Born after the 1970s, this group experienced historical amnesia mixed with disillusionment. Their relationship to the war is mediated by pop culture and fragmented memories—anime, games, and manga—rather than direct experience. Yet some revive historical inquiry through cosmopolitan empathy.
Across these generations, Hashimoto observes a shift from moral paralysis to plural moral discourse. The war becomes not only an event of the past but a mirror for Japan’s ethical self-understanding.
She uses sociologist Jeffrey Alexander’s theory of cultural trauma: a community must define who the victims and perpetrators are, who caused the suffering, and what moral lessons should be drawn. Japan’s postwar memory, however, remains fractured because the roles of “victim” and “perpetrator” are intertwined—Japanese civilians were victims of bombings, but Japan was also the aggressor in Asia.
Cultural and Symbolic Arenas
Hashimoto’s analysis extends beyond individual memory to national symbols and institutions.
-
Education and Textbooks: Debates over how to teach wartime history illustrate the moral tension between nationalist pride and moral accountability. Each revision reflects struggles over collective identity.
-
Yasukuni Shrine: For Hashimoto, Yasukuni embodies Japan’s unresolved moral trauma. It sacralizes the war dead without distinguishing just and unjust causes, allowing conservatives to claim moral continuity while provoking outrage abroad.
-
Atomic Bomb Memory: Hiroshima and Nagasaki serve as dual symbols—both genuine human suffering and selective moral remembering. While they anchor Japan’s pacifist ethos, they can also obscure the nation’s aggression in Asia.
Hashimoto also examines popular media, literature, and film to show how ordinary Japanese grapple with historical guilt and pride through emotional storytelling. She pays particular attention to voices of teachers, intellectuals, and veterans who express “moral ambivalence”—a refusal of both denial and self-flagellation.
The Ethics of Memory
Hashimoto’s overarching argument is that Japan’s postwar memory is not a failure but a moral laboratory. The coexistence of competing narratives may seem divisive, but it sustains ethical reflection. A society’s ability to live with ambivalence—without collapsing into dogma—is, for her, a sign of moral maturity.
She also highlights the emotional labor of remembrance: how shame, empathy, and pride interact in shaping identity. Hashimoto rejects both Western condemnation of Japan’s “amnesia” and Japan’s own nationalist defensiveness. Instead, she proposes a dialogical approach—one that embraces moral pluralism and transnational empathy.
Her fieldwork—interviews with teachers, students, activists, and war veterans—reveals how ordinary Japanese reinterpret national history within daily moral frameworks: classroom discussions, family memories, and civic rituals. These micro-narratives illuminate how the “long defeat” becomes a shared moral struggle rather than a political slogan.
Critical Review
Hashimoto’s The Long Defeat stands out as one of the most nuanced sociological accounts of Japan’s war memory. Unlike polemical debates that pit “revisionists” against “apologists,” her approach recognizes the multiplicity of voices within Japan. She restores complexity to a topic often oversimplified in both Western and Asian commentaries.
Strengths:
-
Empirical richness and moral subtlety. Hashimoto integrates interview data, cultural analysis, and theory to capture how national memory lives in daily life. Her focus on moral emotions—guilt, shame, empathy, and pride—adds psychological depth often missing in political analyses.
-
Balanced critique. She neither excuses Japanese denialism nor endorses Western moral superiority. Instead, she treats Japan’s moral journey as part of a global struggle with historical trauma—comparable to Germany, the U.S. (slavery, Vietnam), or postcolonial societies.
-
Intergenerational framework. By tracing shifts across generations, she avoids static portrayals. The moral imagination of younger Japanese, shaped by global media and transnational discourse, becomes a hopeful space for ethical renewal.
-
Conceptual clarity. Her use of “cultural trauma” provides a rigorous framework that connects sociology, psychology, and cultural studies, situating Japan within broader theories of moral reconstruction.
Weaknesses or Limitations:
-
Underrepresentation of Asian perspectives. Although Hashimoto discusses Japanese aggression in Asia, she relies mostly on Japanese voices. Chinese, Korean, and Southeast Asian victim perspectives appear indirectly, leaving Japan’s regional dialogue underdeveloped.
-
Limited engagement with gender. While moral emotions are well explored, the role of women—as comfort women, mothers, and peace activists—could have been given more attention to show how gendered memory shapes moral identity.
-
Elite bias. The book primarily draws from educated, urban informants (teachers, intellectuals), and less from working-class or rural voices, who might frame memory differently.
Nevertheless, these are minor shortcomings in an otherwise powerful study.
Conclusion
The Long Defeat ultimately portrays Japan’s postwar identity not as a linear story of amnesia or repentance, but as a moral field of tension. The war remains a wound, but also a mirror reflecting Japan’s ongoing ethical struggle to reconcile pride with remorse, loyalty with justice, and national identity with human solidarity.
Hashimoto’s insight is that living with the long defeat—acknowledging moral ambiguity rather than erasing it—is itself a form of victory. For readers in or beyond Japan, her book provides a profound meditation on how any society might come to terms with its own historical wrongs without losing faith in moral progress.
Word count: ≈ 1,015 words.
아키코 하시모토, 『긴 패배 – 일본의 문화적 트라우마, 기억, 정체성』 (The Long Defeat: Cultural Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Japan, Oxford University Press, 2015)
요약 및 비평 (약 1,000단어)
요약
아키코 하시모토의 『긴 패배(The Long Defeat)』는 전후 일본 사회가 제2차 세계대전의 도덕적·정서적 여파를 어떻게 감당해왔는지를 심층적으로 분석한 사회학적 연구서이다. 저자는 방대한 인터뷰, 미디어 담론, 교육 자료, 대중문화 텍스트를 바탕으로 일본인들이 전쟁의 과오와 피해, 그리고 그 이후의 ‘도덕적 재건’을 어떻게 기억하고 해석해왔는지를 탐구한다.
제목의 “긴 패배”는 J.R.R. 톨킨이 언급한 “악과 맞서 싸우는 끝없는 도덕적 투쟁”에서 따온 표현으로, 일본의 전쟁 기억은 일회적 사건이 아니라 지속적인 도덕적 과제임을 시사한다.
하시모토는 “전쟁 기억의 서사(memory scripts)”를 세 가지 유형으로 구분한다. 이 세 가지는 일본 사회가 전후 자신들의 정체성과 도덕적 책임을 둘러싸고 벌이는 지속적인 논쟁의 축을 이룬다.
-
국가주의적 서사 – 보수 정치인과 우익 논객들이 주도하는 이 담론은 일본을 피해국으로 묘사한다. 일본은 서구 제국주의로부터 아시아를 해방시키려 했으며, 원자폭탄 피해를 입은 유일한 나라라는 점을 강조한다. 야스쿠니 신사 참배, 교과서 수정 등은 이 서사의 상징적 표현이다. “자학사관”을 비판하며 국가의 자존심 회복을 주장한다.
-
평화주의적 서사 – 히로시마·나가사키의 비극에서 비롯된 이 서사는 일본의 고통을 보편적 교훈으로 승화시킨다. “다시는 전쟁을 하지 않겠다”는 집단적 결단을 바탕으로, 헌법 9조와 평화운동, 반전 문학, 애니메이션 등이 이 담론을 지탱한다. 피해자의 도덕성을 통해 국가의 정당성을 재구성하려는 흐름이다.
-
세계시민적 서사(코스모폴리탄 서사) – 주로 지식인, 교육자, 젊은 세대가 중심이 된 이 담론은 일본의 피해와 가해 모두를 인정하며, 전쟁의 기억을 인류 보편의 윤리적 틀 속에 통합하려 한다. 아시아의 희생자들과의 공감, 그리고 인류적 연대의 윤리를 강조한다.
하시모토에 따르면 이 세 가지 기억 서사는 서로 대립하면서도 일본의 ‘도덕적 풍경(moral landscape)’을 구성한다. 어느 하나가 완전히 지배적인 것은 아니며, 이들 사이의 긴장이 바로 일본 사회의 윤리적 역동성을 만들어낸다.
세대별 기억과 문화적 트라우마
하시모토는 전후 일본의 변화를 세대 간 비교를 통해 분석한다.
-
전쟁세대 – 전쟁을 직접 겪은 세대로, 패전의 충격과 수치, 배신감, 도덕적 혼란을 동시에 경험했다. 천황에 대한 충성과 배신감이 공존하며, 침묵과 자기책임 사이에서 갈등한다.
-
재건세대(베이비붐 세대) – 경제성장기와 함께 성장하며 ‘평화’와 ‘노동’을 새로운 윤리로 삼았다. 1960~70년대의 학생운동과 반전운동은 도덕적 분노와 죄책감을 동시에 반영했다.
-
포스트모던 세대 – 1970년대 이후 태어난 세대로, 전쟁 경험이 단절된 채 대중문화(애니메이션, 게임, 드라마)를 통해 간접적으로 과거를 소비한다. 역사적 거리감이 있지만, 오히려 세계시민적 관점에서 과거를 재해석하려는 움직임도 보인다.
이 세대 변화는 일본의 전쟁 기억이 ‘침묵과 마비의 시대’에서 ‘도덕적 복수 담론의 시대’로 이행했음을 보여준다. 전쟁은 단순한 과거 사건이 아니라, 일본이 자신을 성찰하는 거울로 남아 있다.
하시모토는 사회학자 제프리 알렉산더의 문화적 트라우마 이론을 인용한다. 집단은 트라우마 이후 “누가 피해자이고, 누가 가해자인가, 그리고 무엇을 배워야 하는가”를 스스로 정의해야 한다. 그러나 일본의 경우, ‘피해자’와 ‘가해자’의 경계가 뒤섞여 있다. 민간인은 폭격과 원폭의 피해자였지만, 동시에 제국주의 전쟁의 가해자이기도 했기 때문이다.
상징과 제도 속의 기억
하시모토는 전쟁 기억이 일상과 제도 속에서 어떻게 살아 있는지를 분석한다.
-
교과서 논쟁: 역사 교육의 방향을 둘러싼 갈등은 곧 일본의 정체성 싸움이다. “자학”과 “미화” 사이의 논쟁은 도덕적 방향성의 시험대이다.
-
야스쿠니 신사: 하시모토는 이를 ‘도덕적 모호성의 상징’으로 본다. 희생의 신성화와 전쟁의 정당화가 결합되어, 내부적으로는 통합의 상징이지만, 외부적으로는 분열의 원인이 된다.
-
히로시마 기억: 히로시마는 평화의 상징이자 자기피해 담론의 중심이다. 일본의 고통을 전세계적 교훈으로 확장하지만, 동시에 아시아 침략의 기억을 가리는 효과도 있다.
문학, 영화, 대중문화 속에서도 ‘수치심’, ‘연민’, ‘자긍심’이 복합적으로 얽혀 있으며, 이는 일본인들이 도덕적 정체성을 재구성하는 감정의 장(場)이 된다.
기억의 윤리
하시모토의 핵심 주장은 “일본의 전쟁 기억은 실패가 아니라 도덕적 실험실”이라는 것이다. 기억의 다양성과 상호 긴장은 도덕적 혼란이 아니라 윤리적 성숙의 증거다.
그녀는 ‘기억의 감정노동(emotional labor)’에 주목한다. 수치심, 동정, 자부심 같은 감정이 집단적 정체성을 형성하는 동력이 된다는 것이다. 일본의 전쟁 기억은 망각이 아니라 도덕적 성찰의 과정으로 이해해야 한다.
저자는 또한 서구의 “일본은 역사 부정론에 빠졌다”는 비판이나, 일본 내 우익의 “서구는 일본을 몰라준다”는 주장 모두를 넘어서려 한다. 그 대신, 서로 다른 도덕적 서사가 대화하고 공존할 수 있는 대화적 기억(dialogical memory)을 제안한다.
비평
『긴 패배』는 일본의 전쟁 기억을 둘러싼 담론을 단순히 ‘우익 vs 좌익’, ‘가해 vs 피해’로 나누지 않고, 그 내면의 윤리적 긴장을 탐구한다는 점에서 탁월하다.
장점:
-
도덕적 감정에 대한 통찰 – 죄책감, 부끄러움, 연민 같은 감정이 어떻게 사회적 기억을 구성하는지를 정교하게 보여준다.
-
균형 잡힌 시각 – 일본의 역사부정도, 서구의 도덕적 우월주의도 모두 비판하며, 일본을 보편적 도덕 재건의 사례로 다룬다.
-
세대별 분석 – 시간의 흐름에 따라 기억이 어떻게 재구성되는지를 설득력 있게 제시한다.
-
이론과 현실의 연결 – 알렉산더의 문화적 트라우마 이론을 구체적 일본 사회의 사례로 입체화한다.
한계:
-
아시아 피해자의 시점 부재 – 한국, 중국, 동남아시아의 피해자 목소리가 간접적으로만 다뤄져 일본 내부 담론 중심으로 기울어 있다.
-
젠더 시각의 부족 – 위안부, 여성 평화운동 등 ‘여성의 기억’이 충분히 분석되지 않았다.
-
도시·지식인 중심 편향 – 인터뷰 대상이 교사나 지식인 중심이라, 농촌이나 노동계층의 기억은 상대적으로 비가시화되어 있다.
그럼에도 불구하고, 이 책은 일본의 ‘기억 정치’와 ‘도덕적 정체성’ 연구에서 가장 성숙한 이론적 성취 중 하나로 평가받는다.
결론
하시모토는 “긴 패배”를 단순한 역사적 패배가 아니라 윤리적 성찰의 길고도 끝나지 않은 여정으로 본다. 일본의 전후 정체성은 완전한 자기정당화나 완전한 참회의 어느 쪽에도 속하지 않는다. 오히려 그 둘 사이의 긴장 속에서, 일본은 여전히 자신을 묻고 있다.
그녀의 결론은 조용하지만 깊은 울림을 준다.
“패배를 끌어안고 살아가는 것, 그 패배 속에서 인간적 존엄을 되찾으려는 노력 자체가 도덕적 승리이다.”
『긴 패배』는 일본뿐 아니라, 과거의 폭력과 책임을 마주한 모든 사회가 읽어야 할 보편적 성찰의 기록이다.
Akiko Hashimoto의 < The Long Defeat: Cultural Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Japan >에 대한 요약 및 비평입니다.
The Long Defeat: Cultural Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Japan (Akiko Hashimoto, 2015)
Akiko Hashimoto’s The Long Defeat is a masterful sociological examination of how the trauma of World War II—Japan’s catastrophic defeat and subsequent moral fall—has not faded into history, but instead remains an indelible and continually resurfaced source of tension in contemporary Japanese society. The book challenges the notion of historical "amnesia" often applied to Japan, arguing instead that war memories are deeply embedded in everyday culture. Hashimoto asserts that the national experience of defeat generated a complex and enduring cultural trauma, forcing the nation to embark on a decades-long project of moral and social repair. This long defeat fuels the country’s current domestic political debates and the escalating diplomatic frictions in East Asia known as Japan's "history problem."
Summary: The Enduring Culture of Defeat
The central thesis of The Long Defeat is that the surrender in 1945 did not mark the end of the conflict, but merely the beginning of a prolonged and fractured cultural engagement with its legacy. Unlike a victorious nation, Japan, as the vanquished villain in the global World War II narrative, faced the unique predicament of regenerating collective life while burdened by a discredited past—a mixture of immense national suffering, military failure, and war guilt. Hashimoto builds on comparative studies of defeated nations, such as Wolfgang Schivelbusch’s work, but updates the analysis by incorporating the proliferating global culture of memory since the 1980s and grounding the study in specifically Japanese cultural contexts.
Hashimoto’s approach is rigorous and multidisciplinary, drawing on ethnography, personal interviews, and a vast array of popular memory data since the 1980s. Crucially, she moves beyond the conventional focus on "official memory" (formal statements by politicians and elites) to explore "popular memory"—the historical and moral understanding of the war found in families, schools, and popular culture. This bottom-up approach reveals that there is no coherent or unified narrative of the war in Japan; rather, multiple and often contradictory narratives coexist, creating a fractured national identity.
The book is structurally organized around the three primary preoccupations guiding Japan’s discourse of defeat: < national belonging >, < healing >, and < justice >. Hashimoto uses three detailed case-study chapters to illustrate the key memory narratives and their transmission:
Repairing Biographies and Aligning Family Memories: This chapter explores personal testimonies and how the trauma is narrated and passed down through generations. Hashimoto finds that within families, a soldier or civilian can simultaneously be remembered as a < perpetrator >, a tragic < victim > of senseless orders, and a fallen < hero >. The need to align personal trauma with national narratives often leads to ambiguity, but ensures that the memory remains potent, not suppressed.
Defeat Reconsidered: Heroes, Victims, and Perpetrators: This section analyzes representations in popular media (movies, documentaries, oral histories). The prevailing narratives often emphasize the victim aspect—the powerless soldiers and civilians who suffered and died in vain. This narrative evokes deep feelings of cultural trauma and serves as a powerful motivator for Japan’s postwar pacifism. However, Hashimoto notes that this focus on "powerless suffering" can inadvertently obscure the perpetrator responsibility of the wartime nation and foster an ethnocentric blindness to the suffering of others in Asia.
Pedagogies of War and Peace: Teaching World War II: Examining civics and history textbooks, as well as educational manga, Hashimoto demonstrates how the educational system encourages negative moral sentiments about the war. While this successfully promotes a "Just Say No" anti-war ethos, the pedagogy often simplifies the historical complexity. Postwar pacifism, born from the victim narrative, focuses heavily on the tragedy of mass death, yet sometimes fails to instill a clear understanding of how to resist an unjust authority, presenting the Japanese people as uniformly powerless victims of fate or their own military elite.
Review: Theoretical Richness and Critical Insights
The Long Defeat has been widely hailed as an essential contribution to the fields of sociology, history, and memory studies.
The book’s greatest strength lies in its theoretical sophistication and empirical rigor. Hashimoto masterfully integrates trauma theory with social memory literature, providing a compelling framework for understanding the national struggle to "repair the moral backbone of a broken society." Reviewers consistently praise her use of a wide trove of original data—from detailed interviews with war veterans' descendants to nuanced textual analysis of educational manga—which grounds the abstract concepts of cultural trauma in the texture of everyday Japanese life. By focusing on the micro-level (family and local education), she offers a powerful corrective to scholarship that prioritizes only high-level political disputes. Her insights into the cultural differences between the memory landscapes of Japan and postwar Germany, particularly concerning the concept of resistance and the nature of familial confrontation with war guilt, are particularly illuminating, urging scholars to consider how non-Western cultures process such violent legacies uniquely.
Furthermore, the book is praised for its timeliness and accessibility. It skillfully connects historical memory to present-day political struggles, such as the debate over collective self-defense and constitutional revision, making it highly relevant for anyone seeking to understand contemporary East Asian politics. Its clear, jargon-free prose ensures that the complex intellectual battles over Japan’s past are accessible to both academic specialists and a wider popular audience.
However, some reviewers have pointed out minor areas of unevenness in the analysis. For instance, the methodology applied to certain sections of media analysis (Chapter 3) has been questioned regarding its systematic nature. A more significant critique focuses on the book's final chapter, where Hashimoto outlines the three potential paths for Japan to achieve moral recovery and become a “normal nation”:
Nationalism: Seeking to erase stigma and restore national prestige.
Pacifism: Emphasizing non-violence as moral atonement.
Reconciliationism: Earning respect through responsibility and solidarity with former adversaries.
While the analysis of these three ideological currents—which correspond logically to the hero, victim, and perpetrator narratives—is strong, some critics found the conclusion lacking a coherent explanation of which path Japan is actively pursuing, or how the complex interactions among these competing narratives play out in the "big political picture" of regional diplomacy. The reality seems to be a frustrating mixture of all three, leaving the reader with a clear picture of the messiness of the memory landscape, but perhaps less clarity on the immediate political trajectory.
Conclusion
The Long Defeat stands as a seminal work in war memory studies. Akiko Hashimoto successfully demonstrates that Japan is not suffering from historical amnesia, but rather an ongoing, highly active, and deeply divisive struggle to process the trauma of defeat. By mapping the competing narratives—< Heroes > who died for the nation, < Victims > who suffered senselessly, and the lingering shadow of < Perpetrators >—she provides a penetrating analysis of how war memory is not a fixed platform, but a perpetually negotiated process that continues to shape Japanese identity. The book is essential reading for understanding why the politics of war memory in East Asia remain so volatile today, affecting international relations and the fundamental choices Japan must make about its future posture in the world. The depth of the research and the compelling nature of its central argument cement The Long Defeat as a major achievement.
(Word Count: Approximately 1,000 words)
No comments:
Post a Comment