2024-05-23

My Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel : Shavit, Ari: 2014

My Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel : Shavit, Ari: Amazon.com.au: Books
Kindle$2.19 Available instantly Audiobook




Ari ShavitAri Shavit

My Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel Paperback – 28 May 2014
by Ari Shavit (Author)

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 
4,997 ratings

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION Question Marks
  1. ONE At First Sight, 1897
  2. TWO Into the Valley, 1921
  3. THREE Orange Grove, 1936
  4. FOUR Masada, 1942
  5. FIVE Lydda, 1948
  6. SIX Housing Estate, 1957
  7. SEVEN The Project, 1967
  8. EIGHT Settlement, 1975
  9. NINE Gaza Beach, 1991
  10. TEN Peace, 1993
  11. ELEVEN J'Accuse, 1999
  12. TWELVE Sex, Drugs, and the Israeli Condition, 2000
  13. THIRTEEN Up the Galilee, 2003
  14. FOURTEEN Reality Shock, 2006
  15. FIFTEEN Occupy Rothschild, 2011
  16. SIXTEEN Existential Challenge, 2013
  17. SEVENTEEN By the Sea
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
SOURCE NOTES

===

An authoritative and deeply personal narrative history of the State of Israel, by one of the most influential journalists writing about the Middle East today.


Not since Thomas Friedman's groundbreaking From Beirut to Jerusalem has a book captured the Middle East as keenly and dynamically as My Promised Land. In this riveting narrative, Ari Shavit draws on interviews, historical documents, private diaries, and letters, as well as his own family's story, to illuminate the pivotal moments of the Zionist century. In doing so, he also sheds new light on the problems and threats that Israel is currently facing.


Beginning with his great-grandfather - a British Zionist who in 1897 visited the Holy Land on a Thomas Cook tour and understood that it was the way of the future for his people - Shavit recounts and analyses the diverse experiences of Israeli people, past and present- 
  • the idealist young farmer who first grew the Jaffa oranges that would create Palestine's booming economy; 
  • the immigrant orphans of Europe's Holocaust, who took on menial work and focused on raising their children to become the leaders of the new state; 
  • the zealous religious Zionists who started the settler movement in the 1970s; and 
  • today's architects of Israel's foreign policy with Iran, whose nuclear threat looms over the tiny country.


As it examines the complexities and contradictions of the Israeli condition, My Promised Land asks difficult but important questions- 
  • Why did Israel come to be? 
  • How did it come to be? 
  • Can Israel survive?
 Provocative, heartfelt, and powerfully compelling, this is a landmark portrait of a small, vibrant country living on the edge, whose identity and presence play a crucial role in today's global political landscape.

'Israel is not a proposition, it is a country. Its facticity is one of the great accomplishments of the Jews' history ... It is one of the achievements of Ari Shavit's important and powerful book to recover that feeling.'
-Leon Wieseltier, New York Times Book Review

' A gale of conversation, of feeling, of foreboding, of ratiocination ... takes a wide-angle and often personal view of Israel's past and present, and frequently reads like a love story and a thriller at once. That it ultimately becomes a book of lamentation, a moral cri de coeur and a ghost story tightens its hold on your imagination.'
-Dwight Garner, The New York Times

French cri du cœur, meaning approximately “a cry from the heart”.

'I can think of no better time for a good book about Israel - the real Israel, not the fantasy, do-no-wrong Israel peddled by its most besotted supporters or the do-no-right colonial monster portrayed by its most savage critics. 

Ari Shavit, the popular Haaretz columnist, has come out with just such a book ... The uniqueness of Shavit's book is that when you're done with it you can understand, respect or love Israel - but not in a dogmatic or unthinking way, and not a fake or contrived Israel. Shavit celebrates the Zionist man-made miracle - from its start-ups to its gay bars - while remaining affectionate, critical, realistic and morally anchored ... It's why his book is a real contribution to changing the conversation about Israel and building a healthier relationship with it. Before their next 90-minute phone call, both Barack and Bibi should read it.'
-Thomas Friedman, New York Times


Print length464 pages

Book Description

An authoritative and deeply personal narrative history of the State of Israel, by one of the most influential journalists writing about the Middle East today.

About the Author
Ari Shavit is a leading Israeli columnist and writer. Born in Rehovot, Israel, Shavit served as a paratrooper in the IDF and studied philosophy at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. In the early 1990s he was Chairperson of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, and in 1995 he joined Haaretz, where he serves on the editorial board. He is married, has a daughter and two sons, and lives in Kfar Shmaryahu.


Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Follow

Ari Shavit



Ari Shavit is a leading Israeli columnist and writer. Born in Rehovot, Israel, Shavit served as a paratrooper in the IDF and studied philosophy at the Hebrew University in Jersualem. In the 1980s he wrote for the progressive weekly Koteret Rashit, in the early 1990s he was chairperson of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, and in 1995 he joined Haaretz, where he serves on the editorial board. Shavit is also a leading commentator on Israeli public television. He is married, has a daughter and two sons, and lives in Kfar Shmariahu.

Customers say

Customers find the content enlightening, uncomfortable, and worthwhile. They also appreciate the non-judgmental analysis and well-written style.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn moreContent
Writing style





Top reviews

Top reviews from Australia


Sydney reader

5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent commentary on Israel's historyReviewed in Australia on 22 June 2014
Verified Purchase
This book is a personal history by the author of the history of Israel as lived by his family. While an unfailing Zionist he takes as much care as possible to be fair and put the Palestinian point of view. This is not the book for those seeking a conventional history of the country,excellently presents a portrait of the Israel of today, its triumphs and challenges. I particularly liked the early chapters dealing with the first Zionists of 1897 and the 1930s, as I had no prior knowledge of these events. While I imagine this book has plenty to enrage those on both sides of the Arab/Jew debate, it is a useful addition to our understanding of Israel.

One person found this helpful


HelpfulReport

Movielover

4.0 out of 5 stars Israel's History with Balanced PerspectiveReviewed in Australia on 1 July 2014
Verified Purchase
Shavit is from the Liberal side of Israeli politics and reader is cautioned to be mindful of this. The book itself provides an insightful historical review of how Zionists settled the land and created a vibrant, democratic society where before there was very little. 

The book also provides an uncomfortable, detailed and well-researched history of how the 700,000 Palestinians living in Israel in 1948 came to leave the land. This is important reading for Jews, Zionists or not, in order to dispel the oft-run storyline that Palestinians left willingly in order to allow Arab armies an unimpeded path to overrun Israel immediately post independence in 1948. It is painful but necessary reading.
The book is engagingly written as the reader would expect from a journalist. Enjoyable, enlightening and uncomfortable but very worthwhile.

One person found this helpful


HelpfulReport

S.B. D. (Darwin)

5.0 out of 5 stars A moving readReviewed in Australia on 25 April 2024
Verified Purchase
Israel is an extremely complex nation often poorly understood, for better and worse. This author avoids hyperbolic praise and faces that complexity ethically.



HelpfulReport

Angelface

5.0 out of 5 stars Honest analysis with both narrativesReviewed in Australia on 5 October 2014
Verified Purchase
Brilliant analysis of the Israel - Palestinian conflict. Shavit is honest in declaring his position and attempting to understand the dual narrative leading to the tragedy it is today. The book's strength lies in its non-judgemental analysis. If one is to read one book on Israel today, this should be it. Beautifully written too.



HelpfulReport

Stephen Shelton

5.0 out of 5 stars An objective look at the past, present and future of IsraelReviewed in Australia on 17 January 2020
Verified Purchase
Whatever your politics, this book will help you understand the Israeli dilemma.



HelpfulReport

carl s rathus

4.0 out of 5 stars I think this is a very useful book.Reviewed in Australia on 20 July 2015
Verified Purchase
I thought the way pivotal or instructive moments in Israel's history worked very well. Certainly my understanding of the forces at play was deepened. Mostly I found the author clear-headed and insightful in his analysis. However the inherent problem of Zionism, that Palestine belongs to two different tribes, while discussed at length throughout, was brushed aside in the final chapter, where a more chauvinistic position emerged. Despite this, and to some extent, because of this weakness, I think this is a very useful book.



HelpfulReport


preeta chag
4.0 out of 5 stars The author's journey into the land’s birth, occupation, existence and survival. A good read
Reviewed in India on 20 December 2023
Verified Purchase

“We dwell under the looming shadow of a smoking volcano.”

Written in 2013, the words of this book hold true even today for Israel, a land that is so permanently on-the-edge.

‘A Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel’ by Ari Shavit is a personal introspection of the author into the land’s birth, occupation, existence and survival. As he writes in the beginning, “This book is the personal odyssey of one Israeli who is bewildered by the historic drama engulfing his homeland.”

The author is a proud Israeli, but with no blinkers on. He knows the nation is born from blood and intimidation. He condemns the brutality inflicted on the Palestinians, but he also professes the need of survival. Ari Shavit lays bare the duality of each chapter of the country’s existence.

Terror perpetrated. Terror suffered. Occupation. Intimidation. Tales of brutality. Tales of prevailing. A nation whose origin and living is enshrined in blood and violence.

‘My Promised Land’ begins with a journey of the group of early Zionists who travelled from London to Jaffa led by Rt Honorable Herbert Bentwich, the author’s great grandfather.

The book is divided into 17 chapters, each chapter dealing with the journey of the country and its evolution with tales of horror and dread, along with fortitude and courage.

In Chapter 2, Into the Valley, the author Ari Shavit describes dramatically, the entry into the Valley of Harod. The seeds of Israel are sown. And comes into existence a state whose sustenance will always be defined by the intimidation it is surrounded with and the cruelty it inflicts.

Israel is a nation born from a steely determination. Chapter 4 Masada is spine-chilling in its intensity of courage and commitment. Shmaryahu Gutman was the chief person instrumental in turning Masada from a symbol of defeat, death, and destruction to an ethos of unification of Hebrew youth. A formative set of New Zionism. The first journey in January 1942 was the beginning of a movement. A cacophony of strong resolution and fervent energy.

But Israel is also a land born from spilled blood, coercion, and forced occupation. Chapter 5, Lydda. The dark chapter of expulsion and destruction. “If Zionism was to be, Lydda could not be.” The chapter is a gory reminder of the law of the jungle-the survival of the fittest.

A nation of conflicting stories and identities, Chapter 6, Housing Estate are stories of endurance. The stories of the four fatal survivors are stories of despair, torment, loneliness, and finally, survival.

Professor Sternhell. “From the age of seven, I had no one to talk to. …..I erased everything.”

Aharon Applefield. “From village to village, from forest to forest. I survived like a field animal.”

Aharon Barak. “My mother and I lived in the one and a half meters between the walls for six months.”

Louis Aynachi. “The world had shifted from its natural course. The impossible had happened.”

Ari Shavat has narrated four of the stories of around 7,50,000 Jewish refugees who arrived in Israel between 1945 and 1951. Stark. Brutal. Incisive. Compassionate. This influx of refugees necessitated the national projects of the 1950’s of Housing, Agricultural settlement, and Industrialisation setting in motion the establishment of the state of Israel.

Chapter 11, J’Accuse deals with the integration of Oriental Jews into the mainstream Israel. The whole chapter dwells on the tortured soul of citizens yet finding ways to belong. Way to integrate. Way to be one. Way to be Israeli.

The author has, in the end, defined seven circles of threat to the country: Islamic, Arabic, Palestinian, internal, mental, moral, and identity-based. And his biggest question is: the survival of Israel.

“Our cities seemed to be built on shifting sand. Our houses never seemed quite stable.”

The book is a reflection: questions seeking answers, the right questioning the wrong, and the light wanting to embrace the dark.

“Both occupation and intimidation make the Israeli condition unique. Intimidation and occupation have become the two pillars of our condition.”

Ari Shavat is self-questioning, self-explaining. The book seems a catharsis of his inner conflict, his dilemma, his country’s dilemma, and his adversaries’ dilemma.

“We dwell under the looming shadow of a smoking volcano.”
Read more

One person found this helpfulReport

Brendan Ryan
5.0 out of 5 stars a profound and nuanced explorationReviewed in Spain on 23 May 2023
Verified Purchase

"My Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel" by Ari Shavit offers a profound and nuanced exploration of the historical, political, and societal complexities that have shaped the state of Israel. Shavit presents a deeply personal and introspective account, blending meticulous research, interviews, and personal anecdotes to shed light on Israel's past, present, and future.

What makes this book truly captivating is Shavit's ability to navigate the multifaceted nature of Israel's story. He delves into the triumphs, examining Israel's remarkable achievements in various fields, such as science, technology, and agriculture. Through vibrant storytelling, Shavit conveys the spirit of determination, innovation, and resilience that has characterized the nation.

However, alongside the triumphs, Shavit confronts the tragic aspects and moral dilemmas that have plagued Israel throughout its existence. He explores the conflicting narratives, complex relationships with neighboring countries, and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The author does not shy away from addressing the difficult questions and the moral challenges faced by Israel as it strives to reconcile its ideals with the realities of its existence.

Shavit's writing style is eloquent, evocative, and introspective, immersing readers in the rich tapestry of Israel's history. He brings the people and places to life, allowing readers to feel a personal connection to the stories he shares. From the early Zionist pioneers to the struggles of different communities within Israel, Shavit captures the essence of the diverse voices that make up the nation.

While the book provides an insightful analysis of Israel, it is worth noting that Shavit's perspective leans towards a more liberal Zionist viewpoint. Some readers might appreciate his candidness and self-reflection, while others may desire a more balanced examination of the issues presented.

"My Promised Land" is a thought-provoking and comprehensive account of Israel's journey, offering readers a deeper understanding of the complexities, contradictions, and aspirations that shape the nation. It is a valuable resource for anyone seeking to explore the intricate layers of Israeli society, history, and identity.

==

Ari Shavit의 "나의 약속의 땅: 이스라엘의 승리와 비극"은 이스라엘 국가를 형성해 온 역사적, 정치적, 사회적 복잡성에 대한 심오하고 미묘한 탐구를 제공합니다. Shavit은 이스라엘의 과거, 현재, 미래를 조명하기 위해 세심한 연구, 인터뷰 및 개인적인 일화를 혼합하여 매우 개인적이고 성찰적인 이야기를 제시합니다.

이 책을 정말 매력적으로 만드는 것은 이스라엘 이야기의 다면적인 성격을 탐색하는 Shavit의 능력입니다. 그는 과학, 기술, 농업 등 다양한 분야에서 이스라엘이 이룩한 놀라운 성과를 조사하면서 승리를 탐구합니다. 생생한 스토리텔링을 통해 Shavit은 국가의 특징인 결단력, 혁신, 회복력의 정신을 전달합니다.

그러나 승리와 함께 샤빗은 이스라엘의 존재 전체를 괴롭혀온 비극적 측면과 도덕적 딜레마에 직면하게 됩니다. 그는 상충되는 이야기, 이웃 국가와의 복잡한 관계, 현재 진행 중인 이스라엘-팔레스타인 분쟁을 탐구합니다. 저자는 이스라엘이 자신의 이상과 존재의 현실을 조화시키려고 노력하면서 직면한 어려운 질문과 도덕적 도전에 대해 언급하는 것을 주저하지 않습니다.

Shavit의 문체는 웅변적이고, 암시적이며, 성찰적이어서 독자들을 이스라엘 역사의 풍부한 태피스트리에 몰입하게 만듭니다. 그는 사람과 장소에 생기를 불어넣어 독자들이 자신이 공유하는 이야기에 개인적인 연결감을 느낄 수 있도록 합니다. 초기 시오니스트 개척자부터 이스라엘 내 다양한 ​​공동체의 투쟁까지, Shavit은 국가를 구성하는 다양한 목소리의 본질을 포착합니다.

이 책은 이스라엘에 대한 통찰력 있는 분석을 제공하지만 Shavit의 관점이 보다 자유주의적인 시오니스트 관점으로 기울어져 있다는 점은 주목할 가치가 있습니다. 어떤 독자들은 그의 솔직함과 자기 성찰을 높이 평가할 수도 있고, 다른 독자들은 제시된 문제에 대해 보다 균형 잡힌 검토를 원할 수도 있습니다.

"나의 약속의 땅"은 이스라엘의 여정에 대한 생각을 자극하고 포괄적인 설명으로, 독자들에게 국가를 형성하는 복잡성, 모순 및 열망에 대한 더 깊은 이해를 제공합니다. 이 책은 이스라엘 사회, 역사, 정체성의 복잡한 층위를 탐구하려는 모든 사람에게 귀중한 자료입니다.
===


Josefine Schrauber
5.0 out of 5 stars ZeitreiseReviewed in Germany on 2 January 2021
Verified Purchase

Sehr interessantes Buch, eine Perspektive in jüngere Geschichte und gesellschaftliche Veränderungen eines heutzutage medial so präsenten Gebietes. Es liest sich in etwa wie eine Zeitreise, v.a. durch's 20. Jhd. Ich will noch mehr VON Leuten der Region lesen, als häufig nur ÜBER sie.

One person found this helpfulReport
Translate review to English


Gerardo Miranda
5.0 out of 5 stars Buen libroReviewed in Mexico on 31 December 2018
Verified Purchase

Excelente libro para leerlo, recomendado.
Es la versión en inglés pero puedes obtener la versión en español si buscas un poco.
Report
Translate review to English


William
5.0 out of 5 stars NecessaryReviewed in Brazil on 5 February 2017
Verified Purchase

Excellent text written by Ari Shavit. It doesn't matter if you're left, center, or right, a necessary book to try to understand in more depth the roots of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

3 people found this helpfulReport

Translated from Portuguese by Amazon
See original ·Report translation


===
Displaying 1 - 10 of 1,210 reviews
Profile Image for Lisa Lieberman.
Author 13 books182 followers
February 21, 2022
Where you’re standing makes a big difference in how you feel about Ari Shavit’s book. I started My Promised Land five months ago, during the tenuous cease-fire following last summer’s conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. What struck me most forcefully, then, was the willful blindness of Zionist pioneers such as Shavit’s great-grandfather, Herbert Bentwich, who came to Palestine from Britain in the 1890s full of hope, intent on creating a sanctuary for Europe’s Jews regardless of the consequences for the land’s existing inhabitants.

Despite the idealism, hard work, and heroism that characterized the founding generation—the Kibbutz-builders, the orange-growers, the ardent young people dancing by firelight in the desert—it all came down to displacement. Shavit was telling the story of how the blindness of Israel’s founding generation played out through statehood and beyond, through the many wars and the rare peaceful lulls when the nation grew and prospered. The “erasure” (his word) of Palestinian villages such as Lydda, the forced emigration of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, the settlers’ fanaticism, the racism and injustice at the core of the “revolution” (his word) that forged a sovereign state where only Jews (and predominantly Ashkenazim) enjoy full rights and myriad opportunities for education and economic advancement: this seemed to be the story he was telling.

I knew that story all too well. As a liberal-minded American Jew and as a modern French historian interested in the postwar era, I’ve thought long and hard about Israel’s place in the world, from the anti-Semitism that sparked the Zionist vision, the nationalism that shaped it, the social engineering characteristic of left-wing utopian ideologies that defined its spirit for decades, to the Holocaust trauma so often employed by its defenders (among them my teachers in religious school) as sufficient justification for anything Israel did.

In an essay I published during the second intifada (which happened to come out right after 9/11), I laid bare the contradictions I felt in commenting publicly, as a Jew, on Israel’s actions. I’ve subsequently written on the Tunisian Jewish writer Albert Memmi’s troubling about-face regarding French decolonization and on the moral cost of France’s Dirty War in Algeria. I’ve advocated for peace and justice for both sides of the Israel/Palestine conflict for most of my adult life, although I’ve despaired in recent years, I will admit.

My Promised Land wasn’t challenging my views, and that’s probably why I set it aside, halfway through. Sure, Shavit told the story nicely, but I’d rather use my serious reading time to prod myself, or to learn something new. If I had finished the book in September, I probably would have been disappointed by the ending, because Shavit winds up doing an about-face of his own. “We probably had to come,” he writes. “And when we came here, we performed wonders. For better or worse, we did the unimaginable.” It takes blindness and fanaticism to create a miracle and sustain it against the various crises Israel has confronted and continues to endure, he argues, the external threats to its very existence, the internal disunity, inequality, and corruption that undermine the state’s moral foundation. Not to mention the terrorist threat posed by Islamic radicals both within and outside of Israel’s borders.

Ah, I would have said to myself in September. I’ve heard that complaint before. French critics of the war their government was waging against Algerian terrorists in the 1950s worried more about their nation’s soul, it often seemed, than about the actual suffering of the Algerians. And how about that nostalgia for the boy and girl pioneers, the plucky orange growers, the self-abnegating kibbutzniks? Shavit exposes the denial that even “bleeding-heart Israeli liberals” (his words) resort to for what it is, the disingenuousness of expressing outrage at the injustices faced by present-day Palestinians while failing to address the consequences of the 1948 Palestinian exodus, (the catastrophe, or Nakba, as Palestinians call it). He himself will not deny the “brutal deed” (his term), but nor will he beat his breast in anguish to salve his conscience. Without the Nakba, after all, he would not exist.

Last Tuesday I was on my way to Puerto Rico for a vacation and there was My Promised Land, beckoning from the home screen of my Kindle. I resumed reading it on the plane, kept with it this time, even taking it along to the beach. When the Charlie Hebdo massacre occurred, I found myself reacting to Shavit’s story in an entirely different way. He is no apologist for Israel’s past, although he admires the miracle of his nation’s founding, “the élan vital of a young nation fighting adamantly while believing that its will to live would overcome the death surrounding it.” (I told you he writes well.) He is dismayed by present-day Israeli society, seeing the hedonism and materialism of the elite, and of the young in particular, as a betrayal of Zionist values. A failure of will. Almost despite himself, he admires the vitality and ingenuity of the modern capitalist state. After all, “Zionism was about regenerating Jewish vitality,” he grudgingly admits.

What gripped me, though, was Shavit’s pessimism about the future. The chickens are coming home to roost.
As I look out at the land Herbert Bentwich left behind in the end of April 1897, I wonder how long we can maintain our miraculous survival story. One more generation? Two? Three? Eventually the hand holding the sword itself must loosen its grip. Eventually the sword itself will rust. No nation can face the world surrounding it for over a hundred years with a jutting spear.
Sitting on the beach in Puerto Rico while French authorities hunted for the murderers, with the news full of reports about Muslim anger at the West, Shavit’s final question hit a nerve. “How long can we sustain this lunacy?”
Profile Image for Orsodimondo [part time reader at the moment].
2,288 reviews2,163 followers
November 6, 2022
LIFE IN THE BALANCE

description
Palestine, the promised land, 1930.

Ari Shavit, born in 1957, is a third generation Israeli. He was a paratrooper in the occupied territories during the naja, an activist in the pacifist movement, he writes for Haaretz (which some define as the only Palestinian newspaper in Hebrew), collaborates with the New Yorker, and with this book he decided to challenge the dogmas of the right and the left .
It is not a history book in the academic sense, says Ari Shavit, (and those in use in Israeli schools should be rewritten, I say), but a personal journey into Israel's past and present: through the telling of dozens of stories of individual Israelis, seeks to tell the story of the country. In fact, it begins in 1897 with the arrival of a group of Zionists in Palestine, including his great-grandfather, Herbert Bentwich.

To tell the stories of individuals, and the larger story of Israel, Shavit read and studied family documents, his own and those of many others, travel notes, newspaper and magazine articles, did interviews, met people even passing through three days in a row listening to their stories, he consulted archives, listened to recordings, studied thousands of documents and read hundreds of books. He tried to tell the history of his country through the individual stories of some of its inhabitants, through a rigorous process of data collection and fact checking.
To arrive at a book made of people. It is the story of Israel as seen by individual Israelis, like me ,” concludes Shavit.

description
Beno Rothenberg: Deporting the women of al-Tantura, 1948.

A beautiful book, which tells the story of a country that is extremely fascinating to me. A country with shadows, many, many, and lights, also many lights, many.
The Jewish state is like no other nation. It has to offer neither security, nor well-being, nor peace of mind, but the intensity of always living to the extreme .
Israel is the only Western nation that occupies the territory of another people. And it is also the only Western state whose very existence is threatened.
There is nothing easy when it comes to Israel and Zionism: Shavit manages to write outside of any propaganda, he knows how to tell both the miracle and the faults.

In a singular way, Shavit decides to dedicate little time and space to wars, apart from the so-called war of independence, that of 1948 immediately following the end of the English Mandate, and which led to the birth of the State of Israel.
And precisely this crucial moment is also the one where his narrative convinces me the least, in my opinion it breaks down.

description
Robert Capa: Haifa, Arriving Immigrants, 1949-50.

I wonder how Zionism could have been that positive, beautiful, peaceful, revolutionary, egalitarian force, with tinges of pure socialism, as Shavit describes it, if the paramilitary organization Haganah had already existed since the 1920s (integrated into the armed forces after 1948 Israeli). How is it possible that the mutation occurred within a few months close to the fateful 1948, if well before the English abandoned Palestine there were already lists of Arab targets and enemies to be eliminated (but Shavit doesn't mention it).
Shavit presents it as an inevitable transformation: faced with Arab violence, the Zionists responded with equal violence. According to others, however, and they are much more historical than Shavit, Arab violence occurred precisely in response to Zionist violence, and never of the same consistency.

description
Micha Bar-Am, 1930.

The final sensation, the predominant one, is that Shavit's story condenses into a self-absolution based on the absolute tragedy of being, on the fact that the two peoples both legitimately aspiring to the earth have no other viable path beyond that of an atavistic and eternal conflict .
A feeling more than supported by similar assertions by Shavit:
Perhaps this multiple removal was necessary, otherwise it would have been impossible to move forward, build, live. For Zionism to succeed, stubborn indifference was necessary in the first decades of the 20th century. Now, for Israel to succeed in its first ten years of existence, a lack of awareness was essential. If Israel had admitted what had happened it would not have survived. If he had been accommodating and compassionate, he would have collapsed. In the young country where I was born, denial was a matter of life and death.

description
Dalia Amotz.

One wonders if right now that the rest of the world is distracted, concentrated on other hot spots on the planet, if right now that the Middle Eastern question has other nations in the spotlight (Syria first and foremost), if it might not be right now that a glimmer of be open to Palestinians and Israelis to directly negotiate a modus vivendi between them.
And perhaps start thinking about alternatives to the two-state solution, such as a single state, in which we can live together in equality and parity.

Israel in the 1950s was a state on anabolics: more and more people, more and more cities, more and more villages, more and more of everything. And despite vertiginous growth, social differences were almost non-existent. The government was committed to ensuring that everyone could work and that every citizen had a home, job, education and healthcare. The new state was one of the most democratic in the world. However, Israel was also a pragmatic nation capable of aggressively combining modernity, nationalism and development. There was no time or serenity, therefore any type of human sensitivity was also missing. As the state became all that mattered, the individual was marginalized. As Israel marched toward its future, it erased the past. There was no more room for the old territory, nor the previous identities. Everything was done en masse. Everything was imposed from above. And everything had an artificial quality. Zionism was no longer an organic process, but a coup worthy of a futurist avant-garde…There was no room for human rights, civil rights, regular trials and economic liberalism. No equality for the Palestinian minority, no mercy for its refugees. Little respect for the Jewish diaspora and little compassion for the survivors of the Shoah.

description
The Masada fortress.

1957, eleven years after the founding of the State of Israel: Israel is now the most stable and advanced nation in the Middle East. It is the most extraordinary melting pot of the 20th century. The Jewish State is a miracle made by human hands. Of course, this miracle is based on repression. The nation I was born in wiped Palestine off the face of the planet. It razed its villages to the ground with bulldozers, confiscated its land with warrants, revoked its inhabitants' citizenship rights, destroying their homeland. Israel removed Palestine. At the time of my birth, my grandparents, my parents and their friends live their lives as if the other people had never existed.

description
Star of David.
Profile Image for Jan Rice.
549 reviews493 followers
April 2, 2015
To begin my review of My Promised Land, I decided to talk some cognitive psychology:

It is the consistency of the information that matters for a good story, not its completeness. Indeed, you will often find that knowing little makes it easier to fit everything you know into a coherent pattern. Thinking, Fast and Slow, p. 87

Narrative fallacies arise inevitably from our continuous attempt to make sense of the world. The explanatory stories that people find compelling are simple; are concrete rather than abstract; assign a larger role to talent, stupidity, and intentions than to luck; and focus on a few striking events that happened rather than on the countless events that failed to happen. Any recent salient event is a candidate to become a kernel of a causal narrative. ...

Good stories provide a simple and coherent account of people's actions and intentions. You are always ready to interpret behavior as a manifestation of general propensities and personality traits--causes that you can readily match to effects. ... The halo effect helps keep explanatory narratives simple and coherent by exaggerating the consistency of evaluations: good people do only good things and bad people do only bad. ...

Paradoxically, it is easier to construct a coherent story when you know little, when there are fewer pieces to fit into the puzzle. Our comforting conviction that the world makes sense rests on a secure foundation: our almost unlimited ability to ignore our ignorance. T,F&S, pp. 199-201


I've started with quotes from the Nobel laureate and 2013 Presidential Medal of Freedom winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman since people have so many and often such diametrically opposed stories about Israel. The psychology points out how that can be.

When it comes to Israel, people are polarized. On the whole if we have a story we are comfortable with, we resist messing with it. On the whole people seek to confirm what we already believe. But Ari Shavit's book doesn't fit well within a simplistic story. There's just too much, too many stories, too many points of view, to do that. That's the main value of this book. Moreover the people and places come across vividly.

Ari Shavit is a left-of-center Israeli journalist for Haaretz who's telling his family story intertwined with a multiplicity of other Israeli stories. His great-grandfather, "a romantic, a Jew, and a Victorian gentleman," toured Palestine in 1897 and then emigrated from England, followed by most of his family. That story is followed by personalities and situations from before the world wars all the way up to the present day and Obama and Iran.

I think the book comes across even-handed. But that's probably because I lean to the Left as Shavit does. Similarly, he greatly pleases Leon Wieseltier. Elliott Abrams, perhaps predictably, less so. I wish I could link to his article in the spring 2014 issue of Jewish Review of Books, but it's locked. He thinks Shavit occasionally indulges in over-confessing, beyond what the facts support, I mean, and then adopts a tragic-hero posture about that. Abrams did raise some new facts. For example, not all the Arabs had been on the land for generations, as the story goes. Some had come recently from other parts of the Middle East, for instance, when the Jewish immigrants got the citrus-growing industry started and had good jobs and improved living standards to offer. Quoting the revisionist Israeli historian Benny Morris, Abrams also thought Shavit over-simplified the Lydda episode during the 1948 war of independence--the excerpt published in the Oct. 21, 2013 New Yorker. Shavit portrays those events as a premeditated expulsion and killings, and he then places that episode at the heart of Israel's existential status, while for Morris they were part of what was, at the time, a civil war, with outside aid for the Palestinians (presumably) coming from their Arab brothers. It was three years after the Holocaust, and a war for survival for the Israelis that would have been a "vast slaughter" had they lost.

What did I learn that was new? This was the first time I heard the peasants on the land referred to as "serfs." And I think that's right. There were wealthy Ottoman owners, their estates, and their serfs. I did not know that the Jews in Israel are majority Sephardi, that is, Jews from Arab lands. That means not "white." That'll mess with some narratives. I heard the term "White Ashkenazi Supporters of Peace" (WASPs!) used for the first time. I learned a lot about Israel's nuclear status--all that stuff that's not acknowledged. I learned about the past bombing of the nuclear facilities in Iraq and Syria. Did I really need to know that much about the night life? I got a better picture of history and mood. I got a lot of confrontation with the term "Oriental" as applied to the Sephardi. In fact, I know it was a past convention to think of the Middle East as "East" and "Oriental," and "Orientalism" as the study of the people of the Middle East--which is a whole other colonialist story in its own right. Oh, and I got a better feel for why Israel can't just correct its settlement problem, any more than the opponent Arab countries can simply pick up and change certain proclivities.

I wasn't really "in the mood" to read this book. I did it for the book club. Since I wasn't in the mood I put off getting the book and ended up with a forced read through the (for me) bleak Kindle terrain. The book wasn't hard to read. It went fast; there was just a lot of it. Abrams pointed out that Ari Shavit has been called "Apocalypse Now, Apocalypse Forever" for his tendency to characterize every year as the critical year, the 11th hour, or the last chance. I noticed, too, that just about every young woman who shows up in this book is "a beauty."

Despite all the glowing reviews I knew it wasn't a 5-star book. You learn but it is not revolutionary or life-changing. It's good journalism.

Back to my opening comments--those who tend toward the pro-Israel are going to look askance at some of the confessional material and tone. But it's not quite as across the board as it may seem from my brief allusions. Those who tend in the other direction may be dismissive of Shavit's loving his country and not condemning it out of hand. I've already seen some letters-to-the-editor of that nature.

As for me, it's amazing to see how precise and analytic we can be of the next person or group, while having, to borrow a phrase, a log in our own eye. My latest learning about polemic is that its focus is most laser-like on what is similar. Israel/Jews are now similar to all these other countries so the job of polemic is to create distinction and make that similarity invisible. Can you believe that the Jews of the late 19th century believed they were hated because they were stateless, and that their situation would normalize once they had one?

Ari Shavit looked at just about every point of view you can imagine, but he didn't have anything to say--didn't analyze--those who are looking at Israel, other than seeming to accept it, I think, as a judgment. I mean, he could say that, yes, Israel has regional power, and then he could step outside that view and say that, given the population numbers and territory, the surrounding Arab countries hold the power trump card. I wish he'd looked back at the lookers, the judges, and analyzed them, as he did just about everything else!

Well, I'm running out of steam, and may have been working with a dearth of steam from the outset, anyway.

Since there were a couple of links I couldn't include (missing links?--ha!), here are a couple. Shavit's peace proposal from The New Republic. Well, maybe I'll stop with that for now.

And one more psychological reference from Kahneman: knowing one's own biases can contribute to peace in interpersonal relationships. Why not in the world at large?
Profile Image for Elyse Walters.
4,010 reviews11.3k followers
September 17, 2015
Facing unprecedented internal and external pressures, Israel today is at a moment of
existential crisis.
Ari Shavit draws on interviews, historical documents, private diaries,
and letters, as well as his own family story, illuminating the pivotal moments of the
Zionist century to tell a riveting narrative that is larger than the sum of its parts: both
personal and national, both deeply human and of profound historical dimension.

It's clear Shavit, a secular leftist, loves his country, but is conflicted about the founding of Israel and the conflicts. He's a strong believer in a two-state solution. He pretty much ignores
the Biblical promise of the land to the people of Israel.
There is chapter in the book in which Shavit describes the expulsion of the Arabs of Lydda ...
( now Lod), in 1948. He shows great sympathy for the Palestinian Arabs.
There are moving parts of the book -- especially when Young Holocaust survivors made a new life with himself in Israel.
Kibbutz builders, Orange growers, Young people dancing in the desert, came together from
their displacement.
Then there is a chapter in the book -- titled 'The New Yorker',... which seems to be the
most anti-Israel section in the book.
Shavit's aim was to be 'fair' ....but 'The New Yorker' chapter was a little depressing. It 'seems' it's only a matter of time until Israel will no longer be 'A Promised Land'.
I feel it's the right thing to do: to split the land- (yet, I have my own memories and history Israel with Kibbutz life, family in Israel, etc .... and have emotional attachments).
The problems are complex......gut -wrenching rendering of a very distressing road traveled by both parties.
Ari Shavit did an excellent job with this book... capturing the essence and beating heartbeat of the Middle East.

Well worth reading!
Profile Image for Jenny.
99 reviews83 followers
December 28, 2013
This is by far the best book of non-ficion I've read this year, and certainly the one that brought me closest to understanding Israel, and along with it the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

What made this book different from all of the other books I've read about this subject so far is that unlike most other authors Shavit focuses on the micro rather than the macro. It tells the story of Israel and the Zionist utopian project that was the beginning of what we now know as Israel, by providing very little handy political facts. No chapter on the Yom Kippur War or on any of the other wars or Camp Davids that in most books about Israel or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would define the face of the country portrayed. Instead Shavit zooms in. On people, on certain events and places. He makes the macro comprehensible by focusing in on the micro. And he does so with a deep passion for Israel and its people, and at the same time an astonishing ability to capture the state of moral ambiguity that Israel has been living in since day one.
Profile Image for Emma Deplores Goodreads Censorship.
1,239 reviews1,408 followers
November 23, 2015
This is not an ideological review. I chose this book not due to any special interest in Israel, but for my world books challenge. For those keeping score at home, my book from Palestine got 2 stars as well. I suspect this is not a coincidence, and that both books’ inflated averages result from ideological/emotional ratings interfering with honest evaluations of their merits.

My Promised Land is a long opinion piece, including a partial history of Israel and a smattering of memoir. Shavit makes no bones about his political views – he’s a liberal Israeli journalist and one-time peace activist – and much of the book consists of his wrestling with the fact that Israel has done and continues to do some awful things, and yet it is his homeland, a country with impressive accomplishments and which he loves very much. His ultimate conclusion is that he’s willing to accept the wrongs Israel committed in order to come into existence (i.e. the expulsion of the Palestinians in 1948), though he condemns the occupation beginning in 1967. It is balanced enough that he’s drawn criticism from both directions – some reviewers blasting him as an Israeli apologist, others as anti-Israel – and while I don’t necessarily agree with him, I do appreciate his wrestling with these issues, when most people would rather not think about the wrongs our own countries have committed. Toward the end Shavit also expresses a great deal of concern about Israel’s future, faced with both internal and external challenges.

Unfortunately, overall I found this book to be repetitive, long-winded and sentimental. One of Shavit’s favorite subjects is the contrast between the tough, suntanned Israeli farmers and warriors and their ancestors, the passive, servile European Jews – yes, these are his descriptions, and he brings them up frequently. Several chapters go into detail about the cultivation projects that apparently transformed the Jewish psyche, and just when you think that’s finished, he’s back with another immigrant story along the same line.

So the history sections were hit or miss for me, but mostly miss. My favorite chapter was “Housing Estate, 1957,” which details the life stories of several newcomers during that decade and the impressive measures Israel took to house and absorb a massive wave of immigrants. Yet that was probably the only chapter I enjoyed. Several chapters go into detail on rather eccentric topics: for example, a youth leaders’ camping trip to Masada in 1942, or the hardcore nightlife of the early 2000s. Other chapters would make sense in a history book, but this is a personal work that doesn’t claim to be comprehensive history, and having chosen this rather than a textbook, I wasn’t looking for every detail about who signed what agreement with whom regarding the Israeli nuclear program, for instance.

Meanwhile, some major topics are mentioned only in passing, such as the wave of Russian immigration in the 1990s, or the lack of assimilation of the ultra-Orthodox, many of whom don’t work but rather receive subsidies for religious study. There’s an odd chapter about a Sephardic leader, in which Shavit asserts repeatedly that the Israelis of Middle Eastern and North African origin are “oppressed” and “downtrodden” without ever explaining in what way – he does tell us they comprise half the population and that they aren’t discriminated against in housing or employment, but by some unclear means their culture is being destroyed? I could have done with more explanation of that, and fewer passages about lemon and orange groves, or sex in nightclub bathrooms.

At any rate, Shavit makes some odd choices about what material to cover, perhaps determined by whom he was able to interview. He does include interviews with many prominent Israelis, some of them protagonists in important chapters in the country’s history. The book does not show quite the breadth he claims in the acknowledgments (“Jews and Arabs, men and women”) – Shavit includes interviews with many Israeli men, a handful of Israeli women, and three Palestinian men. It’s telling that even this author, a prominent liberal journalist, barely knows any Palestinians; how many Palestinians must a typical Israeli know, and vice versa? But Shavit does a good job of including (Jewish) voices with which he disagrees, giving them space to talk and not vilifying opposing viewpoints.

(As a side note, Shavit is a bizarre interviewer, at times lecturing his subjects and including his lectures verbatim in the book, other times asking questions like, “So what is the crux of your story? And what is the crux of the Oriental Israeli story? Do the two really converge?”)

But in the end, this book simply failed to hold my interest over its 400+ pages, and seemed far too long for the amount of material presented. Perhaps worthwhile for those with a strong interest in Israel, but I would advise casual readers to steer clear.
Profile Image for Iris P.
171 reviews216 followers
January 6, 2016

Excellent and comprehensive narrative that helps you understand the history of the establishment of the modern state of Israel and the background behind the conflict with the Palestinian people.
I am far from being an expert but after reading this fantastic non-fiction book, I am much more well-informed. Highly recommended if you're interested in the topic.
Profile Image for Cathy.
163 reviews5 followers
January 28, 2016
Shavit begins his history of Zionism and Israel honestly and that's what kept me reading, even though I fundamentally disagree with his thesis that because of the Holocaust, European Jewry had an inalienable right to create the State of Israel on the land that hundreds of thousands of Palestinians had been living on for hundreds of years. But he was honest about the inability and/or unwillingness of early Zionists to see or acknowledge the indigenous people of Palestine and about the ethnic cleansing that took place during the 1948 war that was explicitly ordered by Ben Gurion. He is also honest about the disaster of Occupation and the illegal settlements and how those "facts on the ground" make a 2 state solution impossible. However, his gloating over the Israeli nuclear weapons capability combined with his paranoia about Iran acquiring the same capability turned my stomach. The book is also endlessly repetitive and at least twice as long as it needed to be. Shavit presents an Israeli "success story" in every chapter: the difficult history of each subject before coming to Israel, whether from Europe during or after the Holocaust or from other Middle Eastern countries after the foundation of the State. All are victims of anti-Semitism, all make fantastic lives for themselves in Israel and contribute to the greatness of the Zionist vision. Although he also repeatedly reminds the reader that this great vision has been built on another peoples' land, he actually only sees the Palestinians as posing an "existential threat" to the "Jewish and democratic state". Insert much eye rolling here.
He goes into a lot of detail about the foundation of Israel, the wars of 1948, 1967 and 1973, the rise of the right and the settler movement, the Oslo accords and the Intifadas, the Lebanon war of 2006, but makes no mention of Operation Cast Lead. Since the book was written in 2013, I was quite curious to discover his POV on this particular and very recent Israeli war crime. Turns out he thinks it was a "defensive war" and those Israelis who called it a war crime are "self-hating". Apparently Shavit is trying to revive something called "Liberal Zionism", which is clearly an oxymoron. Kind of like being a "liberal fascist", methinks.
He is much like Benny Morris who was the first of the new Israeli historians to confess to the ethnic cleansing of 1948 but who then turned around and claimed it had to be done to clear the land for the Jews. I honestly can't understand how one can hold these two ideas at the same time. It's like saying "It's OK if I do a really bad thing because it's going to make my own life better." That's the rationale of every criminal on the planet.
913 reviews432 followers
July 2, 2014
Updated review: Just took off two stars after reading this article. Shame on you, Ari Shavit.

I still think it's a great book, but there's no way I'm giving five stars to a work that includes intellectually dishonest reporting. And if the seminal chapter on Lydda, often excerpted as proof of Israel's wrongdoings, was misleading, what might that mean about some of the other book's claims?

Earlier, more glowing review:

If you're searching for one word to capture the essence of Israel, that word might be complex. I lived in Israel for six years, and it's a land of strong, loud opinions and multiple conflicting perspectives. It's hard to capture all of that in a book, much less a readable and engaging one that's not too cumbersome yet not simplistic. I'll leave it to smarter, better-informed people than I to judge whether Ari Shavit has fully achieved that in this book. I'll simply say he comes close, close enough for me to give the book five stars.

Shavit makes a wise choice when he uses microhistory to examine Israel at different points of time, from different perspectives, with different goals in mind. It makes for readable and engaging narratives that educate the reader. Each of these narratives, while seeming to focus on one or a few individuals, shed light on the whole and offer insight into important segments of Israeli history and society.

Shavit begins with his great-grandfather, a devout British Jew who journeys to Palestine in 1897. Bentwich, Shavit's great-grandfather, embraces Herzl's vision of a Jewish state in Israel with idealistic fervor and tunnel vision, wholly absorbed in this great white hope for Jewish continuity and blind to the fact that people already live in Palestine.

Shavit then takes us into a 1920s kibbutz, where devoted pioneers settle the land at great personal sacrifice. We visit an orange grove in the 1930s, owned by a successful Jew who represents a further step on the road of Jews investing in Palestine, developing self-confidence, and becoming a threat to their Arab neighbors. We join a Jewish leader in the early 1940s as he hikes with a group to Masada, asserting his ownership of the land and his identification with those who died resisting those who wanted to wrest that ownership from them. The picture darkens as Shavit takes us to 1948 Lydda, where the War of Independence displaces Arab civilians from their longtime homes.

Moving into the 1950s, we encounter post-Holocaust Jews who have suffered horrifically and found refuge in the new state of Israel. No group, Arab or Jew, has a monopoly on displacement and suffering, Shavit seems to be telling us here. Shavit then takes us into the late 1960s, where he explores the issue of Israel's developing nuclear power and what this means in terms of Israel's relationship with its many enemies. We get the perspective of fervent settlers beginning in the mid-1970s, individuals who believe it is incumbent upon them to build communities in the occupied territories in order to preserve Israel's existence. Skipping ahead into the early 1990s, we visit an army prison camp where Palestinian inmates interact with their ambivalent Israeli guards. We then learn the story of the Oslo accords, what they were supposed to achieve and how they failed.

Shavit introduces us to Aryeh Deri, a Sephardic politician who gives us a window into some of Israel's internal turmoil. He takes us into the club scene of the early 2000s, where young Israelis rebel against the traditional austerity and idealism and existential fear and embrace hedonism as a kind of life-affirming denial. Shavit then introduces us to the Palestinian perspective of the mid-2000s. We also learn about increasing capitalistic aspirations and demands for social justice among Israeli young adults. We learn about the crisis posed by Iran, and how and why it was ignored for too long.

Shavit pulls all of these stories, interviews, and perspectives together in his final chapters. He describes Israel as having experienced a total of seven revolts: the settlers' revolt against political restraint, the peace revolt against the existential reality of Israel, the liberal-judicial revolt against the all-powerful state, the Sephardic revolt against Eurocentric discrimination, the Haredi revolt against secularism, the hedonist-individualistic revolt against Zionistic ideological conformity, and the Palestinian revolt against Jewish nationalism.

While each of these revolts was justified and sought rights for an oppressed minority, Shavit says, their cumulative effect was divisive and destructive. The early Ben Gurion state, with its kibbutz-socialist mentality and omnipotent government, got the state through its early existential threats and forged the way for it to become a real country. But this state also neglected the individual rights of a wide range of groups, resulting in the fissures we have today. Sadly, today's government lacks the strength to reunite Israeli's multifaceted society.

Shavit describes the various threats to Israel, from within and without, as seven concentric circles. The outermost, he says, is the Islamic circle. Israel is surrounded by Islamic countries, many of which are becoming increasingly radical and hostile to the Westernized democracy in their midst. Inside that circle is the Arab circle. Arab nationalism is on the rise, creating political unrest and turmoil. Inside that circle is the Palestinian circle, a group of people who feels dispossessed by the Jewish state they never wanted. So you've got religious, political, and personal forces coming together to threaten Israel's existence.

But there are also threats from within Israeli society. There are the Arab citizens to whom Israel has not figured out how to relate. There is the loss of the utopian kibbutz idealism that drove earlier Israelis to build and defend their land. There is the difficulty maintaining a democratic stance with growing minorities who don't share democratic values. And ultimately, there is the loss of identity and culture among Israelis. Israelis no longer know who they really are, Shavit states. Shavit also acknowledges his pro-peace leanings, which are evident in the book, while recognizing the realistic challenges to peace.

While no book can fully capture the complexities and fractures of Israeli society, or offer a truly balanced perspective on Israel's volatile conflicts, Shavit comes pretty close in this readable work. Highly recommended for those with an interest in the topic.



===




No comments: