2026-07-15

三一書房 - 上野千鶴子氏が『世界』(2026年8月号)に書いた「わたしが女性天皇を歓迎しないこれだけの理由」が公開されている。... | Facebook

三一書房 - 上野千鶴子氏が『世界』(2026年8月号)に書いた「わたしが女性天皇を歓迎しないこれだけの理由」が公開されている。... | Facebook


三一書房

dreptonSso19131310m95lu115ggt526 i3ha6:6g01mlyu5gJ0 tc186 5t ·


上野千鶴子氏が『世界』(2026年8月号)に書いた「わたしが女性天皇を歓迎しないこれだけの理由」が公開されている。
https://websekai.iwanami.co.jp/posts/9748
多くの人に支持されているのは、最後のこの部分だろう。
「天皇制は制度そのものが、権威主義によって国民にとって抑圧的であり、父系継承原理は日本の「伝統」でないばかりか、そのジェンダー非対称性によって性差別的であり、皇族の人権を無視することによって非人間的である。この制度がジェンダー非対称からジェンダー対称になって、女性天皇が実現したからといって、それを喜ぶ理由はフェミニストにはまったくない。また上皇と上皇后とが信頼できる人格者であろうがなかろうが、あるいは天皇の長女の愛子さんが天皇にふさわしい資質の持ち主であろうがなかろうが、いっさい関係がない。問題は人格ではなく制度なのだ。この制度を二一世紀に延命させる理由はない。民主主義国家日本は、立憲君主制ではなく、共和制を選ぶこともできたのだし、これからもその可能性は開かれている。
 憲法改正をするなら、第1条から手をつけるべきであろう」
この上野氏の文章は「天皇制について発言を求められるたびに、わたしは断ってきた。論じれば論じるほど、賛否共に国民の関心が集まることを怖れたからだ」と始まる。
しかし一方で上野氏は、大日本帝国の「皇軍兵士」と、「皇軍兵士」に性暴力被害を受けたハルモニを「同志的関係」だとした『帝国の慰安婦』(パク ユハ)を一貫して礼賛してきた。
矛盾した対応への言及のないこの文章には鼻白らむ。
植民地主義、男性中心主義への批判が欠落し、大日本帝国の犯罪を隠蔽し、日本国の責任逃れに加担し、韓国の裁判所(大法院)の判決を根拠にして主張をする、権力の側に立つフェミニストだと上野千鶴子氏は前田朗氏(東京造形大名誉教授、戦争犯罪論)に批判されている。
以下の配信動画での上野氏の発言だ。
<慰安婦問題の現在到達地点 朴裕河さん+上野千鶴子さん>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2VruY36rN0
前田氏による批判の配信動画が以下
<反レイシズム市民講座>
前田朗さん(法学者/朝鮮大学校講師)01:51:24
「大日本帝国の植民地支配犯罪」
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GerE7QORsBI&t=6678s
See translation


「わたしが女性天皇を歓迎しないこれだけの理由」上野千鶴子
『世界』(2026年8月号)
https://websekai.iwanami.co.jp/posts/9748

<慰安婦問題の現在到達地点 朴裕河さん+上野千鶴子さん>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2VruY36rN0�


「慰安婦」問題の現在―「朴裕河現象」と知識人
前田朗編
ISBN978-4-380-16001-1
https://31shobo.com/2015/10/16001/

第一部 問われる日韓「合意」
・鈴木裕子  解決には程遠い今回の日韓「合意」
・前田朗 いま何が問われているか
・金 優綺 「合意」の全面無効を――朝鮮民主主義人民共和国の反応
・許仁碩 台湾政府は口先だけの対応をやめるべき
・キャロライン・ノーマ 戦時性奴隷とされた女性に歴史的正義を――オーストラリア政府がなすべき対応

第二部 「朴裕河現象」を考える
・早尾貴紀 「和解」論批判 ――イラン・パペ「橋渡しのナラティヴ」から学ぶ
・李在承 感情の混乱と錯綜:「慰安婦」についての誤ったふるい分け
・前田朗 植民地解放闘争を矮小化する戦略
・金富子 新しさを装った歴史修正の動き
・能川元一 『帝国の慰安婦』における資料の恣意的な援用について
・李娜榮 「『帝国の慰安婦』事態に対する立場」声明の経緯と今後の方向

第三部 朝日新聞記事訂正問題を問う
・今田真人 「吉田証言」は本当だった――公文書の発見と目撃証人の登場
第四部 植民地主義と知識人の責任を問う
・徐京植 日本知識人の覚醒を促す――和田春樹先生への手紙
・前田朗 「慰安婦」問題と学問の暴力 ――植民地主義とヘイト・スピーチ
See less

===

「慰安婦」問題の現在

慰安婦問題の現在帯付

「慰安婦」問題の現在―「朴裕河現象」と知識人

四六判 ソフトカバー 248頁
ISBN978-4-380-16001-1 c0036
定価:本体1800円+税

前田朗編

日韓「合意」は「慰安婦問題」の解決をはるか彼方に遠ざけてしまった。
私たちは、侵略と植民地支配の歴史を見据えてきたのだろうか。戦後70年を経過したいま、この国の歴史認識の地滑りが止まらない。
被害当事者を置き去りにした「朴裕河(パク・ユハ)現象」から、70年談話、日韓「合意」へと連なる動きの根本を抉る!

<書評>


===


===

Comments





Ohama Ikuko
·

·

by author

シェアして、ご紹介させていただきます。





Reply
See translation



ナグモ カズオ
·

·

by author

シェアします。





Reply
See translation











2026-07-14

IDF carried out Hannibal Directive, new 'Sword of Damocles' on October 7 | The Jerusalem Post

IDF carried out Hannibal Directive, new 'Sword of Damocles' on October 7 | The Jerusalem Post

IDF carried out Hannibal Directive, new 'Sword of Damocles' operation on October 7
The Israeli Air Force was carrying out a new 'Sword of Damocles' operation as it was carrying out the 'Hannibal directive,' the IDF's probes found.Follow us on GoogleIsraeli security forces on road 232 near the southern Israeli city of Sderot, October 7, 2023(photo credit: OREN BEN HAKOON/FLASH90)
What was the “Sword of Damocles” operation?➤How did Hannibal Directive shape October 7 attacks?➤Why did aircraft movement delay matter so much?➤How many Hamas fighters did the Air Force estimate killed?➤
ByYONAH JEREMY BOBFEBRUARY 27, 2025 18:59Updated: FEBRUARY 27, 2025 19:29

The Air Force was carrying out “the Sword of Damocles” operation – a code name only being revealed on Thursday for the first time - to attack many Hamas commanders and their headquarters around 10:30 a.m. on October 7, 2023, just as it was carrying out the “Hannibal Directive” of gunning down anything that moved around the Israel-Gaza border.

The Air Force has been questioned about if the forces it had invested in attacking Hamas commanders deep in Gaza would have been better used to defend the Gaza border and to attack Hamas invaders in Israeli villages.


Air Force sources hoped air power had been used 'differently' on October 7

Air Force sources have said that they wish this air power had been used differently on October 7, given that protecting the villages and the border should have been a higher priority than killing top Hamas officials.

Further, Air Force sources indicated that had they known all of the information being debated between IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Herzi Halevi and IDF Southern Command Chief Maj.-Gen. Yaron Finkleman, such as the Israeli SIM cell phone cards which Hamas had activated in Gaza, they might have pushed for the aircraft to be used differently.


In contrast, IDF southern command sources have indicated that they believe that the attack on the Hamas commanders and headquarters significantly reduced the number of invaders who would have streamed into Israel absent those attacks.

Some sources said that there were concerns that tens of thousands or even more Gazans might have invaded Israel, far more than the around 5,400 which actually attacked, and that activating the Sword of Damocles plan was the right move even looking backwards.
Advertisement


Besides that, essentially the Air Force took significant responsibility for being a part of the failure on October 7, but also said that it was simply not in the game.

The general Air Force plan for that weekend was to have only one drone watching over Gaza, as there was an assumption that there would be various warnings and time to prepare if there would be any major change in the stabilized situation.

Sponsored | justcasino




While Halevi ordered that the Air Force have additional aircraft nearby a few hours before the invasion, and two more drones were directed toward Gaza, lower down Air Force officers decided along with lower down Operations Command officers to only move a fighter jet from Ramat David base in the North to Ramon base, much closer to Gaza, on a delay of a few hours from when the order was given.

It turned out that the invasion started 90 minutes before the aircraft was due to be finally moved as opposed to if it had been moved when Halevi ordered, two hours before the invasion.



The lower down officers did not deem the order to be an emergency, as long as they complied within a reasonable amount of time.

The Air Force said that it accomplished this in an impressive period of only several hours, much faster than the pre-war estimated time.

Given that most of Hamas’s forces had returned to Gaza with most of the hostages it took by around 12:00, most of the Air Force simply could not be ready in time.

The Air Force said that it has approximately doubled – from around a dozen - the number of aircraft to be available on short notice for helping with a potential border invasion and that it will also integrate old-fashioned guns onto some aircraft which can be used for flying low and strafing a border area with machine gun fire.


On October 7, much of the Air Force was carrying heavier bombs which could be used to destroy much more powerful damage to an enemy, but which were too large to use in complex situations with Hamas invaders and Israeli civilians in close proximity to each other.
Israeli pilots were afraid of striking hostages in Hannibal Directive

Further, the Air Force said that many pilots were reluctant about hitting potential hostages even after the Hannibal Directive was issued.

In addition, the Air Force probe said that generally pilots receive highly specific information of where and what to attack and that: Most Air Force officers were not in the South due to vacations, those that were had a similar lack of full understanding of the constantly evolving situation, and the IDF Southern Command was similarly “blind” to how multi-pronged the invasion was.


The Air Force would carry out around 945 attacks with helicopters firing 11,000 times.

Out of 1,600 killed Hamas fighters, the Air Force estimates that it killed around 1,000.

157 Israelis were rescued by Air Force special forces Unit 669 and in at least two cases – at the IDF Nahal Oz position and near the “Black Arrow” and Miflasim village area – Air Force interventions scared away or killed Hamas invaders who were about to kill more Israelis.

According to the Air Force, some of its top aircraft which got into the air fairly quickly, were assigned to stay in the air near critical infrastructure areas, or were kept near the northern border lest Hezbollah stage a second invasion, and not to help with the defense of the southern border.


Bar was told by Halevi very early in the morning that he should be sending aircraft northward in case Hezbollah intervened.

Air Force sources said that had Hezbollah invaded, which almost happened, and the Air Force had not been ready in the North, it would have faced even harsher questions than it did about not being ready in the South.

Besides the fact that lots of the Air Force’s serious power was sent northward or to guard critical infrastructure sites, the Air Force probe also showed that its plans for reinforcing border areas downplayed Gaza and had its aircraft stationed too far away.

In one case where the Air Force tried to take the initiative based on pre-war intelligence and to attack without concrete real-time updated intelligence, it attacked a tunnel which officers thought Hamas might use to send fighters into Nativ Haasara. It turned out later that no Hamas fighters had been there.

Next, Hamas’s 3,889 rocket attacks in a short period of time exhausted the Iron Dome supplies in the South, leading to only less protection, which in turn meant that many southern runways were hit and required repairs.

노성환 저자의 출간 도서 : 알라딘

노성환 저자의 출간 도서 : 알라딘


판매량순출시일순등록일순상품명순평점순리뷰순저가격순고가격순
검색결과보기옵션
펼쳐서 보기
50
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 15일 출고
7.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 15일 출고
9.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
10.
11.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
12.
  •  판권 소멸 등으로 더 이상 제작, 유통 계획이 없습니다.
13.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
14.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 15일 출고
15.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
16.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
17.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 15일 출고
18.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
19.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
20.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
21.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 15일 출고
22.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
23.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
24.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
25.
26.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
27.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
28.
29.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
30.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
31.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
32.
  •  판권 소멸 등으로 더 이상 제작, 유통 계획이 없습니다.
33.
  • 고사기 -하 - 예전학술사상총서 6 
  • 노성환 (옮긴이) | 예전사 | 1999년 4월
  • 10,000원 → 9,000원 (10%할인), 마일리지 500
  • 세일즈포인트 : 19
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
34.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
35.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
36.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
37.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
38.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
39.
  • 지금 택배로 주문하면 7월 16일 출고
40.
  •  출판사/제작사 유통이 중단되어 구할 수 없습니다.
41.
  •  판권 소멸 등으로 더 이상 제작, 유통 계획이 없습니다.
42.
  • 고사기 -중 - 예전학술사상총서 5 
  • 노성환 (옮긴이) | 예전사 | 1990년 4월
  • 8,000원 → 7,200원 (10%할인), 마일리지 400
  • 세일즈포인트 : 17
  •  판권 소멸 등으로 더 이상 제작, 유통 계획이 없습니다.


====

==

==

==

==

==

==

==