February 28 incident
People gathered in front of the Tobacco Monopoly Bureau on February 28, 1947 | |
Native name | 二二八事件 |
---|---|
Date | February 28, 1947 |
Location | Taiwan |
Type | Anti-government uprising |
Cause | Highhanded and frequently corrupt conduct on the part of the Kuomintang |
Outcome | Martial law declared, beginning of White Terror |
Deaths | 5,000–28,000 |
The February 28 incident, also rendered as the February 28 massacre,[1][2] 228 incident[3] or 228 massacre[3] (from Chinese: 二二八事件; pinyin: Èr’èrbā shìjiàn), was an anti-government uprising in Taiwan that was violently suppressed by the Kuomintang-led Republic of China government, which killed thousands of civilians beginning on February 28, 1947. The number of Taiwanese deaths from the incident and massacre was estimated to be between 5,000 and 28,000.[4][5] The massacre marked the beginning of the White Terror, in which tens of thousands of other Taiwanese went missing, died or were imprisoned. The incident is one of the most important events in Taiwan's modern history and was a critical impetus for the Taiwan independence movement.[6]
In 1945, following the surrender of Japan at the end of World War II, the Allies handed administrative control of Taiwan to the Republic of China (ROC), thus ending 50 years of Japanese colonial rule. Local inhabitants became resentful of what they saw as highhanded and frequently corrupt conduct on the part of the Kuomintang (KMT) authorities, including arbitrary seizure of private property, economic mismanagement and exclusion from political participation. The flashpoint came on February 27, 1947 in Taipei, when agents of the State Monopoly Bureau struck a Taiwanese widow suspected of selling contraband cigarettes. An officer then fired into a crowd of angry bystanders, striking one man who died the next day.[7] Soldiers fired upon demonstrators the next day, after which a radio station was seized and news of the revolt was broadcast to the entire island. As the uprising spread, the KMT-installed governor Chen Yi called for military reinforcements, and the uprising was violently put down by the National Revolutionary Army. For the following 38 years, the island was placed under martial law in a period that would be known as the White Terror.[7]
During the White Terror, the KMT persecuted perceived political dissidents, and the incident was considered too taboo to be discussed. President Lee Teng-hui became the first president to discuss the incident publicly on its anniversary in 1995. The event is now openly discussed and details of the event have become the subject of government and academic investigation. February 28 is now an official public holiday called Peace Memorial Day, on which the president of Taiwan gathers with other officials to ring a commemorative bell in memory of the victims. Monuments and memorial parks to the victims of 2/28 have been erected in a number of Taiwanese cities. In particular, Taipei's former Taipei New Park was renamed 228 Peace Memorial Park, and the National 228 Memorial Museum was opened on February 28, 1997. The Kaohsiung Museum of History also has a permanent exhibit detailing the events of the 228 Incident in Kaohsiung.[8][9] In 2019, the Transitional Justice Commission exonerated those who were convicted in the aftermath.[10]
February 28 incident | |||
---|---|---|---|
Chinese | 二二八事件 | ||
| |||
February 28 Massacre | |||
Traditional Chinese | 二二八大屠殺 | ||
Simplified Chinese | 二二八大屠杀 | ||
|
Background[edit]
During the 50 years of Japanese rule in Taiwan (1895–1945), Taiwan experienced economic development and an increased standard of living, serving as a supply base for the Japanese main islands.[11] After World War II, Taiwan was placed under the administrative control of the Republic of China to provide stability until a permanent arrangement could be made. Chen Yi, the Governor-General of Taiwan, arrived on October 24, 1945, and received the last Japanese governor, Ando Rikichi, who signed the document of surrender on the next day. Chen Yi then proclaimed the day as Retrocession Day to make Taiwan part of the Republic of China.
Taiwanese perceptions of the Japanese rule were more positive than perceptions in other parts of East and Southeast Asia.[12] Despite this, the Kuomintang troops from Mainland China were initially welcomed by the Taiwanese. Their harsh conduct and the KMT maladministration quickly led to Taiwanese discontent during the immediate postwar period. As Governor-General, Chen Yi took over and sustained the Japanese system of state monopolies in tobacco, sugar, camphor, tea, paper, chemicals, petroleum refining, mining and cement, the same way the Nationalists treated people in other former Japanese-controlled areas (earning Chen Yi the nickname "robber" (劫收)).[13] He confiscated some 500 Japanese-owned factories and mines, and homes of former Japanese residents. Economic mismanagement led to a large black market, runaway inflation and food shortages. Many commodities were compulsorily bought cheaply by the KMT administration and shipped to Mainland China to meet the Civil War shortages where they were sold at very high profit furthering the general shortage of goods in Taiwan. The price of rice rose to 100 times its original value between the time the Nationalists took over to the spring of 1946, increasing to nearly four times the price in Shanghai. It inflated further to 400 times the original price by January 1947.[14] Carpetbaggers from Mainland China dominated nearly all industry, as well as political and judicial offices, displacing the Taiwanese who were formerly employed. Many of the ROC garrison troops were highly undisciplined, looting, stealing and contributing to the overall breakdown of infrastructure and public services.[15] Because the Taiwanese elites had met with some success with self-government under Japanese rule, they had expected the same system from the incoming ruling Chinese Nationalist Government. However, the Chinese Nationalists opted for a different route, aiming for the centralization of government powers and a reduction in local authority. The KMT's nation-building efforts followed this ideology because of unpleasant experiences with the centrifugal forces during the Warlord Era in 1916–1928 that had torn the government in China. Mainland Communists were even preparing to bring down the government like the Ili Rebellion.[16] The different goals of the Nationalists and the Taiwanese, coupled with cultural and language misunderstandings served to further inflame tensions on both sides.
Uprising and crackdown[edit]
On the evening of February 27, 1947, a Tobacco Monopoly Bureau enforcement team in Taipei went to the district of Taiheichō (太平町), Twatutia (Dadaocheng in Mandarin), where they confiscated contraband cigarettes from a 40-year-old widow named Lin Jiang-mai (林江邁) at the Tianma Tea House. When she demanded their return, one of the men struck her in the head with the butt of his gun,[7] prompting the surrounding Taiwanese crowd to challenge the Tobacco Monopoly agents. As they fled, one agent shot his gun into the crowd, hitting a bystander who died the next day. The crowd, which had already been harboring feelings of frustration from unemployment, inflation and corruption toward the Nationalist government, reached its breaking point. The crowd protested to both the police and the gendarmes, but were mostly ignored.[17]
Protesters gathered the next morning around Taipei, calling for the arrest and trial of the agents involved in the previous day's shooting, and eventually made their way to the Governor General's Office, where security forces tried to disperse the crowd. Soldiers opened fire into the crowd, killing at least three.[18] Formosans took over the administration of the town and military bases on March 4 and forced their way into local radio station to broadcast news of the incident and calling for people to revolt, causing uprisings to erupt throughout the island.[19][20] By evening, martial law had been declared and curfews were enforced by the arrest or shooting of anyone who violated curfew.
For several weeks after the February 28 incident, the Taiwanese civilians controlled much of Taiwan. The initial riots were spontaneous and somewhat violent, with mainland Chinese sometimes receiving beatings from Taiwanese. Within a few days, the Taiwanese were generally coordinated and organized, and public order in Taiwanese-held areas was upheld by volunteer civilians organized by students, and unemployed former Japanese army soldiers. Local leaders formed a Settlement Committee, which presented the government with a list of 32 Demands for reform of the provincial administration. They demanded, among other things, greater autonomy, free elections, the surrender of the ROC Army to the Settlement Committee, and an end to government corruption.[20] Motivations among the various Taiwanese groups varied; some demanded greater autonomy within the ROC, while others wanted UN trusteeship or full independence.[21] The Taiwanese also demanded representation in the forthcoming peace treaty negotiations with Japan, hoping to secure a plebiscite to determine the island's political future.
Outside of Taipei, there were examples of the formation of local militas such as the 27 Brigade near Taichung. In Chiayi, the mayor's residence was set fire to and local militias fought with the military police.[22]
The Nationalist Government, under Chen Yi, stalled for time while it waited for reinforcements from Fujian. Upon their arrival on March 8, the ROC troops launched a crackdown. The New York Times reported, "An American who had just arrived in China from Taihoku said that troops from the mainland China arrived there on March 7 and indulged in three days of indiscriminate killing and looting. For a time everyone seen on the streets was shot at, homes were broken into and occupants killed. In the poorer sections the streets were said to have been littered with dead. There were instances of beheadings and mutilation of bodies, and women were raped, the American said."[23]
This section needs additional citations for verification. (August 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
By the end of March, Chen Yi had ordered the imprisonment or execution of the leading Taiwanese organizers he could identify. His troops reportedly executed, according to a Taiwanese delegation in Nanjing, between 3,000 and 4,000 people throughout the island. The exact number is still undetermined, as only 300 Taiwanese families applied for another compensation as recently as 1990.[24] Detailed records kept by the KMT have been reported as "lost". Some of the killings were random, while others were systematic. Taiwanese elites were among those targeted, and many of the Taiwanese who had formed self-governing groups during the reign of the Japanese were also victims of the 228 incident. A disproportionate number of the victims were Taiwanese high school students. Many had recently served in the Imperial Japanese Army, having volunteered to serve to maintain order.[20]
Some Taiwan political organizations participated in the uprising, for example Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League, was announced "communist" and illegal. Many members were arrested and executed. Some of these organizations had to move to Hong Kong.[25]
Legacy[edit]
The initial 228 purge was followed by 38 years of martial law, commonly referred to as the "White Terror," which lasted until the end of 1987, during which over a 100,000 people were imprisoned for political reasons[26] of which over 1,000 were executed.[27] During this time, discussion of the incident was taboo.[28]
This section needs additional citations for verification. (August 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
The government hoped that the execution of Governor Chen Yi and financial compensation for the victims had quelled resentment. In the 1970s, the 228 Justice and Peace Movement was initiated by several citizens' groups to ask for a reversal of this policy, and, in 1992, the Executive Yuan promulgated the "February 28 Incident Research Report."[29] Then-President and KMT-chairman Lee Teng-hui, who had participated in the incident and was arrested as an instigator and a Communist sympathizer, made a formal apology on behalf of the government in 1995 and declared February 28 a day to commemorate the victims.[30] Among other memorials erected, Taipei New Park was renamed 228 Memorial Park.
Since the lifting of martial law in 1987, the government has set up the 228 Incident Memorial Foundation, a civilian reparations fund supported by public donations for the victims and their families. Many descendants of victims remain unaware that their family members were victims, while many of the families of victims from Mainland China did not know the details of their relatives' mistreatment during the riot.[citation needed] Those who have received compensation more than two times are demanding trials of the still-living soldiers and officials who were responsible for the summary executions and deaths of their loved ones.
Prior to the 228 massacres, many Taiwanese hoped for greater autonomy from China. The failure of conclusive dialogue with the ROC administration in early March, combined with the feelings of betrayal felt towards the government and China, in general, are widely believed to have catalyzed today's Taiwan Independence movement and subsequently the Taiwan Name Rectification Campaign after democratization.[20]
On February 28, 2004, thousands of Taiwanese participated in the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally. They formed a 500-kilometer (310 mi) long human chain from Taiwan's northernmost city to its southern tip to commemorate the 228 incident, to call for peace, and to protest the People's Republic of China's deployment of missiles aimed at Taiwan along the coast of Taiwan Strait.
In 2006, the Research Report on Responsibility for the 228 Massacre was released after several years of research. The 2006 report was not intended to overlap with the prior (1992) 228 Massacre Research Report commissioned by the Executive Yuan. Chiang Kai-shek is specifically named as bearing the largest responsibility in the 2006 report.[31] However, some hardline academics have tried to confuse these conclusions, stating the departing Japanese colonial government was responsible by creating food shortages and causing inflation.[32]
In 1990, Taiwan's Executive Yuan set up a task force to investigate the 2/28 Incident. The Report of the 228 Incident was published in 1992, and a memorial was set up in 1995 at the 2/28 Peace Park in Taipei. In October 1995, the state-funded Memorial Foundation of 228 was initially established to distribute compensation and award rehabilitation certificates to 228 Incident victims in order to restore their reputation.[33] Family members of dead and missing victims are eligible for NT$6 million (approximately US$190,077).[34] Compensation application trial statistics, according to Memorial Foundation of 228 (www.228.org.tw), almost 24 years later, as of June 25, 2019:[35]
- Number of cases accepted: 2,857
- Number of cases reviewed: 2,823
- Number of cases established: 2,319
- Death cases: 686
- Missing cases: 181
- Detention, imprisoned, etc.: 1,452
- Number of cases not established: 504
- Inconsistent legal requirements: 301
- Insufficient evidence: 203
Art[edit]
A number of artists in Taiwan have addressed the subject of the 2–28 incident since the taboo was lifted on the subject in the early 1990s.[36] The incident has been the subject of music by Fan-Long Ko and Tyzen Hsiao and a number of literary works.
Film[edit]
Hou Hsiao-hsien's A City of Sadness, the first movie dealing with the events, won the Golden Lion at the 1989 Venice Film Festival.[37] The 2009 thriller Formosa Betrayed also relates the incident as part of the motivation behind Taiwan independence activist characters.
Literature[edit]
Shawna Yang Ryan's novel, Green Island (2016) (Knopf) tells the story of the incident as it affects three generations of a Taiwanese family.[38]
Julie Wu's novel, The Third Son (2013) (Algonquin) describes the event and its aftermath from the viewpoint of a Taiwanese boy.[39]
Jennifer Chow's novel, The 228 Legacy (2013) (Martin Sisters Publishing), brings to light the emotional ramifications for those who lived through the events yet suppressed their knowledge out of fear. It focuses on how there was such an impact that it permeated throughout multiple generations within the same family.[40]
Music[edit]
Taiwanese metal band Chthonic's album Mirror of Retribution makes several lyrical references to the 228 massacre.
See also[edit]
- Formosa Betrayed (1965 book)
- History of Taiwan
- History of the Republic of China
- List of massacres in Taiwan
- The First 228 Peace Memorial Monument
- 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally (in 2004)
- Political status of Taiwan
- White Terror (Taiwan)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
- KMT retreat to Taiwan in 1949
References[edit]
- ^ Wu, Naiteh (July 2005). "Transition without Justice, or Justice without History: Transitional Justice in Taiwan" (PDF). Taiwan Journal of Democracy (1): 10. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 25, 2021.
The memory of the February 28 massacre, although politically taboo during the KMT’s authoritarian rule
- ^ "Taiwan's hidden massacre. A new generation is breaking the silence". Washington Post. March 1, 2017.
realization that his grandfather had been one of the tens of thousands of victims targeted and murdered in Taiwan's “February 28 Massacres.”
- ^ ab Shattuck, Thomas J. (February 27, 2017). "Taiwan's White Terror: Remembering the 228 Incident". Foreign Policy Research Institute.
In Taiwan, the period immediately following the 228 Incident is known as the “White Terror”(...). Just blocks away from the Presidential Palace in Taipei is a museum and park memorializing the victims of the 228 Massacre
- ^ Forsythe, Michael (July 14, 2015). "Taiwan Turns Light on 1947 Slaughter by Chiang Kai-shek's Troops". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 27, 2018.
To somber cello music that evokes “Schindler’s List,” displays memorialize the lives lost, including much of the island’s elite: painters, lawyers, professors and doctors. In 1992, an official commission estimated that 18,000 to 28,000 people had been killed.
- ^ KRISTOF, NICHOLAS D. (April 3, 1992). "Taipei Journal; The Horror of 2-28: Taiwan Rips Open the Past - The New York Times". nytimes.com. Archived from the original on December 13, 2018. Retrieved March 1,2020.
- ^ Fleischauer, Stefan (November 1, 2007). "The 228 Incident and the Taiwan Independence Movement's Construction of a Taiwanese Identity". China Information. 21 (3): 373–401. doi:10.1177/0920203X07083320. S2CID 143766317.
- ^ ab c Chou, Wan-yao (2015). A New Illustrated History of Taiwan. Translated by Plackitt, Carole; Casey, Tim. Taipei: SMC Publishing Inc. p. 317. ISBN 978-957-638-784-5.
- ^ Ko, Shu-ling; Chang, Rich; Chao, Vincent Y. (March 1, 2011). "National 228 museum opens in Taipei". Taipei Times. p. 1. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^ Chen, Ketty W. (February 28, 2013). "Remembering Taiwan's Tragic Past". Taipei Times. p. 12. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^ Lin, Sean (October 6, 2018). "Commission exonerates 1,270 people". Taipei Times. Taipei. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
- ^ Wu, J.R. (October 25, 2015). "Taiwan president says should remember good things Japan did". Reuters. Retrieved March 11, 2020.
Unlike in China or Korea, many Taiwanese have a broadly more positive view of Japan than people in China or Korea, saying that Japan’s rule brought progress to an undeveloped, largely agricultural island.
- ^ Abramson, Gunnar (2004). "Comparative Colonialsims: Variations in Japanese Colonial Policy in Taiwan and Korea, 1895 ‐ 1945". PSU McNair Scholars Online Journal. 1 (1): 11–37. doi:10.15760/mcnair.2005.11.
- ^ "大「劫收」与上海民营工业". 檔案與史學. March 1, 1998.
- ^ "Formosa After the War". Reflection on the 228 Event—The first gunshot. 2003. Archived from the original on March 6, 2006. Retrieved March 6, 2006.
- ^ "This Is the Shame". Time Magazine. June 10, 1946. (Subscription required)
- ^ Cai, Xi-bin (January 11, 2010). "The Taiwan province working committee organization of the CCP (1946~1950) in Taipei city". National Tamkang University.
- ^ 延平路昨晚查緝私煙隊,開槍擊斃老百姓 (民報社) [Yanping Road last night checked the smuggling team and shot and killed the people (the people's newspaper)], 民報社 (in Chinese), Taiwan Ministry of Culture:National Repository of Cultural Heritage, February 28, 1947, archived from the original on July 15, 2012
- ^ "Seizing-cigarettes incident". Reflection on the 228 Event—The first gunshot. 2003. Archived from the original on March 6, 2006. Retrieved March 6, 2006.
- ^ Durdin, Peggy (May 24, 1947). "Terror in Taiwan". The Nation. Archived from the original on April 24, 2006. Retrieved April 22, 2006.
- ^ ab c d Smith, Craig A (2008). "Taiwan's 228 Incident and the Politics of Placing Blame". Past Imperfect. University of Alberta. 14: 143–163. ISSN 1711-053X. Retrieved November 13, 2014.
- ^ Durdin, Tillman (March 30, 1947). "Formosans' Plea For Red Aid Seen". New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2006. Retrieved March 6, 2006.
- ^ Yang, Bi-chuan (February 25, 2017). "The 228 Massacre in Chiayi: "The Airport and Train Station Were Washed with Blood". The Reporter (報導者). Retrieved August 19, 2018.
- ^ Durdin, Tillman (March 29, 1947). "Formosa killings are put at 10,000". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 24, 2006. Retrieved April 22, 2006.
- ^ "DPP questions former Premier Hau's 228 victim figures". The China Post. Taipei. February 29, 2012. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^ *Wang, Xiaobo (February 2004). Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League and the February 28 Incident. Taipei: Straits Academic Press.
- ^ Bird, Thomas (August 1, 2019). "Taiwan's brutal White Terror period revisited on Green Island: confronting demons inside a former prison". South China Morning Post. Retrieved March 1, 2020.
- ^ Mozur, Paul (February 3, 2016). "Taiwan Families Receive Goodbye Letters Decades After Executions". The New York Times. Retrieved March 1, 2020.
- ^ Horton, Chris (February 26, 2017). "Taiwan Commemorates a Violent Nationalist Episode, 70 Years Later". The New York Times. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
- ^ Kristof, Nicholas D. (April 3, 1992). "Taipei Journal; The Horror of 2–28: Taiwan Rips Open the Past". The New York Times. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- ^ Mo, Yan-chih (February 28, 2006). "Remembering 228: Ghosts of the past are yet to be laid to rest". Taipei Times. p. 4. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^ Chen, Yi-shen (February 2005). "Research Report on Responsibility for the 228 Massacre, Chapter II: Responsibility on the part of the decision-makers in Nanjing". 228.org.tw. The 228 Memorial Foundation. Archived from the original on February 28, 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^ Shih, Hsiu-chuan (February 28, 2007). "Hardline academics blame Japan for 228 Incident". Taipei Times. p. 1. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- ^http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/05/29/2003671507; https://228.org.tw/en/operation.html
- ^ "Japanese 228 victim's son awarded compensation - Taipei Times". February 18, 2016.
- ^ "賠償金申請相關事宜|財團法人二二八事件紀念基金會.二二八國家紀念館".
- ^ "228 Massacre, 60th Commemoration". Retrieved March 12, 2017.
- ^ "A City of Sadness". October 21, 1989. Retrieved March 12, 2017 – via IMDb.
- ^ "Green Island by Shawna Yang Ryan - PenguinRandomHouse.com". Retrieved March 12, 2017.
- ^ "The Third Son". Workman Publishing.
- ^ Bloom, Dan (August 19, 2013). "US author probes 'legacy' of the 228 Incident in novel". Taipei Times. p. 3. Retrieved May 7, 2014.
Bibliography[edit]
- Kerr, George H.; Stuart, John Leighton (April 21, 1947). Memorandum on the Situation in Taiwan (Report). American Embassy, Nanking, China. Telegram No. 689. reprinted in United States relations with China, with special reference to the period 1944–1949, based on the files of the Department of State. Far Eastern Series. Compiled by Dean Acheson. Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off. August 1949. pp. 923–938. hdl:2027/umn.31951d01115459w. OCLC 664471448.
- Kerr, George H. (1965). Formosa Betrayed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. OL 5948105M.
- Lai, Tse-han; Myers, Ramon Hawley; Wei, Wou (1991). A Tragic Beginning: The Taiwan Uprising of February 28, 1947. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. ISBN 9780804718295.
- Shackleton, Allan J. (1998) [1948]. Formosa Calling: An Eyewitness Account of Conditions in Taiwan during the February 28th, 1947 Incident. Upland, California: Taiwan Publishing Company. OCLC 419279752. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- Wakabayashi, Masahiro (2003). "4: Overcoming the Difficult Past; Rectification of the 2–28 Incident and the Politics of Reconciliation in Taiwan". In Funabashi, Yōichi (ed.). Reconciliation in the Asia-Pacific. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press. pp. 91–109. ISBN 9781929223473. OCLC 51755853.
External links[edit]
Library resources about February 28 incident |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to 228 Incident of Taiwan, 1947. |
- "Taipei 228 Memorial Museum (臺北228紀念館)". culture.tw. Taiwan Ministry of Culture. Archived from the original on November 29, 2014. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
- Hong, Keelung (February 28, 2003). My Search for 2–28 (Speech). Berkeley, California. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- "The 228 Massacre, As Documented in the US Media". 2001. Archived from the original on June 7, 2007. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- "Reflection on the 228 Event". Taiwan Human Rights InfoNet. 2003. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- 財團法人二二八事件紀念基金會 [228 Incident Memorial Foundation] (in Chinese). 2011. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- Chu, Bevin (February 25, 2000). "Taiwan Independence and the 2–28 Incident". The Strait Scoop. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- "Taiwan Yearbook 2006: The ROC on Taiwan — February 28 Incident". Taiwan Government Information Office. Archived from the original on August 1, 2007. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- "Declaration of Formosan Civil Government 福爾摩沙平民政府宣言". 2009. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- 〈社論〉二二八不是內部鎮壓而是國際罪行 [Editorial: 228 was not internal repression, but an international war crime instead]. Liberty Times (in Chinese). Taipei. February 28, 2007. Archived from the original on July 30, 2013. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- "Editorial: Historical record is key to justice". Taipei Times. February 28, 2007. p. 8. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
- The 228 Incident and Taiwan's Transitional Justice – The Diplomat
- Japanese 228 victim's son awarded compensation – Taipei Times
- Tsai vows to investigate 228 Incident – Taipei Times
- Family of Korean killed in Taiwan's '228 Incident' in 1947 to get compensation – The Japan Times
- KMT slows transitional justice: Koo – Taipei Times
- Forum underlines importance of 228 education – Taipei Times
- Chiang Kai-shek removal backed – Taipei Times
- 228 evidence indicts Chiang: academic – Taipei Times
- Document unearthed shows double-dealing of Chiang behind 228 Incident – Taiwan News
Categories:
February 28 incident
1947 in Taiwan
1947 protests
Conflicts in 1947
Kuomintang
Taiwan under Republic of China rule
Republic of China (1912–1949)
Cold War rebellions
February 1947 events
Human rights abuses
Mass murder in 1947
Political and cultural purges
Political repression in the Republic of China
Protests in Taiwan
Protest-related deaths
Rebellions in Asia
Far-right politics in Taiwan
Taiwan independence movement
White Terror
1940s in Taiwan
1947 in China
20th-century rebellions
Protests in China2·28 사건
다른 뜻에 대해서는 2·28 대구 학생의거 문서를 참조하십시오.2·28 사건(二二八事件)은 1947년 2월 28일부터 같은 해 5월 16일까지 대만 전역에서 일어난 민중봉기 사건이다. 중화민국 정부 관료의 폭압에 맞서 대만의 다수 주민인 본성인(本省人)들이 불만을 표출하며 항쟁을 일으키자, 중국 국민당을 위시한 외성인(外省人)들은 본성인을 폭압적으로 학살했다. 대만에서는 2·28대학살[二二八大屠殺], 2·28혁명, 2·28봉기[二二八起義], 2·28사변 등으로도 부른다.
배경[편집]
대만 반환[편집]
1895년 4월 17일, 청나라가 청일전쟁에서 패배하면서 체결된 시모노세키 조약(下關條約)으로 대만(臺灣)과 펑후 제도(澎湖諸島)는 요동반도(遼東半島)와 함께 일본제국에 할양되었다. 일제는 대만총독부를 설치하여 51년간 대만을 식민지배했다. 1945년 8월 15일 일제가 패망하고 그 해 10월 17일 국민혁명군이 대만에 상륙함으로써 중화민국은 대만과 펑후 제도를 영토로 회복하였다. 1945년 10월 25일 대만 주둔 일본군은 중화민국 소속 국민혁명군에 정식으로 항복하였고, 이날부터 대만은 중화민국의 영토로 완전히 복귀되었다.
그러나 중국국민당이 집권하던 중화민국 정부는 중국공산당과의 국공내전(國共內戰)으로 인해 대만에 정예 관료나 군인을 보낼 여유가 없었기 때문에, 일반적인 행정단위인 성(省)을 설치하는 대신 천이(陳儀)를 대만성(臺灣省)의 행정장관 겸 경비총사령으로 임명해 이 곳을 국민혁명군의 군사점령지역처럼 관리했다. 대만에 대한 군사통치는 현지 주민들의 요구를 제대로 수용하기는커녕 일제의 식민통치행태를 답습하는 수준에 불과했던 것으로 나타났다.[1] 청일전쟁 이후 50년간 일제의 지배와 수탈을 받던 대만 주민들은 새 중화민국 정부에 대한 기대가 컸다. 하지만 그들의 통치는 본토에서와 다르지 않았고, 일제(日帝)의 식민통치 이상으로 가혹했다.
본성인에 대한 외성인의 차별[편집]
이 과정에서 대만 사회는 종전부터 대만에 살고 있었던 본성인(本省人[2])과 1945년 광복 이후 중국 대륙에서 새로 이주해온 외성인(外省人[3])이란 서로 다른 배경을 가진 계층 간의 극심한 분열과 대립을 겪게 된다.
“ 신임장관(천이)은 수행원들을 대동하고 그 섬에 도착하였는데 수행원들은 교묘하게 대만을 착취하기에 바빴다……. 군대는 정복자처럼 행동하였다. 비밀경찰은 노골적으로 민중을 협박하며 본토에서 온 중앙정부의 관리가 착취하는 것을 용이하게 하였다. ” — 미국무부, 중국백서외성인(外省人)에 비해 본성인(本省人)이 압도적으로 많았음에도 요직은 장제스(蔣介石)를 위시한 외성인들이 차지했고, 정부가 본성인을 노골적으로 차별하는 정책을 펴자 주민들의 불만은 더욱 고조되었다. 중화민국 정부는 계엄령을 통해 을 억압하기만 할 뿐 대만의 민심에는 관심이 없었고, 대만을 대륙에서의 전쟁을 위한 일종의 군사기지처럼 취급하였다. 1946년 당시 통계에 따르면 최고위직은 모두 외성인들이 차지하였고, 천임(薦任) 이상의 중상위직에 임명된 본성인의 수조차 전체의 20%에 미치지 못했다. 본성인들은 외성인의 절반에 불과한 월급을 받았는데, 이는 일본의 식민 통치 시대에 본성인이 일본인 월급의 60%를 조금 넘게 받았던 것보다도 더 극심한 차별이었다. 또한 식민지 시기 일본인 가옥들을 외성인이 대부분 차지하면서 외성인과 본성인 사이에 거주지역의 구별도 나타나게 되었다. 이러한 현상은 국공 내전 막바지에 국민당과 함께 대만으로 옮겨 온 약 60만의 하층계급 군인들이 도심 주변에 거주하게 되면서 더욱 심화되었다. 이들은 1949년 이후 대만에서 중화민국 정부를 유지시킨 국민당의 절대적 지지기반이 되었다.
1949년 미국 국무부에서 나온 《중국백서》에 따르면 "정복자의 지배가 다시 시작되었다"라는 인식이 대만 사회 내부에서 폭넓은 공감대를 형성하고 있었다고 한다.[1] 일제(日帝) 식민통치자들이 빠져나간 관직을 대부분 외성인(外省人) 출신자들이 차지하면서 정치구조의 상부를 외성인들이 독점하고 본성인들은 수적 우세를 바탕으로 지방정치체제에 참여하는 독특한 정치구조가 만들어졌다.[1] 이러한 상황에서 대만의 민심은 날로 흉흉해졌고 정부에 대한 실망과 불만이 팽배하였다.[1]
전개[편집]
담배상 폭행 사건[편집]
1947년 2월 27일 밤, 타이베이(臺北)시 위엔환(圓環) 빌딩 안의 복도에서 정부의 전매(專賣) 독점품인 담배를 노점에서 팔던 린쟝마이(林江邁)라는 여인이 허가받지 않고 담배노점을 벌였다는 이유로 담배주류공사 요원[緝煙]과 경찰에 의해 단속되고 폭행을 당하는 일이 일어났다. 탈세를 빌미로 담배주류공사의 단속요원이 담배를 팔던 여인을 상대로 총신으로 머리를 때리는 등 심한 구타를 가하자, 주변에 있던 시민들이 과격한 단속행태에 항의하면서 충돌이 빚어졌다. 군중이 모여들자 요원들은 인근 경찰서로 달아났다.
외성인 경찰이 본성인 시민을 폭행했다는 소문은 삽시간에 퍼졌고, 외성인에 대한 차별로 신음하던 본성인 군중의 규모는 점점 커졌다. 이들은 담배주류공사 요원들이 도망친 경찰서로 몰려가, 해당 요원을 내놓으라고 항의했다. 이 과정에서 경찰이 항의하는 군중에게 발포하였고, 소요사태를 구경하고 있던 학생 한 명(陳文溪; 천원시)이 총에 맞아 사망하면서 사태는 걷잡을 수 없이 커졌다. 이를 원환집연사건(圓環緝煙事件)이라고 한다.
시위의 확대[편집]
1947년 2월 28일, 사망 소식을 듣고 분노한 군중들이 발포공무원들에 대한 처벌을 주장하며 대만에 들어와 있던 중화민국 경찰과 군부대 본부를 에워싼 채 시위를 하기 시작했다. 대만 행정장관 겸 경비총사령 천이(陳儀)는 시민들의 주장을 받아들이기는커녕, 시위를 빌미로 타이베이시에 임시 계엄을 선포하였다. 이에 격분한 시민들은 급기야 경찰서에 난입, 경찰들을 구타해 경찰관이 사망하는 상황에 이르렀고, 천이의 집무처로 밀려든 시위대를 향해 군(軍)이 기관총소사를 퍼부어 많은 사상자를 냈다. 시위는 타이베이 시내 도처에서 파업, 폭동, 무기고 습격 등의 양상으로 확대되었고, 분노한 시위대는 방송국을 점거하고 대만 전 주민이 궐기할 것을 외쳤다. 타이베이에서 일어난 사건은 대만 전역의 본성인을 흥분시켰고, 대만 각지에서 시위가 일어났다. 이것이 이른바 '2·28사건'이다.
시위는 점차 격화되어 대만 전역의 본성인들은 경찰서나 군부대를 습격해 무기를 탈취해 무력시위를 벌였고, 3월 5일 자이현에서는 총으로 무장한 본성인 3,000여 명이 군경을 공격해 300여 명 이상의 사상자가 발생한 자이전투(嘉義戰鬥)가 벌어지기도 했다.
처리위원회 구성[편집]
1년 반 동안 쌓인 민중의 분노가 폭발하여 봉기는 삽시간에 대만 전역에 퍼지고, 타이베이시 참의회는 사태 해결을 위해 당일 오후 2시에 긴급회의를 소집했다. 의회에서는 사태를 진정시키기 위해 "담배 단속 살인사건 조사위원회"를 조직했다. 그리고 천이는 방송을 통해 다음 4개 사항을 공표하였다.
- 계엄은 즉시 해제한다.
- 체포된 시민은 석방한다.
- 군인과 경찰의 발포를 금한다.
- 참의원에서 대표를 추천하여 정부 관리와 같이 공동으로 처리위원회를 구성하여 이번 폭동 문제를 처리토록 한다.
이 발표에 따라 3월 2일 오전 10시를 기해 타이베이, 까오슝 등 대만 전역에서 국민당 정부의 핵심 인사들이 참여하는 한편, 군중 대표들도 참가한 '2·28사건처리위원회(二二八事件處理委員會)'가 구성되었다. 담배 전매 폐지와 언론, 집회, 결사의 자유를 요구하면서 성명서를 발표하기에 이른다.
무차별 발포를 한 군·경을 대신하여 학생과 청년들로 조직된 치안 봉사대가 치안을 유지하고 처리위원회의 공정한 조사가 진행되면서, 3월 4일 이후 사태는 서서히 진정 국면으로 들어서기 시작했다. 특히, 처리위원회에 대한 대만 주민들의 지지가 더해지면서 그 권위가 높아지자, 처리위원회는 2·28 사건에 대한 수습을 넘어 민중 분노의 근본 원인은 국민당 정부의 무능함에 있으며 이것을 해결해야 한다고 주장했다. 이들은 근본적인 정치개혁을 요구하면서 이를 대만의 자치와 인권보장을 요구하는 '32개조 요구'로 구체화시켰다. 천이는 처리위원회에서 협상하여 개혁요구를 수용한다고 밝혔으며, 경찰의 발포를 금지시키는 대신 군중도 집회를 해산할 것을 요구했다.
진압과 학살[편집]
천이는 앞으로는 처리위원회를 통해 소요사태를 진정시키려는 것처럼 보였으나, 뒤로는 시위의 무력 진압을 위해 장제스에게 대륙에 있는 국민혁명군의 조속한 증파를 요청했다. 2·28사건을 틈타 대만에 있던 지하공산당원들도 보다 본격적으로 활동하기 시작했다. 국공내전 중이었음에도 장제스는 폭동이 정부 전복 시도로 이어지고 있다는 천이의 보고에 따라 3월 8일 2개 사단과 1개 헌병대 규모의 증원군을 대만에 파견했다.
국민혁명군의 증원군이 도착한 1947년 3월 8일부터 대만에서는 대대적인 유혈진압이 시작되었다. 당일 오후 두 시에 대만 북부에 투입된 국민당 군 21사단은 곧바로 타이베이시에 진입해 시위대 진압을 개시하였다. 이로 인해 본성인 사상자가 속출하고 본성인 출신 지식인과 2·28 사건을 수습하고자 모였던 주민대표자들 상당수가 살해, 체포 또는 실종되었고 일부는 도망쳤다. 진압은 10여 일간 대대적인 학살로 이어졌고, 본성인(本省人) 약 3만 명이 살해, 실종된 것으로 추정된다.
“ '공무원은 즉시 출근하라. 학생들은 반드시 등교하라. 노동자들은 이전과 마찬가지로 출근하라'는 방송이 나왔다. 하지만 출근하던 공무원들은 모두 사거리에서 죽었다. 등교하던 학생들은 교문 어귀에서 차례로 죽어나갔다. 노동자들은 다시 집에 돌아오지 못했다. ” — 당시 생존자 증언3월 8일 가오슝(高雄), 3월 11일 지룽(基隆), 타이난(臺南), 3월 12일 자이 등에 진입한 국민당의 경찰과 계엄군은 대만 본성인에 대한 무차별적 학살과 약탈을 자행했다. 남녀노소를 불문하고 시민들을 향한 사격은 물론, 기관총과 대포까지 사용되었다. 특히 시위를 주도했던 학생들이 체포되었을 때는 입, 코, 생식기 등을 잘라내고 몸을 칼로 도륙하는 등 잔혹하게 학살했다.
이러한 대규모 살육과 약탈은 3월 17일 국민당 국방부장 바이충시(白崇禧)가 대만에 도착하여 조율에 나선 후 3월 21일이 되어서야 진정되었다. 진압과정에서의 학살과 약탈로 인해 대만은 섬 전체가 초토화되었고, 장제스는 처리위원회 인사들의 체포를 명령하고 위원회의 구성원 상당수를 처형했다. 5월 16일 장제스가 공식적으로 사태 종료를 선언함으로써 2·28 사건은 일단락되었다.
사건 이후[편집]
사건 이후 40년 동안 대만에서 2·28 사건은 언급하는 것 자체만으로도 최대의 금기였다. 국공내전에서 패퇴한 중국 국민당은 1949년 12월에 중화민국 정부를 타이베이로 옮겨왔다.(국부천대) 그러나, 이미 내전의 패색이 짙던 1949년 5월 1일 대만 섬 전체에 걸쳐 총호구 조사를 실시하였으며, 같은 달 21일에는 계엄령을 발표하였다. 그 해 말부터 위험 분자로 간주된 이들이 대거 체포됐다. '대만을 보위하고 대륙(중국 대륙)을 공격한다'(反攻大陸)는 총 구호하에서 내전을 반대하거나 국공 평화 회담을 주장하거나 평화 건설과 민생 문제를 개선하라고 요구하는 사람이나 언론은 무조건 중국 공산당의 간첩, 파괴 분자, 음모 분자로 간주되었다.
1949년 5월 21일 대만 전역에 발포된 계엄령은 38년 동안 계속되다가 1987년 7월 15일이 되어서야 장징궈(蔣經國) 총통의 명령으로 해제되었다. 계엄령이 지속되면서 금기 중의 금기가 되어버린 이 사건은, 계엄이 해제된 후 대만 독립운동가 정난롱(鄭南榕)이 1987년 2·28사건 40주년을 기념해 대만 역사상 최초로 2·28사건을 연구하는 ‘2·28평화일촉진회(二二八和平日促進會)’를 결성하며 다시 주목을 받기 시작했다. 이후 2·28사건은 대만의 독립주의 정당인 민주진보당에서 지속적으로 공론화했으며, 1988년 본성인 출신 국민당원 리덩후이(李登輝)가 총통에 취임하면서 본격적으로 언급되기 시작했다. 2·28사건 당시 구속된 경험도 있었던 리덩후이 총통은 1995년 국가차원에서는 최초로 희생자 가족에게 사과하였으며, 이듬해인 1996년 2·28사건 당일 민중이 최초로 모였던 타이베이신공원(臺北新公園; 당시의 중산공원)은 2·28평화기념공원(二二八和平紀念公園)으로 개칭되었다. 사건 발생 50주년인 1997년에는 중화민국 정부가 공식적으로 사죄하였다.
아직도 2·28 사건 사망자의 정확한 숫자는 알 수가 없다. 1991년 리덩후이 총통의 지시로, 이듬해 행정원이 발표한 「2·28 사건 연구 보고」에 따르면 2·28 사건으로 희생된 사람의 수는 3만여 명에 달하는 것으로 추산된다.
이 사건은 '국부(國父)'격인 장제스가 직, 간접적으로 연루된 사건이라 논쟁이 끊이질 않고 있다. 실제로 사건 발생 60주년인 2007년에는 장제스가 이 사건의 학살을 지시했다는 연구 결과까지 나왔다.[4] 대만에서 진보성향이거나 민주진보당을 지지하는 사람들은 장제스를 기념하는 기념관인 중정기념당을 폐관해야 한다고 주장하고 있다.[5] 이런 논란으로 인해 대만에서는 2017년부터 2월 28일마다 중정기념당을 휴관하고 있다.[6]
관련 영화[편집]
허우샤오셴(侯孝賢) 감독의 1989년작 영화 비정성시(悲情城市)는 2·28 사건을 배경으로 하고 있다. 이 영화는 4형제가 모두 죽거나 행방불명되는 비극적 가족사를 통하여 2·28사건과 제2차 세계 대전 이후의 혼란을 보여준다.
같이 보기[편집]
- 중화민국
- 중국 국민당
- 장제스
- 장징궈
- 국공내전
- 국부천대
- 계엄령
- 대만 성 계엄령(zh:臺灣省戒嚴令)
- 학살
- 대만의 역사
- 중화민국의 역사
- 동아시아의 역사
- 대구 10.1 사건
- 제주 4.3 사건
- 광주 민주화 운동
- 시모야마 사건
- 미타카 사건
- 미츠카와 사건
각주[편집]
- ↑ 가나 다 라 유용태,박진우,박태균 공저 (2010년 12월 20일). 《함께 읽는 동아시아 근현대사 2》. 창비. ISBN 978-89-364-8258-9. p178~p180
- ↑ 명나라·청나라 때 주로 푸젠성(福建省)과 광둥성(廣東省)에서 이주 정착한 한족계 주민(타이완 인구의 약 85.3%)과 오스트로네시아어족계 원주민(타이완 인구의 약 1.7%)을 말한다.
- ↑ 1945년 중화민국 편입 이후에 이주한 한족으로, 대부분이 국공내전에서 국민당이 밀리면서 정권을 따라 이주한 한족(타이완 인구의 약 13%)을 말한다.
- ↑ 대만 '2.28사건' 60주년..천총통 "장제스가 원흉" 연합뉴스, 2007.2.27.
- ↑ 장제스 '살아서는 대만으로, 죽어서는 대륙으로(?)' CBS노컷뉴스, 2007.12.25.
- ↑ 대만 원주민 학살 70주년…총통 "진상 규명이 우선"2017년 2월 28일, 연합뉴스
참고서적[편집]
- 유용태,박진우,박태균 공저 (2010년 12월 20일). 《함께 읽는 동아시아 근현대사 2》. 창비. ISBN 978-89-364-8258-9.
- 신승하 (2001년 10월 10일). 《중화민국과 공산혁명》. 대명출판사. ISBN 978-89-86883-72-5.
외부 링크[편집]
- (어제의 오늘) 1947년 대만 2·28 대학살
- 닮은 꼴 역사 ‘대만 2·28사건과 제주 4.3사건’
- <대만 2·28 사건이란>
- (중국어/영어) 타이베이 2·28 기념관 홈페이지
- (중국어/영어) 재단법인 2·28사건 기금기념회 홈페이지
No comments:
Post a Comment