2025-01-04

We Can Have Peace in the Holy Land eBook : Carter, Jimmy: Amazon.com.au: Books

We Can Have Peace in the Holy Land eBook : Carter, Jimmy: Amazon.com.au: Books






Jimmy CarterJimmy Carter
Follow




We Can Have Peace in the Holy Land Kindle Edition
by Jimmy Carter (Author) Format: Kindle Edition


4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 50


President Carter has been a student of the biblical Holy Land all his life. For the last three decades, as president of the United States and as founder of The Carter Center, he has studied the complex and interrelated issues of the region's conflicts and has been actively involved in reconciling them. He knows the leaders of all factions in the region who will need to play key roles, and he sees encouraging signs among them.

Carter describes the history of previous peace efforts and why they fell short. He argues persuasively that the road to a peace agreement is now open and that it has broad international and regional support. Most of all, since there will be no progress without courageous and sustained U.S. leadership, he says the time for progress is now. President Barack Obama is committed to a personal effort to exert that leadership, starting early in his administration.

This is President Carter's call for action, and he lays out a practical and achievable path to peace.
Read less



ISBN-13

978-1849830645
Publisher

Simon & Schuster UK










Product description

Review
"Its most important intended reader should take seriously Carter's advice to pursue peace." -The New York Times Book Review
About the Author
Jimmy Carter was the thirty-ninth President of the United States, serving from 1977 to 1981. In 1982, he and his wife founded The Carter Center, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of people around the world. Carter was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002. He is the author of thirty books, including A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety; A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power; An Hour Before Daylight: Memoirs of a Rural Boyhood; and Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis.

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Simon & Schuster UK (18 February 2010)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Print length ‏ : ‎ 256 pagesBest Sellers Rank: 1,013,551 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)81,254 in Social Sciences (Books)
925,433 in Kindle eBooksCustomer Reviews:
4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 50



About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Follow

Jimmy Carter



James D. Carter, who is known as Jimmy to his friends, IS NOT THE FORMER PRESIDENT. Jimmy was born in Milwaukee, Wiscosin before the other one ran for office.

He lives in Wisconsin with his best friend and wife Karen. His spiritual journey to maintain sanity progresses one day at a time, it has passed through time as an art teacher, artist, and insurance agent.

The stories that dwell in his head and heart have finally started emerging. The Element is his first novel. His next book, coming out in late 2012 is entitled Dear Mr. Lincoln. It is a historic supernatural/thriller.



Sort by reviews typeTop reviews

Top reviews from Australia

There are 0 reviews and 0 ratings from Australia


Top reviews from other countries


Gordon

5.0 out of 5 stars An urgent issue: Peace and justice in the Holy LandsReviewed in Canada on 3 October 2013
Verified Purchase

Jim Carter communicates with experience, insight and a passionate commitment to peace. I found his personal encounters with key players and organizations to be enlightening. The vexing issue of the settlements is explained in a helpful manner. However, the reader becomes frustrated by the provocative actions of the government of Israel and the overall apathy toward negotiations with Palestinians. I am very grateful to President Carter for his leadership and dedication to building peace in this troubled area. Highly recommended!!!

Report


Anna H. Bedford

5.0 out of 5 stars Peace Is Possible--PerhapsReviewed in the United States on 5 September 2009
Verified Purchase

Writing in his usual modest style, Nobel Peace Laureate former President Jimmy Carter lays out the history of political and diplomatic events in Israel/Palestine since 1948. In the first 12 chapters, he provides a clear and even-handed summary that favors no country--including the U.S.--over another. He makes a strong case for engaging Israel/Palestine's neighbors, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, in any solution of an apparently intransigent situation.He does not praise or blame, but simply lays out the facts gleaned from first-hand experience.
In the 13th chapter and the 5 enormously insightful appendices that follow, he lays out the agenda for peace. Jimmy Carter understands the deep need of both Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and safety. He believes that the moment of decision is close, and that strong, unbiased U.S. presidential leadership willing to deal with both Fatah and Hamas is vital.Despair in lack of progress will lead to disaster: one state instead of the majority-desired two-state solution.
I am using this book for group discussion. It's great for that, although it provides no discussion guide. The 5 maps are terrific, although I would have liked more. That, and the fact that he does not mention the plight of ancient Christian communities in the region,might be the only reason not to give this book 5 stars.

Read less
Report


CG

4.0 out of 5 stars A non-partisan review of this book.Reviewed in the United States on 18 February 2009
Verified Purchase

Too many of the reviews here are politically motivated. My goal here is to step back and write an objective review about the book only, politics aside.

This book is genuine, intelligently written, and has a well-thought out premise backed by Jimmy Carter's decades of experience working with key leaders on all sides of the Middle-East peace process. The political tide in the United States has turned, and the timing of this book is no mistake: Carter is hoping take advantage of the change to encourage another attempt of peace in the Holy Land.

The main body of the text provides a relevant history of peace efforts in the Middle-East. I found this review to be quite helpful. It reads much easier and more interesting than "The Blood of Abraham," Carter's 1985 detailed history of the various groups involved in the Middle-East. The reason I rated this book as 4 stars instead of 5 is because there really isn't a lot of new information or ideas for those who are well-read on Carter. But I can still highly recommend this book since most people out there haven't read lots of Carter.

Carter recounts the trial-and-error Camp David negotiation process that he used as President in 1978. He reminds us of the bickering and accusations made by both sides, but also the compromises they were ultimately able to agree upon. Carter's role was to lay down and enforce some rules, be willing to ad lib, be determined, and to act as friend and intermediary to both sides.

Carter is not getting any younger, and I think the take-home message is clear. This is an urgent issue that still requires a lot of hard work. Too many lives are being lost everyday on all sides. The Camp David Accords, the Oslo Accords, and other agreements were ground-breaking in their day, but time marches on. It's up to our generation and our country to go to work and use our influence in the pursuit of peace. The process will be difficult and may seem impossible at times. With this book, Carter urges us to try.

Read less
Report


W. Price

5.0 out of 5 stars Jimmy Carter rules!Reviewed in the United States on 8 June 2014
Verified Purchase

I was a kid during his Presidency and actually wore a Halloween outfit as the man during his term. However, then I couldn't tell you what his politics were and now I could care less what they were. I just know he has done a lot of good work since...that he will be known for as much as he is for his presidency. I think he is a brave man to speak up on the Isreal / Palestine issues and not take the popular side of the pair. I hope he has many more years to do the good work he does. Got this book, because I am half way through the previous one...and like it, so I got this to follow-up on his view of the issues around the Holy Land.

Report


Jonathan Zasloff

3.0 out of 5 stars Informative and well-intentioned, but naiveReviewed in the United States on 3 February 2009
Verified Purchase

This really is less a book about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and more a book about Jimmy Carter. Those who are searching for his peace plan will not find it until the last few pages of the book; instead, we get a fairly interesting history of his own interest in the region and many of his recent activities at the Carter Center. Fair enough, but perhaps the book could have had a better title.

In any event, who is the Carter that we find? Certainly not the anti-semite or anti-Israel zealot that some would have you believe. Carter clearly believes that were Israel to remove its West Bank settlements, a peace deal could be reached. But he strongly defends the existence of the state of Israel, and is careful to emphasize the fact that Israel is democracy. Indeed, that is part of the problem, Carter believes: the vibrancy of Israel's political democracy means that small parties representing settler interests are able to block negotiations because they can threaten to bring down the government. Of particular interest is a revelation that I had never seen before: Carter relates that during a recent trip to the region, Israel's deputy prime minister, the ultra-orthodox Eli Yishai, wanted to negotiate with Hamas about captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, but Hamas refused to see him. So much for the idea that it is all Israel's fault.

No--the Carter you see here is committed and well-intentioned: a genuine lover of Israel. He is also extraordinarily naive. For all the (justified) attention he gives to the noxious Israeli settlements, he gives virtually no attention to the issue that really killed the 2000-01 negotiations: the Palestinian demand for a "right of return" to Israel itself -- a demand that, if satisfied, would destroy the Jewish state. Outside of Sari Nusseibeh, no major Palestinian leader or public figure has agreed to relinquish this demand (unlike the many Israeli leaders who have called for evacuating West Bank settlements.). Perhaps this is because they feel they cannot say it in order to keep a bargaining chip. But Carter does not even acknowledge the issue.

It's not that Carter thinks the Palestinians are right about this: at the end of the book, when he sets forth his peace plan, he (finally) states quite clearly that Palestinian refugees should only have a right of return to the Palestinian state, and any who do not return should get monetary compensation. But why does Carter think that the Palestinians, who believe this right to be a sacred principle, will suddenly give it up? He doesn't say; indeed, he doesn't even think it's an issue. It's almost as if he thinks, "oh yes, by the way, that has to go." But why would the Palestinians accept it? And if they wouldn't accept it, how can there be a peace deal? He repeatedly references the Arab League's "acceptance" of Israel in the 2002 Saudi initiative, and that initiative was indeed an important development. But the Saudi initiative also insisted on the right of return. Isn't that a problem? Again, the silence is deafening.

The reader can expect as much after reading the first part of the book. There, Carter reflects on the use of the term "apartheid" in the title of his previous book. He explains that he only meant it as referring to conditions in the territories, not Israel itself. He notes that the use of the term to describe these conditions is often used in Israeli journalism (an overstatement, but true enough), and when he published the book, it did not dawn on him that it would receive the reaction it did, that American supporters of Israel might not take kindly to the idea that Israel itself is an apartheid state or that Israel in any way could be compared to the apartheid regime. He now admits that it was a mistake. You think?

And that's what makes the book so frustrating. Here is a very good man, who cares deeply about both Israelis and Palestinians, who is frustrated that a deal hasn't been reached, and has faith -- a sincere, compassionate, abiding faith -- that a deal can be reached. Since the deal hasn't been reached, he will show us the way. But it never seems to occur to him that there are real, significant issues between the parties, that it's not just that they ran out of time, and that real, serious, painful concessions must be made by both sides that they might not be ready for.

And because of that, he cannot really give us a clear idea of what, precisely, the United States should do. As much as he understands people, he doesn't seem to understand political forces -- a strange condition for a man who was, after all, elected President of the United States (and maybe the reason he wasn't re-elected). He seems to think that if only those terrible settlers would get out of the way (and they are truly terrible), then everything would be okay. I hope he's right. But he gives us little reason to believe him.

For those who know little about the region, the book is okay. He has some anti-Israel biases, but they are not strong, at least not in this book. But for those who really want the details of the region, of peacemaking, of the obstacles on both sides, you won't find much here. You are much better off just reading the online English version of the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz: [...]

I note that although this book averages 3 stars, the majority of reviews are either 5 stars or 1 star. So it goes.

Read less
Report
See more reviews

A Full Life - Wikipedia Jimmy Carter Age 90 2015

A Full Life - Wikipedia

A Full Life

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Full Life: Reflections at 90
AuthorJimmy Carter
LanguageEnglish
SubjectAutobiography
Published2015 (Simon & Schuster)
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (hardcover), Audiobook (Audio CD)
Pages272
ISBN978-1-5011-1563-9

A Full Life: Reflections at 90 is a memoir written by Jimmy Carter, the 39th President of the United States, released on July 7, 2015. The book is a collection of reflections and memories, including his upbringing, political career, and humanitarian efforts.[1][2][3][4]

Contents

[edit]

The book begins with President Carter's childhood and early life in the Georgia countryside. It covers his early political career, including his service in the Georgia Senate and his run for the governor's office.[4] The book also provides an in-depth look at President Carter's time in the White House and the difficulties he faced.[4] He divides these difficulties into two categories: "Issues Mostly Resolved" and "Problems Still Pending". The first group includes topics such as Rhodesia, the B-1 bomber, the rescue of New York City and Chrysler, and the end of the Cold War. He touches on the significant SALT II Treaty. Among the issues that remain unresolved, Carter highlights drugs, special interests, the potential for nuclear war, and intelligence agencies. He speaks about Presidents Ronald ReaganGeorge H.W. BushGeorge W. Bush, and Bill Clinton objectively but does not fully absolve them for their actions.[2] The book continues to Carter's post-presidential life, including his work with The Carter Center, his efforts to promote peace and health, and his pastimes: painting, fishing and woodwork.[5]

Critical reception

[edit]

Upon its release, A Full Life received positive reviews from both critics and readers alike. Many praised Carter for his honesty and straightforwardness in sharing his experiences and reflections. The book was also commended for its historical significance and its contributions to the understanding of modern American politics. Despite some criticism for its lack of depth on certain topics, the book was widely considered to be a fitting tribute to Jimmy Carter's life and legacy.






References[edit]
^ A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety. Simon & Schuster. 7 July 2015. ISBN 978-1-4423-9105-5. Retrieved 17 August 2015.
^ Jump up to:a b "Jimmy Carter talks about his legacy and new book, 'A Full Life: Reflections at 90' - LA Times". Latimes.com. 16 July 2015. Retrieved August 13, 2015.
^ "Books by President Jimmy Carter and Rosalynn Carter - Carter Center Books". Cartercenter.org. Archived from the original on August 12, 2015. Retrieved August 13, 2015.
^ Jump up to:a b c Josiah Kamau (2015-07-31). "Review: 'A Full Life: Reflectinons at Ninety,' by Jimmy Carter; no apologies". StarTribune.com. Retrieved 2015-08-25.
^ Rowley, Alice. "'A Full Life': Jimmy Carter's 'Reflections at Ninety' are intimate and illuminating". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 2023-02-03.


show
v
t
e
Jimmy Carter



show
v
t
e
Grammy Award for Best Audio Book, Narration & Storytelling Recording





This article about a biographical or autobiographical book on an American politician is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.




Categories: Books by Jimmy Carter
Political autobiographies
American autobiographies
2015 non-fiction books
Books about Georgia (U.S. state)
Simon & Schuster books
Books written by presidents of the United States
American politician book stubs



=====


Review: 'A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety,' by Jimmy Carter; no apologies

NONFICTION: Best viewed as a supplement to "Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President," Jimmy Carter's new memoir provides more information and insights about his personal life and values than on U.S. politics and public policy.


By GLENN C. ALTSCHULERFor the Minnesota Star Tribune
July 31, 2015 at 8:56PM

NEW YORK NY - NOVEMBER 05: Former President Jimmy Carter sighting on November 5, 2013 in New York City. (Photo by Josiah Kamau/BuzzFoto/FilmMagic) (Laurie Hertzel — BuzzFoto/FilmMagic/The Minnesota Star Tribune




Thirty-five years after he lost his bid for a second term as president, Jimmy Carter remains active and outspoken. Through the Carter Center, he engages in conflict resolution, monitors elections and promotes arms control, environmental reform, education and global health. He works for Habitat for Humanity. He has written more than two dozen books, including "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid." And he has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.


In "A Full Life," Carter reflects on nine decades of experiences, including his upbringing in rural Georgia; his stint as a naval officer, working for Hyman Rickover in developing nuclear energy; his success as a peanut farmer; his fight against racial discrimination; his political career as state senator, governor of Georgia and in the White House, and his varied and voluminous accomplishments.


Best viewed as a supplement to "Keeping Faith," his memoir of his tenure in the Oval Office, "A Full Life" provides more interesting information and insights about Carter's personal life and values than about U.S. politics and public policy.


Indeed, Carter devotes just a few pages to the Camp David accords and the Iran hostage crisis and does not discuss the problem of "stagflation" or acknowledge the downside to deregulation. Nor does he accept responsibility for his travails in office.


The news media, he writes, suspected that he "had something unsavory to hide" and could not abide having a governor from the Deep South as president. He maintains that women's rights activists and labor leaders, "with whom I felt most friendly and whom I attempted to help," caused him the most trouble.


On less overtly political issues, Carter lets his guard down. He indicates, for example, that he cannot now understand or justify his failure to consult Rosalynn, his wife, early in their marriage on decisions affecting the family, including resigning from the Navy, dividing his father's estate and running for political office. He confesses that arguments with Rosalynn during the drafting of their book, "Everything to Gain," grew so heated that they communicated only through harsh e-mails and ultimately decided to label each paragraph "J" or "R."


As "A Full Life" makes clear, Carter retains resentments. Ted Kennedy, he suggests, may have kept him from being re-elected. Ronald Reagan instructed diplomats not to assist him or acknowledge his presence. President Obama has kept his distance, Carter speculates, because he fears a backlash from pro-Israeli American Jews.


Jimmy Carter is a remarkable man who can legitimately look back on a remarkably productive life. Even at age 90, however, this decent and deeply religious man is not always able to forget — or forgive.


Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin professor of American studies at Cornell University.

"A Full Life," by Jimmy Carter (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

President Jimmy Carter applauded Ted Kennedy at the Democratic National Convention in 1980, but he suggests that Kennedy kept him from being re-elected. (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

===





A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety Paperback – Illustrated, 19 July 2016
by Jimmy Carter (Author)
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 1,641


In his major New York Times bestseller, Jimmy Carter looks back from ninety years of age and “reveals private thoughts and recollections over a fascinating career as businessman, politician, evangelist, and humanitarian” (Booklist).

At ninety, Jimmy Carter reflects on his public and private life with a frankness that is disarming. He adds detail and emotion about his youth in rural Georgia that he described in his magnificent An Hour Before Daylight. He writes about racism and the isolation of the Carters. He describes the brutality of the hazing regimen at Annapolis, and how he nearly lost his life twice serving on submarines and his amazing interview with Admiral Rickover. He describes the profound influence his mother had on him, and how he admired his father even though he didn’t emulate him. He admits that he decided to quit the









Navy and later enter politics without consulting his wife, Rosalynn, and how appalled he is in retrospect.

In his “warm and detailed memoir” (Los Angeles Times), Carter tells what he is proud of and what he might do differently. He discusses his regret at losing his re-election, but how he and Rosalynn pushed on and made a new life and second and third rewarding careers. He is frank about the presidents who have succeeded him, world leaders, and his passions for the causes he cares most about, particularly the condition of women and the deprived people of the developing world.

“Always warm and human…even inspirational” (Buffalo News), A Full Life is a wise and moving look back from this remarkable man. Jimmy Carter has lived one of our great American lives—from rural obscurity to world fame, universal respect, and contentment. A Full Life is an extraordinary read from a “force to be reckoned with” (Christian Science Monitor).





===


===


===

From other countries
L. West 5.0 out of 5 stars Five star review Reviewed in the United States on 27 December 2023 Verified Purchase "A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety" is a literary treasure and a true testament to a life well-lived. This five-star review is a heartfelt acknowledgment of the profound impact this memoir has had on me.
Jimmy Carter's reflective journey through his remarkable life is not just a memoir; it's an invaluable source of wisdom, humility, and inspiration. Carter's storytelling is not only eloquent but also deeply authentic, offering readers an intimate look into the experiences that shaped his extraordinary journey.
The narrative is rich with anecdotes, insights, and lessons learned from a life dedicated to service, leadership, and unwavering principles. Carter's humility and integrity shine through every page, making this memoir a beacon of hope and a guiding light for those who aspire to make a positive impact on the world.
The storytelling is both poignant and charming, weaving together personal and historical moments that have defined Carter's legacy. From his childhood in rural Georgia to his presidency and beyond, the memoir provides a comprehensive and engrossing account that resonates with authenticity.
What sets "A Full Life" apart is its universal appeal. Regardless of one's political affiliations, the book transcends partisan divides, offering universal truths about the human experience. Carter's reflections on family, faith, love, and service are relatable and profoundly moving.
The prose is beautifully crafted, reflecting Carter's deep appreciation for language and storytelling. Each chapter unfolds like a conversation with an old friend, making it a joy to read and savor. The narrative flows seamlessly, keeping the reader engaged and invested in every aspect of Carter's life.
In conclusion, "A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety" is a literary masterpiece that resonates with warmth, wisdom, and a profound sense of purpose. It's a book that enriches the soul and leaves a lasting impression on the reader. I wholeheartedly give it five stars and recommend it to anyone seeking a captivating and enlightening journey through the life of one of America's most admired leaders. 13 people found this helpful Report

Rajesh Nair 5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Visage Reviewed in India on 26 July 2017 Verified Purchase Excellent visage of a great person who went beyond the conventional to make the world a better place ! 2 people found this helpful Report
Amanda 5.0 out of 5 stars Amanda Reviewed in France on 20 January 2016 Verified Purchase I lived in the USA whilst he was President and all thought he was weak but I never thought so. This book shows that he is one of the most caring and genuine people to have "ruled" in the US. I hope he will be remembered for all that he has done. Good reading. 3 people found this helpful Report
Jean-Guy Rens 5.0 out of 5 stars One feels a little better while reading this book Reviewed in Canada on 1 September 2015 Verified Purchase Jimmy Carter gives us his view on the facts of his life, since childhood in the segregated South to his days at the head of the Carter Center and it is facinating to be given such a privilege. Everything is his life is extraordinary -- since his days in a submarine to his presidency and his humanitarian action which earned him a Nobel Prize. Everything he did is explained with clarity as being "ordinary" and "simple". Jimmy Carter illustrated this book with naive paintings that are surprisingly effective: his portraits look like real people, his landscapes look like nature. With lucidity, he apparaises his craft: "I realized many years ago that I do not have any special talent as an artist or craftsman, but with a lot of study and practice I have become fairly proficient." Jimmy Carter writes like he paints, with proficiency. This is not great literature, but one discovers behind the written word an author as a "gentleman". What is presented as common sense is, actually, dignity, fairness, kindness. It is such a rare feeling, that it is worth reading every page. Another detail: one feels a little better while reading it! 3 people found this helpful Report
Amazon Customer 4.0 out of 5 stars Indians May not relate much campared to the Americans Reviewed in India on 3 November 2019 Verified Purchase Very good Book about a persons life from son of a farmer to the President of America One person found this helpful Report

MICHELE 5.0 out of 5 stars A Fantastic Read Reviewed in France on 5 May 2018 Verified Purchase "A Full Life" written by an amazing gentleman, very much matches the title it is given. Jimmy reflects on his extraordinary life with calm, humor & humility. I highly recommend Jimmy's 30th book. Customer image One person found this helpful Report Translate review to English
Rafe Mair 4.0 out of 5 stars Age cannot wither ... Reviewed in Canada on 23 August 2015 Verified Purchase Jimmy Carter's presidency improves with the time. He certainly did not have that great political necessity, good luck. Since his presidency he has been one of the more remarkable people on the planet. The good he has done is extraordinary. I had the good fortune to interview President Carter many years ago on his book on flyfishing, a hobby we shared. I was told by my producer that the deal wise that I not ask Mr. Carter any questions about politics. I replied "I never make deals like that – if you think I'm going to miss this opportunity you got another think coming!" We talked about fishing and his excellent little book and I close with a question about the release of the hostages on the day Ronald Reagan was sworn into office and asked his reaction at this point. President Carter gave me a thorough, gracious, articulate answer without showing the slightest indication of annoyance. His current book shows a few signs of age around the edges, not surprising considering he was 90 when he wrote, it but for all that is a hell of a good read. In fact it makes an excellent fairly quick biography of a man who will stand very high indeed when full assessment of his time is made. 2 people found this helpful Report

Luke Williams 4.0 out of 5 stars A Truly Decent Man Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 10 September 2016 Verified Purchase Jimmy Carter was one of the greatest Presidents that America has ever had. He believed in taking greater moral responsibilities in both domestic and foreign affairs, even though the media would frequently see past this and give him a hard time for bucking the Establishment, as well as disloyal members of his own party such as Ted Kennedy standing against him. Internationally, Carter was able to normalise relations with China, take strong standpoints on Russian repression, and reduce proliferation of nuclear weapons; domestically, he achieved such policies as compensating Native Americans in land disputes, and protecting Alaskan natural sites from oil exploitation. Right-wing Presidencies since Carter have sadly repealed some of his progressive policies, such as Ronald Reagan criminalising thousands of drug users instead of helping them with their addictions, and George W. Bush overturning intelligence agency legislation in order to condone personal privacy invasions. Carter and his wife now run the Carter Centre which has achieved great things such as peace negotiations, monitoring to ensure free and fair elections, building homes for underdeveloped communities, and helping to reduce the spread of tropical diseases. This book gives a succinct autobiographical overview of Carter’s life, and although it is not as detailed as some erudite biographies, this makes it more accessible for casual readers. My main criticisms would be that Carter spends too much time extolling the virtues of his religion – which sometimes led him into poor decision-making – and his negativity concerning the Obama administration is unfounded. Of course Carter made mistakes – his failure to confront the Shah of Iran would ultimately be his Presidential downfall – but if more political leaders had his moral integrity, the world would be a better place. 6 people found this helpful Report

Prima 4.0 out of 5 stars Honorable Reviewed in the United States on 26 October 2024 Verified Purchase Condition of the book(s) was very good. President Carter’s 100th Birthday was earlier this month (10/1/24) 🎉Reading this during his centurion milestone alongside an impending Presidential election (Harris & Trump) has been insightful & inspirational. Makes me yearn for a time in America when we worked with ethic, partnered for the better and cared about the fate of our neighbor(s.) I was a young child when he was in office and grew up hearing he was a “weak” president. I disagree after reading this. His wife Roselyn was behind many of the decisions he had to make (they didn’t always agree & backed each other up.) She was an active First Lady. A genuine portrayal of his lived experience(s.) Respect to President Carter for being an Honorable American, Honorable Veteran, Honorable Family Man and Humanitarian. A good Human. 6 people found this helpful Report

===


===








When Jimmy Carter proved he was no saint - Washington Examiner

When Jimmy Carter proved he was no saint - Washington Examiner

When Jimmy Carter proved he was no saint
By
John Roberts
December 30, 2024


As former President Jimmy Carter‘s long life has come to an end, the panegyrics lauding his presidency have begun.

Although there was much good and decent in Carter, there is one aspect of his legacy that is hardly praiseworthy. Until Carter’s 1980 reelection drive, no postwar president had used race to divide the electorate as an explicit part of their campaign strategy.


In late August 1980, Carter’s Cabinet and campaign began launching a series of attacks characterizing Ronald Reagan as a racist. They began when Patricia Roberts Harris, Carter’s secretary of health and human services, delivered a hard-hitting speech saying that if Reagan became president, he would “divide black and white, rich and poor, Christian and Jew.” Harris capped off her polarizing diatribe by saying that whenever she heard Reagan speak, she “sees the specter of white sheets.” It was a clear allusion to the Ku Klux Klan.

This was just the start, however.

Harris’s attack was soon echoed by Andrew Young, formerly Carter’s ambassador to the United Nations, who also attempted to link Reagan to the KKK. To reinforce the attacks, the Carter/Mondale Reelection Committee placed ads in black media charging that Reagan wanted to block progress for black people. An ad in the Washington Afro-American newspaper bore a banner headline proclaiming that “Jimmy Carter named 37 Black Judges” and “Cracked down on job bias.” The tagline read, “That’s why the Republicans are out to beat him.”


The ad copy expanded on the theme that Republicans were anti-black. It excoriated former President Richard Nixon for “coddling the bigots and exploiters” before extolling Carter’s record of creating job programs and federal contracts for minority-owned firms. The ad then singled out Reagan and John Anderson, a centrist Republican who was running for president as an independent. “That’s the record,” it said, “the Reagan and Anderson Republicans want us to reject.” The Carter team’s messaging was clear: Reagan was the embodiment of the Ku Klux Klan and antisemitic. A vote for Reagan was a vote to block black empowerment and roll back civil rights.

The problem with this narrative is simple. Namely, that even before Carter’s attacks began, Reagan had unequivocally denounced the KKK. When an organization calling itself the “Invisible Knights of the Ku Klux Klan” endorsed his candidacy, he publicly rejected its support. “I detest the very basis of the Ku Klux Klan and similar organizations which are founded on racial hatred,” Reagan said. “Racial and religious hatred, wherever they exist in this nation, represent a dark blot on, and a tragic rejection of, all the good that America stands for and has to offer.”

Reagan’s campaign chairman, Sen. Paul Laxalt, responded to the Carter campaign’s negative attacks with a seven-page open letter to newspaper editorial writers. Detailing Carter’s past use of similar negative campaign tactics, the senator called it a “history of unrepentant mud-gunning.” Laxalt blasted Carter for playing the race card in his campaigns.

In one instance, the campaign’s strategy was to arouse racial animosity instead of opposing it. During his 1970 race for the Georgia governorship, Carter’s team passed out leaflets at a Ku Klux Klan rally showing his rival standing next to a black athlete at a postgame celebration. The leaflet was widely distributed in parts of the state with a pro-segregation history and intended to suppress white votes for his opponent, incumbent Gov. Carl Sanders.


Reagan called on Carter to repudiate Harris’s and Young’s attacks. Saying he was “greatly disturbed about efforts to make the Ku Klux Klan an issue in this campaign,” he called them a “futile attempt to divert attention from the real issue of this campaign, which is his sorry record.” But Carter never publicly rebuked Harris or Young for attacking Reagan as racist. Carter apologists may object that Carter himself never smeared Reagan as racist, but he certainly condoned it from his Cabinet officers, his supporters, and his campaign team.

Top line: Carter’s silence legitimized the Democratic strategy of attacking Republican opponents as racists. It has since been used so frequently at all campaign levels that public opinion polls show most Democratic voters actually believe every Republican is a racist. A 2018 Axios survey of 3,700 adults found that 61% of Democrats think Republicans are racists.

Many facets of Carter’s life deserve acclaim, but his conduct of the 1980 campaign is not among them. In his 1976 campaign, Carter pledged to bring back trust and integrity in government. But to win reelection, he abandoned those principles by sowing discord and division. Carter helped set in motion the political dynamics that created our nation’s current state of deep political polarization. That is a major blemish on his record that should not be forgotten.


John B. Roberts II was a press spokesman for the 1980 Reagan/Bush campaign and served in the White House. He is the author of “Reagan’s Cowboys: Inside the 1984 Reelection Campaign’s Secret Operation Against Geraldine Ferraro.” His website is www.jbrobertsauthor.com.

Losing my religion for equality

Losing my religion for equality

Politics
Federal

This was published 15 years ago
Losing my religion for equality

ByJimmy Carter
July 15, 2009 — 12.00am
===

Women and girls have been discriminated against for too long in a twisted interpretation of the word of God.

I HAVE been a practising Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.


Play Video








Play video


0:50
Jimmy Carter backs renewable energy to create jobs









2017: Former US President says millions of jobs could be created if President Donald Trump embraces renewable energy sources.

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women's equal rights across the world for centuries.



At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.


Illustration: Dyson

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

Advertisement



It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices - as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

Clementine Ford: Jimmy Carter was right

Carter's message: the fight continues

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: "The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."



We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world's major faiths share.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place - and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence - than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn't until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.

OBSERVER



Jimmy Carter was president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.

Jimmy Carter: U.S. one of worst offenders in modern slavery - The Washington Post

Jimmy Carter: U.S. one of worst offenders in modern slavery - The Washington Post




clockThis article was published more than 10 years ago



PoliticsBiden administrationDonald TrumpThe FixThe BriefsPollingDemocracy in AmericaElections

Jimmy Carter: U.S. one of worst offenders in modern slavery
March 24, 2014


By Aaron Blake



Former president Jimmy Carter says in a new interview that the United States is the one of the world's worst offenders when it comes to modern-day slavery, saying its slave trade is worse today than it was even in the 1700s.



"The United States is one of the most culpable countries in ... modern slavery," Carter said in an interview on MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports." "The slave trade now greatly exceeds anything that happened in the 19th and 18th centuries."

🏛️

Follow PoliticsFollow


The United States banned the importation of slaves starting in 1808, but slavery itself persisted for another half-century.


Carter said that, of the 29

Jimmy Carter: Slavery is worse now than in 1700s

Jimmy Carter: Slavery is worse now than in 1700s


Jimmy Carter: Slavery is worse now than in 1700s
CNBC.com staff
September 29, 2014






Justin Sullivan I Getty Images

Human slavery is not just a major issue in developing countries, but is a serious problem in the U.S. and is more prolific now than during the 18th and 19th century, former President Jimmy Carter has told Tania Bryer, host of "CNBC Meets."


Carter said 200-300 girls are sold into sexual slavery every month in his home state Georgia, and many living in advanced economies are completely unaware of the abuse happening to young women close to home.


Read More Nearly 30 million people still trapped in slavery

Referring to facts in his most recent book, "A Call to Action, Women, Religion, Violence and Power," Carter describes the abuse of women around the world as "the worst, unaddressed issue that the world faces today."

"And those of us in the more advanced countries don't know much about horrible abuse of girls whose genitals are mutilated when they're very young, children who are killed because a girl is raped by strangers and her family kills her to protect their own nation's honor. These kinds of things go on in the more remote parts of the world as far as we're concerned," the Democratic former president said.

Read More Are interns forced to work too hard?


"But even in the United States, human slavery now is greater than it ever was during the 18th or 19th century. In Atlanta, Georgia, we have between 200-300 girls sold into sexual slavery every month," he added.

Before moving into politics, Carter was in the Navy and worked on the family's farm. He served as the 39th president from 1977 to 1981 and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his efforts in finding peaceful solutions to international conflicts and his work in human rights.


Carter, who is turning 90 on Wednesday, and wife Rosalynn still travel the world doing work for The Carter Center, his human rights and health care charity, which he set up after leaving the White House.

Read More '12 Years a Slave, 'American Hustle' win top Golden Globes

In his new book, Carfter details how gender discrimination and sexual abuse in the U.S. Navy and college campuses across the country is widely covered up.

"It's not addressed directly because the college owners and administrators don't want it to be known that they have sexual assaults still taking place on their college campuses. And the same thing applies obviously in the military," he told CNBC.

Carter, who has written 28 books, hopes his most recent offering will encourage governments to take action.

"Well I hope that this book, which is doing quite well, as far as number of sales, it's got a lot of publicity, I hope it will induce governments, not only in America but around the world, to do something about these abuses that are quite often self-concealed by the people responsible," he said.