You Don’t Get Trump Without Gaza | The Nation

You Don’t Get Trump Without Gaza | The Nation
Politics / April 3, 2025

You Don’t Get Trump Without Gaza

Fascism doesn’t just appear. It must be invited in—and the bipartisan repression of the anti-genocide movement did just that.

Ben Ehrenreich




A protest in the Meatpacking District, Manhattan, New York, on Saturday, March 29, 2025.(Cristina Matuozzi / SIPA USA via AP)
===

Of course, they came for a Palestinian first. I’m sure he didn’t want to be, not like this, but he’s famous now: Mahmoud Khalil, the activist disappeared from his Columbia University–owned apartment by Department of Homeland Security agents on orders from the White House.


00:07

03:12


Read More

Next came the Georgetown postdoc Badar Khan Suri, detained by black-masked agents on his way home from class. Suri, who is Indian, is married to a Palestinian-American and was accused by a DHS spokesperson of “spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting antisemitism.”

Next was Momodou Taal, a British-Gambian PhD candidate at Cornell who, less than a week after he filed suit against the government to block the enforcement of two Trump executive orders aimed at Palestine-solidarity activists like himself, was “invited” by the Justice Department to “surrender to ICE custody” and begin the process of his own deportation. Instead, he left the country.

Then came Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish grad student at Tufts who was grabbed off the street and flown to a private immigration prison in Louisiana. Her crimes appear to be limited to coauthoring an op-ed that asked Tufts administrators to engage honestly with a student senate resolution “demanding that the University acknowledge the Palestinian genocide.”

None of these four are US citizens, and all have been the subjects of online smear campaigns by pro-Israel groups, which made them easy targets. But if you think that citizenship or relative anonymity will keep you safe, think again.

On March 17, the Justice Department announced the creation of “Joint Task Force October 7,” which will be free to pursue citizens and noncitizens alike. Staffed by FBI agents and data analysts, it will investigate, among other things, “acts of terrorism and civil rights violations by individuals and entities providing support and financing to Hamas, related Iran proxies, and their affiliates, as well as acts of antisemitism by these groups,” which sounds nefarious indeed but is, we know by now, established code for “taking a stand against Israel’s genocide in Gaza.”

Current Issue
April 2025 Issue

Like the devil, vampires, and the more timid varieties of ghost, fascism must be invited in. The Trump administration’s first political persecutions have all targeted individuals who were bold enough to believe that constitutional guarantees of free expression extended to solidarity with Palestine. This was hardly an accident. In the time-honored practice of predatory bullies everywhere, Trump’s minions went after the defenseless first, and specifically those made vulnerable not only by their immigration status but by a 15-month-and-running bipartisan campaign to repress opposition to the ongoing slaughter in Gaza, an effort in which nearly every political, educational, and cultural institution in American society has taken part.

In 1941, while waiting in exile in Finland for a visa to the United States, the German writer Bertolt Brecht penned “a parable play,” as he called it, titled The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui. On the surface, it’s a Chicago gangland drama with monologues cribbed from Shakespeare, filtered through the tough-guy argot of a James Cagney film, then stretched to absurd proportions by a screwball plot involving the strong-arming of the city’s powerful “Cauliflower Trust.” Still, the allegory would have been impossible to miss: Arturo Ui, “the gangster of gangsters…direct from heaven in punishment for all our sins of violence, stupidity, and impotence,” is an obvious stand-in for Hitler. Brecht’s concern, as urgent then as now, was to figure out how such a buffoonish and cartoonishly evil figure could take control of a nation.

In Brecht’s version, the cauliflower bosses laugh off Ui’s initial offers of “protection”—he’s just a minor-league extortionist with a shrinking crew of goons. (Think Mar-a-Lago circa 2023, the indictments swiftly multiplying.) But when Dogsborough, the elderly mayor and an apparent paragon of honesty, cuts a crooked deal with the Cauliflower Trust, Ui sees his opportunity. Blackmail unlocks the door. Soon, the protection money is rolling in and, despite the “security” Ui promises to bring to the vegetable market, the bodies begin to pile up. Brecht’s point was hardly subtle: Germany’s elites, unified by greed, corruption, arrogance, and an eagerness to maintain dominance over an increasingly emboldened working class, had invited Hitler over the threshold. He knew where to go from there.

If we survive our present nightmare, we will likely argue for decades about the coalitions, ideological tendencies, and material conditions that combined to usher Trump to power this second time around. From adjoining cages at Guantánamo, we can bicker over whether fascism is the appropriate term for what Trump wrought. But one thing is already obvious. In the 13 months that preceded the 2024 election, the door was again and again pushed open, the invitation issued, copied, and posted for all to see. This time it wasn’t old-fashioned corruption that gave the gangsters their opening, at least not in any economic sense. Gaza opened the door.


The Nation Weekly
Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
EmailBy signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.
Sign Up

The brutal silencing, manipulative dishonesty, McCarthyite pettiness, thuggish illiberalism, and general censorial repressiveness that liberal pundits currently associate with Trumpism have been rampant in the US since just after October 7, 2023, when it became clear that Israel’s response to Hamas’s attack would not be merely disproportionate but exterminatory in scope and intent.

Rot, famously, starts at the top. Joe Biden, sleepy guardian of empire and whatever remained of the liberal world order, had stayed comatose on nearly every issue of import to his constituents. But the genocide seemed to bring him briefly and sporadically back to life. It was as if funding and propagandizing for Israel’s slaughter were the only aspect of the job that still got his blood moving. He was, as Brecht wrote of Dogsborough, “Like an old family Bible nobody’d opened for ages—till one day some friends were flipping through it and found a dried-up cockroach between the pages.” The rest of the political establishment, Democrats and Republicans both, didn’t need to be told to follow Biden’s lead. The very few exceptions—we see you, Cori, Ilhan, Rashida —were disciplined and marginalized.

In an extraordinary show of class unity for a nation supposedly irreparably divided on party lines, our homegrown Cauliflower Trust closed ranks. It was almost as if American upper management, regardless of religion or politics, instinctively understood that maintaining the right of an ethnocratic settler-colonial outpost to exterminate an unruly subject population was essential to its own survival. Or perhaps they were more cunning and saw a ready-made opportunity to take down the left.

The major newspapers, television networks, and virtually all the prestige magazines did their part, boosting the credibility of nearly every outrageous lie invented by Israeli military propagandists while smearing protesters as antisemites, Hamas stooges, and terrorist sympathizers. “It doesn’t matter what professors or smart-alecks think,” pronounced Brecht’s Arturo Ui, “all that counts is how the little man sees his master.”

But it did matter: University administrators across the country banned student groups, investigated and fired professors and staffers, suspended and expelled students, handing them over to riot police and, at UCLA, to a violent right-wing mob. Remember when the presidents of three of the most prestigious universities in the country were ritually humiliated by Congress for not doing enough to “atone,” in the words of one Virginia representative, for the sin of allowing criticism of Israel to persist on their campuses? In retrospect, it looks like a practice run for the groveling required by the current regime. And, of course, it was endorsed by both parties; Democratic governors were imposing their will on universities long before Trump returned to office.

It didn’t stop in higher ed. Months before Elon Musk emerged as the surgically enhanced face of American neofascism, tech industry executives were revealing the brown shirts they kept zipped beneath their hoodies. Google, Microsoft, and Meta, among others, offered their services to the Israeli military while firing employees who dared express support for Palestinians. The one major social media platform that did not enthusiastically censor and throttle news from Gaza would be banned by Congress, with overwhelming support from both political parties.

The repression was nearly universal. An imprudently candid social media post, a keffiyeh around the shoulders, or a watermelon pin on the lapel was enough to bring down the axe. Journalists, cable news commentators, and editors lost their jobs, but so did staffers at synagogues and Jewish organizations, nurses, school teachers, baristas, museum workers, the editor in chief of Artforum, the star of Scream 7. Events were canceled, awards rescinded, contracts broken. For 15 long months before Jelani Cobb, the dean of Columbia’s journalism school, advised his students not to say anything about the Middle East on social media, Americans from all walks of life were getting tuition-free lessons in the tricks of survival in an authoritarian state: silence, self-censorship, submission. All that matters is how the little man sees his master.

And here we are. The obscene weaponization of antisemitism helped bring actual Nazis to power. The Anti-Defamation League felt compelled to defend Musk’s Sieg Heil salute at Trump’s inauguration “as an awkward gesture [made] in a moment of enthusiasm.” Some veteran inquisitors are now suffering buyer’s remorse. (“You holler for meat,” scoffs one of Arturo Ui’s lieutenants, “then curse the cook because he walks around with a butcher knife.”) Former Harvard president Lawrence Summers, who spent months fulminating for ever greater repression of “the cancer of antisemitism”—evident in the use of supposedly hateful words like genocide, Nakba, and divestment—confessed to being “profoundly saddened and alarmed” by Columbia University’s recent capitulation to Trump’s demands. The Atlantic, the thinking man’s propaganda organ for the exterminatory wars of empire, made sure to bludgeon student protesters even while criticizing the DHS’s kidnapping of Mahmoud Khalil—not for its cruelty and manifest illegality, but, in Graeme Wood’s words, for its “simultaneous failure to grasp the spirit of America and of academia at their best. Some countries repress dissent; others tolerate it.” Indeed.

In 1944, with the war still on and the Nazis reaching for unprecedented peaks of butchery, the still-anti-Zionist leadership of the American Jewish Committee had reason to worry that fascism might not be a purely European problem. They hired Brecht’s fellow exile Theodor Adorno and a team of scholars to investigate antisemitic, racist, and authoritarian tendencies within the United States. (The president of Columbia University at the time, it’s worth noting, was an admirer of Mussolini who invited the ambassador to Nazi Germany to campus and had protesting students arrested.) After six years of research and analysis, their conclusions were not exactly reassuring, but they are encouraging, almost. It takes more than the complicity of the powerful, they determined, for a whole nation to fall to fascism. The latter, they wrote, “must have a mass base. It must secure not only the frightened submission but the active cooperation of the great majority of the people.”

If they are right, we are not there yet. But what we are seeing is just the beginning. Trump’s lackeys are not going to stop unless someone makes them. “It is up to the people,” Adorno and his coauthors wrote—in 1950, though it might have been yesterday—“to decide whether or not this country goes fascist.” In the last few weeks, we have watched one institution after another bend at the knee before this latest “great historical gangster show,” to borrow a phrase from Brecht. Did you really expect more from the Cauliflower crew?

It is not at all clear how to proceed when the institutions most capable of offering organized resistance are so thoroughly corrupted, or what, in their absence, “the people” might still mean. But those are the questions before us, and they cannot be answered unless they are asked.

Submit a correction
Send a letter to the editor
Reprints & permissions


Ben Ehrenreich


Ben Ehrenreich’s most recent books include The Way to the Spring, based on his reporting from the West Bank, and Desert Notebooks: A Road Map for the End of Time, which was awarded an American Book Award in 2021.

===
Popular“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →
Trump’s Delusional Tariff Policy Is Already Wreaking HavocTrump’s Delusional Tariff Policy Is Already Wreaking Havoc

Chris Lehmann

You Don’t Get Trump Without GazaYou Don’t Get Trump Without Gaza

Ben Ehrenreich

This Executive Order Reveals the Trump-Musk EndgameThis Executive Order Reveals the Trump-Musk Endgame

Elie Mystal

“Made in America” Never Meant More Ethical“Made in America” Never Meant More Ethical

Derek Guy

====