6:27 / 6:33
Carter urges halt to Israeli settlement building - 27 Aug 09
Al Jazeera English
15.1M subscribers
Subscribed
256
Share
Al Jazeera is funded in whole or in part by the Qatari government. Wikipedia
14,203 views Aug 28, 2009
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
Former US President Jimmy Carter says a freeze on Israeli settlements is "absolutely necessary" to achieving peace in the Middle East.
In an interview with Al Jazeera, Carter, who is currently visiting Israel as a member of the group known as the 'Elders', spoke about his views on the prospects for Middle East peace.
His comments come as Barack Obama, the US president, attempts to seal an Arab-Israeli peace deal that has eluded the region for more than six decades.
His administration has already made it clear it opposes the ongoing building of Jewish settlements on Palestinian land occupied since 1967.
Hundreds of thousands of homes have been constructed by Israel despite international condemnation and in contravention of international law.
====
Transcript
for the building of settlements and the
pressure to stop them dominating plenty
of discussions then but there is another
issue that's not being embraced quite so
publicly and that's what to do with the
Palestinian movement Hamas we will go in
a moment to Gaza and get more from our
correspondent there on that but first
let's cross over now live to Jerusalem
and talk with an internationally
renowned statesman who has been to Gaza
and sat down with Hamas leaders let's
welcome Jimmy Carter the former US
president he's been visiting Israel as a
member of the group known as the eldest
thank you so much for joining us you
were quoted on june the 16th is saying
you would soon meet with obama
administration officials to discuss your
latest visit to the region what reaction
did you get from these officials to your
request for them to reconsider to remove
Hamas from the terrorist list well I
haven't made a specific request that
they do that but what the elders are
here for is to increase our knowledge of
the Mideast region and to add our
influence without any authority to the
pursuit of a comprehensive peace
agreement we have communicated with the
Obama officials that the settlement
freeze is absolutely necessary and this
includes any expansion of the
settlements and this is compatible with
the speech that President Obama made in
Cairo as you all know and also the
agreement that the Israelis made in
Annapolis a couple years ago when Olmert
was a prime minister that they would not
in expand the settlements including
natural growth and that included both
the West Bank of course and east
jerusalem and even last month as you
also know they are you know that's a
quartet reiterated its demand that all
settlement expansion stop included
natural growth throughout the West Bank
and East Jerusalem as I'm sure you're
aware though the recent reports seem to
indicate that the u.s. is position or
the Obama administration's position on
demanding an absolute halt to settlement
activity may be softening do you think
that the they're going in the right
direction with that softening is not in
there
direction no like I think that Sandridge
are you concerned then that perhaps a
deal that would allow settlement
activity to continue in some form may be
actually counterproductive for the peace
process I certainly do think it's not
only counterproductive but it's a
violation of what I just outlined the
statement that President Obama made in
Cairo and the official reiteration of
that premise by the international
quartet members even just last month no
expansion of settlement activity
including natural growth and that
certainly includes East Jerusalem as
well as or perhaps even more importantly
than was the West Bank we could come
back to the issue of Hamas again you
have made statements in the past calling
for the u.s. to change its position on
Hamas have you seen it any indication
from Obama administration officials to
indicate that they actually might take
that course well I would like to see
some communication even either direct or
indirect between the American officials
or representatives and Hamas as well as
as Fatah because Hamas has got to be
involved in the future I would say
reconciliation in the Palestinian
community and also has to be involved
ultimately in approving or disapproving
or copying it's a peace agreement is
reached between Israel and the
Palestinian community I've met it length
with the Hamas officials as you may know
in Damascus and also from Gaza and they
have assured me and announced publicly
that Hamas would accept a an agreement
negotiated between their representatives
that is Mahmoud Abbas of Amazon on the
one hand and Israeli officials if it's
submitted to the Palestinian people and
approved in a referendum to let the
public say among the Palestinians this
is okay with us so I think that's a
major step forward and that's an
important of factors and of course I
would also like for Hamas to agree
perhaps to accept in its entirety the
implementation of the Arab Peace
Initiative that was taken first
announced first in 2002 and
y'all ready last year oh that's the
figure than jumping in again I guess I
have two important questions on this
point first of all when you say Hamas
appear to have accepted or have stated
that they will accept a creation of a
Palestinian state in 1967 lines it's
well known but did they indicate they
would accept the existence of the state
of israel in principle that seems to be
one of the demands of the pietà yes
existence yes recognition no they
haven't agreed to recognition because
Israel has never recognized officially
even the Palestinian National Authority
the only thing that Israel has ever
recognized officially is the PLO and
that was a result of the Oslo agreement
as you know so a recognition I've been
president I've negotiated a lot of times
recognition is a mutual affair and I
don't think there's any constant talk
contemplation of Israel recognizing that
Hamas but I think that in the future
with a peace agreement that can be
mutual recognition even officially of a
Palestinian nation in the west bank and
gaza and east jerusalem and israeli
nation behind the 67 borders and my
final point then mr. Carter is again on
the point of the Obama administration's
reaction do you believe have you seen
anything to indicate that their position
on Hamas might change I think they're
from their position on Hamas might
change but first it's up to Fatah
leaders and Hamas leaders to have a
reconciliation between them so that the
United States can deal with a
comprehensive unity government that
represents equally both Hamas and Fatah
I don't think that it's possible for the
United States to acknowledge or deal
directly with Hamas to the exclusion of
a comprehensive unity Palestinian
community all right thank you very much
for talking to us former US President
Jimmy Carter it's a pleasure thank you
No comments:
Post a Comment