2019-12-01

What is the Aim of Nippon Kaigi, the Ultra-Right Organization that Supports Japan’s Abe Administration? | The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus



What is the Aim of Nippon Kaigi, the Ultra-Right Organization that Supports Japan’s Abe Administration?¹


Tawara Yoshifumi

Translation by Asia Policy Point, Senior Fellow William Brooks and Senior Research Assistant Lu Pengqiao

Introduction by Tomomi Yamaguchi




November 1, 2017
Volume 15 | Issue 21 | Number 1
Article ID 5081







Introduction

Nippon Kaigi [The Japan Conference], established in 1997, is the largest right-wing organization in Japan. The organization is a major supporter of the current Prime Minister Abe Shinzo, and both Japanese and foreign media report that Abe, and many of his cabinet, are prominent member of its Diet Members League. Despite Nippon Kaigi’s influence on governmental policies of Japan, the organization was little known to the general public until 2015. In 2016, however, numerous books and magazine articles focusing on Nippon Kaigi were published, some becoming best sellers. This created a “Nippon Kaigi boom” in the publishing world.2

These 2016 works on Nippon Kaigi, however, were not the first. A number of journalists, scholars and activists have long paid attention to the history and activism of Nippon Kaigi. Tawara Yoshifumi, a leading specialist on education and textbook adoption issues, and the secretary general of Children and Textbooks Japan Network 21, has published articles and books that on Nippon Kaigi over the years.

The article translated here appeared in the December 2016 volume of the magazine, Heiwa Undō (Peace Movement), and summarizes his most recent book Nippon Kaigi no Zenbō: Shirarezaru Kyodai Soshiki no Jittai [The Complete Picture of Nippon Kaigi: The Unknown Reality of an Mammoth Organization.] (Kadensha 2016.) In the book, Tawara utilized data on Nippon Kaigi accumulated over a long period of time to describe Nippon Kaigi’s history, organizational structure, “grassroots” movement style, and goals.



Tawara traces the history of the right-wing movement that led to the formation of Nippon Kaigi from the 1970s, starting with a movement to legalize imperial era names. The two organizations that played significant roles in this movement, namely, Nihon wo Mamoru Kokumin Kaigi [National Conference to Protect Japan] and Nihon wo Mamoru Kai [Association to Protect Japan], merged in 1997 to form Nippon Kaigi. Tawara points out that unlike these organizations, Nippon Kaigi appointed business leaders and intellectuals as board members and hid its right-wing priorities, but the nature of the organization remained unchanged. Tawara then introduces various affiliated organizations of Nippon Kaigi, such as its Diet Members’ League and Local Assembly Members’ League, its women’s section called Japan Women’s Association, and Nihon Seinen Kyōgikai [Japan Youth Council]. Nippon Kaigi has various front organizations for independent issues, such as the Utsukushii Nippon no Kenpō wo Tsukuru Kokumin no Kai [National Citizens’ Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan] promoting constitutional reform. Mobilizing local branches and various affiliated organizations across Japan in national and local levels, Tawara shows, Nippon Kaigi operates a “grassroots right-wing movement,” while maintaining strong ties with the Abe administration.

Tawara emphasizes that Nippon Kaigi presents the Constitution, education, and defense as a set of interlocking issues, an approach shared with Prime Minister Abe’s policy priorities. Tawara particularly focuses on two issues: education and the Constitutional amendment. Tawara’s greatest contribution centers on education, reflecting his long-term commitment to issues of education and textbooks, from Ienaga Saburō’s textbook trials beginning in 1965 to the present.

Tawara shows how the Abe administration’s concept of Kyōiku Saisei [education rebuilding] seeks to overturn the foundations of contemporary education. The 2006 revision of the Fundamental Law of Education, which defined the goal of education not to serve students but the state by emphasizing patriotic education, was a major victory of the first Abe administration (2006-7). This had a tremendous impact on the direction of education – not simply in schools but also in communities and even in families (the revised Law includes an article on “family education”.) Abe’s modification of the Board of Education system in 2014 made it much easier for governors and mayors to intervene in education and the textbook adoption process. Under this new system, Tawara notes, members of the Nippon Kaigi Local Assembly Members League have played significant roles in promoting a conservative and revisionist history and civic textbooks published by Ikuhōsha (connected with the Japan Education Rebuilding Organization) and Jiyūsha (connected with the Society for History Textbook Reform).

Moreover, under the second Abe administration, “moral education” (dōtoku) was introduced as an “official subject” (i.e., with grades assigned, based on evaluation of degree of patriotism among other rubrics) in elementary and junior high schools, which has been criticized for potentially interfering with children’s freedom of thought. As of September 2017, the adoption process of elementary school moral education textbooks to be used from 2018 is under way. The textbook published by Kyōiku Shuppan includes members of the Japan Education Rebuilding Organization among its editors, and has an especially patriotic content, with photos of conservative politicians, including Abe Shinzo, in the text.3 In the translated text, Tawara stresses the danger of the next Gakushū Shidō Yoryō [Education Guideline], which fundamentally changes the guidelines for all aspects of schools, families and communities. Tawara insists that the aim of education became two-fold in the new guideline: to strengthen “human resources” for the sake of the state by promoting patriotism, and also in the service of large corporations by promoting neoliberal policies.

Currently the most important goal for Nippon Kaigi is undoubtedly to amend the post-war Constitution. Nippon Kaigi founded the National Citizens’ Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan in 2014, to promote a constitutional revision movement based on a “national referendum” to be held during Abe’s administration. The organization has actively pursued approaches introduced in the 1970s to pass legislation that requires the use of imperial era names, ranging from a massive “10 million” signature drive, collecting petitions from local assemblies, holding gatherings in such major venues as Nippon Budōkan of Tokyo, conducting small study group meetings across Japan, distributing leaflets and a DVD, and broadcasting videos on YouTube. It is important to note that while there is no doubt that amendment of Article 9 receives the greatest attention, Nippon Kaigi calls for seven important constitutional revisions including the making of a new clause on emergency powers and the addition of a family protection clause to Article 24.5 On May 3, 2017, Prime Minister Abe delivered a video message at a symposium held by the National Citizens’ Association. There, he called for making “explicit the status” of the self-defense forces in Article 9 of the Constitution by the year 2020. Clearly, Article 9 has become a priority for Nippon Kaigi.

On August 15 this year, I visited the booth of the National Citizens’ Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan at a street near Yasukune Shrine. There flags and signs included “Write the SDF into the Constitution” and “Thank you, SDF,” along with a photo of journalist Sakurai Yoshiko, who is also one of the co-chairs of the National Citizens’ Association. I also received a flyer “Thank you, SDF.” Despite heavy rain, Nippon Kaigi was holding a gathering in a tent on the grounds of the shrine. The main speaker was LDP Upper House representative and former SDF member Sato Masahisa discussing the importance of the SDF and the need to revise the Constitution. It was obvious that the goal of amending the Constitution by 2020, by writing the SDF into Article 9 of the Constitution, remains a Nippon Kaigi priority as it is of the Abe administration.




The flags at the booth of the Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan in front of Yasukuni Shrine on August 15, 2017.




The flyer “Thank you, SDF” by the National Citizens’ Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan.




Picture book, Jieitai tte Naani? [What is the SDF?] (Author: Sonoda Haru, Meiseisha 2017), sold at the Nippon Kaigi booth of Yasukuni Shrine on August 15, 2017. The book is recommended by LDP Upper House Representative, Sato Masahisa.5




On September 28, Prime Minister Abe Shinzo dissolved the lower house of the parliament, and a snap election was held on October 22. Abe’s LDP and its coalition partners secured a major victory, with more than half of the seats won by the LDP. As the LDP and the Komeito Party that currently form a coalition government, gained two-third of the Lower House, which is the number of votes needed to assure a national referendum for constitutional revision, the likelihood is that a proposal to hold a national referendum will be submitted to the Diet in the very near future. Under Japan’s national referendum law, a majority (more than 50%) vote is required to amend the Constitution, with no stipulation as to the minimum number of votes cast. Since 2014, with its “10 million signature campaign,” the priority for Nippon Kaigi has been holding a successful national referendum to amend the constitution.

The new Kibō no Tō (Party of Hope) led by Tokyo governor Koike Yuriko was formed immediately before the election, absorbing a significant number of candidates from the then-biggest opposition party, the Democratic Party of Japan. Koike, a former LDP representative, was once the vice president of the Nippon Kaigi’s Diet Members’ League. Like Abe, she supports constitutional revision, and in a press conference held on September 22, she indicated her commitment to constitutional revision efforts, and encouraged further discussion of the issue in her new party. In 2003, Koike stated in Voice magazine that she considers it possible for Japan to arm itself with nuclear weapons. Journalist Aoki Osamu reports that Koike may not have a very close relationship with Nippon Kaigi compared to other conservative politicians at this moment, but it is entirely possible that she may become closer to Nippon Kaigi in future.6 Breaking with the practice of previous Tokyo governors, including conservative Ishihara Shintarō, Koike declined to send eulogies to the commemoration of Korean victims massacred at the time of the Great Kanto Earthquake in 1923, which also suggests her historical revisionist stance.7 Akahata reported on September 28 that six members of the Party of Hope belong to the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members’ League. The Party of Hope struggled in the election, failing to become the main opposition party, while the LDP scored a landslide victory. On the other hand, a newly established Rikken Minshu-tō [Constitutional Democratic Party] led by Edano Yukio, former DPJ politician who did not join the Party of Hope, won 55 seats, and became the second biggest party in the Lower House after the LDP. The party’s platform included opposition to the revision of the Article 9, the Constitution’s peace clause.

The National Citizens’ Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan announced plans to hold a “National Citizens’ Rally” in Tokyo on October 25 to promote constitutional revision. The National Citizens’ Association is inviting representatives from the LDP, Komeitō Party, Nippon Ishin no Kai and the Party of Hope to forge a cross-party coalition, especially to revise the Article 9. The struggle regarding constitutional revision will become much more intense in the coming months. (TY)





What is the Aim of Nippon Kaigi, The Ultra-Right Organization that is a Pillar of Japan’s Abe Administration?

What is Japan’s largest ultra-right organization, Nippon Kaigi, whose slogan is “Build a nation with pride”? On its official website, Nippon Kaigi explains: “We, the Nippon Kaigi, are a civic group that presents policy proposals and promotes a national movement for restoring a beautiful Japan and building a proud nation.” Nippon Kaigi is a national movement organization with a nationwide grassroots network that was established on May 30, 1997 by the merger of Nihon wo Mamoru Kokumin Kaigi [National Conference to Protect Japan] and Nihon wo Mamoru Kai [Association to Protect Japan]. We will briefly look at these two organizations.



Forerunners of Nippon Kaigi

The Nihon wo Mamoru Kai was a religious-affiliated rightwing organization formed in April 1974 as a Shintō and Buddhist-affiliated religious group by the (then) chief abbot, Asahina Sōgen, of Kamakura’s Enkakuji Temple. The central religious association at the time of its founding was Seichō-no-Ie [House of Growth]. In July 1978, springing from the Nihon wo Mamoru Kai, the Gengō Hōseika Jitsugen Kokumin Kaigi [National Conference to Establish Reign Era Name Use as Law] Legislate Era Names (chaired by the late Ishida Kazuto, a former Supreme Court judge) was formed.8 Centered on this organization, a “national movement” [kokumin undō] was launched, and on June 6, 1979, the Diet passed a bill on era names, making the practice into law.

This rightwing organization, having successfully led a movement to pass a law formalizing era names, reorganized in October 1981 into the Nihon wo Mamoru Kokumin Kaigi (or Kokumin Kaigi -- National Conference), as a standing rightwing organization for promoting a “national movement” to revise the Constitution and establish a unity government.9

At its launch, its officials included Chairman Kase Shunji (Japan's first ambassador to the United Nations; now deceased), Steering Committee Chairman Mayuzumi Toshirō (musician, later chairman of Kokumin Kaigi; deceased), Secretary General Soejima Hiroyuki (permanent consultant to Meiji Shrine, former senior member of the Nippon Kaigi; deceased), Executive Secretary Kabashima Yūzō (currently Executive Secretary of Nippon Kaigi).

The first issue of Kokumin Kaigi's official organ Nihon no Ibuki [Japan's Breath of Energy] was issued on April 15, 1984. It was not a monthly publication then, and prior to the launching of Nippon Kaigi, about 113 issues had been published. Even after it became the official organ of Nippon Kaigi, it continued to be published with the same name, and labeled, “an opinion magazine aiming at building a country that has pride” (As of Nov. 2016, the total number of issuespublished is 348).

In a keynote report at the inaugural plenary meeting of the Kokumin Kaigi, then-Steering Committee Chairman Mayuzumi Toshirō outlined the basic goal of “revising” the Constitution and forming a nation centered on the Emperor:


In order to protect Japan, there are two major problems: that of defense or protecting

the country with physical military power, and of education or protecting the country

with our minds and spirit. In unifying these two, the Constitution is a main obstacle, but

I believe that the heart of protecting the country boils down to how we perceive our

nation state or, in other words, how we perceive the role of the Emperor.

When we call for amending the Constitution, it depends first of all on our thinking about

the national consciousness. We also must consider starting from the establishment

of a clear national polity linked to the Emperor. In other words, I believe that if

there is to be a proper national consciousness, the problems of the Constitution,

education, and defense must be approached by starting from the root problem of the

mind – that is to say, the establishment of a proper patriotic spirit. (Nihon no Ibuki, #2,

July 15, 1984)

In October 1982, Kokumin Kaigi held a “Conference to Consider the Textbook Problem,” and proposed an independent textbook. Then, in December 1983, by consolidating rightwing forces, the “National Conference to Normalize Textbooks” was established, and the organization began to write a history textbook. It was Kokumin Kaigi that worked on the task.

At the plenary meeting of the Kokumin Kaigi, Secretary General Soejima Hiroyuki (now deceased, but at the time, permanent consultant to Meiji Shrine), who had proposed a “Basic Policy for a National Movement in Showa 59 (1984),” stated: “In tackling such tasks as publishing a textbook, I would like to lay the ideological groundwork for constitutional revision” (Nihon no Ibuki, #2, July 15, 1984). In this way, Kokumin Kaigi positioned the publishing of a high-school history textbook as “forming an ideal flow” toward meeting the goal of amending the Constitution in order to create a national polity centered on the Emperor. Moreover, placing the Constitution, defense, and education on the agenda, Kokumin Kaigi considered it necessary to publish a high school Japanese history textbook that would nurture a national consciousness or patriotism. The association issued an officially approved textbook that passed the Ministry of Education’s screening, Shinpen Nihon Shi [New Edition of Japanese History] (Hara Shobō, now published by Meiseisha as Saishin Nihon Shi [Most Recent Japanese History]), in commemoration of the 60th year of the reign of the Showa Emperor.

After that, Kokumin Kaigi, while making constitutional revision its central goal, developed other tactics, such as education and the textbook issue, a movement to justify Japan’s war of aggression and its atrocities, a movement to respect and love the Imperial Household, a movement to denounce the displays of peace materials in halls set up by local authorities across the country. At this time, Kokumin Kaigi strengthened its ties with rightwing Diet members in the LDP and other parties, becoming the central organization of the rightwing movement.



Mergers Lead to Birth of Nippon Kaigi: Business executives became officials.

On May 30, 1997, Kokumin Kaigi merged with the Nihon wo Mamoru Kai to launch Nippon Kaigi as an organization dedicated to amending the Constitution and to promoting Imperial rule.

Looking at Kokumin Kaigi’s officials and members, most people could conclude that it was a rightwing organization, but after it became Nippon Kaigi, it hid its rightwing nature by appointing as officials, others such as business executives, university professors, and intellectuals. However, its true nature did not change. Among the first generation of chairmen of the Kokumin Kaigi was the late Tsukamoto Kōichi (then chairman of an intimate apparel company, Wacoal). He was succeeded as the second chairman (June 2000-December 2001) by Inaba Kōsaku (now deceased), who was then head of the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Former Supreme Court justice Miyoshi Tōru became the third chairman in December 2001, and on April 16, 2015, Takubo Tadae, a former journalist and college professor, was appointed the fourth chairman, with Miyoshi becoming the honorary chair.

The executive secretary is now Kabashima Yūzō (chairman of Nihon Kyōgikai [Japan Council] and Nihon Seinen Kyōgikai[Japan Youth Council]), who was the executive secretary of both organizations when they merged in 1997. The vice chairs are Anzai Aiko (musician), Odamura Shirō (former president of Takushoku University, representative of worshippers at Yasukuni Shrine), Kobori Keiichirō (professor emeritus at Tokyo University), Tanaka Tsunekiyo (president of Jinja Honchō [Association of Shinto Shrines]). The director is Amitani Michihiro (chief priest at Meiji Jingū and head of the association of worshippers at Meiji Jingū). The executive director is Matsumura Toshiaki (executive director of Nippon Kaigi). Those listed as consultants are Ishii Kōichirō (president of Bridgestone Bicycle), Kitashirakawa Michihisa (executive director of Jinja Honchō), Takatsukasa Naotake (head of Ise Shrine). Among those named above, five of the 12 officers are connected to religious organizations, and five are officials of rightwing organizations, such as Kaikōsha and Eirei ni Kotaeru Kai [the Association to Respect Deceased Soldiers (at Yasukuni Shrine). Of the 40 representative committee members, 16 are associated with religious organizations, such as the head priest at Yasukuni Shrine (as of July 1, 2016).

After its founding, Nippon Kaigi launched an organizational system, starting with the establishment of headquarters in prefectures across the country, and specialized

committees. (According to records of Nippon Kaigi, in August 1997, “headquarters in the prefectures were established one after another.”)

In order to conduct research on a new Constitution and promote the revision of the current Constitution, Nippon Kaigi took over Shin Kenpō Kenkyū Kai [New Constitution Study Group] (headed by Vice Chairman Odamura Shirō), which Kokumin Kaigi had established in June 1995. And in June 1997, it established “the Seisaku Kenkyūkai [Policy Committee] to Consider the Current Situation and Policy Agenda” (headed by then Executive Director Ōhara Yasuo). In January 1999, Nippon Kaigi launched the Kokusai Kōhō Iinkai [International Public Relations Committee’ For Broadcasting Japan’s New Image to the World] (chaired by the committee member, Takemoto Tadao), and in March, it established the “Nihon Kyōiku Kaigi [the Japan Educational Conference] for Promoting Educational Reforms” (chaired by Adviser Ishii Koichirō, with Takahashi Shirō (currently a board member of the Japan Education Rebuilding Organization [Nihon Kyoiku Saisei Kikō] as principal investigator.

Along with the New Constitution Study Group, the Policy Committee, the International Public Relations Committee, and the Japan Educational Conference, the Japan Women’s Association [Nihon Josei no Kai] and the Japan Youth Council [Nihon Seinen Kyōgikai] functions as its daily operations organizations of Nippon Kaigi. In addition, in response to various challenges of the times, various affiliated front organizations rose to carry out specialized activities. Among them, there was a particular front organization for the constitutional revision movement, as explained below, and another for activities related to the historical consciousness issue, which Sankei Shimbun now calls the “history wars.” For this purpose, on October 1, 2016, Nippon Kaigi established the “Historical Awareness Research Committee” [Rekishi Ninshiki Mondai Kenkyūkai]. When the organization was established, it was chaired by Takahashi Shirō, and its vice chairman and executive secretary was Nishioka Tsutomu, and one of its advisers was Sakurai Yoshiko.10 It is made up of key “theorists” of Nippon Kaigi. On the issue of historical views toward the comfort women and the Nanjing Incident, the organization states: “Anti-Japan views of history have damaged Japan’s diplomacy and damaged our country’s honor and national interests.” It also states: “In response to criticism of Japan regarding historical consciousness, we will present materials for rebuttal, based on historical facts.”



Closely-Linked Round-Table Conference of Diet Members of Nippon Kaigi

On May 29, 1997, the day before Nippon Kaigi was launched, the LDP’s Obuchi Keizō and Mori Yoshirō (both of whom later became prime ministers), together with then Shinshintō [New Frontier Party] member Ozawa Tatsuo, formed a non-partisan Round Table Conference of Diet Members of Nippon Kaigi (a.k.a. Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League), with the aim of fully backing and linking to Nippon Kaigi. After it was launched, Nippon Kaigi was closely aligned with these Diet Members and promoted various maneuvers behind the scenes, such as efforts to revise the Constitution and the Basic Education Law. The group also promoted the adoption of a textbook that distorted Japanese history. In order to Support the Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform [Atarashii Rekishi Kyōkasho wo Tsukurukai] that predated the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League, in February 1997, Nippon no Zento to Rekishi Kyōiku wo Kangaeru Wakate Giin no Kai [The Young Diet Members For Japan’s Future and History Education (a.k.a. Textbook Parliamentarians’ League) was launched centered on Nakagawa Shōichi (now deceased), Abe Shinzō, and Etō Seiichi. In February 2004, the word “young” was removed from the association, and it had an extremely close relationship with the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League.

At its launch, the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League had 189 members from both chambers. The number continued to increase, and as of November 2015, there were 281 members (mostly LDP), and the members of the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League were the largest force in both houses with around 40 percent of the 717 Diet members. This rightwing league was behind the launching of the three Abe cabinets. Abe was the League’s key person as party president and prime minister. In the 3rd Abe Cabinet, 16 out of the 20 (80 percent) of the ministers are members of the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League.

The Nippon Kaigi, with its close ties to the Diet Members League, is now running Japanese politics. One example can be seen in the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), which from 2002 has distributed, to all elementary and middle-school children, supplemental educational pamphlets called Kokoro no Nōto [Notes for the Heart] (four levels: 1st and 2nd graders, 3rd and 4th graders, 5th and 6th graders, and middle-school use). The materials promote official moral values, starting with love of country, and are aimed at controlling the minds of children.

Nippon Kaigi proposed that such materials be drafted and disseminated, and in March 2000, Upper House member Kamei Ikuo (now deceased), a Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League member, brought the subject up in the Diet. Then Education Minister Nakasone Hirofumi, also a League member, replied that he would consider the proposal, and almost immediately, it was budgeted. A week later, then Parliamentary Vice-Minister of Education Kawamura Takeo, another League member, replied in the Diet: “We will publish and distribute (the pamphlets) to schools across the nation.” In March 2001, at a general meeting on policies proposed, Nippon Kaigi touted the success of this one, stating, “Taking the opportunity of Diet interpellations on the House floor, the MEXT minister decided to draw up a moral educational material to be titled Notes for the Heart. A frightful precedent was created in which the request of a rightwing group was brought up in the Diet by lawmakers linked to it, and then was implemented as national policy.

Further, Notes for the Heart was later completely revised and distributed in April 2014 to elementary and middle schools across the country as Watashi tachi no Dōtoku [Our Moral Values.] The Education Minister Shimomura Hakubun and MEXT made use of the teaching materials mandatory. The Abe administration and MEXT in March 2015 elevated moral education to a regular classroom subject, calling it a “special subject.”






Our Moral Values for the first and second grade students of elementary schools.




And for fiscal 2018, approved textbooks will be published, fully carrying out the new policy. Even for 2015, in order to promote the policy before it is put into effect and the textbook published, the Ministry ordered that Our Moral Values be used as a “textbook” and that it be used jointly with the approved textbooks after it came out.

In addition, the author of the textbook Our Moral Values, Kaizuka Shigeki (professor at Musashino University, who is a member of MEXT’s round-table of promoting moral values as educational material, as well as a board member of the Japan Organization for Educational Reform) has been promoting the issuance of educational material on morality, asserting that the book Our Moral Values would become a model for approved textbooks. (For more detail, see Textbook 21’s booklet Sweeping Criticism! Children Being Warped by the Moral Education Textbook ‘Our Moral Values’, 2014.






Sweeping Criticism! Children Being Warped by the Moral Education Textbook ‘Our Moral Values’, Gōdō Shuppan, 2014.




Nippon Kaigi’s Development of a Grass-Roots Rightwing Movement

Nippon Kaigi is Japan’s largest rightwing unity organization. It promotes a policy aimed to make Japan a nation centered on the Emperor, a nation that can fight in wars, by revising the Constitution. It has set up headquarters in prefectures across the country and branch organizations in the regions. Its slogan is “Build a nation that has pride.” Prime Minister Abe’s slogan, “Beautiful Country Japan” [Utsukushi Kuni Nihon] , has also been used by Nippon Kaigi

In September 2001, Nippon Kaigi established as its organization for women, Nihon Jyosei no Kai [Japan Women’s Association] (then chaired by Anzai Aiko, who was vice chairperson of the Nippon Kaigi; the following chair was Onoda Machie.)11 What became the central campaign of this women’s association was the so-called “gender backlash,” that is, repeated attacks on such issues as gender equality measures, separate surnames for married couples, and gender equal education.

Currently, Nippon Kaigi is making every effort to advance constitutional revision, which Prime Minister Abe has been promoting. Targeting a female audience, it has hosted “cafes” across the country, where “women get together to chat about the Constitution.” The Japan Women’s Association is taking up that challenge.

In addition, the rightwing Nihon Seinen Kyōgikai [ Japan Youth Council], founded in 1970 by Etō Seiichi (now an assistant to Prime Minister Abe), Takahashi Shirō (board member of the Japan Education Rebuilding Organization), and former education committee chairman for Saitama Prefecture), Kabashima Yuzō, et al., has now become in effect Nippon Kaigi’s youth organization. This organization is carrying out secretariat activities for Nippon Kaigi; it is an “action squad” which carries out a “national caravan” campaign several times a year.

Nippon Kaigi is the central organization of such activities as a round-table conference of intellectuals to “reform Japanese education” by promoting amendments to the Fundamental Law of Education (Private Ad Hoc Committee on Education, established in 2003 and chaired by Nishizawa Jun’ichi, as well as “Japan and the Constitution in the 21st Century”, a group that promotes revising the Constitution, a.k.a. Private Ad Hoc Committee on the Constitution, established in 2001 and then headed by Miura Shumon. ) This group has generated a “national movement” to amend the Constitution, and every March, it holds a rally, sponsored by the Private Ad Hoc Committee on the Constitution, to call for constitutional revision.

On May 3, 2016, the Private Ad Hoc Committee on the Constitution, together with the Utsukushii Nippon no Kenpō wo Tsukuru Kokumin no Kai [National Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan” (Kokumin no Kai)], sponsored the 18th public forum on the Constitution, titled, “Calling for an Initiative to Realize Speedy Revision of the Constitution! We Propose that Each Political Party Hold Discussions on the Constitution to Respond to the Emergency Situation” (1,200 people attended according to the organizers).

In a video message, Prime Minister Abe, who was then travelling abroad, exhorted the assembly: “Do not fall into a brain-dead state of not daring to even lay a finger on the Constitution or even avoid debating it. We will create with our own hands a constitution appropriate for the times.

Let us unite to revise the Constitution.” The LDP President’s special assistant, Shimomura Hakubun, was present and asserted to the crowd: “There are many people who feel it is thanks to the presence of Article 9 in the Constitution, that Japan has not been drawn into war.” He cited as an example the Great East Japan Earthquake as a situation demanding an emergency provision in the Constitution: “Since the terms of Diet members are limited by the Constitution, we cannot legally make an exception. If an emergency situation occurs, the terms should be extended as a special case. No one would have any reason to oppose this” (as reported by Asahi Shimbun, May 4, 2016).

In a keynote address, Sakurai Yoshiko rejected constitutionalism, saying: “The notion that the Constitution is a basic set of rules that pits the state against the people and fetters the state does not suit Japan.” She continues, “We must aim at having our own Constitution that protects what is characteristic of Japan.” She proposed: “Why not make a fresh start by proposing a provision for emergency situations that one might call the biggest campaign pledge of each political party?” Many speakers insisted on the emergency powers provision, and the declaration presented asserted that “lack of provision for emergency powers is a fundamental flaw in the Constitution” and deemed the provision of emergency powers an “urgent task” that would strengthen the government’s authority in such situations. It called for “an early motion for constitutional reform, as well as a popular referendum.”

Prime Minister Abe, his administration, and the LDP share this view. Moreover, in addition to Shimomura and Sakurai, also attending were Matsubara Jin (Democratic Party, Lower House member), Eguchi Katsuhiko (adviser to the Diet members’ group Initiatives from Osaka [Osaka Ishin no Kai]), Nakayama Kyoko (head of the Nihon no Kokoro wo Taisetsu ni suru Tō [The Party for the Japanese Kokoro]), Uchida Fumihiro (secretary general of the Kokumin no Kai), Hara Masao (former mayor of Koriyama City in Fukushima Prefecture), Nishi Osamu (professor emeritus of Komazawa University), Aoki Shōgo (vice chairman of the Junior Chamber International Japan), Yamamoto Mizuki (student, Faculty of Law, Keio University), and Momochi Akira (professor emeritus of Nihon University).

With the return of the Abe administration presenting an ideal opportunity, Nippon Kaigi developed a “national movement” to amend the Constitution and campaigned to have local assemblies issue “position papers calling for early realization of constitutional revision.” The concrete realization of these efforts would become the Kokumin no Kai, an organization that I explain in detail below.

Nippon Kaigi, since its establishment, has set up prefectural headquarters, and at present, it has an office in every prefecture. Moreover, from 2000, it started to establish local branches. This project did not proceed well at first. However, from 2006 and 2007, the organization put its efforts into establishing branches, aiming at 300 nationwide. It began that effort in order to counter the launching of 9-jō no Kai, the Article 9 Association, and the activities of that group across the country. The Article 9 Association was established in June 2004 by nine prominent people,12 and in response to their appeals, branches were established across the country in different localities and sectors. Membership in the Article 9 Association by 2006 surpassed 5,000 people. Through a series of lectures across the nation, the Article 9 Association, as well as the activities of related local or specialized groups, public opinion toward constitutional revision greatly changed. In a public opinion poll in 2004 by the Yomiuri Shimbun, 65 percent were found to approve amending the Constitution, while 22 percent disapproved. But by 2006, the same poll showed the approval rate to have dropped to 55 percent, while the disapproval rate rose to 32 percent. Then, in the 2007 poll, approval plummeted to 46.2 percent, with the disapproval rate rising to 39.1 percent, or around three times that of 2004.

In 2007, the gap between approval and disapproval had narrowed to only seven points. (Currently, the approval and disapproval rates are about the same.) In order to compete with the Article 9 Association, Kokumin no Kai worked to establish local branches. At the end of September 2016, there were 250 branches (author’s survey), and those cities with more than 10 branches included Tokyo (19), Saitama (17), Kumamoto (17), Okayama (13), Aichi (12), Niigata (10), and Hiroshima (10). There were also prefectures, like Nagano (4), Shiga (4), and Tottori (4), where branches were few but still covered the entire prefecture.

These prefectural headquarters and branches were linked to such organizations as the Nippon Kaigi Local Assembly Members’ League [Chihō Giren], the Japan Women’s Association, and the Japan Youth Council. In each locality they developed grassroots rightwing and constitutional revision movements.

The main efforts of the movements were such activities as promoting the revision of the Constitution, adopting the school textbook published by Ikuhōsha by the Nihon Kyōiku Saisei Kikō [Japan Education Rebuilding Organization] and Kyōkasho Kaizen no Kai [the Textbook Improvement Association], as well as the one published by Jiyūsha of the Society for History Textbook Reform. Other activities included efforts to distort history by justifying Japan’s war of aggression and atrocities, and denying the system of military “comfort women” and the Nanjing Incident. They also included pressuring school boards of education to require schools to display the Hinomaru national flag and sing the Kimigayo national anthem. In addition, prefectural assemblies were pressured to display the flag, and in the schools, even homework and tests were monitored for content, leading to further pressure on school boards and schools themselves. In addition, there were activities to stir up nationalism over territorial issues.



Formation and Activities of the Nippon Kaigi Local Assembly League

Nippon Kaigi Chihō Giin Renmei (Chihō Giren) [Nippon Kaigi Local Assembly Members League], chaired by Kanagawa Prefecture assembly member Matsuda Yoshiaki, was established on November 11, 2007, under the slogan “Building a Country with Pride, Starting with Local Assemblies.” As of March 2016, it was supported by 1,633 members (author’s survey), and, breaking this figure down, there were two governors, 31 mayors, 795 assembly members, and 805 local heads. (Because this organization is an assembly members’ league, once a member becomes governor or mayor, they cease to be a member, but I included them in the list so that we can know their political stance.)

When we look at the share the league holds in prefectural assemblies, we find that they make up more than 70 percent in Yamaguchi, more than 60 percent in Yamagata, Ibaraki, and Ehime, more than 50 percent in Miyagi and Nagasaki, and over 40 percent in Akita, Gumma, Saitama, Chiba, Tokyo, Gifu, Shizuoka, Kyoto, Okayama, Fukuoka, Miyazaki, and Kagoshima. Such an unusual situation also prevails in 19 prefectures, where Nippon Kaigi has hijacked the assemblies with over 40 percent being members. Moreover, in city assemblies, 47.7 percent of the Osaka City assembly and 43.8 percent of the Yashiro City assembly in Kumamoto Prefecture are members.

The Local Assembly Members League, by working through local assemblies, is developing such activities as promoting the adoption of textbooks published by Ikuhōsha and Jiyūsha, denouncing other textbooks, and organizing constitutional revision activities in the local area. Assembly members belonging to The Local Assembly Members League have blocked the adoption of history textbooks published by Jikkyō Shuppan during the process of selecting textbooks for high schools. Members have intervened with questions in the local assemblies, and they have pressured local school boards, aiming to block the adoption of this textbook. For example, in Saitama Prefecture, during the school textbook adoption process in 2013, the high school, as well as the Board of Education, chose the textbook published by Jikkyō Shuppan. To reverse this decision, the education committee of the prefectural assembly held two sessions when the assembly was in recess, and denounced the authors of the Jikkyō textbook, and summoned and examined the principals of the eight schools that adopted the Jikkyō textbook. The assembly then passed a resolution to reverse their choice. The Local Assembly Members League was behind this campaign. Similar cases of using the assembly to pressure for schoolbook choices occurred in Chiba Prefecture, Kanagawa Prefecture, Yokohama City, and Kawasaki City. In all cases, The Local Assembly Members League members organized the campaign. In Osaka, the campaign was led by the assembly members of Osaka Ishin no Kai [The Osaka Restoration Association].

Branches of Nippon Kaigi linked up with the Local Assembly Members League to promote their cause. In connection with history education and textbook adoption, the Nippon Kaigi and its related organizations (members and local branches) have begun to submit petitions and appeals to the local assembly, with the Local Assembly Members League members becoming facilitators, bringing up those issues in the assemblies, and making it easier for textbooks published by Ikuhōsha and Jiyūsha to be adopted.

In 2014, the Abe administration revised the board-of-education system, making it easier for the heads of local government to intervene in the education system and textbook selection. Given this change, such organizations as the Japan Education Rebuilding Organization and the Society for History Textbook Reform, which have close ties to Nippon Kaigi, are calling on their local organizations, members and supporters to recruit assembly members who will cooperate in choosing textbooks during assembly sessions, as well as engage in joint activities to promote “education rebuilding.” In response to this, Nippon Kaigi developed activities to link up with other local assembly leagues and branches so that junior high school textbooks selected in 2015 would be those proposed by Ikuhōsha and Jiyūsha.

On the issue of the Hinomaru national flag and Kimigayo national anthem, as well, maneuvers behind the scenes are linking local assembly leagues and local branches of Nippon Kaigi across the country. For example, a petition circulated by the local branch of Nippon Kaigi in 2013 in Nakano Ward in Tokyo called on all public elementary and middle schools to display the national flag daily. Three Ward assembly members belonging to the Local Assembly Members League introduced the petition and worked to persuade other assembly members to support it. Then, at a full session, the number of approvals and disapprovals was tied. However, with the approval of the assembly leader, the petition was adopted. A similar movement toward schools and petitions on the floor of local assemblies seeking to display the national flag was promoted by cooperation between both organizations. It is expected that such activities will be increased in the future.



Kokumin no Kai’s Movement to Collect 10 Million Signatures

The task that Nippon Kaigi has put most of its efforts into has been the promotion of a grassroots campaign to revise the Constitution, a long-cherished goal that has united it with the Abe administration.

At New Year’s in 2016, an unusual scene could be seen within the grounds of Shinto shrines, crowded with people paying their first visits of the year. At Shinto shrines all over Japan, the shops and donation boxes had signs exhorting worshippers to sign a petition calling for constitutional revision. The petitions stated, “I approve of revising the Constitution.” At Nogi Shrine in Tokyo, there were banners displayed with such slogans as, “Aiming for a proud Japan,” and, “The Constitution is ours.” There was a tent holding a large framed poster of Sakurai Yoshiko. On the poster was printed, “Let us, the people, make a beautiful Japanese Constitution with our own hands”; and, “We are now collecting 10 million signatures. Please cooperate.”

The signatures to urge constitutional revision were not the work of limited number of shrines. The religious corporation Jinja Honchō, The Association of Shinto Shrines, reportedly encompasses 80,000 shrines nationwide who “aligned with the movement of the ‘National Association to Create a Beautiful Constitution for Japan (Kokumin no Kai),’ and promoted a signature campaign based on the actual situation in each shrine.” (Tokyo Shimbun, 1/23/2016) Based on a directive from the Association of Shinto Shrines, the prefectural shrine associations ordered shrines under their jurisdiction to collect signatures.

Although the signature campaign was carried out by the Kokumin no Kai, it is an organization for constitutional revision established by Nippon Kaigi on October 1, 2014.

On November 13, 2013, Nippon Kaigi held a convention of representatives from all over the country under the slogan “Bring about Constitutional Revision!” (800 participated, according to the sponsor). The body passed a resolution at the meeting calling for amending the Constitution within three years. Those attending the convention and giving speeches included Sakurai Yoshiko, who gave the keynote speech, Takaichi Sanae (then LDP Policy Affairs Research Chairperson), Hiranuma Takeo (Diet representative of the Japan Restoration Party [Nihon Ishin no Kai]), Matsubara Jin (Diet Steering Committee Chairman of the DPJ), Asao Keiichirō (Secretary General of Your Party), and Etō Seeichi (Prime Minister’s assistant).

The meeting opened with such slogans as “Bring about a national referendum to amend the Constitution, one written by the people’s own hands!” and “Pass resolutions in all prefectural assemblies and 1,742 local assemblies demanding a national referendum!” Miyoshi Toru, then chairman of Nippon Kaigi, in his remarks as the representative of the convention’s sponsor, stated: “This convention aims to bring about constitutional revision through the powerful efforts of Nippon Kaigi.” In the written resolution of the convention, it was decided to “establish headquarters for amending the Constitution in all 300 election districts in order to attain half of the national referendum votes for amending the Constitution.” It also called for planning the formation of a grand national alliance to promote a national movement to approve constitutional revision (Nihon no Ibuki, January 2014).

After a year of preparation, Kokumin no Kai emerged. It was described as a “national organization to develop at the grass-roots level a movement to promote amendment of the Constitution.” At the meeting to formally establish the organization, co-leader Sakurai Yoshiko gave a speech titled, “Breathe Life into Constitutional Revision!” It was followed by a speech by Hasegawa Michiko (professor emeritus of Saitama University and NHK board member), titled, “Conditions for an Independent State and Paragraph 2 of Article 9.” The co-leaders of Kokumin no Kai are key members of Nippon Kaigi: Takubo Tadae, chairman of the Nippon Kaigi (professor emeritus of Korin University), honorary chairman Miyoshi Tōru (former Supreme Court justice), and Sakurai Yoshiko. Listed as promoters were 40 well-known rightwing figures connected to Nippon Kaigi, and appointed as Kokumin no Kai members were 500 people representing various circles. These included The Association of Shinto Shrines’ President Tanaka Tsunekiyo, Hyakuta Naoki (Writer, Commentator and former member of the NHK Board), Hasegawa Michiko, Sugiyama Koichi (composer), Yayama Taro (critic, Representative director of the Association to Revise Textbooks, associated with the Ikuhosha Publishing Company).



Seven Topics and Explanations in the Leaflet of Kokumin no Kai

As explained above, Kokumin no Kai is conducting a campaign to collect collect 10 million signatures supporting constitutional revision. The signature form includes a space for writing in one’s name, address, and telephone number. If there is a national referendum, it is expected that 60 million would vote. The 10 million who signed their names would form the base for a predicted 30 million votes of approval.

Displayed on the front of the signature form is a color photo of four children against the backdrop of Mt. Fuji, with the following slogans: “With your cooperation, we will reach 10 million signatures of approval to bring about constitutional revision”; and, “For a beautiful Japan, for our children.” On the back of the form, there is the name of the person who is introducing the supporter, as well as the names, addresses and telephone numbers of 10 supporters. There is also a leaflet, made up of three pages of A-4 sized sheets of paper. It has the same slogans as the signature form, and on the back is a message from Sakurai Yoshiko, titled, “Rainbow of Hope for a Beautiful Japan – People’s Power to Revise the Constitution.” The contents consist of seven statements that promote constitutional revision.





The front and back pages of the signature form for the 10-million signature campaign by Kokumin no Kai.



The seven headings and explanatory notes in the leaflet are exactly the same as another educational flier on constitutional revision, titled, “Let us now begin a national debate on amending the Constitution,” which was issued by Nippon Kaigi during the national convention of representatives in November 2013, as mentioned above. At that time, Miyoshi stated, “We are raising seven themes promoting constitutional revision.” This example is proof that the Kokumin no Kai is an organization run by Nippon Kaigi.The organization, in its founding declaration, stated: “Conditions have been prepared for passing a National Referendum Law that would set in motion the process for amending the Constitution, and a national referendum to propose that the Diet amend the Constitution would then be carried out.” It went on to state, “We will begin the activities listed below, aiming at bringing about constitutional revision in two years, having gathered the number of votes needed in the Diet for adoption of the referendum measure, and then carrying out a national referendum coinciding with the next Upper House election in 2016.”

The three activities mentioned are:
Promote a signature campaign among Diet members, as well as a resolution campaign among local assemblies, seeking early realization of constitutional revision.
Establish “associations of prefectural residents” across all 47 prefectures, and promote an educational movement that will rouse public opinion to favor constitutional revision.
Promote an expanded movement of 10 million supporters for creating a Constitution for abeautiful Japan.

The organizations engaged in promoting Kokumin no Kai’s signature campaign and educating the public on the “constitutional revision” are the prefectural headquarters of Nippon Kaigi and local branches, the assembly members who belong to the Nippon Kaigi Local Assembly Members’ League, and the Japan Women’s Association. In order to carry out the activities of the Kokumin no Kai, Nippon Kaigi sponsored rallies in regional blocks (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Hokuriku, Tokai, Kinki, Shikoku, Chugoku, and Kyushu), calling for early amendment of the Constitution. Block rallies, covering the entire country, continued until the end of December 2014 with lecturers including Kokumin no Kai coleaders Sakurai Yoshiko and Takubo Tadae.

Following the rallies, Kokumin no Kai by November 3, 2015 had established the associations of prefectural residents in all 47 prefectures aiming at creating a constitution for a beautiful Japan. It also developed in each region street-corner campaigns and signature collecting activities. Further, it introduced a system of promoters to expand the number of supporters to 10 million. The roles of each promoter (organized in committees) were to: 1) make daily efforts to build public opinion in favor of amending the Constitution; 2) to expand the number of supporters by over 30 people; and 3) once the Diet to amend the Constitution was in session, to promote an expanded movement of supporters calling for Diet approval of a national referendum.

In addition, contributions were solicited (minimum of 5,000 yen per person) for a “Constitutional Revision Movement Fund.” Such organizations as the Nippon Kaigi prefectural headquarters and branches, as well as the Japan Women’s Association, carried out the establishment of such organized activities and directed signature campaigns.

At the founding plenary of the Kokumin no Kai, the members of Nippon Kaigi Diet Members’ Association, such as Upper House representative Etō Seiichi (Prime Ministerial Assistant), Lower Hosue representative Hiranuma Takeo (The Party for Future Generations), Lower House representative Matsubara Jin (Democratic Party of Japan), Upper House representative Matsuzawa Narufumi (Your Party) attended and gave greetings. (Positions of Diet members as of November 2015.)

Prime Ministerial Assistant Etō Seiichi delivered the following important remarks, under the title, “The Final Switch”:


The time is upon us to press the final switch. The LDP, since its founding, has flown the banner of Constitutional revision, but in 2003, when the LDP fell from power, its leaders proposed that the party should remove the plank about establishing an independent Constitution from its platform. At that time, 10 young LDP members, including the late Nakagawa Shōichi and Abe Shinzō, argued heatedly against that in a party leaders’ study group of about 30 lawmakers. As a result, during the debate, arguments were made that if the LDP were going to drop its efforts to amend the Constitution, they should dissolve the party.

Accordingly, it was decided that the LDP would ‘draft a constitution that would be appropriate for the current era.’ Now, the key members at that time have formed a second Abe administration (2012 present). In other words, it is no exaggeration to say that the Abe Cabinet was founded for the ultimate purpose of amending the Constitution. (Nihon no Ibuki, November 2014)



10,000 Person Convention Held at Nippon Budōkan (Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo).

On November 15, 2015, Kokumin no Kai held a “10,000 Person Convention at Nippon Budōkan: We Must Now Revise the Constitution!” From all over the country, 11,300 people (sponsor’s number) gathered for the rally. Prime Minister Abe, as LDP president, provided a video message shown on a giant screen on stage.

At the convention, it was reported that the signature campaign to gather 10 million supporters for “creating a Constitution for a beautiful Japan” that Kokumin no Kai was promoting had reached 4,452,991 names, and that 417 members in the Diet from various parties had signed up as supporters (422 according to the website of the Nippon Kaigi Local Assembly Members’ League, that 31 prefectural assemblies had issued resolutions, and that the Kenmin no Kai (Prefectural Residents’ Association), which was collecting signatures, were established in all 47 prefectures.

Local assembly resolutions as of October 2016 had been passed in 35 prefectures and in 51 city and town assemblies. Moreover, as of the end of October 2016, 7.54 million people had signed petitions, and the targets in 24 prefectures had been reached (Miyagi, Yamagata, Gumma, Chiba, Niigata, Toyama, Ishikawa, Gifu, Shizuoka, Aichi, Osaka, Hyogo, Nara, Wakayama, Okayama, Ehime, Kochi, Fukuoka, Saga, Nagasaki, Kumamoto, Aichi, Miyazaki, and Kagoshima).

The Kokumin no Kai is showing all over the country a documentary film (DVD) on constitutional revision. It is titled, “The World Has Changed: How about Japan?” It was produced by Hyakuta Naoki, supervised by Sakurai Yoshiko and Momochi Akira, and narrated by actor Tsugawa Masahiko.







The Abe Administration and Nippon Kaigi’s Policy of Education Rebuilding [Kyōiku Saisei]

Nippon Kaigi present the Constitution, education, and defense as one set of issues, which coincides with Prime Minister Abe’s own policy approach. The Abe administration, under the rubric of “Education Rebuilding”, has sought to overturn conventional education from its very foundation. It aims to thoroughly change the classroom environment and school textbooks based on the Fundamental Law of Education of 2006. It has sought to change the original goal of education from being for the sake of children to one of being for the sake of the state, national interests, and global corporate interests. The coming version of the Gakushu Shidō Yōryō [Education Guidelines] promotes Abe’s “education rebuilding” policy.

The Abe administration has two policy aims: 1) economic policy (Abenomics), which seeks to make large companies more competitive so that they can succeed in the global market; and 2) amending Article 9 of the Constitution to make Japan into a “war-waging” country. For that second policy goal, he rammed security legislation through the Diet in September 2015 (war laws) in violation of Article 9 of the Constitution.

The Abe administration’s “education rebuilding” policy was realized with the passage of the revised Fundamental Law of Education in 2006. The policy aims to create “human resources” (jinzai) to carry out the goals of the new law. Abe’s “education rebuilding” policy aims at 1) the cultivation of human resources sought by large corporations seeking to win in global competition; and 2) education that will produce a “national army” and supporters of the same. In both aims for human resources education, there must be inculcated in the schools a sense of “patriotism” and “morality,” and in order to realize these aims, the system of education and type of textbook are essential. The Abe administration stresses that “education rebuilding is the foundation for realizing a society in which there is “dynamic engagement of all 100 million citizens” [ichioku sōkatsuyaku].

Setting up a council to carry out education rebuilding, the Abe administration moved forward at a fast pace with various “educational reforms” to nurture such human resources. The main reforms included: 1) strengthening control over the contents of education; 2) nurturing effective human resources for the sake of the large corporations; and 3) controlling school administrators and teachers.

To accomplish that, the system of screening textbooks was revised. What had been treated as a “special course” of “moral education” [dōtoku] was elevated to the status of official subject entailing evaluation, (on a par with courses such as mathematics). The education guidelines were greatly revised to make this possible.

The next version of the education guidelines comprehensively control the education system with the state setting not only the contents of what is being taught but also the instructional method used by teachers, the way schools should be run, and even the relationship between schools and the home and local community. The system has changed from one in which the dignity of children is respected and the aim is character development to one shifted 180 degree toward creating “human resources” that will serve the state, national interests, and the interests of corporate giants. (Regarding this point, please see Textbook 21’s book, Dai Mondai! Kodomo Fuzai no Shin Gakushū Shidō Yōryō: Gakkao ga Ningen wo Sodateru ba de nakunaru. [Huge Problem Ahead! The New Education Guidelines Ignore Children’s Views, Schools No Longer Will Be Places to Nurture Human Beings!] Gōdō Shuppan 2016, Japanese Only.)





Conclusion

As we have seen, Nippon Kaigi is Japan’s largest far right organization and a powerful citizens’ body supporting the Abe administration. Nippon Kaigi and Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League have strengthened their links and are promoting through a “grassroots rightwing movement” centered on such organizations as Kokumin no Kai, which is a front organization of Nippon Kaigi, the Constitutional revision advocated by the Abe administration, to result in the creation of a “war-waging” country.

The importance of the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League, which penetrated the first, second, and third Abe cabinets, has grown greater than that in any other cabinet. The second cabinet reshuffle of Abe’s third term, has resulted in 16 out of 20 ministers (80 percent) being members of the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League. Three of the prime minister’s assistants and two of his deputy chief cabinet secretaries are members of the Nippon Kaigi Diet Members League. It might be said that the Cabinet has been hijacked by Nippon Kaigi, and that it has taken political control over Japan.

It is critical to inform the Japanese people about the actual state and nature of this organization and its Diet Members League. I think that this is also the role of the media, as well as peace groups and civic groups.



Related articles
Jeff Kingston, “Nationalism in the Abe Era”
Adam Lebowitz and Tawara Yoshifumi. “The Hearts of Children: Morality, Patriotism, and the New Curricular Guidelines.”
David McNeill, "Nippon Kaigi and the Radical Conservative Project to Take Back Japan."
Sachie Mizohata, “Nippon Kaigi: Empire, Contradiction, and Japan’s Future.”
Mark R. Mullins, “Neonationalism, Religion, and Patriotic Education in Post-disaster Japan.”
Nakano Koichi, “Contemporary Political Dynamics of Japanese Nationalism.”
Karoline Postel-Vinay, “The Global Rightist Turn, Nationalism and Japan.”
Lawrence Repeta, "Japan’s Democracy at Risk – The LDP’s Ten Most Dangerous Proposals for Constitutional Change"
Sven Saalar, “Nationalism and History in Comporary Japan.”
Sasagase Yuji, Hayashi Keita and Sato Kei. “Japan’s Largest Rightwing Organization: An Introduction to Nippon Kaigi.”
Akiko Takenaka, "Japanese Memories of the Asia-Pacific War: Analyzing the Revisionist Turn Post-1995."
Tawara Yoshifumi. "The Abe Government and the Screening of Japanese Junior High School Textbooks 2014."


Notes
1

Original Japanese article published in the December 2016 issue of the monthly magazine Peace Movement [Heiwa Undō].
2

At least eight books that include Nippon Kaigi in their titles were published in 2016-7, in addition to special issues of magazines and newspapers.
3

See Tawara Yoshifumi, “Kyōiku Shuppan Shōgakkō Dōtoku Kyōkasho Mondai ni Tsuite” (About the Problem of Moral Education Textbook for Elementary School Students by Kyōiku Shuppan).
4

See Carl Goodman, “The Threat to Japanese Democracy: The LDP Plan for Constitutional Revision to Introduce Emergency Plans” on the danger of an emergency clause. As for the LDP proposal to introduce a family protection clause as part of Article 24, the proposed language makes the family, not the individual, the basic unit of the society, and requires family members to help each other (which could lead to decreased governmental assistance for struggling families, childcare and elderly care.) See “Nippon Kaigi calls for Constitution to define family, cites ‘sazae-san’as Japan ideal.” The Mainichi, November 3, 2016.
5

Nippon Kaigi’s book sales website.
6

Aoki Osamu, “Koike Yuriko shi, Nippon Kaigi honryū kara hazureta aikokusha.” [Ms. Koike Yuriko, a patriot who is off from the mainstream Nippon Kaigi.] AERA, November 14, 2016.
7

“Koike says no to eulogy for Koreans killed in 1923 quake.” The Asahi Shimbun, August 24, 2017.
8

The requirement for the use of reign era names, instead of the Western calendar years, would signify that it goes back to prewar practice, and its association with the imperial reign is particularly problematic, especially when it is required by law.
9

The word, “yokusan,” used by Tawara here to explain these rightwing organization is used in the case of the pre-war Taisei Yokusan Kai, the Imperial Rule Assistance Organization.
10

As of September 2017, the organization’s chairman is Nishioka Tsutomu, and Takahashi Shirō is the vice chairman.
11

Currently the organization has no chairperson.
12

The nine people were: writer Inoue Hisashi (deceased), philosopher Umehara Takeshi, writer Oe Kenzaburo, constitutional scholar Okudaira Yasuhiro (deceased), activist and writer Oda Makoto (deceased), critic Kato Shuichi (deceased), writer Sawachi Hisae, critic Tsurumi Shunsuke (deceased), and activist and the wife of former Prime Minister Miki, Miki Mutsuko (deceased.)

Two years on, a sobering look at the human toll of the maximum pressure campaign against North Korea | Wilson Center

Two years on, a sobering look at the human toll of the maximum pressure campaign against North Korea | Wilson Center

Two years on, a sobering look at the human toll of the maximum pressure campaign against North Korea
November 26, 2019
By Henri Feron



We are now more than two years into the Trump Administration's "maximum pressure" campaign against North Korea, a sanctions regime designed to compel Pyongyang to give up its nuclear program. This almost total embargo on the country has yet to yield any concrete progress on denuclearization. All it seems to have achieved is hurting ordinary North Koreans.

In a new report, my co-authors and I shed light on the human costs of the chosen response to North Korea's nuclear program. It is the first comprehensive investigation on the subject. We synthesize what is known today about the impact of sanctions on the humanitarian situation, on the development of the country, and on women as one of the more vulnerable groups. The report was commissioned by Korea Peace Now, a women-led movement to end the Korean War.

Here is what we found, based on publicly available information:

First, sanctions are interfering with the ability of international aid groups and of the North Korean government to address the urgent and longstanding humanitarian needs of the population. What is particularly concerning is that sanctions are currently prohibiting the transfer of a wide range of humanitarian-sensitive items to North Korea, according to a report issued by the UN Panel of Experts tasked with monitoring the implementation of sanctions. The list of items the Panel reports as banned includes medical appliances, agricultural equipment, and generally any item with a metallic component, be it as small as a nail or a screw.

Second, sanctions are stifling the economic development of the country. While UN Security Council sanctions used to target only the military and the elite, since late 2016, they have started to block, one by one, every profitable North Korean export industry, directly affecting the livelihood of ordinary workers. Sanctions in 2017 also imposed a global ban on joint ventures with North Koreans and on accepting North Korean expatriate workers. These measures have resulted in the collapse of what used to be the country’s growing trade and engagement with the world, threatening the progress made since the economic crisis and famine of the 1990s. North Korean exports to China, for instance, have plunged from a high of $3 billion in 2013 to just $200 million in 2018.


Sanctions have a gendered impact

Third, sanctions have a gendered impact. They are destabilizing North Korean society in ways that disproportionately affect the economic security, physical security, and social status of women, consistent with trends observed in cross-national research of sanctioned countries. Sanctions disrupt sectors in which the majority of workers are female, such as the textile industry (82 percent) and the retail sector (89 percent). They also appear to underpin increasing violence against women and increasing instances of prostitution and human trafficking.

Fourth, existing sanction-exemption mechanisms are insufficient to prevent negative impacts on the population. Delays and funding shortfalls to UN programs alone may have caused more than 3,900 deaths in 2018, with an estimated 3,193 of these being children under age 5 and 72 being pregnant women. This is a conservative estimate that likely represents only the tip of the iceberg, as it does not cover shortfalls in North Korea’s own capabilities. While the UN Security Council has repeatedly stated that its sanctions are not intended to have adverse humanitarian consequences, there is a widening gap between this mantra and the reality on the ground. Part of the problem is that UN exemptions are granted only on a case-by-case basis and under highly restrictive conditions, creating a complex administrative hurdle that even large aid organizations struggle to overcome.

We do not claim to have the final word, given the data challenges in evaluating the situation in North Korea. In light of the current evidence, however, we found that the sanctions regime raised serious humanitarian and human rights concerns.

These concerns draw on the findings of an ongoing inquiry at the United Nations on the legal principles circumscribing the use of unilateral sanctions – that is to say sanctions imposed by individual countries, as opposed to those imposed by the Security Council. A landmark study by the UN Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights found that unilateral coercive measures could infringe upon the human rights to life, health, food, and an adequate standard of living, as well as humanitarian principles such as the prohibition of collective punishment and the prohibition of the starvation of a civilian population.


The current sanctions regime against North Korea appears difficult to reconcile with international law.

Indeed, the current sanctions regime against North Korea appears difficult to reconcile with international law. The UN General Assembly and UN Human Rights Council have repeatedly pronounced themselves against the use of unilateral sanctions, stating that “unilateral coercive measures and legislation are contrary to international law, international humanitarian law, the Charter of the United Nations and the norms and principles governing peaceful relations among States.” We are currently in a situation where the practice of countries regularly resorting to unilateral sanctions, including the United States against North Korea, is at odds with the interpretation that most countries make of international law.

Since the sanctions regime against North Korea includes both unilateral sanctions and UN sanctions, one question that would also have to be solved is to what extent the principles invoked apply to the Security Council. This is a complex legal question that would merit further investigation – possibly an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice. On the one hand, the UN Charter gives the Council primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security and explicitly gives it the power to impose sanctions. On the other hand, the Council is subject to the Charter and generally applicable principles of international law, which include fundamental human rights and humanitarian norms. These norms apply to peacekeeping operations mandated by the Council, so it’s hard to see how one could sustain the argument that sanctions be exempted.

What we recommend is as follows.

First, there should be formal humanitarian and human rights assessments of the impact of sanctions by the UN and by the countries that use this policy tool. North Korea should cooperate with the relevant agencies to share data for these assessments.

Second, there should be a lifting or modification of sanctions to bring them in line with international law. There should be no resort to unlawful policy tools in the resolution of the security crisis.

Third, all sides should, in the interim, take all measures available to mitigate and ultimately eliminate the negative impact of the sanctions on the North Korean population. There are a number of steps that could be taken immediately, such as the adoption of a whitelist to systematically exempt humanitarian-sensitive items. All sides should stop politicizing humanitarian aid.


Our report is not an indictment or judgment.

Our report is not an indictment or judgment. We are merely raising awareness and concerns about the policy tools adopted in response to the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula. We did not specifically determine which sanctions would be unlawful, nor did we assign responsibility on how to best solve the security crisis. There is a wide range of mechanisms available in the UN context to address these issues, including the Security Council itself.

Instead, our open-ended recommendations are human-centric and based on the fundamental UN Charter principle that international disputes should be solved peacefully and in accordance with international law. Ultimately, all sides have a legal responsibility to the North Korean people, including the North Korean government, the Security Council, and the countries imposing unilateral sanctions.

We should not take innocents hostage on account of the policies of an authoritarian government they have little to no control over. North Koreans have rights as human beings regardless of what one side or the other believes is necessary for national security.

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

Henri Feron is a Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy. 
He is a co-author of “The Human Costs and Gendered Impact of Sanctions on North Korea” (October 2019), with Kevin Gray, Ewa Eriksson, Suzy Kim, Kee Park, Marie O’Reilly and Joy Yoon. 
Follow him on Twitter @henriferon.
The views expressed are the author's alone, and do not represent the views of the U.S. Government or the Wilson Center. Copyright 2019, Asia Program. All rights reserved.

Image: Jean H. Lee

「韓国は重病を患っている」日韓で物議『反日種族主義』とは?


「韓国は重病を患っている」日韓で物議『反日種族主義』とは?


2019/11/29 16:00 © AERA dot. 提供 日本記者クラブで11月21日、会見した李栄薫氏

 韓国の日韓軍事情報包括保護協定(GSOMIA)問題、従軍慰安婦問題、徴用工問題など日韓問題で、強い反日感情を抱く韓国人の主義主張を指す「反日種族主義」。

「韓国人は反日を掲げなければ生きていけない種族」と韓国の大学教授ら6人が出版した本、『反日種族主義 日韓危機の根源』(文藝春秋)が日韓でベストセラーとなり、賛否両論を呼んでいる。

 韓国では7月に発売され、11万部を突破、日本では11月に発売されたばかりなのに、累計は25万部に。

 編著者の一人、元ソウル大学教授で李承晩(イスンマン)学堂校長の李栄薫(イヨンフン)氏が来日し、11月21日に日本記者クラブで会見を開いた。韓国メディアも含め120人が会場に詰めかける中、李栄薫氏は冒頭、用意してきたメモを日本語でこう読み上げた。

「『反日種族主義』は、韓国現代文明に沈潜している『原始』や『野蛮』を批判したものです。こんにち、韓国はその歴史に原因がある重病を患っています。……」

 同書は韓国人の「自己批判」をまとめたものという。

「自国の恥部をあえて外国語、しかも日本語で公表する必要があるかという批判を予想することは難しくありません。それでも出版に同意したのは、それが両国の自由市民の国際的連携を強化するのに役立つだろうという判断からでした」

 昨年10月、韓国の大法院(最高裁)が、元徴用工訴訟で日本企業に賠償を命じる判決を下した件について、こう言及した。

「判決後、日韓関係は確かに悪化している。私は、反日の対応をしている文在寅(ムンジェイン)政権が導き出した判決だと思っています。三・一独立運動以降の抗日精神を継承している文在寅政権と与党『共に民主党』は、反日運動家として非常に訓練されている集団だと言えます。そういった政権の影響を受けての判決だと思っております」

 今年9月には、韓国国会は来年の東京五輪・パラリンピックで、旭日(きょくじつ)旗の競技会場への持ち込み禁止を求める決議を賛成多数で可決した。これに関しても「与党の感情が生み出した」としている。

 韓国政府が、「反日種族主義」に「黙従」したことにより、日本政府との亀裂は深まったと主張する。

 日本の記者からの「どういう読者を想定して書いたか」という質問にこう答えた。

「ターゲットは考えておらず、韓国人全体に向けて書いた。この本を韓国で買っているのは30~40代。最も反日教育を受けて、50代よりも強い反日感情を持っているにもかかわらず、買い求めているのは歴史認識の進歩。日本は想定していませんでした」

 出版後、韓国での反応は、書店ウェブサイトのレビューによると、好感と反論の両極端に分かれたという。本国よりも日本で倍の部数が発行されたことを危惧した韓国の記者から「歴史が歪曲されるのではないか」と質問された。

「これは東アジア全体の問題だと思います。日本の読者がこれほど大きな反響を示すのも、大きな関心を寄せているからだと思います。歴史の歪曲という表現を使っていましたが、あるはずがないと言わせていただきます」

(本誌取材班)

※週刊朝日  2019年12月6日号
----


Jin Pyo Park 1.일본이 건강하다는 증거.
2.한국이 많이 어리다는 증거.
1
Hide or report this


Like
· Reply
· 20h

Jin Kaneko 予想外の売れ行きですね。もう一冊頼まれて、茨城県水戸地区の大きな書店数件を回ったら、どこも品切れ。書店の取り寄せは時間がかかるので、増刷・配本の様子をみることにしましたが。カバーのにぎやかな、いわゆる嫌韓本はわかりませんけれども、韓国関係の学術書に近い内容のものが、こんなに売れるというのは予想だにしていませんでしたね。韓国ものにかぎらず、こんなに売れる学術書というのは、近年例がないのではないか? 文芸春秋も驚いているんじゃないですかね。
3
Hide or report this


Like
· Reply
· See translation
· 19h
· Edited


Jin Kaneko 文藝春秋は、初版の刷り部数を間違えた。同社にとって嬉しい誤算ではありますが、私は、書店を数件まわって徒労だった。とはいえ、書店を覗くのは好きだから、いいんですけどね。しかし、これはアマゾンに注文したほうがよいか(笑
Hide or report this


Like
· Reply
· See translation
· 4h


Write a reply...







림정훈 한국은 너무 빨리 자유 민주주의가 성장해서 오랫동안 시간들여 성장한
일본과 달리 부족한부분이 많습니다.
1
Hide or report this


Like
· Reply
· 11h

Sungdoo Lee これが日本の底力だ。やはり日本はすごい国であり、日本人は偉大な国の国民である。ありがとうございます。
1
Hide or report this


Like
· Reply
· See translation
· 9h

海を渡る「慰安婦」問題――右派の「歴史戦」を問う 2016 山口 智美 (著), 能川 元一 (著)




この画像を表示



海を渡る「慰安婦」問題――右派の「歴史戦」を問う 単行本(ソフトカバー) – 2016/6/24
山口 智美 (著), 能川 元一 (著), & 2 その他

5つ星のうち 3.5 10個の評価
---------------------
商品の説明

内容紹介

「米中韓が連携し、「慰安婦」問題で日本を攻撃している」。そんな危機感を抱く歴史修正主義者たちは「歴史戦」と称して、アメリカなど海外への情報発信を強めている。ネットによる情報拡散のみならず、現地での集会や訴訟も展開。政府も加わった「歴史戦」の実態を詳細に報告し、歴史認識と政治のあり方を問う。
内容(「BOOK」データベースより)

「米中韓が連携し、「慰安婦」問題で日本を攻撃している」。そんな危機感を抱く歴史修正主義者たちは「歴史戦」と称して、アメリカなど海外への情報発信を強めている。ネットによる情報拡散のみならず、現地での集会や訴訟も展開。政府も加わった「歴史戦」の実態を詳細に報告し、歴史認識と政治のあり方を問う。

登録情報

単行本(ソフトカバー): 160ページ
出版社: 岩波書店 (2016/6/24)
言語: 日本語
ISBN-10: 4000222325
ISBN-13: 978-4000222327
発売日: 2016/6/24
-----------

目次を見る
目次



第1章 「歴史戦」の誕生と展開(「歴史戦」前史―転機としての「一九九七年」
情報戦―第一次安倍内閣時代の右派論壇 ほか)
第2章 アメリカ「慰安婦」碑設置への攻撃(日系アメリカ人が「慰安婦」碑に反対しているという誤報 - 実態のない「日本人いじめ」 ほか)
第3章 謝罪は誰に向かって、何のために行うのか?―「慰安婦」問題と対外発信(マウマウ記念碑 - 「連累(implication)」という概念 ほか)
第4章 官民一体の「歴史戦」のゆくえ(男女共同参画批判と「慰安婦」否定論
一九九〇年代の歴史修正主義と「慰安婦」否定論 ほか)


15
単行本(ソフトカバー)
¥1,760

文藝 2019年秋季号

雑誌
¥1,518

歴史戦と思想戦 ――歴史問題の読み解き方 (集英社新書)

山崎 雅弘
5つ星のうち 3.9 43
新書
¥1,012

日本軍「慰安婦」制度とは何か (岩波ブックレット 784)

吉見 義明
5つ星のうち 3.8 31
単行本(ソフトカバー)
¥572
---------------------------

カスタマーレビュー
5つ星のうち3.5
星5つ中の3.5
評価の数 10

星5つ 45%
星4つ 11%
星3つ 11%
星2つ 12%
星1つ 20%
-----------------------------
10件のカスタマーレビュー
トップレビュー

ミスター・ディグ

5つ星のうち5.0「歴史戦」の起源、実状、そしてその虚妄性を懇切丁寧に解説してくれる佳作2018年11月14日
Amazonで購入
本書を始めて手に取った時、その薄さに驚いた。全部で160ページという事だが、巻末付録に慰安婦問題に関する年表と、「河野談話」、「戦後70年談話」が掲載されており、それを含めての数字なので、実際の本文の文章はもっと少ない。3時間もかからずに全体を読み通せてしまう。
だが、短い文章の中でも、慰安婦問題の「歴史戦」に関する記述は簡潔でしかも丁寧であり、慰安婦問題をよく知らない人でもすんなりと知識が頭に入ってくるだろう。裏を返せば、「歴史戦」というものがそれだけ中身が無い、本書の表現を借りれば「虚構」である事を表しているとも言える。
本書は4章に分かれており、4人の著者がそれぞれ1章を担当している。第1章は、能川元一が日本の論壇における「歴史戦」の起源及びその展開について追っている。「歴史戦」は90年代半ば頃から始まっており、当初は「情報戦」という名前だった事、「歴史戦」は偏狭なナショナリズムと深い関係がある事、「歴史戦」を戦う人達は、日本国内での歴史論争には完勝したと思い込んでおり、それ故に海外での活動が上手くいかない事に苛立っている事などが語られている。
第2章では、アメリカ在住の日本人、小山エミが、アメリカでの慰安婦碑建設をめぐる係争と、それに関わる日本政府の行動や、この係争が与える日系アメリカ人コミュニティへの影響について解説する。
アメリカにおいて慰安婦や、慰安婦碑建設に反対する活動を行っているのは、アメリカ生まれの日系人ではなく、バブル期以降に渡米した「新一世」と呼ばれる人達が大多数を占めていると言う。そういった人達が主張し、かつ活動の根拠にしている「慰安婦碑は日系人へのいじめを引き起こしている」という事実は全く確認されておらず、デマだった事が判明している。慰安婦碑に反対する裁判では、日本政府が関与しており、日系人コミュニティに接触して慰安婦碑建設反対に回らせたという興味深い事実もある。(本書出版の時点では、裁判はまだ終わっていなかったが、結局最高裁で日本側の敗訴が確定した)日本人グループは他にもアメリカの大学などで慰安婦否定の講演会などを開いているが、言動が余りにも韓国側に酷く差別的で、アメリカ人の反感を買ってしまっており、逆効果になっている。
主な内容は上記の通りだが、日本側の活動が赤裸々に明かされており、本書の中でも一番のハイライトである。
第3章は、イギリスで生まれ育ち、オーストラリアに移住した経験を持つテッサ・モーリスースズキが、日本人の過去の歴史の否定や、そのような歴史観に基づいた外国への情報発信について批判している。
割り当てられたページ数は2章と同じぐらいだが、3章は内容がやや薄い気がする。「戦後70年談話」を発表しながら、それに反する行動を取る安倍総理及び日本政府を批判する、日本人は過去の戦争において直接的責任は無いが間接的な責任はある、多数の、外国人に日本政府が慰安婦を否定する本を送り付けている、などが主な内容である。
第4章は、山口智美が、慰安婦問題に関する否定派の運動・活動の流れを概観し、それに対する与党や政府の関与を説明している。非常に多岐に亘って日本側の運動・活動について解説されており、参考になる。「テキサス親父」で有名なトニー・マラーノの名前も出てくる。とにかく、外国人に本やパンフレットを配る、送り付ける、日本に都合の悪い意見を持つ外国人には大々的にバッシングを行い、トニー・マラーノのような外国人は持ち上げるなど、日本側のなりふり構わない活動が印象に残る。それによって、ますます日本の立場が悪くなってしまうという悪循環が発生していると言える。
160ページしかないとは言え、非常に参考になる本だった。ただ、1700円と言う値段については、少し高いのではないかと思う。

22人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

nakanaka

5つ星のうち5.0今も必要な本2019年5月19日
Amazonで購入
今公開中の映画「主戦場」の中で、アメリカでの慰安婦像を巡る訴訟(グレンテール訴訟)が描かれています。大変よくまとめられたいい映画ですが、この本には、その背景も含め丁寧に書かれていますのでおすすめです。「慰安婦」像を巡っては、吉村大阪市長(当時)がサンフランシスコ市との姉妹都市を解消しましたが、その後大阪府知事に当選。彼のような歴史認識を持つ人物が、大阪万博を進めていく資格があるのか、大いに疑問です。日本では、「従軍慰安婦はなかった」との論説が多いですが、世界ではどう見られているかを知ることは、今も必要だと感じます。

14人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

能手 聖利

5つ星のうち1.0歴史修正主義?2018年11月11日

歴史修正主義と批判している人々の主張をまとめると、

・兵士1人が日本刀1本で100人以上斬り殺せるほどの戦闘能力と有り余る予備の日本刀を持ち

・銃剣と単発銃のみで80万人以上殺すなど、原爆以上の破壊力を持つ携行兵器を誇り

・各植民地で無駄に現地人を殺してまわるほど武器弾薬が余っていて

・中国で320万人もの現地労働者を動員し、そのうち100万人が死に

・機密保持の為に1万人を生き埋めにするほどの労働条件でも反乱を起こさせないほどの統率能力を使って

・国境地帯に計19ヶ所、4700kmにおよぶ要塞および1700kmもの地下要塞を作り

・さらにこの超巨大要塞を60年間に渡って秘匿しつづける程、情報管理が徹底していて

・沖縄で米軍上陸後も市民に玉砕命令が出せるほど命令系統がしっかりしていて

・何百万人を殺しておきながら、戦後半世紀以上も、殺害時期、殺害方法、日本兵の心理状況などこと細かな内容迄隠し通す機密保持の高さを誇り

・当時オランダ領だったインドネシアにも開戦前から日本軍用の慰安婦を送り込むほど先見性があり

・揚子江の川幅約20kmを2m以下にしたりするほどの高い土木技術を持ち

・人口20万人の南京市で30万人を虐殺し、かつその死体を1台のトラックで2週間で片付けられるほどの行動力があり

・日本兵の数を上回るほどの従軍慰安婦を一日に一人あたり何十人も暴行するほど体力と食料が有り余っていて

・AVが無かった時代にも関わらず慰安婦に顔射するほど独創性に富み

・韓国で文化施設はもちろん一般家庭にある辞書から料理本に至るまで処分してまわるほど暇で

・保護するために植民地ではなく「併合」したにも関わらず、韓国の運気を捻じ曲げるために、山の頂上に鉄杭やら真鍮杭を埋め込むほど風水に明るく

・人間の脂肪から、航空燃料を作れるほど錬金術に長け

・写真の影さえ消せる位の隠密行動に長け、銃殺しても血が流れない銃を開発し

・韓国の優れた建築施設・街・鉄道を全て接収することなく破壊し尽くした上、新たに日本のダメな建築物に建て替えるほど資材と資財と人材が有り余っていて

・当時の朝鮮の人口のおよそ半数近くを日本へピストン輸送するほど燃料と船舶が豊富で

・960万平方kmもの大地をもつ中国の3分の2を支配し

・家々に火を放ちまくり6年間で1万7000以上の村を焼き払うほどの行動力があり

・250種類もの殺人方法を思いつくほどに残虐で

・無駄に虐殺した5000万人もの民間人の死体を一カ所に集めてたっぷりとガソリンをまいて燃やすほど石油資源に余裕があり

・中国の近代化を50年も遅らせるほどの徹底的な破壊を行い

・わずか70万人の関東軍で戦闘の合間に20万人もの中国人慰安婦を満足させるほど絶倫で

・広く険しい中国大陸を大軍勢で移動していたにも関わらず、各地区の兵士や民間人が逃げる暇も無い程のスピードで動き回るなど金メダル級の運動能力を誇り

・山東省で広島+長崎の核2発分の犠牲者数を超える42万人を殺戮するほどの細菌兵器を保有し

・田舎から都市部まで全ての街道を余す所無く隅々まで破壊し尽くし、さらに人気の無い山の奥深くでさえ草一本残さず毟り取る程の根気と几帳面さを兼ね揃え

・11歳が戦場で暴れ回るほど若い内から逞しく、14歳で731部隊に採用されるほど医学を習得し

・15歳の少年に細菌戦部隊での軍務が務まるほどの教育水準を持っていて

・さらに細菌兵器開発のため20万人を生体実験出来るほど医療設備が充実しており

・1941年の大東亜戦争開戦時にダム一つ作るために延べ360万人を動員し9年間に83名もの犠牲者を出し

・圧倒的科学力を誇る朝鮮の反日勢力になぜか圧勝するほど運がよく

・中国での最初の慰安所「大一サロン」にはハイテクエアコンを完備させ

・中国呼倫貝爾市の地下に60年も見つからない、広さが東京ドーム2.5個分の毒ガス実験室を作れるほどの優れた土木技術と豊富な資源、人材を保有し

・それが建設後60年間誰一人として発見できないような隠蔽を行えるほどの科学技術を誇り

・半世紀以上放置されても使用出来る毒ガスを作れるほどの科学力を誇り

・金の掛かる化学兵器砲弾を200万発も生産して中国全土に埋め

・終戦間際の補給線が断たれた時期にマニラで一日3000人を殺害する継戦能力を保持し続け

・朝鮮人を殺しまくりながら人口を2倍にし、その上でもともと無い記憶を奪えるという摩訶不思議な技術を持ち

・日本一の深度を持つ田沢湖を朝鮮人に掘らせ

・終戦後になぜか意味の無い強制連行を行いまくるほどの軍備と余裕があり

・敗戦国でありながらGHQを手玉にとって朝鮮戦争を起こすようコントロールするほど政治力と外交能力に長ける

ということになってしまうのだけど?

19人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

くまじ

ベスト50レビュアー
5つ星のうち5.0大金を投じて全世界に恥を晒す。2017年12月30日

 日本の歴史修正主義者が海外で何かしているらしいという事はなんとなく知っていたが、本書によって実際にどういうことをやっているのかがよくわかった。しかも日本国政府までもが一緒になってやっている。「慰安婦」問題にしても「南京事件」にしても今さら否定のしようがないことには学問的・国際的にもかたがついている。それにもかかわらず官民挙げてそれを否定して回れば、当然世界中に馬鹿を晒す結果になるわけだ。そのための予算は600億円とかで大変な浪費だ。
 しかし本書でも言及されているように、日本国内では彼らは「なかった」が通じると思っていられる現状がある。こういう事実に触れると、集団としての日本国乃至日本人が無理筋の戦争をやらかした挙句に、収拾がつかなくなって痛い思いをした過去に全く懲りていないことがよくわかる。自分も含めてこのような集団は核とか軍隊とか危ないものを不用意に弄ばない方が良い、と再確認した次第。
 しかし、今後このことで日本国が世界中の笑い物となり、それをきっかけに日本に住む皆が自分たちの至らなさを自覚できるのなら600億円も全くの無駄ではない。

37人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

blue fire

5つ星のうち5.0Shame on You!2017年12月15日

日本の右派が、海外で日本国の評価を必死になって貶めようとしている実態が明らかにされています。正に恥を知るべき。

28人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

Mike Alpha

5つ星のうち4.0官民の歴史修正主義を概観2016年11月29日

民間団体だけでなく、外務省など官を巻き込んだ歴史修正主義運動を概観する一冊。
現在までの流れを知るには最適な本。

69人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

おっちゃん

5つ星のうち5.0右派のトンデモ言説に正面から向き合った学術書2016年7月4日
Amazonで購入
一気に読了。右派(歴史修正主義者)の「歴史戦」なるものがまったくの妄想によるドン・キホーテであることが立証される。一昔前ならトンデモ本扱いの言説が、今や政府の公認となりつつあることに戦慄。第一級の学術書。

131人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

せう

5つ星のうち1.0歴史修正主義者って何だ?2017年3月20日

歴史修正主義者って何だ?間違っている事を正しく修正しても歴史修正主義者なのだろうか?例えば慰安婦における左派の主張に大きな捏造あり、問題となった事実はどのように説明するのだろうか?それは彼らが否定する歴史修正主義者の姿そのものではないのか?。

海外で韓国人が主張している慰安婦の説明は、日本人で左派や韓国人が主張している慰安婦とは全く別物だ。より酷い内容にグレードアップされ、様々な話が追加されており捏造とされている部分も健在だ。それを批判する事が歴史修正主義者なのだろうか?

どうやら韓国の言い分やプロパガンダ・捏造だろうが全て無条件で受け入れ、犬になければ歴史修正主義者となるようだ。軍事国家時代の日本のように全てを無批判に受け入れているようでは、平和や民主主義は遠のいていくだろう。これでは軍事国家時代に逆戻りだ。

68人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立ったコメント 違反を報告

すべてのカスタマーレビューを見る(10)
カスタマーレビューを書く