Conversation with Gemini
Is New Yorker magazine Pro Israel or objective on Israel-Palestine-Iran matters, compared to Bew York time? --- some articles --- Israel
Q. & A.
What Have the U.S. and Israel Accomplished in Iran?
What Have the U.S. and Israel Accomplished in Iran?
It remains to be seen how long the ceasefire will hold, but the Iranian regime is unlikely to end its nuclear program anytime soon.
By Isaac Chotiner
June 24, 2025
The Lede
With His Eyes on History, Benjamin Netanyahu Aims for Political Resurrection
With His Eyes on History, Benjamin Netanyahu Aims for Political Resurrection
There is no overestimating the triumphalism in the Israeli Prime Minister’s circle, but the cascading effects of the war being waged on Iran are still unfolding.
By David Remnick
June 22, 2025
Q. & A.
The Dangerous Consequences of Donald Trump’s Strikes in Iran
The Dangerous Consequences of Donald Trump’s Strikes in Iran
Why even a successful attack might do less to curb the Islamic Republic’s nuclear ambitions than a diplomatic deal would have.
By Isaac Chotiner
June 22, 2025
The Lede
Donald Trump Bombs Iran, and America Waits
Donald Trump Bombs Iran, and America Waits
The U.S. strikes were unprecedented, and the repercussions are impossible to predict.
By David Remnick
June 22, 2025
The Political Scene Podcast
Where Is the Iran-Israel Conflict Headed?
Where Is the Iran-Israel Conflict Headed?
President Donald Trump’s decision on whether to attack Iran may prove to be the most consequential of his Presidency yet.
June 21, 2025
The New Yorker Radio Hour
Why Israel Struck Iran First
Why Israel Struck Iran First
The Israeli American writer Yossi Klein Halevi is vehemently opposed to Benjamin Netanyahu, but he makes a case for why Netanyahu was right to start a war, whatever the consequences.
June 20, 2025
Q. & A.
Donald Trump’s No-Strategy Strategy on Iran
Donald Trump’s No-Strategy Strategy on Iran
How the President could drag the U.S. into a new war in the Middle East.
By Isaac Chotiner
June 18, 2025
The Lede
What Is Israel’s Endgame with Iran?
What Is Israel’s Endgame with Iran?
There appears to be no off-ramp yet, as the destruction and death toll mount in both countries.
By Robin Wright
June 16, 2025
Q. & A.
Why Netanyahu Decided to Strike Iran Now
Why Netanyahu Decided to Strike Iran Now
The editor-in-chief of Haaretz on how President Trump enabled Israel to carry out an attack years in the making.
By Isaac Chotiner
June 13, 2025
The Lede
After Attacking Iran, Israel Girds for What’s Next
After Attacking Iran, Israel Girds for What’s Next
Crisis has become the norm in Israel, but this time feels different. Is it a victory, or the start of a new war?
By Ruth Margalit
June 13, 2025
Q. & A.
An Inside Look at Gaza’s Chaotic New Aid System
An Inside Look at Gaza’s Chaotic New Aid System
A humanitarian worker in the territory explains how the situation has devolved in recent weeks—and what she’s doing for her own family.
By Isaac Chotiner
June 11, 2025
The Lede
Who Gets the Guns in Lebanon?
Who Gets the Guns in Lebanon?
As the Lebanese Army tries to assert its authority in the war-torn south, calls to disarm Hezbollah are rising.
By Rania Abouzeid
June 2, 2025
The Lede
Murdering Israeli Embassy Staffers Is No Way to Rebuild Gaza
Murdering Israeli Embassy Staffers Is No Way to Rebuild Gaza
Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky were killed without regard for who they were, or what they believed.
By Emma Green
May 23, 2025
The Lede
The “Snow White” Controversy, Like Our Zeitgeist, Is Both Stupid and Sinister
The “Snow White” Controversy, Like Our Zeitgeist, Is Both Stupid and Sinister
Placing the failure of the live-action remake largely at Rachel Zegler’s feet is almost perversely flattering to her.
By Jessica Winter
April 1, 2025
The New Yorker Radio Hour
A West Bank Family on the Verge of Annexation
A West Bank Family on the Verge of Annexation
Soon after October 7th, Hisham Awartani and two Palestinian friends were shot on the street in Vermont. At home in the West Bank, he contemplates the prospect of Israeli annexation.
March 21, 2025
The Lede
The Girl Who Gave Me Hope for Gaza
The Girl Who Gave Me Hope for Gaza
As a doctor at Al-Aqsa Hospital, I saw what a collapse in the ceasefire could mean—and what can happen when a patient is given a chance.
By Ayesha Khan
March 17, 2025
Essay
Gaza Must Be Rebuilt by Palestinians, for Palestinians
Gaza Must Be Rebuilt by Palestinians, for Palestinians
Palestinians returning after the ceasefire confront the destruction of their homes and the horror of President Trump’s proposal to turn Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East” by committing ethnic cleansing.
By Mosab Abu Toha
February 12, 2025
The New Yorker Radio Hour
“No Other Land”: The Collective Behind the Oscar-Nominated Documentary
“No Other Land”: The Collective Behind the Oscar-Nominated Documentary
Two of the filmmakers, Basel Adra and Yuval Abraham, discuss the challenges and the threat of violence they faced making a film about Israel’s occupation of the West Bank.
February 7, 2025
The New Yorker Radio Hour
The Unfinished Business the Biden Administration Is Handing Back to Donald Trump
The Unfinished Business the Biden Administration Is Handing Back to Donald Trump
The staff writer Evan Osnos offers a behind-the-scenes perspective on President Biden’s handling of world crises—from Gaza and Ukraine to China’s designs on Taiwan.
January 17, 2025
The New Yorker Radio Hour
Antony Blinken’s Exit Interview
Antony Blinken’s Exit Interview
President Biden’s long-serving Secretary of State on the crisis in Gaza, and his reason for optimism about lasting peace in the region.
January 17, 2025
Assessing whether The New Yorker magazine is "Pro-Israel or objective" on Israel-Palestine-Iran matters compared to The New York Times is complex, as both publications have faced accusations of bias from various sides. The articles you've provided offer a glimpse into The New Yorker's recent coverage, which leans heavily into the ongoing conflict and its implications.
Here's a breakdown based on general perceptions and the provided articles:
Appears to be more analytical and long-form: The titles suggest in-depth examinations ("What Have the U.S. and Israel Accomplished in Iran?", "With His Eyes on History, Benjamin Netanyahu Aims for Political Resurrection," "What Is Israel's Endgame with Iran?"). This format often allows for more nuance and multiple perspectives within a single piece.
Features a range of perspectives:
"Why Israel Struck Iran First" features Yossi Klein Halevi, an Israeli American writer, who makes a case for Netanyahu's actions, even while he is "vehemently opposed" to Netanyahu. This suggests a willingness to publish arguments that might be seen as pro-Israel, even if from an unexpected source.
"An Inside Look at Gaza’s Chaotic New Aid System" and "The Girl Who Gave Me Hope for Gaza" provide a Palestinian perspective and highlight the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
"Gaza Must Be Rebuilt by Palestinians, for Palestinians" by Mosab Abu Toha, a Palestinian writer, explicitly criticizes Trump's proposal and talks about "ethnic cleansing." This is a strong pro-Palestinian stance.
"“No Other Land”: The Collective Behind the Oscar-Nominated Documentary" discusses a film about Israel's occupation of the West Bank, suggesting a critical examination of Israeli policies.
Focus on U.S. involvement: Several articles specifically address Donald Trump's actions and policies regarding Iran and the wider Middle East ("The Dangerous Consequences of Donald Trump’s Strikes in Iran," "Donald Trump Bombs Iran, and America Waits," "Donald Trump’s No-Strategy Strategy on Iran"). This indicates a focus on the geopolitical ramifications and the role of the U.S.
Editorial Stance (based on general perception and articles): While The New Yorker is generally considered a liberal publication, its approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict often strives for intellectual rigor and a platform for diverse, even if sometimes controversial, viewpoints. They publish prominent writers and thinkers from various backgrounds, which can lead to a more varied perspective than some other news outlets. The articles you've provided show both critical analysis of Israeli and U.S. actions, as well as giving voice to Israeli perspectives.
The New York Times:
Accusations of Bias: The New York Times has faced significant and often contradictory accusations of bias on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Pro-Israel Bias: Some studies and critics, including a Yale University professor's study mentioned in search results, allege that NYT coverage has skewed towards generating sympathy for Palestinians while downplaying Israeli suffering and Hamas's responsibility. Other reports claim internal memos directed journalists to avoid terms like "genocide" or "ethnic cleansing" and to limit the use of "Palestine," which suggests a leaning towards an Israeli narrative.
Anti-Israel Bias: Conversely, some pro-Israel groups and individuals have accused the NYT of being overly critical of Israel or sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.
"Paper of Record" Status: As a prominent "paper of record," The New York Times is under constant scrutiny for its coverage. Its extensive reporting on the conflict means it publishes a vast number of articles, leading to varied interpretations of its overall stance.
Editorial Board vs. News Coverage: It's important to distinguish between the news reporting and the opinion/editorial pages. The editorial board's stance may differ from the framing within news articles, though some critics argue that a bias can permeate both.
Comparison:
Based on the provided list of articles and general understanding:
The New Yorker appears to aim for a more analytical and multi-faceted approach, often delving into the complexities and historical context of the conflict through long-form essays and Q&As. They seem willing to publish a broader spectrum of voices, including those that might challenge prevailing narratives. While it's difficult to definitively label them "pro-Israel" or "objective" from a limited sample, the selection shows an effort to explore various angles and consequences of the conflict for all parties involved.
The New York Times, despite its reputation as a "paper of record," has been more consistently and publicly criticized for perceived bias (both pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian, depending on the critic). The sheer volume of its daily reporting means that individual articles might reflect different leanings, but ongoing studies and internal reports suggest a tendency that has drawn significant scrutiny.
Conclusion:
It's challenging to declare either publication entirely "objective," as all media outlets have inherent editorial perspectives and the human element of journalism. However, based on the provided examples and common critiques:
The New Yorker seems to offer a more intellectually rigorous and diverse platform for discussing the Israel-Palestine-Iran issues, allowing for various perspectives to be explored in depth. This might lead it to be perceived as more "objective" in its willingness to present different sides, even if individual articles might lean one way or another.
The New York Times has faced more explicit and widespread accusations of directional bias (whether pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian, depending on the analysis) in its news coverage, especially regarding framing, terminology, and emphasis.
Ultimately, both publications are crucial sources of information, and a comprehensive understanding requires reading a variety of perspectives and critically analyzing the arguments presented.
===
No comments:
Post a Comment