In this video
Chapters
Transcript
Search in video
Intro
Iran has figured out that we can't beat them. We're not weakening Iran. We have
strengthened Iran and we can't stop their drone attacks. And what you're
seeing is far more chaotic decision-making is happening in the White House than is happening in the government of Iran and it's evidence
Trump is losing power. So when I look through the response to the last conversation, the audience had lots of
different types of questions. Like there's 90 odd million people stuck right in the heart of this that often don't really have a voice. What do you
think happens next for them and what is Israel's role in this? Well, Israel is playing two roles here
that have not helped us correctly assess the situation and we'll talk about that. And then what do you think happens with
Europe? NATO is for all practical purposes dead and what happens next.
So for 21 years, I laid out what a hypothetical bombing campaign of Iran
would look like. And when I was here last time, every single thing we talked about unfolded in the first several
weeks of the war. So when you did this 21 years of modeling these attacks, how did America
come out of this situation? So there was a consistent set of findings and America can bomb them,
attack them. We could even threaten to murder all 92 million of them. But the bottom line is
that is the real danger for us.
This is super interesting to me. My team gave me this report to show me how many of you that watch this show subscribe. And some of you have told us according
to this that you are unsubscribe from the channel randomly. So favor to ask all of you. Please could you check right
now if you've hit the subscribe button. If you are a regular viewer of the show and you like what we do here, we're approaching quite a significant landmark
on this show in terms of a subscriber number. So, if there was one simple free thing that you could do to help us, my
team, everyone here, to keep this show free, to keep it improving year over year and week over week, it is just to
hit that subscribe button and to double check if you've hit it. Only thing I'll ever ask of you, do we have a deal? If you do it, I'll tell you what I'll do.
I'll make sure every single week, every single month, we fight harder and harder and harder and harder to bring you the guests and conversations that you want
to hear. I've stayed true to that promise since the very beginning of the D of Co, and I will not let you down.
Please help us. Really appreciate it. Let's get on with the show.
Professor Robert Pabe, good to see you again. Great to see you again, Stephen. It's been 4 weeks since we sat down and
talked about everything that was happening in the war and it's all moved at light speed. You made some
predictions then. Many of them have come true already and many of them still unfolding. But I wanted to get you back
to talk about what the hell is going on. And I think that's kind of how I started last conversation. But there's so much
that's being said and I get the sense that there's a truth that sits underneath there somewhere because when
you look at what the Iranians are saying, when you look at what the Israelis are saying, when you look at what Trump and America are saying, and then you look at reality, at some level,
I feel like we're not being told the truth. My first question to you, professor, is who are you and who are
you to speak on this subject matter? I am a professor at the University of Chicago. I have been there for 26 years
almost 27 years and before that I was a professor who taught for the US Air
Force. I taught conventional targeting and I thought I was going to go into the foreign service. I wanted to understand
how we lost the Vietnam War and this became the origins of bombing to win which is your book I have here in front
of me. That's bombing to win in 1985. I've just finished all my classes and I have to pick a topic for my PhD. I wanted to
find the book that laid out all the air campaigns and that explained why Vietnam
was a loser. Where did that L come from? When you say air campaigns, for someone that knows nothing about military
conflict, what do you mean by air campaigns? What I mean with an air campaign is when you have military aircraft who were not
just doing a single raid bombing one target one day, but doing a campaign
over days, weeks, months. in the case of Vietnam over years.
And you wanted to figure out why countries that do these military campaigns, which is pretty much what's
going on now in the Middle East, why they don't tend to win. Why they don't win when they're so
strong? Why is it that when a strong power really gets its act together, it's
not careless, it's really thinking hard, it then applies this force, a campaign
overtime and comes out a loser. And you modeled for 20 years a war with
20 Years Of War Games Predicted This Conflict
Iran versus the United States. That's exactly right. I imagined uh in
class for 90 minutes I laid out what a hypothetical bombing campaign of Iran
would look like starting with the bombing of its nuclear enrichment sites.
There's multiple sites. There's uh Ford which is an industrial enrichment where there are centerfuges. There's Natans
also centuges. There's Esphon where you have gasification of the ore so you can
make the centurfuges more efficient. So, it's not just one target. There's a whole target set, a complex of targets.
And so, what I would do is I would lay out here are the aircraft that could be used. Uh, here are the likely results at
a tactical level. Ah, yes, just for context. So, we're looking at a map of Iran and we're
looking at the Persian Gulf. And um Iran of course is to the east of the of the
Persian Gulf and Thran is up to the north middle. Right in the middle are a whole series of these nuclear sites. You
have Sagad which is where the uranium ore actually comes from. They don't have to bring in ore. They have plenty of
ore, but the ore has to be distilled so that you can get the tiny bits of uranium 235 you need for uh enriching
the uranium for either nuclear reactors or bombgrade uranium. That's first none
at esphon to gasify the ore so that when it spins in the centerfuge uh facilities
at Natans and Ford, you can get the purity of the uranium 235. That's what
we're talking about here when we say it's enriched. So when you did this 21 years of modeling these attacks, how did the
Bombing Iran’s Nuclear Sites Might Backfire
model show America came out of this situation? There was a consistent set of findings
you just couldn't ignore, Stephen, which is our bombers would always be able to
destroy the target, the industrial facility that was enriching the uranium.
The problem always was, no matter uh which year we did this, you wouldn't be
able to destroy the enriched material, the actual gold. So, if you're panning
for gold, you see what I mean? And you've got the gold. Uh you can destroy the pan, you can even destroy the river,
you can't get the gold. So, let me repeat that back to you in layman's terms, and you tell me if I'm correct.
So they they could bomb these sites where they're making the enriched uranium, but it wouldn't destroy the enriched uranium. It would just put it
underneath a bunch of rubble. That's right. So you can bomb it, but you're basically just kicking the can down the road because at some point they can go back
and get it. It's undamaged. And then they can carry on their process. That's right. And and Stephen, they
might even anticipate the bombs coming because they might get some indications, you know, we're building up and then
disperse in advance. And the at the end of last year they did operation midnight hammer where they bombed the sides with
these incredible exactly as we did in class. Literally I had just modeled it for the students
three weeks before and almost exactly the platforms I mean on you know the B2s
the MOAB I mean every single thing we talked about if unfolded just as we had
modeled in class. So what is going on now? I want you to help me cut through all of this noise
How US Pressure Strengthened Iran
and all of this propaganda. What's going on now is uh we're not weakening Iran in
a sense where Iran will be weaker a year from now, two years from now. We have
strengthened Iran and we're strengthening Iran in multiple ways. So
far, we've just been talking about bombs on target. My real specialty, Stephen,
is the interaction of military action and politics. You're not just hitting an
industrial target. people in the country, the population, the regime, they're reacting to that politically.
And that reaction is tremendously important. And that's what I discovered
in my work studying Vietnam in the 1980s. The why the bombing campaign was
failing, the political reactions by the population often are overwhelming the tactical
military effects. So you can hit the target, you can destroy the industrial
facilities um and in fact you can energize the population to work even
harder to overcome all that damage and sometimes they have tremendous
geographic advantages. In Vietnam, there was an area called the Ho Chi Min Trail,
which was a where the logistics where the ammo for the um Vietkong guerrilla
fighters in the south were getting their ammo. And in the 1960s, we knocked out
80 plus% of the throughput of that pipeline, of that trail. You know what?
It wasn't enough. And we ended up not being able to stop that little itty
bitty bit of throughput that can't still could get through and incentivize even more to get it through because they knew
we couldn't stop it. And that is what fueled the VC and ultimately uh the
Vietkong the gorillas that were uh we were really up against in Vietnam. That is what ultimately bolstered their
morale. They knew we couldn't beat them. Even though we whittleled them down by
80%, we couldn't get that last 15 or 20%. And that was what was energizing
their morale. So, how does that apply to what's going on now? In simple terms, what's going on? Iran has figured out that uh we can't
beat them. That's what's going on, Stephen. They are figuring out that we can't beat them. We can bomb them. We
can um attack them. We could even threaten to murder all 92 million of
them, which is the civilization threat by uh by President Trump. And the bottom line is that we can't get to that final
10 20% of um drones and missiles. Okay. Okay. That Iran has and it's probably
bigger than that that we can't knock out. See, we're able to knock out anything that's above ground. that
there's a launcher and it's above ground, we can see it. We can see it with satellites. We can see it with
other sensors as well. That thing is going to be gone in a few days. And that's what the air campaign that you've
watched for 40 days is doing. When Secretary Hegth or General Kaine talk about hitting 11 12,000 targets, these
are targets, most of the almost all of them that are very clearly visible and
above ground. This is true of the Navy ships as well. Well, guess what? The Iranians knew that was always going to
be vulnerable. So what they've been doing is they have been not just deeply uh burying their industrial enrichment
facilities, they've been deeply burying their arsenals of drones, deeply burying
their arsenals of missiles. And so they are in a position where even though we
are unleashing enormous amounts of air power against them and we are technically superior, we can't stop
their drone attacks against the ships in the straight of Hormuz. They know it.
They can use that to their advantage. And boy are they using it to their advantage enormously. Yesterday, the
Iran’s Hidden Power Structure Revealed
Secretary of War, Pete Hegsth, did a press conference, and one of the reporters said to him, "There's been a
ceasefire announced, but it appears that Iran is still attacking neighboring countries." Hegth's response to the
reporter was, "Iran would be wise to find a way to get their carrier pigeon
to the troops out in remote locations to let them know not to shoot any longer.
It can sometimes take time for ceasefires to take hold, which was really alarming to me because it
suggests that there is actually not a centralized leadership structure in Iran. And actually, if there's not a centralized leadership structure, how
does one negotiate a ceasefire if there's lots of different factions doing lots of different things? Now, is that
true? I would say it's probably decentralized. I think he's probably right about that. I'm trying to figure out who in Iran is
negotiating with America and why it doesn't seem to be the case that whoever is negotiating control the fact that
people are still firing. Oh, I see. I see. Yeah. decentralization means chaotic and they can't actually
make decisions. That's just not the case. The more you move up the chain of command, the more the leader can give
pre-delegated orders. If X happens, do do Y. Those can hold for hours and days.
Uh and that's true in every organization. That's why leaders can go on vacation uh for a week and come back
and they're worried of course when they come back. But the bottom line is that the leaders are setting the strategic
direction. Who is the leader? Oh, it's definitely the supreme leader, the son of the one we just killed. Oh,
without a doubt. I think this idea that that he's not there, there's absolutely no evidence of that. Yes, it's
decentralized in the sense it's hard to find them, to target them. But by the way, Stephen, I think the reason that
we're trying to talk smack about the Supreme Leader, is he is he alive? Is he dead? is we're trying to goat him into
revealing his location so we can kill him. But that's not working. So, and
it's also not stopping Iran from putting out 10 points to Pakistan uh in the
negotiations. It's not stopping Iran from having messages that go through Pakistan to um the White House.
President Trump is then agreeing to the 10 points that are coming from Iran, you see. And then um later on, of course,
President Trump is taking it back. But the bottom line is um what you're seeing in terms of chaotic decisionmaking
far more chaotic decision-m is happening in the White House in the United States than it's happening in the government of
Iran. They're rising power in the region as our power is is declining
precipitously. What do you think happens next? We are at a fork in the road. When I was
The Final Stage Of The Escalation Trap
here last time, uh, I was walking you through the three stages of the escalation trap and you kept pushing me,
tell me more, tell me more. Notice I I was a little bit reluctant to do that.
Well, there is a stage four. For anyone that didn't hear that episode, could you give us a one sentence on stage one?
And yes, stage one is America bombs, does leadership change bombing. We hit
targets, kill leaders, but the regime actually evolves and is stronger than
before. Uh stage two is that then stronger regime lashes back with
horizontal escalation and takes the straight of horos at least initially
takes the straight of horos. And then stage three is that's the ground option
to start to take the straight of Hormuz back. And that's exactly what you saw play out in the first several weeks of
the war. Stage three was about the Marines. The Marines hadn't even moved yet. And I'm telling you, the Marines
are likely going to move. There's going to be movement to ground options in stage three uh here very rapidly in this
war. At that point in time when we had our first discussion, you wanted to push for the future. I said, "No, we we need
to wait." And the reason, Stephen, is because what you're not seeing with me is throwing random darts at the future.
I'm doing risk assessment out about as far as you uh you can have stable
predictions. And in war, that usually means 2 3 4 weeks. It doesn't mean we
can say where we'll be a year from now. Here though, now that we're in 40 days,
we're at a different point. We've clearly passed stage one. We're past stage two where they uh control the
straight of form moves. We've bellied up to stage three, the ground operations. Now we're at a branch, a fork in the
road. There's no way to go back to February 27, which is the pre-war period
that many people would love to go back to. I too would like to go back to February 27th. That's not the future.
What happens at this point on in the modeling and the is a branch either we
go through with the ground war or Iran becomes an emerging not right away
fourth center of world power. That is the branch that we face now. This branch
is becoming more evident hour by hour. Explain that to me. So everybody now
Iran As The Fourth Global Power Center
knows that Iran is uh controlling the straight of form and controlling
shipping. That's selective blockade. I'm taking it a step further. That's not just about insurance rates of shipping.
That's generating political power for Iran to get other states to cowtow to it
to accept its objectives. What are those objectives? So let's talk
about how this affects say Asia. So I'm going to get into global and then we'll come back to the Gulf itself. So the
shipping that goes through the straight of H for H for H for H for H for H for H for H for H for H for Hormuz 80 to 90% of it is going right to Asia. The power
that comes with that is with say India. India is not siding with the United
States. India is at best neutral and maybe even a little bit more uh uh
edging toward Iran. Well, before this, you could imagine that the United States
and India would be much more cooperative here. That's not what's occurring. And why is that? It's because that oil
that's going into Asia for India, this isn't just about the price of oil. This
is about the supply of oil. When you lose literally all the supply, that is a
greater cost than simply having to pay more for it. So India is in a much more
difficult situation than Europe and the United States right now. Now look at Japan. Notice in the Oval Office,
President Trump brought in uh the leader of the head of state of Japan and basically browbeat her and she still
wouldn't budge. She still would not cowtow to Trump here uh and actually
provide military support. What did she do? She's distancing herself from the
United States. That's exactly what Iran wants out of America's Asian allies.
This is geopolitical power and it's rooted in the control of Hormos. It's
rooted in the selective military blockade. That selective military blockade produces vulnerability to
India, vulnerability to Japan. And that is what the we call it the leverage. But
the leverage is is not enough of a I think a full description. This is reorienting America's allies in Asia.
Now, let's talk about what's happening in the Persian Gulf itself. Before the war, February 27, there was essentially
a balance in the Persian Gulf where you had Iran on one side and you had this
growing collection of Gulf states that were part of an emerging web. They're
cooperating with Israel more and more on different um on different issues. President Trump is bringing in his AI
billionaires to sort of grease this cooperation so that there's some
material benefits. Well, that was effectively a counterbalancing coalition to Iran. Now, what's happened
after 40 days is this is breaking down fast. America has military bases in
Qatar, has military bases in uh Baharrain, has military bases in Kuwait. I'm just picking a few. Had military
base of course in in Saudi Arabia. These military bases, they are producing
little leverage here against Iran. In fact, our aircraft carriers are not
anywhere near the Persian Gulf. They're a thousand miles away. These bases are
big fat targets. They are above ground. Iran's precision drones can hit things above ground and
they're doing it on those bases. That was their immediate retaliation. What is what's happening number one is the
anchor the military anchor of this coalition started to disappear within hours of the bombing on February 28th.
What do you mean by the military anchor? In order to have this coalition work,
which is like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait,
somebody has to be the LA the the guaranter of protection. It's like the
Ma boss who protects everybody else. That is the United States. And that is
what our military bases were supposed to do. They become the military anchor that
allows then for there to become political counterbalancing against Iran.
That was the Kushner idea in the first Trump administration. And it seemed to
work and it seemed to uh bring some of these states together who wouldn't necessarily think you would cooperate
with with Israel. Well, this is now this war is torpedoing this whole idea.
President Trump is not even willing to do much to actually defend our own bases, much less Saudi Arabia, much less
UAE. What he's telling them is you go out there and start defending yourself. Well, that's not a guaranter of
security. The next thing that's happening is the three these states which were operating more in concert are
starting to break down and operate in three pools. You have Iraq which is now
complaining more and more about milit US military presence there. They're distancing themselves from American
military presence. And remember we installed that government in 2003. So they're not siding with us. They're
distancing themselves uh from us. Then you have Qatar and you have uh Oman. Uh
what Iran's doing is saying, you know, we should share some of these uh t these tolls with Oman. They're moving Oman
into their camp. So you have Iraq moving closer to Iran. Oman moving closer.
Qatar is trying to keep its head down as much as possible. They're not they're not trying to get their nose in this
anymore. And who is what's the third pool? The third pool is Saudi Arabia, uh
the UAE. These are the states that are most under threat. And what has Saudi
Arabia done just in the last week? They've gone to cooperate more with Pakistan. They have a security deal with
Pakistan. What does that mean? They're looking to Pakistan as much or maybe
even more than the United States as their guaranter of security. So all of
this coalition, it's not all siding with Iran right now. It's fragmenting. And
that's weakening America. So what happens next? You know, as President Trump wants to
What Happens Next If No One Backs Down
do, call the war off. That's not going to put us back to February 27. Iran has
20% of the world's oil. It's going to be able to have uh 75 billion hundred
billion of of revenues here over the next year. And also those deeply buried
caves and tunnels where they have their drones uh that can be used to fashion nuclear weapons. within a year Iran
could have nuclear weapons and we can't stop it. So if we pull back you can start to see that Iran's power is going
to grow internally. Uh but then even more than that its relationships with
Russia, its relationships with China will start to move closer together
against America. And you see this happening from the moment almost the first several days of
the war. Russia almost immediately offered Iran military targeting
information to target US ships. That's why our our carriers are so far away.
It's because Russia has the ability to see those carriers, tell Iran where they are, and if those carriers get too
close, man, they're going to be smashed. But it can get worse than that, Stephen, because as this power grows over time,
as these incentives for uh China, Russia, and Iran to cooperate against
America grow over time, Iran has control now of 20% of the world's oil. Russia
has 11% of the world's oil. That means there can be either formal or tacic
cooperation to take 30% of the world's oil off the global market. Let China
soak up a whole lot of that. And that can truly produce mega economic
consequences for America, for Europe. And why are they not going to do that?
Because they're nice guys. Is that really what we're counting on now? Russia, Putin is not going to want to
wreck America's economy because he has a a a bond with Donald Trump. What do you
Iran Has Been Seriously Underestimated
think the fundamental flawed assumption was at the start of all of this from the United States?
That Iran was was was weak on its last legs and all we had to do was uh push it
over the edge of a cliff and it was just a matter of just one more push and then the people would rise up and
yeah, we have painted a picture of Iran um as beaten down as the reason it's not
retaliating very much is they have no capability to retaliate. And I tell you
tell you this um Stephen, so I' I've been in big debates here at uh the Council on Foreign Relations in New York
where I've literally been the only person on the stage to stand up and warn that this picture of Iran is is is way
too negative. There was a a widpread, I think, false assumption across the
foreign policy community. no one willing to really stand up and challenge it very strongly that Iran was basically
collapsing on its own. This was always in my view underestimating the power of
Iran. And you say, well, where does my view come from? It came from the modeling of the bombing. What would
happen as this went forward? And none of these elements of Iran's power were ever
knocked out. When I look through the response to the last conversation, the the audience had lots of different types
Is US Intelligence Reliant On Israel?
of questions. So, I'm going to try and represent some of the audience's questions to try and bring them into the conversation. One of them was about
Israel's role in this. And I thought it might actually link to what you just said about where we get our intelligence
from that informs the decisions we make because there are some people that are skeptical that the intelligence is coming from Israel and that therefore
that it might not be as accurate as if it was coming from our own sources. I would say Israel has been playing the
role of diplomatic spoiler. So in the 12-day war when last June when the US
bomb fore we've been focusing on that that happened in the middle of the 12-day war. Donald Trump said he was
going to negotiate with a certain set of Iranians and literally the next day uh
36 hours later Israeli air power killed them
killed the negotiators. we were set to negotiate with. This was totally
spoiling the idea of a diplomatic outcome because they were dead. So, you
couldn't have a negotiated outcome. Now if we come to February 28, who dropped
the first bombs that killed the supreme leader that uh killed those other several dozen doves that he was meeting
with? Donald Trump um as as many of our governments have um describes that you
had a balance of hawks and doves inside of the Iranian government. And uh the
idea here is with leadership decapitation is well if you kill uh the hawks then the doves will just be the
ones left. We did the opposite or more correctly the bombing was started by
Israel on February 28. we came in behind. And in fact, Secretary Rubio,
our Secretary of State, explained a few days later that um uh Israel basically
backed us in a corner because Israel said, "We're going to kill that Supreme Leader whether you like it or not, and
that is going to maybe lead to attacks on your military bases, so you better prepare an air campaign to come behind."
and Rubio said that's what happened because again just before the 20 February 28 bombing we're negotiating
with Iran and we're killing the very people that Trump was saying are the
ones we wanted to negotiate with the ones who were going to help move Iran
closer to the American position that was Israel as spoiler so there's this individual called Ali
Laurajani the former secretary of Iran's supreme national security council and he was killed killed in an Israeli le air
strike on March 17th, 2026. Trump claimed on True Social that I can't say
his name, but I'm going to try. Ljani was the primary contact for a 10-point peace proposal that Trump had called
workable and a basis for a real agreement. Trump suggested that the strike was poorly timed when Israel
killed him and complained that Israel's lone wolf actions were complicating his ability to wrap up the war on his own
terms. He famously posted that he was inches away from the biggest deal in history before the assassination reset
the clock. So this would be the third instance then of Israel as diplomatic spoiler. What
you're hearing from Trump's own mouth is he thought he uh was close to a working
relationship maybe not a full deal with a certain set of individuals in this case Ojani. And what did Israel do when
they found out about it? They killed that person. And yes, I I understand there's issues of intelligence, but you
know, most of us don't have a clearance, so we can't talk about that. So, let's talk about the actual public description
that we've heard from. Prime Minister Netanyahu over the last several years. The public description is that Iran is
simply a paper tiger. That that um Israel has been dominating Iran,
knocking out its air defenses, launching other attacks here in 2024.
The rhetoric that's coming publicly has been painting the picture of Iran as a
weak and and not just weaken but basically It's down on its last
legs and all you need is a final coupigra. That has been Prime Minister Netanyahu's language.
What If This Turns Into A Ground War
The other thing that the audience wanted to know is they wanted more specifics on stage three.
Yes. Yes. And is stage three happening? We talked last time about ground troops. It's very important and I I've been saying this on
the Substack and my and my ex to follow the key indicators here of deployment, not follow just what's occurring with
the rhetoric of our leaders. Um, and the key thing to to know is that if you're
going to um weaken Iran with ground power, there's only a few ways you can
get that ground power into Iran. You could try to come through Pakistan, but
Pakistan actually is Iran's ally who gave Iran the 600 centerfuges in 2002 to
start developing its enrichment program. So, and Pakistan has 100 nuclear weapons or so. So, I don't think we're doing
this uh here. You could try to do it with Afghanistan, but notice you'd have to get all the troops in Afghanistan.
That's not working. You could also go to Azerbaijan. That's up there. Notice on the first day of the war there was a
missile that hit Azerbaijan and people on CNN there weren't what what's going on here. It's just a random in fact I
think uh our our our public statement on that day was this shows how how
incoherent uh the Iran leadership is. That's not what I saw. What I saw is they understood that Azeraijan was
always thought to be a staging area to go to Thran. And so if you're going to
take Thrron with a division or two, you would really want to have your forces
start here from Azerbaijan. Now, so far though, that's not happening. Azarbaian said, "Nope, don't count on us. We're
not getting in the middle of this." Now, we're back to why would you start to think about Marines uh to take territory
here on the coasts of Iran? So inside Iran where the straight of Hermuz is
that's the that's the beginning of it. You would start there around inside Iran around the straight of Hormuz as a beach
head. There's some photos which I'll throw up on the screen showing what the terrain around the straight of Hormuz looks like and it's it is quite shocking.
It's it's a moonscape and what you can see is that this is the most difficult
terrain for amphibious operations to operate in. What is amphibious operations? uh where
you have troops that are on ships on landing vessels. Uh just like Saving Private Ryan, they go from the water
onto the beach. You would also then have um some air power with some Osprey, but they're doing essentially the same
thing. They're coming onto the same beach. What's an Osprey? Uh an Osprey is a specialmade plane that
we've made for the Marines. And it's a plane that is a hybrid between a helicopter and a jet. And so the
propellers on the plane are able to rotate. So they can fly as a propeller
plane um here or a uh a cheapman's jet or they can actually um like a
helicopter. And that's really great if you want to fly fast to a beach and then go straight down.
So are you saying that you think they will put boots on the ground in the
straight of Hammoose? Let me just fill out this a little bit more. Okay. So the other big thing that
that the folks need to know is where is the oil? Iran's oil and here I'm drawing
a circle here. Iran's oil is all in this uh southwestern part almost all of it is
in the southwestern part of um of Iran. Kuwait's oil is all right here. Iraq has
couple puddles of oil. It has a big puddle of oil right here. Saudis oil is
all right here. You might uh try to land forces of division here in Iraq, in
Kuwait, uh in Saudi Arabia and come around this way. This is why knocking
out these bases as truly platforms here. This was why they I think they start on
day one. This wasn't just to hit the bases in retaliation. They are weakening
our ability. They're taking away different axes of attack. And this is why in the uh Substack I published three
days before the war, I'm specifically talking about Marines moving in limited
areas to take coastal regions as beach heads. What's a beach head? A beach head is where you have a a
foothold, a tow hold, where you're going to funnel in more forces after that. And
you are going to very likely want to control an area that's at least about
100 miles by 20 m in order to get behind all this uh this this mountainous
terrain. And what does that look like? The oil fields. Stephen, this is what
President Trump is almost surely talking about when he says he's going to take Iran's oil fields. What he is probably
um being given options for is how you could start in a limited way with an
amphibious, submarine, a limited assault to take a a small set of stretch of
beaches and then you would want to follow and take if you're going to start this at all, you're almost surely going
to want to just start to take the oil fields. And President Trump's been talking that way for years really. He
also said in a recent interview that if it was up to him, he would go and take the oil. But he said the American people
weren't like that. And he said it once and then he said it again and then he said it again. This was during a press conference on Monday, April 6th. He
said, "If it were up to me, I would take the oil. I would keep it all for ourselves and make a lot of money because to the victor belong the spoils.
But people in the country sort of say just win and come home." And I'm okay with that too. And he said that from the
interview that I was watching twice, which made me think that he really wants to go take the oil. But if he does put
troops on the ground in Iran, it just creates a clearer target for
those drone strikes. It creates a clearer target for those drone strikes. But what people maybe are not fully
understanding is the political consequences of the deaths of those Marines. Yeah,
most people are assuming if those Marines go in and die, this will make
America run away. It'll be like a punch in the face and we'll run away. That's not likely to be what happens. Again,
this is my area of what happens when you have military force in politics come
together. You need to understand that when those Marines go in and say hundreds die or or
so over time, there will be 36% of the public that will have supported that.
That 36% is going to see those Marines died for them. That 36% is likely to
double down in their commitment because otherwise they died for nothing. Now,
the 50% 59% excuse me, who's opposed to the war, they'll still be pretty hotly
opposed to the war. I'm not saying they're going to move toward the war, Stephen. What I'm saying is you have a
Republican president supported by 36% of of the Republicans here, almost no
Democrats. If you start to actually have deaths here, this is going to lead to a
bigger version of we can't withdraw now. we must quote finish the job otherwise
they will have died for nothing. This is what happened in Vietnam. In Vietnam in
the early stages you will see that it's sticky up the support for the war. It
takes a while to go down. And why does it take so long to go down? It's because
of exactly what I'm saying. The politics of this of the death of our troops in
battle does not lead to we cut and run. It leads to we double down for the honor
of the troops. That's why I'm saying we start this even in a small way. Even
car. It doesn't really matter where you start it, but once you have those ground
forces go in and they start to take casualties, you're probably in for the sixmonth ground war minimum. It looks
A Civilization Could Die Tonight
like they're going to try and avoid that outcome. It looks like they're doing everything in their power, America, to
avoid a scenario where they have to send troops in. The the threats that have come out of Donald Trump's truth social
posts really talk about I mean, look, I'll read this one here. It says, "A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don't
know what will happen, but it probably will." Um, and all a lot of the tweets are Can we just focus on that one, the
civilization, because it's much that was a few days ago. A lot of people are already trying to move past it. This has
much more importance and endurance than I think we're understanding now. So,
first of all, that statement that President Trump said that he will end an
entire civilization in one night, uh, we need to understand this is not a drunk
at a bar. This is the president of the United States who has at his disposal
thousands of nuclear weapons that could in fact achieve that. And let me just explain how hair triggered these are. We
have 500 Minutemen 3 missiles. They have warheads between 100 kilotons and 300
kilotons which is multiple times more powerful than Hiroshima Nagasaki each
one of them. and they can be retargeted within 45 minutes. That's what it takes
to retarget the gyroscopes. And then it takes about 25 minutes for them to hit
Iran. So when the president of the United States is saying this, he's only one of a handful of people in the world
who could pull who could actually make this credible. Second point is that is the most declared statement of genocidal
intent we've ever seen from an American president. No American president has
threatened to end a civilization before, which is at the heart of the genocide treaties in 1948. The intent to commit
genocide. Harry Truman, people will say, "What do you mean? We had Harry Truman. We bomb we we bombed Hiroshima
Nagasaki." Go and look at his statement on Hiroshima. Harry Truman. He did not say he was ending Japan as a
civilization. He pulled back and said it was about to destroy Japan's military
power. What President Trump has done by making those statements is he's
persuading all 92 million Iranians that he is willing to kill them and he has
the power to kill them. And yes, he pulled back from killing them on Tuesday. And yes, he may not have used
nuclear weapons on Tuesday, but if any other leader had said that, if imagine
Vladimir Putin stands up and says he's going to end American civilization
tonight, he's got the weapons to be able to do that. Are we just going to sit back and say, "Oh, yeah, he didn't do
it. He must not have meant it." No. That would mobilize enormous anger against
Vladimir Putin in the United States, even among Democrats. And my point here, Stephen, is before uh this war started,
we had a real pro-democracy movement in Iran. And on your show, I told you this
was going to fade. This was one of the predictions I made to you said this is going to fade over time. You're going to
see nationalism bonding the society and the regime closer together. President
Trump is bonding them together like never before. If you're one of the pro-democracy
individuals here, movement in Iran, where are you going to go for protection? Are you going to go to
Donald Trump who's threatening to kill you with essentially nuclear weapons? Or
are you going to go to your own government? This is going to hasten the support, increase the support for Iran
developing nuclear weapons. the pro-democracy movement is now likely to
support this. On that point, one of the questions and one of the points raised by the audience
What This War Means For Ordinary Iranians
last time we had the conversation was really we didn't spend enough time talking about the 90 plus million people
that live in Iran. Yeah. That are often many of them caught amongst all of this absolute chaos. And
I I was looking at a bunch of messages from people that are living in Iran. Um I'll read some of them from ordinary
citizens. Um, I'm not great at math, but where will the money, the resources, and the experts come from to build a country
that ordinary people spent decades trying to build? From the This is a different person. From the beginning of the war until
today, we have been bombarded. Not only are we not one step closer to freedom, from what I can see, we are miles away
from it. From another person in Iran, a whole civilization will die tonight,
never to be brought brought back again. This has deeply terrified me.
It's it's it raises really the question a lot of this disc discourse doesn't speak much to 90 plus million people
that are living there and that are having to exist under this terror. And like the best way that I could conceptualized it is I I I imagined if I
had woken up one day and Vladimir Putin or some other leader around the world had said that they were potentially
going to end the civilization that I live in, the country that I live in tonight, how would I be feeling? And if
I was hearing bombs go off all the t time, how would I be feeling? Um, and if things were escalating when me and my
family lived, how would I be feeling? And it is chilling to think about. It's
chilling because this is now moving the needle inside of Iran to make the
ordinary person on the street uh even the pro-democracy movement willing to
tolerate Iran killing Americans because we're killing them and we're
saying we're going to do it even worse and we're say even beyond that we're saying at the whim of a president who
wakes up thinking Maybe this will help his save his presidency. He is willing
to uh uh kill the entire civilization of a country because he thinks maybe this
is going to be his off his golden uh offramp to get out of this problem for himself personally. And by the way, we
we in our country when al-Qaeda attacked us on 9/11, there was tremendous fear.
There would be more attacks by al-Qaeda in the weeks afterwards. There was just much fear. And I've done the studies of
the American public opinion on this. It's the fear of Muslims killing
Americans that's driving the support for the Iraq war. If this is happening to
Americans, you can only imagine what's going to happen to the ordinary Iranians. And they've been subjected not
to just one attack, 40 days of attack. So for the average Iranian person that
opposes the regime in Iran and has been living under terror and oppression for
many, many decades. What do you think happens next for them? They're they're the group of people that
I that I think about and care about the most in this equation. We spend a lot of time talking about US power and we talk about lots of these other regional
partners, but there's like 90 odd million people stuck right in the heart of this that often don't really have a voice. Their life expectancy will go down in
measurable years. So if we had taken out the electric power, so this is something I know quite a bit about in the 1990s. I
was uh working for the Air Force literally under uh my boss was John Warden, the leader of the leadership
decapitation school. And he brought in, not classified at all, he brought in engineers of electric power plants to
teach us how to take down electric power. The electric power grid in Iran,
it looks like a network. And that network has big nodes. That's what
President Trump said he would he's going to take off the big power plants that produce uh in the 10 20 30 uh megawws uh
range. And they're probably about 130 nodes altogether. But if you just take out the top 10, you're probably going to
take down the entire network because the top 10 nodes are distributed in the
right places to support different uh electric power in different regions of the country. You have two choices in a
target in targeting sense. You can take out the transformers in which case you knock it out for a week or two and it is
inconvenient. And yes, there will be some people who will die. There were human chains around those targets by the
way. those people would die. But if you took out the hulls, the generating hulls,
what's that? That's the giant turbines that are huge. There is no backup to those. Each of
those is specially made. You will be knocking the out that generation for 6
months, 12 months, maybe 18 months at a minimum. What that's going to do is stop
all dialysis in the country. that's going to stop all um the uh heart
surgeries and other life-saving surgeries that are going to happen in the country. It's going to take out all
the food refrigeration in the country. So, you know, when power goes out in
your house and goes out for 10 minutes or or or an hour, it's not so bad. You
don't really notice it. But when it goes out for 2 days or 3 days or a week, all the food in your refrigerator spoils and
you can't eat it fast enough. you can't give it away fast enough because it's happening to everybody on your block.
Well, that's what would happen across the country. So, there's going to be an enormous amount of spoilage of food and
that refrigeration then is not going to be available to come back. And so, you're going to have enormous hunger
problems here. So, people that were already malnourished, they are going to be susceptible to more disease. So you
will end up lowering the life expectancy in a measurable way of that population.
Ads
This company that I've just invested in is growing like crazy. I want to be the one to tell you about it because I think it's going to create such a huge
productivity advantage for you. Whisper Flow is an app that you can get on your computer and on your phone on all your
devices and it allows you to speak to your technology. So, instead of me writing out an email, I click one button on my phone and I can just speak the
email into existence and it uses AI to clean up what I was saying. And then when I'm done, I just hit this one
button here and the whole email is written for me. And it's saving me so much time in a day because Whisper
learns how I write. So on WhatsApp, it knows how I am a little bit more casual. On email, a little bit more professional. And also, there's this
really interesting thing they've just done. I can create little phrases to automatically do the work for me. I can just say Jack's LinkedIn and it copies
Jack's LinkedIn profile for me because it knows who Jack is in my life. This is saving me a huge amount of time. This company is growing like absolute crazy.
And this is why I invested in the business and why they're now a sponsor of this show. And Whisper Flow is frankly becoming the worstkept secret in
business, productivity, and entrepreneurship. Check it out now at Whisper Flow spelled w
lw.ai/ Steven. It will be a game changer for you. Do any of you remember a
conversation I had on this podcast with anthropologist Dr. Daniel Lieberman? It was one of the most viewed conversations
of all time on the Diary of a CEO. And interestingly, the most replayed moment of that entire conversation was when I
talked about a specific pair of shoes that I wear. They're called Barefoot Shoes, and they're made by a brand
called Vivo Barefoot, who have become one of the sponsors of this show. Now, all of their shoes have significantly
reduced support, which gives my feet the opportunity to strengthen just by wearing them. And research from
Liverpool University backs this up. They've shown that wearing Vivo Barefoot shoes for six months can increase foot
strength by up to 60%. So if you want to start strengthening your feet, which are the foundation for the rest of your
body, head to vivobarefoot.com/doac. And if you do that, I'll give you 15%
off when you use my code Steven B15. Use that code at checkout. And I'll also
give you a 100day money back guarantee. Steven B5.
Enjoy. So, there's been a lot of talk in the recent days about a ceasefire and
Is The US Locked Into A Long War?
Trump said he was going to he said tweet these horrific things about ending a whole civilization tonight and then at
the final hour said that they had proposed a 10-point plan and that there was going to be a twowe ceasefire. What
do you think was actually going on there? The collision of stages three and four. So what you are now seeing is we can we
we are now understand we're in it for the long haul which means we can't go
back to February 27. We can't undo the last 40 days. It's just not going to be possible. So there's only two futures
going forward. Future number one is that ground war option and we've talked about how terrible that is and of course
that's obviously bad bad cost. But future number two is Iran as an emerging
fourth center of world power. And that is incredibly damaging to America's
power. And that is going to be damaging to President Trump's legacy. Is there not another option where Iran,
their leadership says, "Okay, we won't make nuclear weapons. Okay, we'll be friends. Okay, it's all over. Please
stop bombing us. Let's go for peace." So, so my response to that is I've been
studying the history of international politics for over 35 years. I know quite
a bit about uh great power politics and regional power politics going back 300 years. I have never seen a country at
the regional level or at the great power level surrender power. Did America after
World War II decide, well, yes, uh, we we have the capability to build nuclear
weapons, but, you know, we want to get along with the Russians who helped us defeat Germany. So, what we're going to
do is we're going to actually have a a a deal, an arms control agree. In fact, this was proposed, by the way, um, and
we rejected it, which is we're just going to not go down that road. We're going to surrender the power advantage
that we have uh here so that we can be cooperative with the Soviets who had
just worked with us to defeat Nazi Germany. So that's not going to happen. We there's no evidence in history in our
history. We've never surrendered power even when it might have been a good idea. We haven't done that. They're not
going to do this. They're not going to do that. No, they're not going to do this. You already see this in the in why the uh
the ceasefire is breaking down. so fast. It's breaking down so fast because
essentially President Trump, he didn't just declare victory. He said that
Iran's uh not going to have all this power that I'm explaining to you. And what Iran did is almost immediately
assert, oh yes, we are. They they've come right back right away. If President
Trump is expecting that out of the goodness of their heart, they're gonna surrender emerging world power,
this is this is just a fantasy. Uh it's not going to happen. Uh he wouldn't
surrender power. Why is he going to expect Iran's going to surrender power? So, I'm looking at this apparent
Iran’s 10-Point Plan Explained
10-point proposal submitted by Iran. Mhm. Um, and you you got to take this with a pinch of salt because there's
different reports about what this 10point proposal looks like, but it says that based on official releases from the Iranian state news agency, the IRA and
international reporting, the 10-point proposal from Iran to the United States was for a permanent ceasefire, number
one, end attacks on allies, a complete halt to Israel and US strikes across the region, specifically Lebanon, Iraq, and
Yemen. Number three, reopen the Straight of Hummos. Iran will allow safe passage through the Straight of Hongos. collect
tolls. Iran will charge a fee, reportedly $2 million, for each ship passing through the straight. Revenue
sharing with Aman, which is toll revenues, will be split with Oman as custodians of the strait. Number six,
lift the sanctions, the complete removal of all US primary and secondary sanctions. Release assets. Number seven,
the immediate return of all frozen Iranian funds held abroad. Number eight, the right to enrich uranium. US
acceptance of Iran's right to domestic uranium enrichment while Iran commits to
not seeking nuclear weapons. Number nine, war reparations, full compensation paid to Iran for reconstruction costs
from the bombing. And lastly, number 10, the termination of all UN resolutions
against the regime and a new binding UN Security Council resolution to enforce this deal. Now, listen, I don't know a
lot about what I'm talking about, so that's the disclaimer. However, it sounds like a good deal for Iran in many
respects. on every single point and it also validates Iran as an emerging world power. So all of those points in the
details if you think of them as a flow diagram all 10 of them are adding up to
validation of Iran as uh top in the hierarchy in the Persian Gulf. So why is
The Shifting Global Power Balance
it so important to be the number one strongest state in the world? It's because in the last 300 years, whether
it was Britain, the United States, or whether it's China in the future, the number one state typically dictates the
rules of how the world systems operate. Well, what you're seeing with Iran is they want to dictate the rules in the
Persian Gulf. And that's what that is. Now, if we pull this over, which I love
your props, uh here, that is good. So right now you see that even though it's the United States is just um uh that
lone flag it has this higher weight and what this is reflecting is uh the United
States as uh the number one country in the world the most powerful. Now if you also then add um this over here. So this
would be Israel. You can see this is the world that Netanyahu is depicting um
before on February 27th. But the actual world I just want to point out is a
little bit different. The actual balance of power is closer to this. It's closer to the United States and then we have
China and we have uh Russia. There are three centers of world power and in 1990
um it used to be by the way uh just the United States and the Soviet Union. Then
Russia, the Soviet Union collapses. This is when the United States is the sole superpower, the unipolar moment. It
immediately shifts like this from 1989 to 1992. Dramatic shift. However, along
the way in the last 30 years, you see um this changing. And what's changing?
Russia actually still is weak. It's still about 2% of the world's GDP. That's not really what's changing.
What's really changing is is China is now much much much more powerful. It's
still not as powerful as the United States, but notice that we were here in 1990 and now the balance is starting to
be uh to come like this. Well, if we start to add Iran as a center of world
power, uh, now we're starting to change this in a much different way. Now these
three powers are starting together in concert to become more powerful than the
United States uh especially with respect to energy and energy matters so much
because it's an underlying component for our economic growth that GDP the way um
uh we measure uh great power Stephen for decades and decades we've used static
indicators GDP how big is your military How many nuclear weapons you have that
all rests on the productive capacity of your country which is why the productive
capacity is so important. What does that turn on? It turns a lot very heavily on
oil. Oil today is the commodity. If you
lose access to oil within weeks or a month and a half, this has dramatic
cliff effects on your economy. Now, if you lose access to semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, that's bad. And it's
bad over time in particular, you lose access to oil. This is a cliff that you
we go off over six weeks, eight weeks because there's not enough uh storage
capacity of anybody in the world to make up for 20% 30% loss of world oil.
Why US Oil Prices Are Rising
So on this point of oil, the US don't get their oil from the straight of Hammoose. We don't. But it's a global market and a
lot of the uh price of oil that we're going to pay is going to be determined
by the global price of oil because oil is a funible commodity. It's like a uh
water that runs through the whole system. When there's a shortage, it drives the price of all of us up.
Okay. So, I've got a graph here showing the price of oil. And you can see I'll throw it up on the screen. You can see it's been climbing ever since the 27th
of February. So, this will impact Americans at the pump as well. Oh my gosh. And you see it in the pump
already. Where I am in Chicago, I'm paying some I was paying something like 310 a gallon. Now, the last time I I
filled up, it was 460. It's a bit of a misnomer to think that we can as America
get away scot-free with everybody else losing oil and we're not going to we're
not going to pay a price. Now to be clear, we will have supply of oil. The
price will go up. This will increase inflation. This will probably increase
bond prices over time. Uh the bond price, the bond is the loans that essentially
any uh corporation companies or the University of Chicago takes out to
borrow money to operate. So the University of Chicago borrows uh has has
10-year bonds. This is essentially we're borrowing money and then we have to pay back that money plus an interest rate.
That's what the bond rate is. It's an interest rate on on borrowed money. Well, if that interest rate goes from 4%
on a 10-year bond um to 5% or 6 or 7%
the costs of the interest just goes up massively and everybody will feel that in various
ways. the US government right now, the biggest uh budget item in the US
government budget is the cost of interest for the debt of the $40 trillion in debt. We're going to have to
shrink social security. You're going to have to shrink Medicaid. This is not notional, Stephen. Iran and uh Russia
together could have a tremendous impact on America's economy. This this is the
real thing. So with your balance of power analogy, this is where we where we could get to. This is where we could get to with the
next several years. I would say um probably two years out. I would say that America has an edge. And I'm trying to
depict it as it's like about a 25 or 30% edge from the combination of China and
Russia today. And China is gaining, but still it's actually slow yearbyear. So
you'll see a little bit of an uptick. So maybe going I'm trying to depict from say a third advantage for the United
States to maybe uh 30% 28% in the next four or 5 years. You add Iran to this
and then especially these combinations I'm describing where they can do things together. Now in the next several years
you're actually talking about uh the scales where these three are much are
stronger than America where I'm not talking about just America's losing it incrementally. You're getting abrupt
changes in the world balance of power. So, what happens now if Trump just pulls out? This is the world. Iran is an oil
hegeimon in the Persian Gulf. Uh, within a year or so, they're very likely to
have nuclear weapons. I'm saying the pro-democracy movement is going to be pounding the table to get nuclear weapons. They're going to want to deter
any uh idea from Trump of hitting them again. Um, and then I'm saying beyond that, you have the possibility of Iran
and Russia deciding to cooperate here to strangle uh and coers the United States.
And if the United States doesn't cowtow to them, then they can pull that oil off
the market. So, what should Trump do? Do you think if you were
If You Were Trump: What Would You Do?
president of the United States, what would you do right now? So when I was here 40 days ago, we had the same question. And what I said was we needed
to accept uh that there would be a deal and we were going to have to accept that the deal that Iran was offering us on
February 27 where they would get to keep their 3.5% enriched uranium wasn't going
to be good enough. We were going to have to lift oil sanctions. We're going to have to do various things to sweeten the
deal, so to speak. Well, notice actually Scott Besson did some of that. He did lift the but the power of Iran has grown
so much Stephen that's not good enough and that's what you're seeing with why this deal is the ceasefire is starting
to break down from Iran's side. So what would you offer Iran? I think a enforced
military containment of Israel would be a serious uh card that America could
play that I think Iran would get Iran at least in a serious discussion. I don't
know if it would be enough. I want to be careful here that I don't say, "Well, this will certainly uh be the deal Iran
will take." But we have to imagine if Iran has world power, what is it going
to take to get Iran to surrender some of that? Well, one thing would be to have confidence that Israel is not going to
keep attacking it or its allies. But then they're not going to believe
that after what's happened. Well, it would have to go through. You'd have to make it enforceable. It's not going to be good enough to try to
promise that. What thing President Trump could do since the Republicans control both houses of Congress is President
Trump could push through a bill through Congress that says if Israel attacks Iran or uh could even extend to to
Lebanon, but let's at least start with Iran. Um all funds for Israel, both
military and economic, will be cut off through the end of Trump's presidency. Now, that passes through uh both
chambers of Congress. President Trump signs it. Now you're talking. Now we actually have as much teeth as you could
ever have of a military containment of Israel. So presumably in such a scenario, Iran
If Israel Joins The Nuclear Treaty
would continue to enrich uranium because they've now had a taste of what can happen to them if they're powerless.
Well, let me extend this um a little bit more. So let's talk about article two of the deal that's going to go through the
Congress. Israel joins the NPT and that is the quidd proquo for getting Iran to
accept the on-site inspections of its 3.5% enriched uranium. So, Israel gets
to have um its Deamona nuclear power plant where it has plutonium for its
nuclear weapons that's measured by the non-prololiferation treaty, the IAEA.
Those are the inspectors. And Iran will have on-site inspections at the
various locations we're talking about. But the second part of this, Stephen, would be quit proquo. If Iran is going
to be subject to on-site verification, on-site monitoring, Israel, which is now
not part of the non-prololiferation treaty, already has nuclear weapons.
It's going to have to accept that this can't be a one-sided deal going forward.
It's going to have to be a more balanced situation when it comes to monitoring um
nuclear weapons capabilities. So, what does that mean specifically that Iran would be able to monitor Israel's nuclear weapons
uh through the IAEA? That's right. That would be the material for the weapons, not the weapons themselves. So,
they already have weapons. So, what's there to monitor? Oh, no, no, no. Right now, the number of Israel's uh Israel's nuclear weapons is
not known. We have vague counts. The reason Israel is not part of the NPT is
not because it doesn't matter. It provides the kind of calc the kind of detailed information through the IAEA
that would be useful for estimating the size of Israel. Israel Netanyahu is
going to want to give that information to Iran. This isn't about want to anymore. Stephen, what we're talking about is
what are the offer? You've asked me the hard question. What is an offramp to this tradeoff between the ground war and
Iran as the fourth center of world power? And I said, okay, there is an actual off-ramp here. But notice that
the hesitation now is politics. And that's what I'm trying to explain that that I study the interaction of military
action and politics. And I'm with you. I I don't think Israel will likely they've
been trying to spoil these other deals. I don't think Israel is going to allow this to occur. But now then we're right
back to the tradeoff that nobody wants to confront. So So what do you think is going to happen?
What Experts Think Happens Next
What I think is that we are going to go back and forth between stage three and stage four for months.
What's stage three and stage four? So stage three are preparations for the ground war. Yep. And Iran emerging as a force center of
world power. I think both of these are likely to go on for months. I think that
uh for stage three, the ground war option to truly be taken off the table, you would need to see America
withdrawing its military forces. You would need to see all the carriers leave
the region and go back to uh other parts of the world. You would need to see the
Marines that have been moved to the Gulf go back to Camp Pendleton in California,
go back to uh Japan. You would need to see the hundreds of aircraft like the F-35s, for example, that have been moved
to the region. They all need to go back to their pre-war locations. So, we're
going to bounce between stage three and stage four. Yep. That's the diagram. So, the new diagram I'm trying to
we just um I think there's still, if you pushed me on this last time, I still say
there's a 70% chance that we're going to start a ground operation. And it's not
because President Trump wants it. It's not because he's not trying to avoid it. It's because there's a trap. And the
trap that he's gonna face is, is he really willing to be the president where
under his presidency, Iran detonates a nuclear weapon to demonstrate it has nuclear power? From his rhetoric, and
listen, these are just the tweets. It seems like the alternate option he's considered when he talks about bombing
the infrastructure and bridges and roads and power plants is just completely decapitating the country and I think in
his own words, sending it back to the stone ages. will come back. This will come back, but it would be as I believe
the precursor to more ground operations, Stephen. So, I don't think that this
will be a case where you do the electric power targeting and then it's done. Finally, he's satisfied. He's pounded
them enough and walk away because you do the electric power targeting. You have
further incentivized 92 million. They still have the enriched uranium. You have 92 million people desperate now for
not just getting a nuclear weapon for deterrence, but for payback. And so you will find the pressure for the ground
war will be even more intense in the aftermath of all of that. This idea
they're going to be bombed back to the stone ages where we won't worry about them anymore. um they're going to be
this minor country that we will just ignore. As long as they have 1,000 lb of
60% enriched uranium, 10,000 lb of five and and 20% enriched uranium, um this is
this will just not be the case. So, you still think the most plausible probable outcome is that Trump ends up
sending ground troops in specifically to do two things? I think I remember you saying last time. One of them is to go and get the uranium. Yep.
And the second, I believe, is to defend the straight of Hormuz. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. I think I think
these are the two things that are on the table. And you think it's going to it's probably going to take several months.
I think it could go on Yes. for months because I think that you were going to see that there's going to be uh this
back and forth. And the way to monitor this so you can see is the timeline speeding up or slowing down is literally
the movement of the deployed troops. Don't track this by what the
negotiations are. Don't track this by what comes out of President Trump's mouth or even the Iranians mouth. Track
this by the movement of forces. That is the best indicator of what's going to
come. You know, every once in a while you come across a product that has such a huge
Ads
impact on your life that you'd probably describe as a gamecher. And I would say
for about 35 to 40% of my team, they would currently describe this product
that I have in front of me called Ketone IQ, which you can get at ketone.com,
as a game changer. But the reason I became a co-owner of this company and the reason why they they now are a sponsor of this podcast is because one
day when I came to work, there was a box of this stuff sat on my desk. I had no idea what it was. Lily in my team says that this company have been in touch. So
I went upstairs, tried it, and quite frankly, the rest is history. in terms of my focus, my energy levels, how I
feel, how I work, how productive I am. Game changer. So, if you want to give it a try, visit ketone.com/stephven
for 30% off. You'll also get a free gift with your second shipment. And now you can find Keton IQ at Target stores
across the United States, where your first shot is completely free of charge.
Make sure you keep what I'm about to say to yourself. I'm inviting 10,000 of you to come even deeper into the diary of a
CEO. Welcome to my inner circle. This is a brand new private community that I'm
launching to the world. We have so many incredible things that happen that you are never shown. We have the briefs that
are on my iPad when I'm recording the conversation. We have clips we've never released. We have behind the scenes
conversations with the guests and also the episodes that we've never ever released and so much more. In the
circle, you'll have direct access to me. You can tell us what you want this show to be, who you want us to interview, and
the types of conversations you would love us to have. But remember, for now, we're only inviting the first 10,000
people that join before it closes. So, if you want to join our private closed community, head to the link in the description below or go to
daccircle.com. I will speak to you then.
What Iran Would Do With Nuclear Weapons
on this point where you said you don't think Trump would want to be the president that presided over Iran releasing a nuclear weapon. Is that
because if he pulled out now they would enrich the uranium and then maybe demonstrate it under his
that that's right. So the scenario that I have laid out I've laid this out to my classes for years. The idea of what Iran
would do with nuclear weapons a lot of people have an image and it's coming from the public so I understand why they
have it. People have been a lot of people have said this image where Iran gets a a nuclear weapon or two and that
what they do immediately is they blow up Tel Aviv with the first one and maybe New York with the second one. This is
just highly unlikely because what would happen is we would retaliate with nuclear weapons under that. uh here much
more plausible and everything I'm seeing from Iran has been completely supporting the idea that they're thinking this
through um uh uh strategically is you would want not to just have one working
nuclear weapon or even two. You want five. Ideally, you want 10, maybe even
15. This is what happened with North Korea. Because once you have, let's even say five, the most rational thing to do
is you detonate the first one as a detonated test. You test it on your own territory and then you listen for a week
while everybody says, "Well, they only had one. They were stupid. They don't have dot." And you detonate the second
one. And once you detonate the second one, just like when we hit Nagasaki after Hiroshima,
everybody will assume there's a lot more there. And that is how you actually
deter the United States from attacking you. And by the way, that's what effectively North Korea did. When
President Trump took office in 2016, North Korea was a major problem. We were talking about bombing North Korea and so
forth. And there's multiple reasons, but the big issues are that North Korea has
a lot of nuclear weapons. We're not going to be able to get them all. They have some other things they can do too
like like artillery on soul. But this isn't just North Korea and Trump decided
to be, you know, sort of best buds here. So the other route that played out in my
Has Trump Lost Control?
mind was that Trump would just keep bombing Iran to keep them weak. But again, that doesn't solve the straight
of Hammoose problem. Doesn't solve the uranium problem and doesn't solve the straight of Hormuz problem because if we knew where that
material was and we could just bomb it out of existence. I'm talking about the enriched uranium material. We would have
done this already. Which leads all roads to really the only solution being some kind of deal.
Absolutely. That's why the best thing to do is a deal with the military
containment of Israel. That's deal. The problem you have with such a deal if
when you're going into that deal is the enemy know that you don't really have a plan B. You don't have a plan B. That's
right. And so your negotiation position is very weak. That's why you That's why you're they're going to keep their 3.5%
enriched uranium no matter what. The problem we face here is if we were ever
going to get the 3.5% enriched uranium um to go away, we should never have
ripped up the Obama nuclear deal by Trump in 2018. They've been developing
ever since the Biden administration. He Trump one couldn't figure out how to stop the enriched uranium by by Iran.
Biden couldn't figure out how to stop it. Trump now has been trying to figure out how to stop it. And you know what?
It's not stoppable. It's not stoppable short of these options I'm laying out.
There's no way to get that material without ground forces, Stephen. And you're not going to send those ground
forces in just a thousand guys to get be it some postage stamp of an area for a
month or two trying to find that enriched uranium. This is just not realistic. Going to be a bigger option.
I think it's clear to me, you know, I do this podcast and ask these questions and have people on because I'm actually really trying to find answers for myself. And I think if I've arrived at
any conclusion from everything I've learned over the last couple of weeks, it's that I think Trump made a really big mistake. Um pro and that mistake
probably started when he ripped up Obama's deal. That's right. But it's clear that
Foraux was the really really big one. I think I think he's stuck. He is stuck.
I think he's stuck. I think he's facing several bad options going forward. So I
really have no idea what's going to happen. And well what you're going to what you will also watch Stephen back to politics here
is uh Trump right now we're not it's not just paper anymore who's saying he's
lost control he's losing power the world is saying that and this is going to
start to become the Republican party is going to say that and what this is going to do is it's going to incentivize Trump
even more probably to become more belligerent not to become calmer so as
Trump is becoming the lamest of lame ducks going forward because it's evident
he's losing power and as he loses power here on the international scene this
will mean he will lose power domestically as well and we'll never go to zero but it will be a slow decline
this is where the real sort of future is here why this is not simply a steady
state now this is why I won't make a prediction of what's going happen in September. We are not at a steady state.
It is an unstable balance here between three and four. Three and four.
What This Means For Europe
What do you think happens with Europe? I feel like Europe, you know, Europe aren't on either side of your scale here. You've got Iran, Russia, and China
on one end of the scale scale. You've got the US on the other. Europe and NATO, what happens? Are they going to
NATO is for all practical purposes dead? We're just writing its obituary. It's a
body in the morg already. Most people don't think that NATO is a political
alliance. NATO is much more than that. If there's an article 5, what that means, Stephen, is there's a military
operation with an American general at the top. And with article 5, the
American general tells the other count's militaries, including their nuclear
weapons, what to do. Now, if you're Britain and you have nuclear weapons and
or even if besides the nuclear weapons, if you're Germany, you don't have them, are you going to follow uh uh General
Kane's orders on anything at this point? I don't think so. So, article 5 is the document that all
the NATO countries have signed. No, it's the part of the NATO treaty which says if there's a NATO operations like in
Afghanistan, it's American general who orders all the
other countries militaries what to it's a hierarchy. So it's not a um a
collection where the countries get together and they have these big like uh
cooperative decisions. No, the Americans run the plan. They are the ones who organize the military operation. they
run the plan and they just assign the uh other countries uh roles the way they would um the army, the navy and the air
force inside of the Pentagon. What I'm saying is what you just saw with Iran is such a a horrible catastrophic failure
within just weeks. The idea that any Europeans are going to follow the orders
of an American general and and I don't even think this is going to be just under Donald Trump. I mean, I think for
years, I think this is just laughable. Trump was quite angry and scathing with his words about NATO. He said, "It's a
paper tiger and referred to them as cowards." And as we've been sat here today, you might be aware that NATO were
meeting with Trump today in Washington DC. And the NATO Secretary General Mark
Root said, "When it came time to provide the logistical and other support to the United States needed in Iran, some
allies were a bit slow, to say the least. In fairness, they were a bit surprised. To maintain the element of
surprise for the initial strikes, President Trump opted not to inform us ahead of time. But what I see when I
look across Europe today is allies providing a massive amount of support nearly without exception. Allies are
doing everything the United States is asking. They have heard and are responding to President Trump's request.
So, it sounds a little bit like an apology tour coming from NATO. Um, and the German chancellor has also made made
a comment saying that they do not want to split NATO. Well, they don't want American troops to
leave the um uh the European continent because that provides some deterrent to
Russia. That's what you're hearing there. But NATO was always had an
anchor. Remember we talked about anchors. The anchor in NATO was America's protection of European
security. What you're seeing when President Trump creates a problem, a
catastrophe the for the world and says he won't send American uh forces in to
the straight of Hormuz, but he wants the Europeans to send their forces into the
straight of Hormuz. This is the opposite of protection. He's making NATO
countries or European countries vulnerable and they're reacting to that
by saying we won't do it. According to diplomats, NATO secretary briefed member capitals today that Trump
is demanding concrete commitments within the next few days from NATO to help to secure the strait of Hormuz, which would
only make sense if you were doing phase three, the ground operation. So you
cannot secure the straight of H for H for H for H for H for H for H for H for H for H formuz only with air power. We if we could we already would. You can't
secure it only with naval power. If you could we already would. We have a much bigger navy, much bigger air forces than
any of those countries individually or even combined. The only reason you would
really want those uh forces from NATO is uh because you're planning on a bigger
ground operation and you're that's what you're seeing right there. And I don't think Europeans, let's not even talking
about the word NATO. I don't think the Europeans are likely to do it because you're seeing why would they, if they're
ever going to do it, Stephen, they would want Trump out of office. The number one thing that I don't think is going to
happen here is anybody's going to bail out Trump. It's political suicide really for a lot
of the European leaders. Political suicide for the Democrats to bail out Trump in our country. It's
going to start to become political suicide for even Republicans to bail out Trump. That's what you're going to start
to see in the fall. And it's going to be political suicide for the Japanese, for the Indians. This is the problem. Trump
caused the problem. He's, as I said on your show last time, he's going to become LBJ if he doesn't
uh take a deal soon. Well, that was 40 days ago, Stephen, and he still hasn't taken the deal. Not really. And he's
becoming LBJ. Nobody's going to want to be associated with him. Here in the UK, we have Karma as the
prime minister. And it appears to me that since he's come out and started
saying that he won't support Trump's war, he we won't send troops to the Middle East, it appears that that's
actually driven up his favorability amongst certain people. And it makes me think that actually, as we say, it's
it's political suicide for European leaders to send troops there because they will be they will lose the next
election in their country. I I think you put it exact excellent, Stephen. I I really can't improve on
that. Let me just say that a year ago with the tariffs um I started to do a
study of tracking how European support for America was starting to go into the
tank and that was with tariffs. Now what Trump has done is he's driven up the
price of oil. He's hurting their economies in a serious way and as that
actual damage occurs and it's still in the pipeline. it hasn't hit as strong as
it likely will in the next month. You are likely going to see that the publics
in Europe are going to become anti-American and it's not just going to be can't
support Trump anymore coming here. I had to pay the the visa the ETA and it it
took forever and what's happening here. We're getting some payback here on Americans. I think this next next time I
come to London, I'm not going to be surprised that the price of that visa is doubling or tripling. What is your closing highlevel remark
What Can The Average Person Do?
about all this stuff? And I guess I really want to focus it on on the average person who is going about their
life as a normal civilian in any of these countries that are affected. What is the highle point of view here that we
we need to close upon? The high level point of view is we're about to start
think think seriously about the election and what we need to do is not just
choose bounce back and forth between uh Republican and Democrat and actually
Britain is a is a case study of what can happen if you bounce back and forth here. We need to start to really support
strong stable policies that will empower the middle. The problem that we face,
Stephen, is we're moving back and forth from really uh ideas here that uh one
year we we really don't like what Biden's doing and now we have the radical wing on the other side and we
certainly don't like that. Well, if we keep going back and forth here between two uh extreme alternatives, we'll just
get different versions of bad outcomes. And it's not making things better. It's a cycle that's making it solution.
The solution is the public needs to hear that every election, every choice, we
are uh we have an opportunity here to focus on the more centrist candidates.
And this is something that we really can make decisions about. And it's just
simply the case that if we don't do that, what you're going to get is you're going to get back and forth bouncing
around. And I don't think a third party here, these ideas are really very meaningful. This really comes down to
talking to the public. And it's one of the big reasons, Stephen, I'm going to the podcast world because you remember I
I've advised every White House and so forth. We've got to get beyond that. We've got to actually talk to real
people and this is what you do and increasingly I'm doing it and I really
believe that the podcast network is an opportunity to do that. But it doesn't
mean that it forces people to vote Democrat or Republican. We've got to understand that we we can't just keep
thinking about uh well, okay, now we're really mad at Donald Trump and we're going to get the independents and now
they're going to vote with the Democrats if all we do is end up getting another extreme on the other side because what
you're going to do is you're going to keep pissing off the middle and they're going to keep bouncing back and forth.
And round after round, we've been doing that now um for years in the United
States. And what does it look like? It keeps getting worse. keeps getting worse. What are you suggesting the solution is?
Vote for the centrist candidate all the way through. Yes. Yes. It's a very simple thing, but it's not going to
happen unless we talk about this because it does mean that sometimes the centrist
candidate is the person, the woman on the other side. And if we're not willing to do that, then we're really condemning
ourselves to this cycle. I'm going to explain more about it. It's it's a version of the escalation trap gone
domestic. It's called the legitimacy shock cycle and I'll be talking more about this in September. So the trap I'm
talking about here with violence and politics isn't just international and
you end up with traps here domestically as well. And I'd like to close with a few thoughts for the people in Iran. I
think ever since I've put myself mentally um in a situation where there was a world leader saying that they were
going to annihilate my civilization and there was bombs going off. You know, we're currently filming this in our London studio, but if there was bombs
going off around the studio and there was threat that someone was going to annihilate civilization, it's quite unthinkable for me how I would I would
be functioning. And it immediately, I think, shines a light on the the mental health and psychology of the people in Iran right now and how they must be
feeling. So, I think that's probably an important message to share cuz we can
sometimes get a little bit caught up in the hypotheticals of war and strategy and all these kinds of things, but at
the end of the day, there's 90 plus million people in Iran that are right in the middle of this and we we're sat in
this very warm, cushy London studio. So, well, there's a bond that is occurring
between the middle 60% of the American public and the 92 million in Iran. Yeah,
they don't like the radicalism and on on either side. And what you were
what you were vocalizing, Stephen, is the frustration that our politics has
been locked up by the extremes. And I suspect the 92 million in Iran are
feeling almost exactly the same thing. Their choices now are being locked into extremes. And that is that bond here
that you're trying to vocalize. I believe it's valuable to vocalize it because this is what it means to empower
the people and this is what it means to be a democracy which is that we actually talk about not just the other side is
bad and we're always good is we we talk about where the future really should go
and the idea that we're even imagining the possibility of a $40 trillion in
debt country getting rocked by um Iran and Russia here who have their own
reasons for wanting to hurt us. We may not fully realize that, but but we really hurt Russia in the '9s here with
our ideas of shock therapy, and we made out like bandits, by the way. Uh so that
the we we really do have some uh real growing bonds at the social level.
Professor Robert P, thank you so much. It's a pleasure to speak to you once again. And uh this is such an evolving situation, so I feel like we might end
up talking again at some point in the future when things play out. Hopefully, you know, one can only hope uh for peace
for for everybody situation every day. That's my number one thing. Just ask my wife. And by the way, will
you stop being so charismatic? Because my wife, when we listen to this, she turns my voice off. All she wants to do,
Stephen, is listen to you. Is she American? I think Americans. I'm just You have And you've made me up
my game. That's so funny. Well, thank you so much for your time and uh you've put a lot of time into explaining this to layman's
like me and it's really helped turn the the lights on to some degree. I'll I'll be honest, it's turn the lights on and
with the lights on I am confused. I'm confused about
which path is productive and most beneficial to society and humanity. And even though I
can see more clearly now about the dynamics of all of these potential pathways, none of them seem that great.
So that's where I'm going to leave it for today. But we'll pick up this conversation again soon when more information comes in.
That's right. And let's hope it's not as much as a trap as as I'm as I'm painting it. But if it is, then it's really even
more important that when we get to the fall, we don't mislead ourselves into
into thinking that this is just um temporary, that it's all going to be solved quickly. We need to understand
that we're going down some major major roads here. And this situation, as bad
as it is, notice that it's actually worse than it was a month ago when we were here. It's worse, Stephen. And the
reason it's worse is we didn't head it off enough at the past 40 when we when I
was here four weeks ago. If President Trump had taken some of the deals that we were talking about then we wouldn't
be anywhere near where we are today. So as bad as that negotiating position I'm
say of can militarily containment of of Israel I realize people are saying oh my god could never happen. Well think about
the things that could never happen that are happening right now. This is the better pathway now. And if we don't take
this pathway now, we come back in a month or two, it will be worse.
Thank you, Robin. We're done. Thank you. Thank you so much. YouTube have this new crazy algorithm
where they know exactly what video you would like to watch next based on AI and all of your viewing behavior. And the
algorithm says that this video is the perfect video for you. It's different for everybody looking right now. Check
this video out and I bet you you might love it.
You can purchase Robert’s book, ‘Our Own Worst Enemies: America and the Age of Violent Populism’, here: https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/Ajkhyts
12,632 Comments
Sejin Lifeforce 生命
Add a comment...
Pinned by @TheDiaryOfACEO
@TheDiaryOfACEO
7 days ago
Do you like these types of conversations? Tap the like button on the video, that’s the best way to let me know you want more like this ❤ And if you haven’t already, hit subscribe - it’s completely free and it really helps the channel grow 🙏🏾appreciate you!
One last thing: our incredible team has been working very hard to make these conversations available to as many people as possible. All episodes are now dubbed in 14 different languages. If you know someone who would enjoy these conversations, please share them with them - SB x
1.6K
Reply
@alitavakol5405
7 days ago
This is unbelievable, as iranian i have to say all the experts in the podcast so far are picturing the situation fully wrong, they don’t even mention the big majority of the people are waiting for a moment to take the government and by any second the government might fall, talking about iran has upper hand is simply not true and if you even write down what both countries have done so far you can easily see who is winning, something he said which is truly opposite in iran is after war people are working more for the government however it’s fully opposite more people are running away and not working
20
Reply
@TicuMorariu-vk9ci
1 day ago
@alitavakol5405 multa lume așteaptă să cadă hegemonia petrodolarului in orientul mijlociu care e durerea cea mai mare a lor trampistas . Degeaba încearcă trampi cu diferite forme șirete cu CIA și Mosad ,pentru că Iranul nu e Venezuela .Iranul sa pregătit pentru orice mișcare greșită a lui trampi și acționează întocmai și la timp .😂😂😂
2
Reply
@nxtlucky83
5 days ago (edited)
@alitavakol5405 With what you wrote I know you don't live in Iran.
8
Reply
@tylershields-lr8tw
7 days ago
Quit being of overwhelming self interest. Starting to wonder if the show is there just to to self ptomote your investments. Keep up all these adds, im out.
You closed with an AI prop.
What i suggest, is when trump says this "ill erradicate" nonsense, its being driven by AI. The government already has stuff better than what we see. And AI is seeing the worlds reactions with the troop movements, the crazy tweets, and the we won, threaten.... we won, threaten(let alone purposefully destabilizing markets), and some super AI somewhere is just data collecting the worlds reactions. Trumps a puppet, and does what hes told. Hes not this free willed guy that "cant be controlled". Thats simply just a successful psyop to any that buy it.
6
Reply
@juliasommer2364
7 days ago
The goal is to destroy the leverage of Hormuz. The world will get the oil from America: usa, Venezuela, greenland, canada, etc
5
Reply
@kennethgladden7014
6 days ago
As someone said in the suggestions bring on an Iranian.
5
Reply
@ImAManMann
5 days ago
@kennethgladden7014 yeah... Tousi
1
Reply
@Robzomb92
7 days ago
I think you mire appreciating the money you get .
Im done with these lies !
4
Reply
@marybeth6676
7 days ago
I subscribed 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
3
Reply
@marybeth6676
7 days ago
I subscribed 😊🎉🎉🎉🎉
3
Reply
@spacetime7979
7 days ago
Re Oil prices and the US inability to control world prices... what if the US nationalises their oil supply (no compensation other than company worth) to have self sufficient supply with price controlled by the state?
3
Reply
@marie-paulempore6631
7 days ago
Thank you for this interesting conversation. China , Iran and Russia are authoritarian regimes that oversee systems that benefit a powerful core of predatory elites and their clients.
3
Reply
@anthonytester6873
7 days ago
OK, have done all that you have asked. 🎉 😊
3
Reply
@rabbitholerider
7 days ago
ALL OF THIS BS WOULD STOP IN ITS TRACKS WITH RELEASING THE HIDDEN SECRET WE KNOW OUR DEEP STATE HAS HAD ALL THIS TIME. IF ITS ALL ABOUT THE OIL !
3
Reply
@MarkMarK-w5e
7 days ago
Professor Jiang next!
3
Reply
@wiedykwanda7824
6 days ago
@MarkMarK-w5e dia bukan professor
1
Reply
@mas-wolf
2 days ago
@MarkMarK-w5e Why not go straight to IRGC?
Reply
@ayoooitsriccoooo
7 days ago
No the old fart was born before any electronic he knows nothing
3
Reply
@twicv911
6 days ago
Yes we do . Robert Pade sounds like he doesn’t understand negotiation. Kinda sounds like he’s starting to suffer from TBS.. war is War since 1979 no US President has had balls. The US has a massive quantity of nuclear weapons. Do you see the US bum and everybody with them? No Iran would do that in a heartbeat to the US if they had 100% weapons
3
Reply
@daniellemarie1726
7 days ago
YT doesnt let me hype
2
Reply
@anthothiyahisrael422
7 days ago
Red words of Yahusha.
Dumitru Duduman — America Will Burn.
Ken Peters — I Saw the Tribulation.
2 Esdras 11 & 15:28 — America’s fall.
2
Reply
@ImAManMann
5 days ago
@anthothiyahisrael422 lol no
Reply
@briansoares1647
7 days ago
one thing that hasnt really been talked about is how much this war is costing America and what affects this will have on the economy. I realize you talked about oil and gas but im more referring to the military spending aspect. Would like to know more if possible.
2
Reply
Show more replies
@pouya-business
10 hours ago
Iranian here, thank you for your care for people of Iran, may all wars end and we reach global peace! One can dream.
20
Reply
2 replies
@aviaja2008
7 days ago
I belong to the 99 % of people on earth who want a world without wars, without pollution, without poverty, without discrimination.
2.9K
Reply
@cannabislife1688
6 days ago
I agree so much with your comment. Why can’t all countries get along, it’s entirely plausible. Imagine the technology we could achieve and medical advances if we all worked together. We could explore space together, instead of fighting each other. We only get 1 Earth, that’s it there is no other place we can call home. Please, cherish the Earth, cherish your fellow Man. Have respect for the environment, be grateful and humble for what you have. Fight for equality, achieve liberty.
16
Reply
@iapos2951
1 day ago
@cannabislife1688 no because the heart of man always wants more. Its human kind. People in power always want more power. If there is supposed peace, then peoplr are getting slaughtered in the background and you are actually a slave. If aomeone proclaims that then you are looking at slavery and a liar
3
Reply
Show more replies
@marciafonseca3306
1 day ago (edited)
@cannabislife1688 Quando você tem um presidente que coloca o seu país em primeiro lugar e não quer deixar que acabem com ele, é no mínimo louvável. O governo do Irã quer acabar com os EUA e com Israel e falam isso em alto w bom som. Suas crianças são ensinadas a odiar americanos e judeus. Pense nisso .
Reply
@jacquelinerodriguez3213
5 days ago
@cannabislife1688 we need to hold feminine ideals ( compassion, empathy, nurturing, connection) in the same regard as we do with the masculine traits ( ego, power, force)
4
Reply
Show more replies
@mentak2593
6 days ago
Yeah, we should peacefully put the violent people in a cooling off place until they are able to regulate themselves to be in society. If they can - great, if not - well they can enjoy the prison environment. Something like the Nordic countries have that actually have success to rehab people, or they stay in prison but have useful tasks to complete daily.
4
Reply
@carolwalsh3264
6 days ago
We also want a world without terrorists 🙏
50
Reply
@iapos2951
1 day ago
Wait are you saying a world without evil people ? Because thats not actually poasible considering that is the heart of man. There will and always has been evil in this world because of sin. This world will always have sin in it.
1
Reply
@KatieHiggins-hc1ph
6 days ago
@carolwalsh3264 Or those who inspire terrorists.
17
Reply
@jacquelinerodriguez3213
5 days ago
@carolwalsh3264 or lying about terrorist to invade sovereign countries 🙄
5
Reply
Show more replies
Show more replies
@Galshan523
7 days ago
Nice to be there but history shows that 99% of the people on earth do not think like you so you do need to prepare and act sometimes
26
Reply
Show more replies
@Benjamin777-e3n
6 days ago
Yes and without God. That's why it's never worked. People have hearts that are filled with greed pride hate and wickedness.
3
Reply
@NightlyHooter
4 days ago
@Benjamin777-e3n Correct! Apart from God, we can do nothing. Our sinful hearts will destroy everything. We are contaminated with sin inside us, in the world all around us, and the evil spirits as well. Only Jesus, who paid for everyone’s sin, can correctly run this world and our lives. We just have to surrender to Him and obey His commands. He is the Good Shepherd. Everyone else is just a hired shepherd who just looks out for their own self interests.
1
Reply
@l.torres6276
6 days ago
Without corruption!
24
Reply
@iapos2951
1 day ago
@l.torres6276 lmao. Ya that will never happen
6
Reply
@AprilDee-u9c
4 days ago
@l.torres6276 and GREED.
5
Reply
@user-mr8yi4iv5v
6 days ago
@l.torres6276 That is a matter of The People taking control of their governments. And, that may result in revolution of some description. But, revolt doesn't always have to be carnage.
5
Reply
Show more replies
@qualeaarte889
6 days ago
Porém para ter a paz mundial, seria preciso renunciar o próprio ego e colocar o coletivo em primeiro lugar, é uma luta pessoal contra a própria natureza. São poucas pessoas que estão dispostas a renunciar as próprias vontades em prol do coletivo.
É preciso pensar além de si mesmo e grande parte das pessoas não consegue.
20
Reply
@mkkrupp2462
6 days ago
@qualeaarte889 Especially when men are involved. It’s ego and one upsmanship against other men. It happens with male animals too. It’s testosterone.
4
Reply
@CelticThai
6 days ago
Keep dreaming
1
Reply
@nokmbk
6 days ago
Unfortunately keep wish as it will never happen!
1
Reply
@Alex-all-day
6 days ago
These European shows lmaooo
1
Reply
@BobaFett4L-g8y
6 days ago
That's all well and good, but the history of ALL civilization should have taught you, that it's not possible to do so even within our own species. Now imagine there's species that are more advanced that us. We'd be Rats or Bunnies to them.
1
Reply
@user-mr8yi4iv5v
6 days ago
@BobaFett4L-g8y That's also all well and good. But, the globalists consider themselves more advanced than us and they think that we are their property to do with as they please, including killing and or eating us. They are psychotic and they need to be permanently removed. Therein lies the peace and harmony of us regular and more importantly sane folks.
2
Reply
Show more replies
@TheDon71047
6 days ago
The elites who run things won’t let people have peace because their father is Satan the father of lies.
1
Reply
@comama1629
5 days ago
Good luck with that.
1
Reply
@CosmicGirl78
4 days ago
Yes, the 1% can go to another planet.
1
Reply
Show more replies
@MetalsUnlimited
5 days ago
I’m worn out by everything now , the chaos and all and currently it is all just about making money. There used to be more to life than this, and I really miss that, honestly it’s sad…
415
Reply
30 replies
@pardischakavakrahmani1789
2 days ago (edited)
I think you should invite an Iranian to discuss this war. There are many experts amongst us, who unfortunately get “Iransplained” time and again by “professionals” who have at best only studied similar cases.
68
Reply
2 replies
@WabiSabi_lifee
7 days ago
Why can’t these ultra wealthy people send their own families to fight these wars. Leave us regular people out of it!
2.5K
Reply
183 replies
@justicekwansa4818
6 days ago
I pray for the people of Persia. They'll overcome this. History tells me this.
522
Reply
23 replies
@robertfoertsch
1 day ago (edited)
Excellent Analysis, Deployed Worldwide Through The TRUTH Network…
Thank You 🙏 ❤
20
Reply
@mohammedalsharifi9333
1 day ago
للمنتصر تعود الغنائم دائماً منطقهم وان شاء الله تعالى نتعامل معهم بنفس منطقهم معهم ومع من وقف معهم الا ما رحم ربي ومن رحم ربي
9
Reply
2 replies
@mizzLopez
7 days ago
Netanyahu is the worst US president ever!
282
Reply
29 replies
@DarioDAversa
5 days ago
Just last week, my Lebanese friend here in Canada just announced that his brother, along with his wife and two children, all died during an Israel bombing in Lebanon. They were just regular, peaceful people living their quiet lives. They loved the USA, had no hate in their heart, and yet they are now dead. This geopolitical talk has its place, but here's a friendly reminder that innocent people DIE during wars. This could have all been avoided if the people on top were not egomaniacs. It's really sad that the world keeps being shaped by a bunch of raging maniacs. We're not going to survive this way.
274
Reply
20 replies
@robzplace4747
7 days ago
The world is tiresome…why can’t we just exist in peace?
2.2K
Reply
363 replies
@happysimus
6 hours ago
Nice you acknowledged the People of Iran at the end.. Great sense of Humanity !
1
Reply
@TheDiaryOfACEO
6 days ago
For those asking! We recorded this just before the weekend 👊🏾
471
Reply
31 replies
@takek9215
4 days ago
The act of starting a war for the sake of elections has resulted in soldiers dedicating their lives to evil rather than their families.
What do they call the act of blowing up infrastructure and plunging a country into terror? They don't understand which side they're on.
35
Reply
@justinapaleckyte717
5 days ago
Please bring this gentleman back in a few weeks time it’s really interesting 🙏
409
Reply
19 replies
@bertogooch
1 day ago
Sometimes i wonder how some people can be watching entirely different things while watching the exact same thing
1
Reply
@UK-MMA
4 days ago (edited)
I remember when General Smedley butler said he was “sick and tired of old rich men, dreaming up new wars, for young men to die in”
Sadly I am a 22 year veteran and I kept seeing this again and again, eventually leaving the military disgusted as this whole war machine is simply to make more and more money for super rich people who would never send their young family members into a single war ggrrrrr!!!!
143
Reply
4 replies
@bigskiesmontana7267
6 days ago
There is no forgiveness EVER for a president that threatens genocide. Unforgiveable. My sincere apologies to the people of Iran.
334
Reply
@andrewjenkinson7052
6 days ago
As I said elsewhere, that is why he will actually commit genocide. That way he will not go down in history as just a stupid conman but be Infamous!
8
Reply
@vicarious4961
5 days ago
@andrewjenkinson7052 🫵😆🤣
1
Reply
@rosariocarbajal1380
2 days ago (edited)
@andrewjenkinson7052 he talks shit all the time, whatever is on his mind, but how realistic is to do that—none. He loves Iranias.
1
Reply
@BigBroJon
5 days ago
@andrewjenkinson7052 That was an empty threat and we both know it.
4
Reply
Show more replies
@pratiktoharsosusanto9205
5 days ago
Amerika dan Israel takut negara lain memiliki nuclear
4
Reply
@BigBroJon
5 days ago
@pratiktoharsosusanto9205 yes, they don't want another superpower on the block. It's a battle of the Titans. This is why America hates Russia. They want to break it up into 5 parts and leave just China and America at the top.
Reply
@rosariocarbajal1380
2 days ago
Trump can say that, but will not do that ever. He loves Iranians, he is upset with the suppresive government only.
2
Reply
@Ayt-m4c
2 days ago
Çok yalan katliam yaptı tramp. bir okulu bombaladi yargilanmali tramp bir katil
Reply
@SamsulKhoir-w5t
2 days ago
Bravo iran ❤💞❤💞❤💞❤💞❤💞
1
Reply
@tonibrooks9719
1 day ago
Thank you! I agree.
1
Reply
Show more replies
@reviewtalent9021
7 days ago
The international community demands accountability: Trump and Netanyahu must be held responsible for their actions.
23
Reply
@AdzynDadzy
9 hours ago (edited)
Something big is coming—not just war, not just technology, not just disease.
Change is accelerating across every part of life.
Stay informed. Stay prepared. Stay grounded.
The future will demand awareness, resilience, and clear thinking.
More to come.
1
Reply
@eattheheat1919
7 days ago
Thank you for sparing a thought for the innocent Iranian people, that shows true compassion and respect.
922
Reply
79 replies
@ummhurairah99
4 days ago
How many wars has Iran started in the Passed 40 years? 0 How many wars has America and Israelis started in the Passed 40 years? dozens! Who is the aggressor then? NO MORE WARS!
31
Reply
10 replies
@ethanthomas-21
7 days ago
Isn't netanyahu like facing some criminal charges that's why he wants the war to keep going??
31
Reply
2 replies
@Chicitatequila10
2 days ago
Thank you Steven for asking questions!
2
Reply
@patrickmiller9315
7 days ago
I feel we are watching a Greek Tragedy where the story has been written and the actors are all just playing their part while the audience is shocked and feeling powerless to change the ending.
869
Reply
69 replies
@RuthBrown-tm2gt
7 days ago
Dealing with Trump is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks all the pieces over, leaves droppings all over the board and then struts around like it won.
80
Reply
10 replies
@gd4163-c1k
6 days ago
Absolutely Steven - my heart also goes out to the ordinary people of Iran. As it does to all people who are affected by war
200
Reply
4 replies
@UserZzz-u4d
1 day ago
Excellent journalism
1
Reply
@TheDeathopper
7 days ago (edited)
Just a suggestion for future episodes discussing the war, because things are moving so fast and the situation is so fluid. I think it would be useful to mention the date this was recorded so that we can put the conversation in context with the developments of the war.
EDIT: Apparently, this is mentioned in the video, but I was listening to the video as a podcast so I did not see it. I meant in the description.
1.4K
Reply
54 replies
@alibahaa5988
4 days ago
انا كعراقي لا أرى أكثر إرهابا من اسرائيل وامريكا قل لي كم دولة حاربتم وكم من روح ازهقتم انتم ارهاب وليس. العرب وانتم من صنعتم داعش والقاعدة وكل منحرف انتم واسرائيل من اوجدتموهم
37
Reply
3 replies
@vimbaichatitai6715
5 days ago
Israel isn't talking about a ground invasion of Iran. Vietnam was a French war, but in the end it was America that did the fighting. History is repeating itself.
7
Reply
2 replies
@PiggyFinance-s6p
16 hours ago
I will never be able to forget this man.
Reply
@Michael_O.
6 days ago
The conversation is nothing truly new to me, but I'm glad it's being had.
I just can't move past the way he's moving the scales backwards.
28
Reply
1 reply
@k4i21c
6 days ago
Love how Steven just asks questions on things he doesn't know or understand right away instead of not saying anything to not "look bad". Thanks Steven.
352
Reply
14 replies
@zaisaber
7 days ago
This will be worse than Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam all together…………
27
Reply
2 replies
@huyentrang7350
1 day ago
Có thể không có chiến tranh được không? Chúng tôi yêu chuộng hòa bình không muốn người dân bị nghèo khổ
1
Reply
@gldk736
5 days ago
I appreciate Steve amplifying the voices of the citizens of Iran.
48
Reply
5 replies
@jamesjdonatelli2of2
6 days ago (edited)
So grateful for this intelligent discussion on the facts with an expert who actually understands the pros and cons of this sensitive geo political situation. Thank you!
36
Reply
2 replies
@diegousalma
5 days ago
Why do Americans think they can do whatever the hell they want? Even better: Do they know they are not the center of the universe?
Hollywood really fucked up that country.
24
Reply
2 replies
@robeckel4965
3 days ago
That scale demonstration was really confusing
1
Reply
1 reply
@dstjohn2007
5 days ago
Prof. Pape is a very good communicator of these complex and nuanced scenarios. Thanks for having him back in such a timely manner. Please keep his number close by, SB.
65
Reply
5 replies
@doreenscott4654
7 days ago
Listening from Australia 🇦🇺. Great interview. Knowledge is power.😊
18
Reply
@anthonydesic9306
7 days ago
great video Steven !! Very insightful
24
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
1 reply
@JorgeMucavele
3 days ago
força o programa esta bom
Reply
@singlim2327
6 days ago
The weighing scale was NOT the best prop 😅
30
Reply
5 replies
@porcupine783
6 days ago
All of the little babies on ventilators will die if they take out the power 😢
13
Reply
5 replies
@bt1378
7 days ago
Hello Mr Ceo - i like how you ask them to clarify what they say so you make sure everything is understood.
66
Reply
2 replies
@Nimajobs
2 days ago
Tanx Steven ❤ from iran
Reply
@samtoller
7 days ago
I pay for YouTube premium so I don’t have to watch ads. Sneaking them in within the show is super frustrating.
110
Reply
15 replies
@DB-dw5gz
6 days ago
Steven you are doing God's work! Thank you so much for creating this content and sharing it with all of us. Informative and intelligent conversations that we can understand. I love the questions you ask. You are asking for all of us. Keep up the incredible work! ❤
22
Reply
1 reply
@IronViron444
5 days ago
Benjamin Fulford called...
Puh Lease, this is absolute Nonsense 💯
14
Reply
3 replies
@SLF-o2w
2 days ago
The Bomb Mafia refers to the group of US Air Force generals like Curtis LeMay. Howard Zinn “served” as a bombadier in WWII who dropped a liquid substance he later found out was napalm at the end of the war on parts of France which might have had remaining German soldiers.
1
Reply
@raphaeldelaghetto8680
6 days ago
What an absolutely wonderful guest and well produced show. I wish these were not such grim times, it would be more enjoyable.
45
Reply
1 reply
@ramonamk56
7 days ago
Decoupling from the Petro Dollar THAT IS WHAT IS GOING ON.
247
Reply
22 replies
@Maldo15
7 days ago
Something I really like about this show is how although you are clearly not an oblivious man to the topics at hand, you still ask some questions as if you know nothing about it and help us, through the guest´s clarifications, fully understand what they are saying. Great job
153
Reply
2 replies
@RobinHood2434
1 day ago
Peace ! - this is the way ! Thank you !
Reply
@zigfreidbop
5 days ago
We really need to do something to stop sociopaths rising to power in the country. These people who become our most powerful leaders in government AND industry are BY DEFINITION among the most disturbed people among us. Our most callous, selfish, and lethal are funneled straight to the heights of power in this society. We seriously need a structural mechanism that limits these types of people from getting any power, much less the power of the US presidency.
8
Reply
3 replies
@sarahbaharavdni6139
5 days ago
This interview is the first one that look at this war from technical persoective objectively by a real educated person, and thank you for your empathy for innocent people❤
118
Reply
2 replies
@symals
7 days ago
In short, arrogance turns everyone against you.And you end up losing, no matter how powerful you are, arrogance, always falls
110
Reply
4 replies
@jituvaghela4592
19 hours ago
Very nice journalism🎉🎉🎉
Reply
@YasithAlwis
6 days ago
Why do Americans think that USA is the only country in the world and they are the only people who are supposed to live freely?
132
Reply
47 replies
@traceyhunter5454
6 days ago (edited)
It was so refreshing to have a guest offering such transparency and insight in the political / war arena. The visuals of the map was nice... It provided more clarity on the subject that no one has covered the way that you and your team have Steven. Thanks and well done team!
43
Reply
3 replies
@Tdonn25
3 days ago
You should have this guy come on to talk about the blockade now
4
Reply
4 replies
@markgdallas
21 hours ago
Spot on interview
Reply
@DigitalLogicCircuit
6 days ago
This conversation made me cry. There’s too much truth here. The aftermath from what’s going on will affect generations. Praying for all those who have lost their lives or loved ones
78
Reply
2 replies
@ArcherBow4x
3 days ago
Bring professor jiang xueqin in your show in person.
46
Reply
7 replies
@eunuseusuf
7 days ago
Love the host for clearing every military term
32
Reply
2 replies
@uk4490
5 hours ago
Great show ❤
Reply
@zb2551
7 days ago
Steven love these videos on the current war. You aren't afraid to ask the basic questions as well as the more complex ones to help us all understand the true complexity of the situation. Wonderful guests.❤
37
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
4 replies
@bobbader4789
7 days ago
No boots on the ground! We don’t need another Vietnam.
172
Reply
13 replies
@jonathandeller
7 days ago
Not sure when this was filmed but it seems to be before Trump announced that the US will blockade the Strait. He doesn't seem to mention that option, and he also doesn't mention how much of the oil that flowed through the Strait prior to the war has now been rerouted. You'll have to bring him back for another update😂
11
Reply
3 replies
@margrethughes4066
1 day ago
Great reporting
Reply
@malcolmsamuel7918
6 days ago
This video is so powerful. This video was deep and serious conversation. We need to bring him back for each stage of this war to showcase where we are and where we are heading. Thank you DOAC.
84
Reply
7 replies
@Itstrailmixchick
5 days ago
Really enjoyed this episode. Robert is so knowledgeable and really good at breaking things down.
8
Reply
2 replies
@Risingcappy77
6 days ago
Love all the questions you ask him Steve! You represent us so well!
20
Reply
@AsepKomara-eu7uy
2 days ago
Sudah saya subrike komen and share
1
Reply
@goodgames9576
7 days ago
Love your videos keep it up, brother
42
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
1 reply
@Kung.Pao.Kitty.
7 days ago
Another video I'll sit through the whole episode.
19
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
1 reply
@Ahimsabeing
6 days ago
The ceasefire is actually breaking down very fast because Israel has no respect for ceasefire agreements, and acts like a terrorist state and keeps attacking... Just like the "" "ceasefire" " with Gaza
48
Reply
4 replies
@valeriemoran842
1 day ago
Teue words!! This is damgerous!!!
1
Reply
@superregfrancis
7 days ago
Time for everyone to visualize peace and understading
195
Reply
16 replies
@geronimomiles7171
7 days ago
Bring this guy back in six months. 😉
64
Reply
13 replies
@bernardthemissionary
7 days ago
Bring an official of the Iranian Government.
117
Reply
61 replies
@debikirkwood9784
1 day ago
Very Good Show
Reply
@ashebirkebede2062
7 days ago (edited)
So valuable and brilliant ideas with clear analytics I have gained ever. I have a better understanding of the war between the USA and Iran than before.
38
Reply
2 replies
@brianzerega1958
6 days ago
Imagine we had a president who listened to experts
37
Reply
13 replies
@cassamcgann
7 days ago
Australia tuning in.... more insight than Iva^**a!
127
Reply
8 replies
@pepe8059
2 days ago
Thanks for the very good Convention.
Reply
@EmsTerminator
7 days ago
Watching from New Zealand. Absolutely love your videos and so helpful for such a time as this. Thankyou
66
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
10 replies
@liftrig7383
7 days ago
Thank you professor Pape, I am Iranian and listening to you calms me down.
151
Reply
11 replies
@shabnamkabiri9498
7 days ago
The realities discussed in this conversation are horrendous. They made me shiver and cry as an Iranian in diaspora who has always been against the war.
89
Reply
14 replies
@justiceandpeace
2 days ago
Excellent interview, please bring Paul back again
Reply
@paulk756
7 days ago
I'm going to assume this was recorded before Trump came out and said today he was going to block and take control of the strait....🤯
68
Reply
28 replies
@theresiabrazao6435
7 days ago
Brilliant show. Thank you for this update. It makes so much sense. Peace is the only path that will fix this.
27
Reply
5 replies
@romaldorichards8429
7 days ago
Since 1950, every Israeli prime minister went to the White House to ask the president to bomb Iran, and they all said no because they knew it was military suicide. But then the smartest of them all, Donald Duck, had to come along and say yes.
62
Reply
20 replies
@MarcianoFelizolaFormento
1 day ago
Me gusta mucho sus comentarios,, saludos gracias por su noticias,, desde STGO de cuba,,, felizola
Reply
@kirthammond9704
3 days ago
What good was the Obama treaty with Iran. Billions of dollars to inspect nuclear facilities. The inspections were scheduled so highly enriched material could super easily be hidden. The mistake was not building a Saudi Arabian Pipeline through Oman to avoid all striates and choke points back in 2001. Instead all that money went into the failed Iraq campaign.
3
Reply
@lenoreleitch5297
6 days ago
Best analysis of this war I’ve heard yet. Clear, concise and based on facts and research.
31
Reply
2 replies
@stazarosnick3649
7 days ago
You post awesome stuff, thank you for having these conversations and guests
61
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
1 reply
@kristinlee123
1 day ago
Excellent. Thank you. Logical.
Reply
@mohamedelsayed7512
6 days ago
This was a top notch interview. Really, the guest is just excellent.
143
Reply
8 replies
@adm58
7 days ago
Excellent discussion. Thank you both for sharing this.
9
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
1 reply
@BTev-l83
7 days ago
Having a nuclear bomb as a deterrent is like pulling out a gun at a fist fight 🤜
7
Reply
4 replies
@hagegeorges3333
1 day ago
The matrix strategy
1
Reply
@BroncoNakoma
7 days ago
Australia listening I’ve started listening to your podcast while at work 🤙🤙
21
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
2 replies
@mavishills9311
7 days ago
I am watching from Melbourne Australia keep up your great work
22
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
3 replies
@lihimizrahi5157
7 days ago
I think it will be useful to bring other angles of the subject, like actual Iranians or Israelis who will help your audience understand or see things it is hard to understand from Europe or the U.S.
You focuse solely on the Western angle or the American one which oposes the war, including inviting the same expert twice without really challenging his opinion or bringing about contrary points of view
450
Reply
@atemel-r2r
7 days ago
Thank you for pointing this out , American view is not world view or in this case Middle East view.
51
Reply
@yusi2966
7 days ago
Yeah, it would be great to se other perspectives
28
Reply
@kimmichelle0808
7 days ago
I agree…I was going to post this earlier and I’m glad you did. Overall, I’ve appreciated this platform and the information shared. This however is a major fail…as soon as I hear someone who is this openly biased on one side OR the other I start to tune out. Yes, it’s hard to find someone who can speak to both sides, or even represent one side without insulting or ridiculing the other. But it’s not impossible…if your expert turns out to be wrong both his credibility and yours is shot. It’s dangerous to operate from such arrogance and hate.
23
Reply
@hine4381
7 days ago
I agree with ya
13
Reply
@enf3999
7 days ago
No one is winning in this war. As an Iranian I want regime change but I don’t want war. Don’t imagine this favors Iranians when civilians are targeted. I think it is quite a brain washed perspective to swallow any of the false and changing claims of the US government and Isreali government. Three terror states fighting each other and the civilians are trapped in the middle. Wake up. No one NEEDS to kill civilians. You can’t add any justification to this cause.
46
Reply
@zachperry393
6 days ago
@enf3999 "I want regime change but I don't want war" I have news for you. You can't have one without the other.
2
Reply
@blessphemy
7 days ago
@enf3999 hmmm fishy, i though iranian dont have Internet right now?
9
Reply
Show more replies
@matthewgarvin1165
7 days ago
Good point.
8
Reply
@taniaazarnia7085
7 days ago
THIS!!! Please no NIAC related people. Bring true Iranian analysts and freedom seekers and Israelis to portray a proper image. Rather than Western perspectives of the East. I find all the people except Benjamin that was brought on this channel to talk about this conflict and Iran were all wrong.
4
Reply
@teacup3064
7 days ago
thank you for articulating this! literally my problem with his videos so biased
3
Reply
Show more replies
@richardstanley1885
2 days ago
Please have similarly Podcast with Professor John Mearsheimer at University of Chicago, and Professor Jeffrey Sachs at Colombia University.
Reply
@THEGOAT69564
7 days ago
Please invite Prof. Jiang
71
Reply
13 replies
@HeWeHaPe
6 days ago
Good Job Steve.. Americans need to hear this guy..
real facts..
63
Reply
6 replies
@kimvelasquez5520
6 days ago
You are hands down one of the best interviewers! Always well done getting to the details in an easy to understand way.
36
Reply
@montyshelton5494
3 days ago
Doing great
Reply
@ya-ali-ai
7 days ago (edited)
Then what happens if USA Nukes Iran, and Iran retaliates with a dirty bomb in USA or Isrl? Does that serve the US interests or the security of Isrl in any way?
9
Reply
@RunandSee
7 days ago
Does this man not know how a scale works ?
18
Reply
1 reply
@heather1701d
6 days ago
Prof Pepe is the man of the moment! Great interview!! Love these longer formats as they allow us to understand more than just some sensationalist headline we don't even know where it came from.
15
Reply
@FromRiversTotheSea
2 days ago
การเอาชนะกัน=การทำลายชีวิต
Reply
@Asd123Fdsa
7 days ago
If soldiers are just props for political poll numbers, something is seriously broken. Maybe the ones making these decisions should be sending their own kids.
8
Reply
1 reply
@ramonoxido
6 days ago
Wow, this man is not a professor, this man is THE professor. His explanations are clear and rich on details to make it easy to digest. Perfect pedagogy!
75
Reply
20 replies
@joeb5327
7 days ago
Is anyone else bothered by this? This was interesting, but it feels like the conclusions go further than the evidence. The point about bombing not translating into long-term wins makes sense, but jumping from that into “we’re strengthening Iran” and “we can’t beat them” seems like a long stretch.
Same with the Israel angle. Calling them a “spoiler” kind of assumes diplomacy was about to work, which isn’t really clear. It could just as easily be that they’re operating on a much shorter timeline and different risk tolerance, which I think they likely are.
And the regional piece didn’t fully land for me either. Countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates aren’t exactly moving toward Iran—they’ve seen Iran as a HUGE threat for years. Feels more like a lot of countries are hedging and trying not to get pulled into something bigger, not realigning.
Overall, it’s a thoughtful perspective, so thank you, but it seems like one lens being treated as the full picture.
19
Reply
11 replies
@TheEmpowermentAlchemist
2 days ago
Be peace!
Reply
@teda8995
7 days ago
When the power of love becomes stronger than the love of power the world will be at peace
54
Reply
7 replies
@susyg82
6 days ago
This is one of the most comprehensive explanation and description of the current war that have heard. Thank you for such a great guest and great questions.
Also, wars suck.
Thinking of the Iranian people, and everyone in the region, caught in the madness of a few people.
51
Reply
@bellyjeans999
7 days ago
I think it will be one gigantic, absolutely unnecessary blood bath if they put boots on the ground, my heart goes out to all American marines families. 💔
62
Reply
22 replies
@richardlowedjproducerIre
20 hours ago
Great Episode 👏👏👏
Reply
@ColKurtzknew
2 days ago
Straight of Hormuz opened. Iran is capitulating. Need a take back ?😊
3
Reply
@danteg2388
7 days ago
If you damage the middle class your damage the country. Governments need to protect and grow the middle class to make countries better.
32
Reply
7 replies
@MartinaVesela-y2g
7 days ago
Steven, thank you for consistently bringing amazing guests, these conversations are always so insightful and educational.🙏🏼💗
88
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
6 replies
@miguelrugeroni9917
1 day ago
€2.49
Thanks
Reply
@Rar3Breedz
7 days ago
They have the strongest granite in the world and have all there missiles and drones all in underground cities. It all most impossible to destroy there supplies. They have ships and planes underground even . 100s of miles of these cities. Thank you for your amazing video ❤️❤️❤️❤️
10
Reply
7 replies
@kevinlotr
6 days ago (edited)
Do not call him the “Secretary of War”. Congress never approved any changes, it’s a made up name. We have the defense department and a secretary of defense. Don’t give them what they want. I’m saying this on behalf of the sane Americans in the USA.
49
Reply
4 replies
@bbbbbbking
7 days ago
Well shit. If this guys is the Iran expert we should have asked him what to do!🤪
49
Reply
16 replies
@beauwayitu7365
16 hours ago
Excellent Analysis
Reply
@claudiotagini
2 days ago
turned out just a bunch of bullcrap, didn't it?
6
Reply
1 reply
@Enassamirdawood
3 days ago
How can a university professor speak about Iran and not know that Iran did not build a nuclear bomb, not out of fear of any country, but because of the Islamic fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini, who was killed on the first day he was a religious authority whose fatwas are followed? He issued a fatwa that nuclear weapons are forbidden in Islam because they do not distinguish between humans, animals, nature, evildoers, and civilians; they kill everything.
28
Reply
11 replies
@MRKAYEYECEE
6 days ago
Excellent listen (and watch) ALL the way through. 100% !
10
Reply
2 replies
@tekkemtaaxago
3 days ago
Raisonnable ce Monsieur merci pour tous que vous faites.
Reply
@nicksky9568
2 days ago
4 days later, the bottom line is....this guy looks more and more like a kook and is completely wrong about how "this war will play out". Find a fortune teller with no military experience and I am sure his/her prediction will better mirror reality. LMAO!!!
4
Reply
@spbobs
7 days ago
What? At 12am video? I gotta work later on today! Im gonna have to call in late
29
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
9 replies
@cm23045
6 days ago
This conversation was the most important and interesting explanation of the actions of the Orange menace. I have heard anywhere.. the conversation was riveting, informative, and easy to understand. I appreciate being able to hear this from someone who clearly has a handle on the entirety of the situation..
Thank you for presenting such important information. Continue on with a good Works honest reporting is so badly needed.
10
Reply
@RaeAttarian
3 days ago
Let's hope for a better situation! Great information professor, thank you.
Reply
@joshlicht1359
6 days ago (edited)
99.9% of us just want peace, it's a shame we give power to few power hungry blockheads who ruin it for everyone.
18
Reply
3 replies
@EtotheFnD
7 days ago
The sad part about this...i just have this feeling NONE OF THIS INFO even makes it to our president...🤷♂️
27
Reply
8 replies
@Trisha_oz
7 days ago
Watching from Melbourne Australia 🇦🇺 too! Dinner time here! Love your work 👍🏻🙌🏻
15
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
1 reply
@the_young_batsman
3 days ago
Informative video content
Reply
@innap1100
4 days ago
I watched this podcast and found the discussion interesting, but I think it would be more balanced if the host also invited a guest with a different perspective on the situation in Iran. Hearing two sides would give viewers a more complete understanding of the issue.
Also, I’m curious, if the professor has over 20 years of experience and has worked closely with the government, why haven’t his views been more widely adopted or implemented?
18
Reply
3 replies
@MohdNaushad-h3v
7 days ago
Stop the war please 😢
54
Reply
13 replies
@straubulous9511
7 days ago
These interviews are exactly what we need. Keep them coming! Thank you for the professional manner you follow through with everything.
4
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
2 replies
@Chris-fb1zc
3 days ago
Oil greed is evil
Reply
@ThatGuyFromAlberta
7 days ago (edited)
Pape is a great guest. I watched his first appearance and I was highly impressed with his take on the war in Iran. Having him back on now 40 days into this made me light up and immediately click on this interview. Very insightful and on point.
21
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
3 replies
@anamariaradu292
7 days ago
US at the command of Israel opened a can of worms
33
Reply
5 replies
@swirvin704
2 days ago
This guy was completely wrong! His bias and politics guides his rhetoric.
3
Reply
@TAG-TTAGGG3
9 hours ago
Love you and what you do!
Reply
@brandonbrown9598
5 days ago
What's the point of having YouTube Premium if we have to experience ads throughout the entire video?
6
Reply
@emeric3449
7 days ago
These people are always right until they are wrong, but you never hear anything after that. The reason nothing ever works in the middle is that we have had presidents that only use half measures. They see that as weakness. Iran can be toppled. The people of Iran have to do it though
12
Reply
@jimmpy83
7 days ago
It's high time for US Congress to raise Article 25. Trump should be removed to world peace and safety.
12
Reply
1 reply
@ytar-n7
1 day ago
Силы и удачи ИРАНУ!
Reply
@emilyhammond7471
7 days ago
This is what happens when you let an ignorant, unqualified, DICTATOR and CULT regime take over‼They eff'd up the USA and then the entire world‼ LOCK THEM UP...NOW‼
15
Reply
1 reply
@stackwithstacks
6 days ago
Love you dude! I've been following you since the start and your progress and guest are inspirational!
5
Reply
@adriantyler2260
7 days ago
Sitting at the diner table with 3 generations of my English family, not 1 person likes Trump, or supports the USA.
Never thought my middle class family would be pro Iran and anti America
Trump you are truly hated
23
Reply
6 replies
@bokmakierie1
1 day ago
Very very good discussion.
Reply
@themongoose7318
6 days ago
The fact that nothing can be done about drone attacks surely renders this war as a stalemate.
6
Reply
@eltonwl86002
2 days ago
So what does the professor have to say now??? Is he coming back to the show...
4
Reply
8 replies
@internationaldaily9820
6 days ago
Thank you Professor Robert Pape. Thank you DOAC! 😘😍🥰
12
Reply
@tahrahembara-ts4tu
3 days ago
Une analyse pertinente et objective
Reply
@grasshoper3770
7 days ago
The world saw we could not beat Iran
That’s the dangerous part
12
Reply
4 replies
@JGold-cu5mo
7 days ago
Oh well, looks like everybody needs nukes to be safe from USA aggression. It worked with Nth Korea... soz Sth Korea. Russia also.
9
Reply
@sanfordbrotman1191
6 days ago
Whenever I get ants inside the house over the years I spray them. They come back, I spray and they return. My 8 year old daughter tells me that it's not going to work, I can't get rid of them. It happens maybe 3-4 times and then they're gone. I'm sure they're still around but they stop bothering me inside my house so I'm pleased and my daughter learns a lesson. Robert Pape reminds me of my 8 year old daughter.
11
Reply
3 replies
@caroltoledo2648
3 days ago
Amazing video !
Reply
@8Seven65
6 days ago
I get what he's saying, as a broad concept, but the idea that the US is "making Iran stronger" by destroying their nuclear facilities, their air force, their missile silos, their Navy, and select infrastructure, comes off as delusional.
26
Reply
@iliassoukere2514
5 days ago
L'operation terrestre serait un desastre pour les Etats UNIS
2
Reply
@metal_junky01
5 days ago
ITS BC HE CANT GET TRUMP OFF HIS MIND HIS EGO GOT CHALLANGED SO NOW EVERY OPION THEY HAVE IS BIAS
2
Reply
@vigaliwu
5 days ago
exactly. No one foresee such genies move of US blocking boats leaving Iran.
Lets see what will happen next. But I see war is kind of over.
Reply
@ojidowu
5 days ago
It is obvious then that you either have not been paying attention or you have been hearing your own version as you wished it. Apparent also is that your consumption of news is very limited.
Alastair Crookes, on many channels, has said that most of what the US is claiming to have destroyed are exquisitely built decoy weapons (aircrafts, missiles, missile launchers etc) that Iran had bought from China in huge quantities before the war began, many of which are actually heat-emmiting and which heat-seeking US/Israel munitions logged onto and blow up.
Do you think these people are stupid to leave their armaments on the surface for them to be picked by satellite and destroyed? The ancient race from which these people descent built the perplexing underground cities found all over the area now called Turkey. Haven't you been reading some archeology? These people have had decades to prepare for this showdown
They maintain their capabilities and will destroy the American empire if they start ground invasion.
By the way, Iran has no satellites in space. They have switched from GPS (American-owned) shortly after the 12-day war to Chinese's high-orbit BeiDou. Why do you think they did that?
These people were set and the US walked into a trap ... on a leash by Netanyahu
And they'll pay
3
Reply
@CaptainSleep
5 days ago
@ojidowu everybody is a war expert all of a sudden
1
Reply
Show more replies
@carmelagalvan9290
5 days ago
That is because none of that is true. Iran’s military capabilities are still intact. You gotta stop believing Trump. He is demented & not in touch with reality. The US is losing very badly and they’re covering everything up. It’s not even the first time either. Try to learn some pattern recognition and stop insulting your own intelligence.
2
Reply
@thomaskeys180
5 days ago
can you point me in the direction to the best evidence that we are covering everything up? I think it’s plausible but how are you so certain?
Reply
@AywilRekkyu
5 days ago
@carmelagalvan9290 Wat they gonna with only fast attack boats? It's their only remaining forces lmao. I suggest you keep updated, you're being fed with wrong information.
Their geographical advantage has turned against them. What are your evidences that they're winning?
Reply
@BigBroJon
5 days ago
@carmelagalvan9290 They had approximately 13 ships, which wouldn't be particularly difficult to neutralize. Iran operates more from a militia-based standpoint — they don't rely on a large conventional military presence with jets and naval vessels. Instead, they leverage cost-effective drone technology and nuclear deterrence to maintain their strategic position.
Reply
Hide replies
@XYZ-nh5ti
3 days ago
GREAT TALK 🗣️ ‼️. But ISRAEL’s 🇮🇱 subvertive role only skimmed over. Given that their bloodlust has caused so much pain in the world, we need to scrutinise their hold over US/UK politics.
13
Reply
2 replies
@zhaoyang68
6 days ago
自从上次节目就一直关注Pape教授,很有道理,持续关注,谢谢更新
5
Reply
@deloresdilday3978
3 days ago
Really acutely explained...Loved this talk..Thank You
Reply
@XxXtraCookie
6 days ago
The moment we put scientists to rule countries instead of delusional politicians - this is the time humanity will really trive!
6
Reply
2 replies
@JamesMakers1
6 days ago
Imagine a world without Israel
30
Reply
5 replies
@Marko_Media
17 hours ago
This was excellent! Thank you!
Reply
@gomnokijuhy
5 days ago
America and its allies are not fighting for the people, believe me, this is like the interests of a few people sacrificing the people of a country, and you are really damn!
4
Reply
2 replies
@AllTheDips
6 days ago
Funny how he failed to mention that Iran’s chant is death to America
22
Reply
20 replies
@farshidhoushmand
7 days ago (edited)
Tuning in from Iran, thanks for this.
11
Reply
6 replies
@cesarqueti
2 days ago
I really like that you ask the interviewee to clarify concepts and phraseology that some people take for granted
Reply
@stephenmoore8354
7 days ago
If he has advised past American presidents and foreign policies... should be held accountable for the disastrous American foreign policies over the last 30 yrs
35
Reply
7 replies
@cfofra
7 days ago (edited)
He is right on some points, wrong on others. Remember, this guy is selling his book and life's work. He doesn't have access to the full picture though.
25
Reply
10 replies
@EriclesOcean
6 days ago
Not sure article 5 is correctly stated here ... for that article to kick in, a nation must have been attacked and not be the aggressor. Also, the US is not automatically getting command over the others' militaries.
If this guest is generaly this imprecise and advises on these topics, i am not sure what you are supposed to think of it ...
@TheDiaryOfACEO have youconsidered inviting sarah paine?
25
Reply
3 replies
@malcolmkirk3343
3 days ago
Love your mellow approach
Reply
@HakimLitim-xr3ft
7 days ago
Steven, you kill it everytime. Keep it up
16
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
3 replies
@Ozjockey1
7 days ago
24 ads to suffer through plus his own in-house schilling of clap is just unwatchable!
23
Reply
8 replies
@vas6643
7 days ago
To the most of the listeners here these analysis are noble. Because almost all of their information base on propaganda machines from mainstream media.
7
Reply
2 replies
@FELIXGrullon-vd1kv
3 days ago
" excelente programa con magníficos
análisis de los problemas geopolíticos
mundiales "
Reply
@mgrn63-m4k
6 days ago
They were probably bombing some decoys thinking they were destroying legitimate above ground targets
6
Reply
1 reply
@RoboKong-c4k
2 days ago
I guess his model didn't account for option #3 - the US blocking the straight of Hormuz, and adding additional economic sanctions. I've seriously come to question the credibility of some of the "experts" on this podcast, no different from the episode with Steven Keen, who is known for getting it wrong more than he gets ir right.
6
Reply
1 reply
@ThisIsLeeBird
5 days ago
Will you have him back on when he is completely wrong?
6
Reply
@KirbyMiller
2 days ago
Professor Pape doesn’t seem to understand how a scale works. Great interview though. Congrats to both of you. Thanks.
Reply
@Jonno-c9b3m
7 days ago (edited)
I've listened to a few of these episodes and I'm a bit disappointed in the calibre of the "experts" interviewed. They have solid expertise in their chosen area but they also have strongly biassed perspectives and seemingly no perspective beyond them. Economics, the impact of AI..... I came away thinking - yeah, maybe, but then maybe not. The world is not as linear as they project.
That said, this guy sounds pretty solid in his perspective.
26
Reply
15 replies
@cyanraptor4403
6 days ago
Love the vids Bro, I love that you ask thoes hard to ask questions.. keep up the amazing work brother.
5
Reply
@chrispapa2782
7 days ago
You can’t compare Vietnam times with now days.
24
Reply
7 replies
@Jay-x2y4v
1 day ago
Professor Jiang n this professor together would be a really good yin and yang to try help the people understand would be a brilliant show reckon but thank you for your brother and for your humanity and humility. 🙏✌️
Reply
@andrescer
7 days ago
Robert Pape is a wise man. I wish Trump would listen to him. But he won't and we will all suffer.Operation AIPAC Fury will never stop until we are all punished.
18
Reply
@rahamotaqy
5 days ago
I really appreciate your empathy for the Iranian people, who are already oppressed by their government and now facing immense pressure.
6
Reply
1 reply
@Katebsaber
6 days ago
As an Iranian, I genuinely believe conversations like this matter, not just for people in Iran living through this, but for anyone in the world trying to make sense of it. Having someone of Dr. Pape’s caliber involved makes all the difference. Thanks for shedding light on such a dark moment in history. Would love to see more with him.
6
Reply
@michaelswain868
7 days ago (edited)
This conflict is rooted in American nepotism and the fact Trump is a certifiable moron. Bush, Obama and Biden all got the Netanyahu "we are starting a war in Iran speech...." every single one of them told him NO!. Trump.... Trump got walked like a dog and now the dumpster fire of Iran like all his other award winning policies like tarrifs, ICE, attempting to remove birth right citizenship, social security cuts and DOGE have spilled over to a global state and a warzone no less. You don't have to wonder "what would happen if the village idiot became president".... It happened.
18
Reply
@Diana-zm1hl
3 days ago
Dialysis, surgeries, refrigeration. How horrible😭
Reply
@tiffanyvang1085
6 days ago (edited)
American multi-party system is a failure. It divides the country, causes daily domestic fightings and push the parties to extreme policies for short-term gains at each election.
12
Reply
1 reply
@SweetOldLadyKremlinTroll
7 days ago
Certainly don’t want to hear Ivanka Trump.
21
Reply
3 replies
@barryispuzzled
7 days ago (edited)
It's a question of how much of America's interests Trump can destroy before Congress reins him in. There could be nothing left of America by the time he's finished. It'll be a third world country.
15
Reply
4 replies
@zohrabenbyi8757
15 hours ago
Bonsoir et merci à vous deux monsieurs ❤
Reply
@MauKilauea
7 days ago
I do really like your interviews Steven. My only criticism is lately a lot of them are feeling a little doomsday-ish. I'm often coming away from them feeling negative and hopeless, and there's only so long I'm going to enjoy doing that. Finding myself less likely to click your videos. Would love to see some more positive ones. Thanks for everything though, appreciate it x
7
Reply
1 reply
@spbobs
7 days ago
I subbed! I better get good info year after year
4
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
2 replies
@prayerfuldailies
7 days ago
What a recovery after teh Ivanka interview hahahah
8
Reply
2 replies
@SeverianoCanela
1 day ago
Buen analisis ..me gusta desde R.D.
Reply
@Nefarious86
4 days ago
Israel being the aggressor and ensuring stability can’t be a reality in the region? Colour me shocked….
11
Reply
1 reply
@tercets_in-greenland
7 days ago (edited)
Sadly, Trump’s strategy was “trust me, bro” and also “I’m Jesus,” which he posted today. From geopolitics to spirituality, the man is pure incompetence, megalomania, and sacrilege. In lieu of real diplomacy, Trump wants America and the world to gather round him with a fervor that might obscure the weak and indeed fatal position in which his administration has placed Americans.
9
Reply
1 reply
@DS-ql2iy
7 days ago
Fully respect Pape and his thought processes. But the big thing he is missing here, the critical piece, is Jihadism. This is what we are dealing with when it comes to Iran.
14
Reply
2 replies
@gordonkirkpatrick8090
2 days ago (edited)
Turns out that Pape’s view is pape thin.
2
Reply
@scottevans1244
2 days ago
This didn’t age well did it. Just another guy who underestimated Trump. The strait is open, Iran is no longer a threat to the world. I don’t understand why people after 5 years see that Trump is a master thinker and negotiator.
3
Reply
2 replies
@JonathanRodriguez-bx3hm
7 days ago
prof jiang is the expert
6
Reply
2 replies
@HorrorEmergency
7 days ago
Kinda crazy, I'm seeing the decline of the US in real time, I wonder what will be in the history books 20 years from now. If I even make it that long.
38
Reply
18 replies
@cnikolov
1 day ago
Thanks for introducing robert, what a comprehensive and intelligent answers wow❤
Reply
@jessicadutridge9882
7 days ago
I hate Trump. I hate Bibi. I hate this stupid war. I hate what this country has become. I hate our weak ass Congress, our pathetic Democrat party for their silence, military kids will die for nothing, and that the Epstein files have to take a backseat AGAIN. We are a disgrace.
My heart goes out to every single parent of those 150+ Iranian school girls. And all the other innocent civilians harmed.
18
Reply
4 replies
@cindysmith6040
7 days ago
I don't know, maybe the USA and Israel should just stop bombing Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Iran, Syria... Just thought.
8
Reply
1 reply
@gordoncounts1840
2 days ago
This aged terribly
14
Reply
6 replies
@fguffghfuiyfv6277
1 day ago
البرنامج راءع اختيار خبير امريكى له رؤيا نجعلنا على بينة من رؤيتنا ومعرفتنا بامريكا مثل هذا البروفيسور يرفع الوعى عندى❤❤❤❤❤
Reply
@loudogg3367
7 days ago
Trump just underestimated how ridiculously complicated it is in Middle East. In many ways, Iran is simply unable to make any kind of deal. This is what Trump and many others just don't get.
8
Reply
@Zino-u1l
7 days ago
Iran is doing the whole world proud. God bless Iran.
13
Reply
1 reply
@xchazz86
7 days ago
Lets not forget, all of this was only possilbe as a down stream consequence of globalisation, technology transfer, labor outsourcing and wallstreet and corporate greed.
We are now closer to nuclear annilhation than ever before, hope it was worth it just so the rich and powerful can get even richer at the expense of everyone else.
The global elites will be responsible for the end of the human civilization.
8
Reply
1 reply
@Aicha-w9q
21 hours ago (edited)
ضيف جيد ومحلل سياسي ممتاز والصحف محاور ماهر عن جد
Reply
@faranaktabareh
4 days ago
As an Iranian, I heard your speech. What you don’t know is that there is no negotiator in the Iranian regime; it is a multi-layered regime. There are stallers, but they are all connected to each other by ideology or by financial benefit. So there is not going to be any crackdown on the system through negotiation.
Now, we have stallers in the Iranian regime—better stallers and worse stallers—but we still have stallers there. And that doesn’t give anything to the U.S. or Israel. It’s just a stalling technique until they reach and develop a military weapon and create a nuclear bomb to threaten the world with it.
Imagine that now they don’t have a nuclear bomb, and they try to bully the world by closing the Hormuz Strait. So if they do have a nuclear bomb, all the small Arab countries will be heavily bullied, and Israel is going to get destroyed for sure. They’re going to keep sending terrorists to Europe and to the U.S., and then it won’t end. They could push the world back into the Middle Ages. That’s what you don’t understand about the Islamic terrorist regime culture.
However, it was painful listening to you talk about fading the social movement and raising nationalism, because that is not true. Your guest has no education, research, or updated knowledge about Iranian sociology. While the internet is cut off and there are foreign militia in the streets of Iran to quiet down the movement, how do you dare to talk that way?
6
Reply
2 replies
@ArissaArradMagicWorld
5 days ago
As an Iranian here, thank you Mr President Trump, you only have the courage to go against the Islamic Republic,please just finish the job, God bless you, we love you
6
Reply
5 replies
@DonnaV411
7 days ago
Good for you Steven for raising the issue of what the average Iranian person must be feeling with the threats of ending their "culture" while bombs are falling all around them. It must be terrifying - it is good for people to be reminded of what is REALLY happening.
4
Reply
2 replies
@BkzqorXjcna
2 days ago
Prof jiang anyone
Reply
@Collin-n3y
2 days ago
4 days this video release shows how wrong this guy is 😂 happy i won’t see him on YouTube until people forgot what he said 😂
3
Reply
2 replies
@garyin5085
6 days ago
The idea that any bill restricting aid to Israel would pass US Congress is absurd with lobbies like AIPAC and billionaire Zionists owning mainstream media. (1) need to vote every AIPAC politician out (2) acknowledge Zionism as root cause of this problem
6
Reply
@-SonZetta-
6 days ago
“We’re not weakening Iran. We have strengthened Iran, the US is losing power”
I’m not sure what planet this doom-crier was born on, but that was some hilarious gaslighting right there 😂
10
Reply
@Brandolfyr
3 days ago
lol its almost $6 a gallon in Washington, over $7 for diesel
1
Reply
@leowanlpn
7 days ago
Is this recoded after the announcement of the blockade of the straight of Hormuz?
4
Reply
1 reply
@persiandude1164
7 days ago
None of these Iran experts know anything about Iran it’s so sad
9
Reply
4 replies
@merrypaws-q2s
7 days ago (edited)
It's hilarious that MAGA thinks Iran is losing, as if this is a video game, that the more you kill and destroy, you win 😂 Iran now controls 20% of the world's oil supply (twice that of Russia), 32% if we also include the Red Sea route controlled by Houthis, and charge $2million per ship in Chinese yuan. They have destroyed all US bases in the Middle East and US-ISRAEL is depleted of its interceptors. And US has lost support from most of its allies.
7
Reply
@andreuzice7417
19 hours ago
Thanks so much for your dedication to humanity, honesty and educating the world Steven!! I love your work and watching you grow. Top man!!
Reply
@way2muchNFO
7 days ago
Wow, even as we watch this, he just posted something about being Jesus and stuff. What is going on? Is he really losing losing it over Iran? Great episode Steven! so far I’m in 4 minute mark
9
Reply
The Diary Of A CEO
·
3 replies
@MinSeokSong-f8d
2 days ago
Turns out he was wrong
4
Reply
@user-vn6ol1jn9l
7 days ago
Our credibility in the world is extremely low now, all because of ridiculous decisions.
4
Reply
1 reply
@faillefelon8470
3 days ago
mais Steamer enverra son système de renseignements 😊😊😊
Reply
@mazdaknazemi8268
5 days ago
I am sure there will be an enormous wave after this war, and many podcast businesses will go out of the market or the market will change somehow. The so-called expert is really out of the league; in Persian, we say the conversation is at the taxi driver level.
4
Reply
@HiThere-sc2jr
7 days ago
Trump's EGO is OUT OF CONTROL! This WILL
destroy AMERICA, FOREVER, PLUS decimating
Our WONDERFUL MILITARY
16
Reply
4 replies
@RiadDiur
5 days ago
I am moroccan. And the buzz of criticizing its own country from some americans is amazing.
Believe what your country does. You will be thankful in the future.
Here we know the depth and aims of islamist regimes in the very detail, a thing that a great doctors in a university in usa isnt really able to do.
I wont call him a useful idiot like netanyahu did, but being honest, you should reconsider again : what if your'e the one who is out of history common sens, and not usa.
5
Reply
1 reply
@fabianvazquez5259
23 hours ago
Great podcast !!! I really think the content is worth the watch.
Reply
@mm-ik2hb
7 days ago
First time ive had to switch an interviewee off, so much nonesense talk
7
Reply
@upinya5223
5 days ago
This guy is an idiot, he speaks what he hopes is true, But knows he’s wrong.
5
Reply
@Zabiru-
7 days ago (edited)
1:19:48 - Finally. You realize that Trump is an idiot, that Trump is surrounded by idiots, that he is an easily manipulatable fool, and he should never have been elected in the first place because he lies about his intentions, breaks promises to other international powers as well as his voters, and he doesn't understand global politics or even regional politics for that matter. He is a bull in a china shop with ADHD, dementia, and pronounced narcissistic and psychopathic tendencies.
America needs to impeach him and remove his entire administration.
Yesterday.
Fucking Act, Congress!
Now.
12
Reply
2 replies
@Roseta2805
2 days ago
It's so depressing watching this episode. ☹️
1
Reply
@deanchapman-cw3cm
7 days ago
🔥 🇮🇱 to the ground and we can live in peace
8
Reply
@AnandVasudevan-i5j
7 days ago (edited)
Just be honest. America's empire was slowly falling and there was no way out. With the Economy, unsustainable debt, internal division, social degeneracy, rise of China, destruction of the petro dollar , formation of Brics , supply chain dependency and numerous other factors i can site. This was the only option, they still have the world's most powerful military and some say not for very much longer, exacerbating the situation. It won't work though. Eventually the world will either come together to put that mad dog down (country or leadership) still not clear which or of course the world gets blown up.
8
Reply
5 replies
@davidyaraldi
7 days ago
Iran isn't the enemy, the west is particularly USA and Zionist Israel
10
Reply
2 replies
@edwardgrabczewski
15 hours ago (edited)
This is the best analysis I've heard to date: good questions and very detailed answers. Many thanks to you both.
Reply
@LifeLore2024
5 days ago
Maybe if you really care to know how is day to day life in Iran, you can just ask an average Iranian, NOT a podcaster NOT a reporter NOT any activist, just an Iranian
6
Reply
2 replies
@akwamarsunzal
7 days ago
NATO is not dead ffs! NATO is not Trumps war machine on demand!
4
Reply
1 reply
@sherylshark
7 days ago
This guy is high
10
Reply
1 reply
@RM-ed1if
3 days ago
At present, Iran's sole leverage is oil. Control of the strait. Reduce dependence worldwide on oil and leverage is reduced. Adapt to a life without oil. New technologies that don't use oil. Once Iran obtains nuclear weapons, their leverage is cemented.
2
Reply
@parisqa
5 days ago
The claim that the average Iranian, even pro-democracy Iranians, would stand behind the Islamic Republic in wanting nuclear weapons as a result of the war shows how little this “expert” understands about Iranians.
For the overwhelming majority of Iranians (roughly 80–90% who oppose the Islamic Republic) the greatest fear is a nuclear-armed regime, because it would ensure the indefinite survival of a dictatorial, occupying force.
We do not see the Islamic Republic as being on our side in this war, nor is it fighting for the benefit of the Iranian people. It is fighting for its own survival and for the “Axis of Resistance.” It clearly distinguishes between its 10–20% supporters and the rest of society, rewarding one group with free food in the streets and internet access to spread its propaganda, while threatening the majority with death if they take to the streets, confiscation of property, revocation of citizenship, arrest, and execution.
6
Reply
1 reply
@xvi_zone
7 days ago
Mossad have all of the Epstein receipts.
US President is operating as a victim
of blackmail - what else explains the insanity 👈
13
Reply
3 replies
@gardenia5686
6 days ago
On Easter Trump wrote in an insane statement, that he would skin the Iranian people alive. He is disgusting.
6
Reply
@NatReg6489
1 day ago
This was a fabulous talk! Thank you for THIS!!!!! We need MORE!
Reply
@abrakadeborah1398
7 days ago
Before I even click on this video...I am thinking...Oh boy, Another "Expert" that keeps repeating the same old, same old narrative to promote his books and his own political opinion.
5
Reply
@ЕвгенийДедюхин
2 days ago
Дякую🙏
Reply
@krumel20
3 days ago
Hello, Canadian here. I have just discovered your channel, and appreciate the content so much. Informative, high quality , thanks to your host, Prof Pape and you. 😊
Reply
@anderssart6628
3 days ago
Хороший разговор с доктором Лектором!
Reply
@Elpro-q9v1f
1 day ago
Gracias gracias
Reply
@przemysawwojciechpaw7733
1 day ago
Gloria in excelsis DEO!
Reply
@АликШахов-в1ь
3 days ago
Спасибо большое вам за отличную и грамотную объяснение
Reply
@cemalagarer5021
19 hours ago
Verdiğiniz bilgiler için teşekkürler ❤
Reply
@maxwellM7seven
2 days ago
there is a saying "people who live in glass jouses should not be throwing stones"
Reply
@sadkbugraevgin684
1 day ago
Teşekkür ederim
Reply
@aboyusef-b2x8u
3 days ago
حلقة جيدة لكن اتوقع استخدام ترمب للنووي
Reply
@roguerepublic1460
1 day ago
Movement of forces is really an accurate description
Reply
@frankdiaz1072
1 day ago
Praying for peace,and eyes open,evil evil hearts and minds and souls 😱
Reply
@maricogan2903
1 day ago
My father, communications CMSGT during Viet Nam, told me that our greatest weakness was that we sent the soldiers into the Viuet Nam conflict one man at a time. A stranger entered a unit of strangers, 40% of which would never survive. WW1 & WW2, the soldiers were trained, transported and fought as brothers in a company, platoon or unit. They were invested in each other and fought for each other.
1
Reply
@suxix7312
14 hours ago (edited)
45:51 Im surprised they didnt make an attempt on Vance when he went over for the "Peace Talks."
Reply
@manta406
2 days ago
Dziękuję, kolejny raz było miło wysłuchać inteligentnej rozmowy. Pozdrowienia z Polski ❤
1
Reply
@ClaudejuniorMaille-m7r1b
1 day ago
Amazing informative podcast Diary of a CEO is too notch
Reply
@ahmedbinsaidalamri9438
1 day ago
Courage
Reply
@Mr_ar15
14 hours ago (edited)
Get Professor Jiang on👀👀
Reply
@charles-z1i8r
1 day ago
Dangerous informations useful for IRAN destruction ! Yes, Professor !
1
Reply
@hlsartistry
1 day ago
I joined DOAC! Really great group!
Reply
@Glenn-hm8sb
10 hours ago
Dude.. you are better than the major newsnetworks. Chances are you will be as huge as Rogan tomorrow.
Reply
@AnetteEngel-s3d
2 days ago
Gruß aus Deutschland - ❤ lichen Dank
Reply
@RespectOR182
1 day ago
Consequences must be inevitable.
Pride goes before fall.
Reply
@chriskredlo5198
2 days ago
This guy lives alone in his partisan mind, justifying his postulation to make it fit his self-worth, and esteem.
2
Reply
@Cancan-g8n
3 days ago
❤👍
Reply
@faillefelon8470
3 days ago
Mais les USA n'ont pas besoin du pétrole de cette région....c'est un plus grand producteur de pétrole.😮
Reply
@bgwinn67
22 hours ago
Totally, agree that’s a very limited viewpoint.
Reply
@homerobrasilfilho6989
3 days ago
Comprei e nao recebi.
Reply
@Michael-v2m9o
2 days ago
口音很妙
Reply
@thomasabirached8091
17 hours ago
Please interview him every month
Reply
@faillefelon8470
3 days ago
Pourquoi tout ça ?
pourquoi tuer autant de gens ?
pourquoi ?😡❗
Reply
@derricksimpson2643
1 day ago
Great episode but can you explain to him how a scale works
Reply
@carloautoscuola
2 days ago
Mi piace
Reply
@dusansainmobiliaria
2 days ago
Donde los políticos tienen sus cabezas? Atacando entre ellos, sufriendo la gente, subiendo sus impuestos, metiendo miedo 😱😨 a las poblaciones.... Que se volteen el cerebro 🧠🧠 y aprendan hacer acciones a favor de todos.
Reply
@316bonnie1
1 day ago
P.S. thank you for not posting his question for him from previous guests Steven❤
Reply
@ty_williams_nz8410
2 days ago (edited)
NZ$2.00
What do we do about AI Steven? Give us direction please!
Reply
@ChrisAaron-g4e
20 hours ago
Wow I haven't even seen the end of your podcast and I know exactly what your guest is going to say! Like I said it's all about the oil!!!!!
Reply
@SandraPeake-jx5ft
17 hours ago
Amazing insight into the Middle East conflict right now
Reply
@Mr_ar15
14 hours ago
Please Get Professor Jiang on👀👀
Reply
@robertsalade9140
2 days ago
C'est hallucinant ce qui se passe quand même et de voir ce magnifique outil qu'est le consumérisme sédater les macaques de la planète Terre, je trouve ça trop beau, je passe ma vie a prélever le troupeau de manière subtil et quand je vois tout ça, j'ai des larmes de joies ^^.
Reply
@Batzax
3 days ago
Suggest Steve interviews Mayar Tousi
Reply
@faillefelon8470
3 days ago
12-14 bases détruites dans le golfe ❗😡
Reply
@paramjyothsingh5257
1 day ago
I will ll subscribe your channel sir ji
Excellent conversation with
a very experienced person in detail
Reply
@paulyarin
3 days ago
Did this come out before the blockade?
Reply
@Rocketfist-g7o
6 hours ago
No one’s taking the off ramp
Reply
@PINTV-do4vd
3 days ago
Perang di Iran Tujuan utamanya minyak ..... Kalau alasannya karena Iran punya nuklir kenapa Korea Utara dibiarkan saja???
Reply
@neneanea
2 hours ago
The phisics of a balance works different from how our professor was showing. Anyways. The idea is clear. Just saying
Reply
@ClaudejuniorMaille-m7r1b
1 day ago
Top
Reply
@spanx92
9 hours ago
Professor Jiang said this and got called the Chinese Nostradamus. Robert Pape says it? Crickets.
Reply
@clsaw9570
2 days ago
I think the weight scale was confusing. Powerfful should be heavier isnt it. Haha
Reply
@Hiyall-i9e
20 hours ago
I love that he uses the correct name “ Persian Gulf” because it always has been and always will be ⛳️
Reply
@libragaming5856
23 hours ago
Powerful talk by Robert Pape — Stage 4 is chilling. I’ve heard from some credible insider sources that Iran & USA are having internal talks and soon there will be a ceasefire. Urgent diplomacy needed to prevent catastrophic escalation.
Reply
@สมศรีลีสุวรรณ
1 day ago
พวกคุณจะคิดยุทธวิธีเพื่อการสงครามและการรุกรานประเทศอื่นไปทำไม นี่คือการปล้นชัดๆ
ทำไมคุณไม่ทำยุทธวิธีเพื่อการผลิตเพื่อปากท้องและความมั่นคงทางอาหารซึ่งจะทำให้โลกมีความสงบสุข ซึ่งดีกว่าการเข่นฆ่าทำลายล้างมนุษย์และทำลายโลก พวกคุณเกิดมาเพื่อทำลายล้างซึ่งเทียบได้กับการเป็นซาตานในความเชื่อทางศาสนาของคุณ ซึ่งเป็นความชั่วร้าย ความมืดดำทางจิตวิญญาณของการเกิดมาชั่วระยะเวลาหนึ่งในโลกนี้ คุณต้องตายไปเช่นกันตามกฏธรรมชาติ เกิด แก่ เจ็บและตาย ทำไมหนึ่งชีวิตแสนสั้นในโลกนี้จึงมุ่งแต่ทำลายแทนที่จะสร้างความดีความสงบสุข รักษาโลกให้เป็นดาวเคราะห์ที่สวยงามน่าอยู่
1
Reply
@faillefelon8470
3 days ago
c'est l'Arabie Saoudite qui a financé la Bombe atomique 😮
Reply
@RomanKnapczyk-qr9en
1 day ago
Brawo Tramp.
Reply
@arah2269
1 day ago
The depths of evil from today's leaders in the western world is beyond any human comprehension. BUT one day the they will be met with the consequences of their actions and pay for the immeasurable suffering and death they caused for oil, land and money that they will not take with them to their graves.
Justice in front of the Almighty in His court will be the ultimate showdown.
1
Reply
@Manage2Damage
1 day ago
We need him back in 4 weeks
Reply
@MW-zp1my
3 days ago (edited)
Bro doesn’t know how a balance works
1
Reply
@CaptainDunsel-lz5yd
3 days ago (edited)
This smug man would have described the Normandy invasion as “the US is falling into the escalation trap”…Moving on…
1
Reply
2 replies
@316bonnie1
1 day ago
Exactly! 1hr13m, ships are NOW rerouting to Gulf of America for oil purchasing!
Reply
@palitech08
1 day ago
@min 11:28 a large amount of them were decoys.
Reply
@arikchen7070
3 days ago
What about the 35,000 Iranian who were killed by the crazy regime , suddenly this isn’t important?? It’s interesting to see how professors that are really intelligent are so wrong about politics or human dignity
1
Reply
1 reply
@The_War_Ledger
1 day ago
i just hope this will end soon.
Reply
@shakilakram4444
1 day ago
I'm a subscribe....🎉❤🎉❤
Reply
@KevinBoneSosa
3 days ago
This didn't age well
1
Reply
@FrancoRossi-f2l
15 hours ago
Molto interessante ma anche molto prevedibile perché è già accaduto da sempre e sempre succederà
Reply
@ViktorFryn
1 day ago
Bring professor marandi
Reply
@Randhawa-in-USA
1 day ago
This is some nice podcast. Lisitening after Iran again blocked the Strait of Hormuz.
This man, the interviewee ain't no youtube fool. And the interview/podcast is done nice so that points stand out.
Reply
@coachellacoleman
1 day ago
My brother introduced me to your podcast, although very long and makes me grateful for ADHD/Narcolepsy medication, yet, unable to afford even a 2 week supply and learning still by seeing your podcasts. I have a deep appreciation for you and @GoodHangWithAmyPoehler - wish she'd be a guest! Much love from #CoachellaColeman
Reply
@toniheath8243
3 hours ago
Death of the troop then the draft 🤔
Reply
@chrisfullard5580
1 day ago
1:01.54 Now I'm paying $4,60 a gallon, here in the UK it's averaging £8, 69... 😱
Reply
@greekychill
3 days ago
professor doesn't know how the scales work? WTF?😳
1
Reply
@judithwake2757
12 hours ago
Can we get an UPDATE ????4/18/2026
Reply
@marciafonseca3306
1 day ago
Materia pelos democratas. Que tristeza ver que o que importa é só o poder.
1
Reply
@ASG-81
2 days ago
I’ve never seen a country full of people so doubtful of their own country’s standing, success, and future as the United States of today. Thank God their POTUS and his voters are patriotic and moving forward with things. Seems like much of the country is just entitled negative Nancy America haters. Interesting times. These sorts of interviews sound like little rich kids telling people who get their hands dirty for a living how difficult life is. These people gotta go hangout somewhere else, they might be contagious.
2
Reply
@jamesakbar-given5009
1 day ago (edited)
In New Zealand we changed from fist past the post like in US And UK. To MMP. This has really helped we still get significant shifts in policy with a change in government. But it is no were near as bad as it was before MMP. This time s a way to get more centrist representives.
Reply
@shazianoreen5560
11 hours ago
mujhe bohet afsos s kehna per raha he k Dunia 5000sal peeche jaygi
Reply
@GhgGhg-t5g
16 hours ago
เป็นเรื่องทื่ดีน่าสนใจครับ
Reply
@suxix7312
14 hours ago
24:57 Sounds like we have someone in power who really really really fucked up, bad.
Reply
@ytcommentacct
19 hours ago
Sure...
Reply
@Eddiegq22
21 hours ago (edited)
I find it hard to believe that the United States is weak, a country that was able to take out the entire Iranian leadership is not weak. American should finish it
No comments:
Post a Comment