How Russia Colonised Central Asia
Hikma History
45,941 views Jul 16, 2025 #historylovers #russia #turkic
Central Asia is not a region that stimulates significant conversation in the modern West. The dominance of medieval horse lords on the steppe, the centers of learning and culture in places like Samarkand and Herat, and even the existence of brilliant cities like Merv have since been largely forgotten in a Europeanized world. Instead, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan are better known for their positions in the Russosphere and not for their own histories. But just like everywhere else in the Islamic world, the Central Asian Khanates would soon find out the hard way how far they were behind the might of Europe. So, join me as I enquire how these great nations become part of the Russian sphere of influence in the first place? Was it possible that they could have avoided subjugation?
===
===
Intro
Central Asia is not a region that stimulates significant conversation in the modern West. The
dominance of medieval horse lords on the steppe, the centers of learning and culture in places like
Samarkand and Herat, and even the existence of brilliant cities like Merv have since been largely
forgotten in a Europeanized world. Instead, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan,
and Turkmenistan are better known for their positions in the Russosphere and not for their
own histories. As the age of modernity approached, these traditionally prosperous societies faced
the might of Russia’s mechanized army. Just like everywhere else in the Islamic world,
the Central Asian Khanates found out the hard way how far they were behind the might of Europe.
So, join me as I enquire how these great nations become part of the Russian sphere of influence
in the first place? Was it possible that they could have avoided subjugation? And
most importantly, how is it that a diverse region once filled with warriors, artists,
and scientists, can now be lumped into an area termed as the “Soviet stans?”
Ivan The Terrible Paves The Way
Central Asia has been hugely shaped by many different cultural influences, primarily of
Turkic, Iranian, Arab, and Mongolian people’s. The people of Turan, as it had been called by
other Iranian language-speakers for over 2000 years, struck fear among settled peoples for
their brutal and efficient raids through their unmatched use of mounted archery. Horsemanship
remained essential to controlling Central Asia well into the modern-period. After the conquests
of the Mongol Empire and its breakaway states, all powerful nomadic polities in Central Asia claimed
their legitimacy through relation to Genghis Khan. Their power would stagnate, however, especially
in relation to the meteoric rise of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent commercial and gunpowder
revolutions in the Christian kingdoms of Europe. European Christians, in particular, would very
soon begin to advance on the same Central Asians who had once subjugated them. In 1480,
the Russian prince, Ivan III, cast out the Golden Horde, an offshoot of the Great Mongol Empire,
and subsequently won de facto independence for Moscow. His grandson, the first Tsar
Ivan the Terrible moved to conquer the horse lords; in 1552, he decisively conquered the
Khanate of Kazan. Over 100 years of war between the two states had hitherto been
insufficient to determine a winner. This made the subjugation of Kazan an, understandably,
notable moment for contemporary geopolitics. Unimpressed, however, was Devlet I Giray. As
the Khan of Crimea since 1551, he had confronted the Russians before; the Khanate of Kazan had
previously been under Crimea’s sphere of influence before the Russian conquest. In 1556, the Russians
conquered the Astrakhan Khanate, another traditional ally of Crimea. The dynamic between
the Russian Tsardom and the Central Asian nomads had already fundamentally shifted at this time.
Not only did the Europeans clearly have momentum in the battle to control the steppe, Devlet found
himself struggling to balance relations with his Ottoman guarantors and allocating resources to
repel incursions from his new Cossack neighbors. After years of raids on Russian territory and
failed attempts to take Moscow, finally there was a breakthrough: the Crimean Khanate sacked
Moscow in 1571. Drawing on support from several Russian boyars who had defected, the nomads were
able to enter the city with relative ease and destroyed the city completely. For a moment,
it seemed as though Devlet would totally subdue Ivan and slam shut Russian entry into Central
Asia before it could really begin. Instead, a series of miscalculations on the part of Devlet
Giray culminated with a Russian force decisively expelling the Khanate’s forces from the region in
1572 at the Battle of Molodi. Though the Crimean Khanate may technically have not been located
within Central Asia, it had the pedigree of the esteemed Central Asian horse lords. Regardless,
it had become clear that significant advantages in firepower and fortifications rendered any
antiquated notion of the invincible horse archer moot. For the first time, the Russians had
unequivocal control of the entire River Volga, and the rest of Central Asia would soon follow suit.
The Kazakhs Lose Autonomy
Over the next century, Russia was too busy with its “Time of Troubles”, a period that was shaped
by domestic upheavals and foreign invasions. But that was decisively ended by Peter the Great, who
set Russia on aggressive course of conquest. In the heart of Asia, in the modern day northern half
of Xinjiang laid the Dzungar Khanate. Unbeknownst to its aging Khan, Tsewag Rabtan’s realm would
soon draw the attention of the Russian military machine. But he was unmoved by the fortresses
Russians were constructing within the northern reach of his territory. The Russian threat did
not loom nearly as large as that of the Chinese Qing Empire, with whom the Dzungars had already
been warring for a decade before he began the first of his 30 years as Khan. The Russian Tsar
Peter would learn the difficulty of conquest in 1716. Deep within unfriendly territory,
the commanding Russian officer had already taken shelter at a nearby fortress. Intending to alert
the Tsar he had insufficient manpower to engage the Dzungar military, his message could not be
delivered before Tsewang Rabtan laid siege to the fort, which fell after two months.
This would not be the last of the Russian failures in Central Asia. Alexander Bekovich-Cherkassky,
who was originally born a Muslim prince of Circassian origin, was tasked by Peter to survey
the Caspian region in 1717, ensuring the loyalty of the Khanate of Khiva along the way. The Khivan
Khan, Shir Ghazi, did not shy away from using force during his reign, harassing new arrivals
in the lower delta of the Amu Darya and crushing a slave rebellion. Bekovich-Cherkassky, ignorant of
Shir Ghazi Khan’s brutality, was slaughtered along with his men after the Khan feigned surrender to
separate the Russian troops. All officers were executed, and any other captured Russian survivors
were sold into slavery. The loss of a substantial number of his troops did not particularly concern
Peter. At the moment he had not yet ensured victory in the Great Northern War and hostilities
between Russia and the Ottoman Empire were increasing rapidly. Russian attempts at conquering
Central Asia had to be postponed for the time-being. Unfortunately for the Khans of Central
Asia, they could not forever go like-for-like in a brutal conflict against the Russian Empire.
This was becoming increasingly apparent to some Central Asian Khans. Abul Khair Khan, leader of
the junior jüz (division) of the Kazakhs, laid the groundwork for potential Kazakh resistance against
Russia in the future, though perhaps unknowingly. He galvanized the de facto independent middle and
senior jüz into a unified force under his command in the conflicts against Tsewang Rabtan’s Dzungar
Khanate. The united sentiment fizzled out, unfortunately for Khair Khan, but it would
make significant comebacks in the coming years. Khair Khan also saw the importance in maintaining
friendly relations with the Russians when possible, even swearing an oath of submission
to the Russian Empire in 1731. This led to some confusion: the Russians interpreted this as the
Khan accepting Russian suzerainty. The Khan interpreted this as a mutually beneficial
alliance that only nominally had the Russians as senior partners. However, upon the realization of
the misunderstanding, the Russian policy towards the Kazakhs actually stayed mostly the same. To
the Russians, access to trade further east and safety from devastating Kazakh raids were well
worth sacrificing more formal control over nomadic subjects. Ablai Khan, leader of the middle jüz
since the early-mid 18th century, was made Khan of the all Kazakhs in 1771. His reign saw the
zenith of the Kazakh Khanate – and was immediately followed by its downfall. Ablai Khan was a savant
at playing powers against each other. He courted alliances with the Russian and Qing Empires very
meticulously, and eventually received the support of both states against his own Kazakh rivals. His
diplomatic cunning even made him a symbol of Kazakh patriotism today. However, peace and
stable relations with Russia and the Qing came at the cost of a vicious internal strife within the
Khanate. Ablai Khan was a powerful and respected ruler among virtually all of his Kazakh subjects,
but his sons did not remotely command the same respect. Upon Ablai Khan’s death in 1781,
his sons squabbled amongst themselves for power. By the time Khanzada Wazi Sultan could succeed
his father, he had already lost control of the junior and senior jüz to the Russian Empire.
By 1822 the Kazakh lands were firmly under Russian control. Emperor Alexander I formally
abolished the Khanate of the middle jüz four years prior, stripping the traditional Kazakh
elites of even nominal influence. Furthermore, there were now concrete attempts to colonize
the Kazakh way-of-thinking: Alexander issued reforms intending to pressure the Kazakhs into
abandoning their nomadic ways. Though these largely failed, encroaching Russian settlers
and merchants continued to block Kazakh horsemen from grazing grounds, often leading to bloodshed.
The most protracted of the Kazakh rebellions, and perhaps most significant, was Kenesary’s
Rebellion. Kenesary, grandson of the revered Ablai Khan, began raiding Russian caravans in
1837. Hoping to re-form an independent Kazakh Khanate, he collected victories and supporters,
and even established himself as Khan of the Kazakhs in 1841 – he had succeeded,
if only briefly. The Russians eventually organized themselves and concentrated on Kenesary, who was
now hopelessly outgunned. Forced to flee, he died in battle against Kyrgyz tribesmen,
themselves seeking protection from Russia. Any chance of his rebellion succeeding died with
him. The hibernating Russian bear had now awoken, and none of the Central Asian tribes were safe.
The Kyrgyz Become The Next Victims
The Kyrgyz killers of Kenesary, for their part, had already mulled over their own
best methods to exercise agency. A kurultai among Kyrgyz tribesmen was called in 1842 to
determine the best way to counter the encroaching Russians and Kazakhs. They decided on unity:
Ormon Niyazbek uluu was named the first Khan of the Kara-Kyrgyz Khanate. Ormon Khan proved to be
a shrewd diplomat and a commanding leader; he very quickly centralized power in the Khanate,
uniting the Kyrgyz against external threats. When Kenesary launched his invasion into Kyrgyz land,
Ormon Khan asked for Russian aid. His request was denied, but even this he used to his advantage.
Defeating the Kazakhs in battle through clever usage of terrain, he captured Kenesary and
executed him. Then, he sent the final Kazakh Khan’s head to the Russians as a macabre
peace-offering demonstrating aligned interests. So impressed was Emperor Nicholas I that he
bestowed upon the Kyrgyz leaders gold medals and gold-embroidered robes. Ormon Khan, in particular,
was made a podpolkovnik (lieutenant-colonel) of the Russian Empire. He now had Russian legitimacy.
The Kyrgyz wielded great power under Ormon Khan, but the Khanate was only held together by him,
and Ormon Khan was not without rivals. Ormon Khan was defeated and captured by Bugu tribesmen in
1854. The Bugu chieftain, whose son was married to Ormon Khan’s daughter, wanted only to ransom
Ormon Khan in exchange for a guarantee that he would not be invaded again. Instead,
a Bugu rival of Ormon Khan personally speared him and left him to bleed out in his daughter’s arms.
Retributive attacks by Ormon Khan’s sons would spell defeat for the Bugu tribe but it was too
late for the Kara-Kyrgyz. Ormon Khan was dead and his son, even with great effort, would
never have been able to maintain unity. In 1867, thirteen years after the death of his father,
Umetaaly Ormon submitted to Russian authority. The death of Ormon Khan and the fall of his
Silk Road Cities Fall Rapidly
Kara-Kyrgyz Khanate would prove to be the point in which the Russian conquest became inevitable.
Multiple Central Asian polities that had held out for decades crumbled entirely in 1868.
The first was the Khanate of Kokand. Even prior to Umetaaly Ormon’s formal surrender,
Kokand’s grasp on independence was tenuous. The Russians had captured Tashkent in 1865, killing
the Khanate’s de facto leader in the struggle. Tashkent, then the wealthiest city in Central
Asia, was the primary source of Kokand’s power and revenue. With control of Tashkent ceded, the
Khanate’s only real lifeline was their ally and neighbor, the yet-unconquered Emirate of Bukhara.
However, any Bukharan forces sent in relief were smashed by the Russian soldiers. Unmolested,
the Russian army conquered the city of Khujand in 1866, thus cutting off Kokand from Bukhara
entirely. Bukhara did not long outlast Kokand. For many years, the emirate was led by Nasrullah
Khan. Emir Nasrullah was unafraid to make threatening overtures to European powers. In fact,
he ordered the beheadings of two British envoys, Arthur Connolly and Charles Stoddart, in 1842.
He also introduced sweeping reforms to Bukharan society, including in military modernization. The
effectiveness of his reforms is debated, but his reputation as a leader far outclasses his
successor’s. When Nasrullah Khan died in 1860, his son Muzaffar bin Nasrullah became Emir. The
reformed Bukharan military under Emir Muzaffar were little obstacle to the Russian forces.
Commanding the Bukharans himself, Emir Muzaffar was defeated at the Battle of Zerabulak on 14 June
1868, and his army was destroyed. Four days later, the Russians successfully captured the crucial
city of Samarkand, forcing swift negotiations from Emir Muzaffar. In only six months, two-thirds
of the infamous Uzbek states had fallen. The final Uzbek state, the Khanate of Khiva, had
historically proven to be especially challenging for would-be Russian conquerors. Aside from
Bekovich-Cherkassky’s disastrous 1717 campaign, an attempt in 1839 at installing a Russophile
khan was also unsuccessful. In 1873, however, the circumstances could not be more different. The
Khanate’s capital fell in June after a three-month campaign in which Russian officers were more
concerned about their personal rivals than the enemy Khivans. Muhammad Rahim II, the Khan of
Khiva, fled during the Russian advance to seek refuge among his Yomut allies. Upon the Russian
capture of Khiva, the Khan reluctantly returned to his territory to enter negotiations. He agreed
to end the Khivan slave trade and bequeath all military and foreign relations decisions to the
Tsar. Muhammad Rahim II, a renowned patron of the arts, thus signed away the independence of
the Khanate of Khiva. Perhaps it is fitting: the first target of Russian aggression that
offered the fiercest resistance fell quietly and unceremoniously, with the stroke of a poet’s pen.
Scattered resistance continued to annoy the Russians, however. On-and-off uprisings lasted
into the Soviet Era. A rebellion intended to reassert the Khanate of Kokand as independent
was crushed in 1876. The failed revolt prompted the Russian Empire to formally disestablish the
Khanate, much to the chagrin of the wealthy figurehead Muhammad Khudayar. All that was
left of the independent Central Asian polities were the divided Turkmen tribes. To their credit,
the Turkmens showed furious resistance: a Russian campaign in 1879 culminated
with the humiliating Russian retreat at the First Battle of Geok Tepe. But this
did not change the bleak reality – the Russian conquest was by now unquestionably inevitable.
In fact, the Russians were so confident of eventual victory that their presiding
commander was publicly maligned for unnecessarily slaughtering the Turkmen defenders just as much
for his gross waste of resources. Indeed, the final Turkmen stronghold surrendered
in January of 1881 at the Second Battle of Geok Tepe. Over 150 years after Peter the
Great’s failed attempt at conquering the Dzungars, Central Asia was united under a European banner.
In 2025, Central Asia is not as globally known for its past glories as it perhaps should be. However,
the peoples of Central Asia have not forgotten. Russian influence in the region is obviously
prevalent, but each of the Central Asian nations retains their own language. The spiritual
successors of the region’s Khanates are still devout Muslims. They view their ancestors who
resisted Russian imperialism not as pitiable and oppressed, but as national heroes to be
celebrated. And nomadism still maintains a role in Central Asian societies, even making a resurgence
in certain places. After nearly 200 years, the Russian Empire did, indeed, conquer Central Asia.
But over 100 years after the death of the final Russian Tsar, the Central Asians have not left.
No comments:
Post a Comment