2026-01-13

Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power : Cumings, Bruce: Amazon.com.au: Books

Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power : Cumings, Bruce: Amazon.com.au: Books





Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power 2010  by Bruce Cumings
(Author)
4.4 out of 5 stars (16)


From the author of The Origins of the Korean War, this book “faces West” to focus on the importance of the Pacific Coast in a boldly original reinterpretation of the American ascendency.

America is the first world power to inhabit an immense land mass open at both ends to the world’s two largest oceans―the Atlantic and the Pacific. This gives America a great competitive advantage often overlooked by Atlanticists, whose focus remains overwhelmingly fixed on America’s relationship with Europe. Bruce Cumings challenges the Atlanticist perspective in this innovative new history, arguing that relations with Asia influenced our history greatly.

Cumings chronicles how the movement westward, from the Middle West to the Pacific, has shaped America’s industrial, technological, military, and global rise to power. He unites domestic and international history, international relations, and political economy to demonstrate how technological change and sharp economic growth have created a truly bicoastal national economy that has led the world for more than a century. Cumings emphasizes the importance of American encounters with Mexico, the Philippines, and the nations of East Asia. The result is a wonderfully integrative history that advances a strong argument for a dual approach to American history incorporating both Atlanticist and Pacificist perspectives.
Read less


Report an issue with this product


Print length

672 pages

Product description

Review


"This is nevertheless one of the richest and most thoughtful books of American history I have read in a long time. . . . Cumings's book is both a timely and splendidly enjoyable read."--Dominic Sandbrook, Literary Review

--Dominic Sandbrook "Literary Review" (2/1/2010 12:00:00 AM)

"Dominion from Sea to Sea is both original and so well researched that I am in awe of all the work and how all that information has been integrated."--Daniel Chirot, University of Washington--Daniel Chirot

"Bruce Cumings traces American history along its inexorable drive westward, not merely to California and the limits of the continent's frontier but all the way to the Pacific Rim. He argues that such westward outreach has transformed America's character and helped to write its destiny, if not always for the good. . . . To make his case, Mr. Cumings . . . has produced a sprawling narrative, with shifting subthemes and flashes back and forth in time."--Arthur Herman, The Wall Street Journal--Arthur Herman "Wall Street Journal" (11/20/2009 12:00:00 AM)

"Bruce Cumings, in this beautifully written book . . . presents consistently stunning analysis of a mountain of dascinating data."--James I. Matray, American Historical Review--James I. Matray "American Historical Review"

"In a rich and colorful narrative Cumings sweeps the reader westward across time and space, recounting U.S. history from the perspective of the Pacific, with special attention to California on one side and East Asia on the other. From Jurassic trenches to Silicon Valley, he links the westering of people, technology, capitalism, and lifestyles to both domestic and foreign policy and concludes that whatever has happened to California (and hence to the country), America remains ascendant, even if it doesn't always know how to go about its global leadership. Agree or disagree, the story is irresistible."--Carol Gluck, Columbia University--Carol Gluck

"In this fascinating book, Bruce Cumings, whose scholarly work has focused on East Asia, shows that he can be just as adept and exciting in writing American history. Actually, it is a 'Pacificist' version of U.S. history. He shows that 'the American story' can never be fully told unless the Western parts of the United States as well as the Pacific region are incorporated. Describing in colorful detail developments in the Western states, including Texas, as well as the countries of East Asia, the author argues that these developments have been inseparable from the story of U.S. 'dominion from sea to sea, ' or its overwhelming military presence in 'the global archipelago.' The book fits into an emerging scholarly trend, to transcend narrowly focused national narratives and to deal with larger entities and in large frameworks such as Atlantic history, Europeanization, South Asian cosmopolitanism that have already enriched our understanding of modern global history. Few historians are as capable as Cumings of launching the field of Pacific history, and readers will find in this imaginatively conceived and earnestly but also humorously presented history much that will help them understand how the United States became globalized domestically and internationally, and what the future holds both for the nation and for the world."--Akira Iriye, Harvard University--Akira Iriye

"In this sprawling and vastly interesting book, Bruce Cumings reorients American history from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Stressing America's expansionist thrusts and violent, unilateralist impulses, he illuminates how adventurers and entrepreneurs, state and federal governments, corporations and universities all collaborated to transform the West and revitalize America, especially after the Great Depression of the 1930s and the attack on Pearl Harbor. Rarely has a historian so evocatively and insightfully integrated the settlement of America's frontiers with the history of migration, technology, trade, agriculture, race, the environment, and foreign relations. Dominion from Sea to Sea reshapes and reorients our thinking about our nation's history; it is a book that must be read and discussed; it inspires pride and shame."--Melvyn P. Leffler, University of Virginia--Melvyn Leffler

"This book is a history of how the West has transformed America. It looks at our country's rise in power from a Pacific view."--Theodore Scott, 1776 Magazine--Theodore Scott "1776 Magazine" (12/23/2009 12:00:00 AM)



"The story of America's rapid unrolling of the exceptionalist carpet is very well told by Mr. Cumings. . . .[He] writes marvelously. . . .A lively rattlebag of a history of the Pacific slope and how the Pacific Ocean came to be an American Lake."--Economist

-- "Economist"

Selected as one of the Atlantic's 25 Best Books of the Year 2009 -- "Atlantic Monthly"
About the Author
Bruce Cumings is chair of the History Department at the University of Chicago and author of the award-winning book The Origins of the Korean War.

Top
About this itemSimilarQuestionsReviewsDominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power

Product details
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Yale University Press
Publication date ‏ : ‎ 28 September 2010
Edition ‏ : ‎ 1st
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Print length ‏ : ‎ 672 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0300168004
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0300168006
Item weight ‏ : ‎ 898 g
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 14.78 x 3.56 x 23.11 cm
Best Sellers Rank: 749,587 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)395 in Western U.S. History
1,450 in Political Economy
1,555 in Economic Conditions (Books)
Customer Reviews:
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars (16)




From other countries


thomas
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing
Reviewed in the United States on 2 July 2025
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
An amazing book in its scope and detail.
Report


Alexandre Dube
2.0 out of 5 stars Missing the point
Reviewed in Canada on 19 May 2013
Verified Purchase
Bruce Cumings is able to write a vivid English and to speak directly to the reader... Maybe too much, as a matter of fact. He proclaims to do a "Pacifist" (i.e.: in opposition to the Atlanticist history) reading of the USA and the Pacific world. In reality, he only does a history of the US West, mostly California, and speak about Pacific world only to assert the importance of the US West in the world. He uses unnecessary examples and stories that add weight to the book (like the weather in June at Seattle, or a description of the first car he bought) and confuses (and bores) the reader.


If you're interested in a history of the West (and not the Pacific world, as Cumings pledged to write about) and especially of California, you'll find this book very interesting, but unnecessary long. If you were looking for an equivalent of Atlanticist history, but for the West (as I was), you'll be deeply disappointed and bored.
Report


M. Swanson
5.0 out of 5 stars A Great Book
Reviewed in the United States on 25 January 2011
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
This is a great book. 10 years ago I was a graduate history student and found his second volume of his Origins of the Korean War series one of the best explanations and overviews of US foreign relations in the period after World War II and start of the Cold War. The book had a big impact on my thinking along with Carrol Quigley, Franz Schurman, and Charles Beard.


When I saw Cumings had a new book about the US and its in place in the world I was excited when I ordered it and the book exceeded my expectations. This book is written to fit more of a non-academic and mainstream audience than some of his other books so hopefully will reach a wide audience. It gives a great view of how the US got to be so big and powerful by focusing on the West Coast of the US from its first settlement to today and the several booms if went through - the gold rush, World War II, cold war military industrial complex, and the Silicon Valley. It also present a new way of thinking about foreign policy by creating a dichotomy between Atlanatic leaning internationalism and westward leaning thinking.


There is much more to the book than just this. This is a great book worth your time to read.
13 people found this helpful
Report


hudunit333
3.0 out of 5 stars First the good (actually excellent)
Reviewed in the United States on 28 July 2014
Verified Purchase
I want to give this book 5 stars and 1 star for different reasons. First the good (actually excellent): I really enjoyed learning about the history and development of California and the other western states and the hypothesis that Prof. Cumings develops throughout the book about a western facing future. It's jam packed with very intersting facts and personalities.


But from the beginning it seemed to me to be heavily, maybe overly, belabored with the issue of racism. OK, we all know about the treatment of Chinese and Japanese on the west coast and racism everywhere in America until the last several decades so that is absolutely part of the story . But then I got to the 1970's and 1980's (the part that I lived through as an adult and am familiar with) and it goes on to state that Nixon and Reagan were backed by money from the same bigoted old money and appealed to those holding the same old throwback beliefs. Now I don't know if any of the financial supporters are/were bigots or not, but I do know that that's not how they won elections.


I love to read history but I try to stay away from books where the author lets his politics get in the way of telling an accurate story. That's not history, It's propaganda. I will hold my nose and finish the book with hope, but I will now have to wonder if and how much of the story that I'm not familiar with was similarly tainted. And how is this interpreted by someone who is in their twenties and who doesn't have first hand knowledge. Also Prof Cumings states that Reagan and others weren't honest about there limited government stance because they supported a strong military and increased military spending and totally ignores the massive growth in government social spending since the 1960's. This is not a balanced view.


I don't like to make political comments on a history book but if the author is going to color history with his politics it's fair game. It's a real shame as there must have been a lot of work put into an otherwise excellent book. Just beware.
4 people found this helpful
Report


Biz Reader
5.0 out of 5 stars Compelling look at the connections of civilization
Reviewed in the United States on 27 June 2012
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
I read this book first when it was released in 2010 and have come back to it time and time again since. I am re-reading it again, as I prepare to take my family on a 10-day trip to California.


The ability of Cumings to make connections across continents and describe how the American West facilitates human integration is remarkable.


I am awed by this book and would recommend anyone interested in global affairs to put it on their shelf and refer to it often.
4 people found this helpful
Report


JLA
5.0 out of 5 stars The book safely arrived as described.
Reviewed in the United States on 1 May 2021
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Thanks.
Report


Heidi
5.0 out of 5 stars Quick service
Reviewed in the United States on 14 March 2017
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
Product as described
Report


Jim Phelan
4.0 out of 5 stars USA Hegemony
Reviewed in the United States on 20 April 2011
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
This is a big-picture book. How did the USA make its way to economic, military and cultural global hegemony?


Bruce Comings describes the westward expansion of the United States and how it didn't stop at the Golden Gate, but continued on out into the Pacific Rim. He stresses the active involvement of the Federal government in the growth of California and other western states. The future of USA prosperity and global influence can be glimpsed by looking westward towards the Pacific Rim and eastward not towards Europe.


Based on a decade of historical research, here are 500 pages filled with interesting facts and solid interpretations of US history; this book is well worth reading!
6 people found this helpful
Report




Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews


Nathan Albright
4,488 reviews160 followers

Follow
September 9, 2023
Dominion From Sea To Sea: Pacific Ascendancy And American Power, by Bruce Cumings

This book aims to do for the Pacific Ocean and especially for the Chinese-American relationship what Atlantic historians typically do for the Atlantic Ocean and the Anglo-American friendship. There are a lot of things that keep this book from being as enjoyable or worthwhile as it could be, or as seminal as the author wants it to be. For one, the author's pro-Communist China agenda, and general bias towards radical leftists, makes this book a terribly inaccurate read and terribly biased against Republicans, especially conservative ones. For another, this book suffers terribly from insecurity about the status of the West Coast when compared to the elite circles on the East Coast. The author takes a lot of snipes at cities like Tampa, for example, which are quite gratuitous and unnecessary since the author doesn't have anything to say about the South except for Texas, which the author views as part of the west, as the author does with Chicago even though it is geographically part of the Midwest. This book, furthermore, would have been a lot better if the author had more to say about the Pacific Ocean as a means of transportation and movement of peoples. One of the things that makes the history of Atlantic historians so compelling is the way that the movement of goods and people and ideas around the ocean helps to join together a complex world made up of the native inhabitants of North and South America, Europe, the Mediterranean Sea, and Africa. The Pacific is a sprawling region, but the author seems more interested in criticizing American attitudes towards land and other people, and not so much about exploring the Pacific Ocean as a geographic region itself.

This book is a bit more than 500 pages of material, divided into five parts and 17 chapters. The author begins with a preface and acknowledgements. This is followed by the first part of the book that discusses the frontier of the mind, with an unoriginal discussion of the machine in the garden (1) as well as the finding of California (2). This is followed by a discussion of manifest destiny which includes the five easy pieces of America's continental expansion (3), a talk about gold, the continental railroad, and Texas (4), as well as America's increasingly muscular foreign policy after the Civil War (5). This is followed by a look at the peopling of the West, with a talk about the Pacific Northwest (6), Hawaii and Alaska (7), as well as the experience of Asians in the Pacific states (8). The author then spends three chapters talking about California's protean nature, including chapters on crops (9), water and power (10), and Southern California in particular (11). The fifth and final part of the book looks at the author's view of a supposed tipping point in the fate of the West, with chapters on the development of the West (12), the rise of Western Republicanism (13), the non-California west in the postwar era (14), America's Pacific empire--ignoring Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands as imperial territories (15), Silicon Valley (16), and a conclusion on the American century (17). The book then ends with an appendix where the author explains his Marxist perspective, notes, bibliography, and index.

Ultimately, this book is a highly tiresome read. Over and over again the author demonstrates his bias by sniping at Republicans, showing contempt towards those who take the Bible seriously, and engages in blatant political favoritism, even thinking that anti-Communism was a mistake and that the United States should see China's contemporary rulers as kindred spirits in terms of their approach to politics and the environment. Given the problems that exist between the United States and China at the moment, it appears unlikely that the author's efforts will be successful in terms of his political agenda. Even the author's desire to celebrate the West as a potential place for radical leftist politics fails because the author has nothing to say about the reality of those politics when they have been practiced in the contemporary West. He correctly notes the way that Oregonians despise Californians (one of their more noble qualities, it must be admitted), but has nothing to say about the disastrous rule of Democrats over the West and the way that it has led to an explosive problem in homelessness and the flight of many people to other regions to escape the ills of Democratic rule. Ultimately, this book falls short in its intents to provide a Pacific history to rival that of Atlantic historians, but it does manage to provide a long-winded screed about the author's own political biases and pro-CCP propaganda efforts.
challenge-2023
1 like
Like
Comment




Greg Kelly
11 reviews

Follow
December 29, 2023
Interesting history of manifest destiny in the U.S. and how many of the historical undercurrents from that time are reflected in our current foreign policy. I learned a lot from this book but also felt that it lacked focus. Bruce Cummings also feels like the kind of professor who you think is really cool at first but also wants to constantly remind you of how smart he is. Could have been a bit shorter.
Show more
1 like
Like
Comment



Boyd Cothran
81 reviews3 followers

Follow
June 6, 2021
A re-narration of American history with a focus on explaining the rise of an American empire in the Pacific. It's fine, but the author's framing is relentless and at times silly. The book also suffers from a lack of engagement with America's involvement in Latin America. The author insists that his book is focused on the North Pacific. This seems insufficient for a book about Pacific Ascendancy and American Power. That said, it is enjoyably written and contains many fine stories.
read-2021
Like
Comment



Tommy
338 reviews40 followers

Follow
May 29, 2020
The Asiatic mode of production? California was just an early asian tiger economy? Interesting anti-Atlanticist reading of American development. Cites numerous movies from Western to Eastern directors.
america history
Like
Comment



Iahc
5 reviews1 follower

Follow
August 21, 2010
This is a dense history of the American West, although the author focuses mostly on California and Texas, with less space devoted to Oregon and Washington. I originally thought this book was going to be about the rise of Pacific Rim nations vis-a-vis America based on the title, so the emphasis on America was a surprise. That being said, the book is a fascinating portrait of how these four Western states and their key industries developed. I did not know of the importance that the defense industry and government spending on defense contracts played in the development of Silicon Valley and its companies until I read this book. That is but one of the fascinating revelations. The writing can be hard to follow at times; there are frequent references to movies, especially "Chinatown," which is an apparent favorite of the author. If you like the movie, then perhaps its oft-repeated references will delight you. If you don't, the dread at encountering yet another "Chinatown" movie reference can be palpable. The author does not write about all of the Western states equally, as I mentioned, and even in his portrait of California, there were more pages devoted to Los Angeles, which seems to hold a special place in the author's heart, than other parts of the state. The book thus seems to be a deeply personal endeavor for Bruce Cumings and at times his choices can seem quirky as opposed to essential. I did not share his enthusiasm for all of his topics, but I did find the book revelatory on many fronts. Cumings ultimately argues that America's "Atlantic" perspective--that is, its tendency culturally and politically to look toward the U.K. and Europe from the vantage point of the East Coast--is passé, hence his emphasis on "Pacific Ascendancy." In this sense, Cumings is persuasive. I do think America's West Coast and Pacific perspective will be increasingly important in the 21st century.

Like
Comment




Sarah Milne
119 reviews13 followers

Follow
May 8, 2010
On page 419 Cumings writes: “The archipelago of empire has its domestic expression not just in Southern California, but throughout the west.” That's believable, and he makes a good case for it, but he so strongly favors California as the all-consuming expression of that empire that I started to feel the book should have been called "Californian Ascendancy and American Power." The second to last chapter, dealing with Californian based technologies, was like wading through one of Dantes' levels of hell. If I were not so obsessive I would have skipped it and moved on to the much more informative and purposive final chapter. Still, I think this is an especially pertinent and timely book, and I strongly agree with the proposition that it is time to steer away from the Atlanticist (sp?) view and give due consideration to Pacific contributions and developments. That thesis is the only reason it gets three stars, because that dang tech chapter about killed me.
Show more
Like
Comment



RYU Cheol
8 reviews2 followers

Follow
December 10, 2013
Reading the finishing part of this book, I realized that this book is on China or East Asia rather than California. He seems to be pretty sure that there would not be a war between China and US. Because China had been very cautious on the conflicts, as it had been in Korea and Vietnam. He came out with a conclusion that Chinese think they could not defeat the others with military force but the power of the culture. He complains Americans do not care what are happening in Pacific area, which is his toy, but just care for the Atlantic parties which had lost prime times. He is saying to Americans there will not be an ultimate war between G2 and urges them to relieve the tension in East Asia. But I don't know Koreans would be happy or not with the suggestion. Still Koreas are in the war and the south likes to rely on the big brother who protected him.
bruce-cumings
Like
Comment



!Tæmbuŝu
1,511 reviews

Follow
Want to readMay 15, 2010
KOBOBOOKS
history united-states
Like
Comment



George
133 reviews

Follow
October 24, 2010
Great... Exceptionally readable. Best primer for why the Navy is where it is in the Pacific.

Like
Comment




Vaibhav Verma
12 reviews2 followers

Follow
April 26, 2017
Long, abundant with knowledge, and excellent prose. The book is about the rise of America as a Pacific power. The traditional approach in narrating the rise of American has an Atlanticist emphasis, focusing on the relation of America with its European counterparts. From my knowledge, Cumings does the most extensive analysis of America's rise on the other side of the continent. And he does an absolutely fantastic job. I learned a ton about the rise of Western cities such as Los Angeles and San Francisco, the relationship between America and its Pacific partners (i.e. Japan, China), how World War II (and the events after WWII) initiated a "militarily Keynesian" model that the US government has followed profusely, and much more. It's a very satisfying book for anyone interested in history. Highly recommend!

Like
Comment

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews
===

===

브루스 커밍스의 2010년 저작 <Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power>(바다에서 바다로: 태평양의 부상과 미국의 힘)에 대한 1,000자 분량의 요약과 평론을 준비했습니다.

요청하신 대로 요약과 평론 본문은 <해라체>(반말)로 작성하였으며, 강조 표시에는 별표 대신 꺾쇠 괄호< >를 사용했습니다.


<Dominion from Sea to Sea> 요약 및 평론

1. 서론: 잃어버린 반쪽의 역사를 찾아서

미국의 주류 역사 서술은 오랫동안 <대서양 중심주의(Atlanticism)>에 갇혀 있었다. 워싱턴 D.C.와 뉴욕, 그리고 아이비리그 대학들을 중심으로 형성된 엘리트들은 미국을 유럽 문명의 연장선으로 파악했고, 외교 정책의 핵심을 대서양 횡단 동맹에 두었다. 하지만 브루스 커밍스는 이 책에서 고개를 돌려 서쪽을 보라고 주문한다. 그는 미국의 진정한 제국적 힘의 원천과 현대적 정체성은 대서양이 아닌 <태평양>에서 형성되었다고 주장한다. 이 책은 서부 개척 시대부터 현대의 실리콘 밸리에 이르기까지, 미국이 어떻게 대륙을 넘어 태평양을 내해(內海)로 삼는 거대 제국으로 거듭났는지를 추적한 대체 역사서이자 지정학적 분석서다.

2. 요약: 서부 확장이 낳은 제국

가. 명백한 운명(Manifest Destiny)의 완성은 태평양이다 기존 역사학은 미국의 <명백한 운명>을 서부 해안 도달로 끝맺음하곤 한다. 그러나 커밍스는 이것이 캘리포니아 해변에서 멈추지 않았음을 강조한다. 19세기 말, 미국은 이미 증기선과 철도를 통해 캘리포니아를 넘어 하와이, 필리핀, 그리고 중국 시장으로 팽창하고 있었다. 커밍스는 미국이 건국 초기부터 대서양 공화국이 아닌, 대륙을 가로질러 태평양으로 향하는 제국을 꿈꿨다고 분석한다. 서부 확장은 단순한 영토 확장이 아니라, 아시아 시장과 자원을 향한 자본주의적 팽창의 서막이었다.

나. 전쟁이 만든 국가: 태평양의 군산복합체 책의 중반부는 제2차 세계대전과 냉전이 미국 서부, 특히 캘리포니아와 워싱턴 주를 어떻게 변모시켰는지에 집중한다. 커밍스는 현대 미국의 힘이 <군산복합체(Military-Industrial Complex)>에 기반한다고 보며, 그 핵심 기지가 바로 서부 해안이라고 지적한다. 진주만 공습 이후 태평양 전쟁은 캘리포니아를 거대한 병영이자 공장으로 만들었다. 샌디에이고의 해군 기지, 시애틀의 보잉(Boeing), 로스앤젤레스의 항공우주 산업은 모두 이 시기에 급성장했다. 이러한 <전쟁 국가(Warfare State)> 시스템은 냉전을 거치며 고착화되었다. 미국은 일본, 한국, 대만, 필리핀, 호주를 잇는 거대한 군사 기지 네트워크, 즉 <제국의 군도(Archipelago of Empire)>를 구축했다. 커밍스는 이 네트워크가 미국이 전 세계에 힘을 투사하는 실제적인 물리적 기반이며, 이는 동부의 외교관들이 아니라 서부의 군인과 기술자들에 의해 유지되었다고 설명한다.

다. 실리콘 밸리와 정보 제국 군사 기술의 발달은 현대 정보 기술(IT) 산업의 토대가 되었다. 커밍스는 실리콘 밸리의 부상을 자유로운 히피 문화나 차고의 천재들만의 이야기로 보는 시각을 배격한다. 대신 스탠퍼드 대학과 국방부의 긴밀한 협력, 냉전 시기의 막대한 군사 R&D 투자가 인터넷과 마이크로칩 혁명을 낳았음을 상기시킨다. 즉, 오늘날 미국의 소프트 파워와 경제적 패권인 <정보 기술> 역시 태평양을 향한 군사적 팽창 전략의 부산물이라는 것이다.

라. 대서양 엘리트의 맹점 커밍스는 딘 애치슨이나 존 F. 케네디 같은 동부 엘리트들이 얼마나 태평양의 중요성을 간과했거나, 혹은 오해했는지를 비판한다. 그들은 유럽 우선주의에 빠져 아시아의 복잡한 민족주의와 혁명적 열기를 이해하지 못했고, 이는 한국 전쟁과 베트남 전쟁이라는 비극적 오판으로 이어졌다. 반면, 더글러스 맥아더 같은 인물은 (비록 위험했지만) 미국의 미래가 아시아에 있음을 직관적으로 알고 있었던 <태평양 주의자>의 전형으로 묘사된다.

3. 평론: 탁월한 지정학적 통찰과 논쟁적 시각

가. 독창적인 지정학적 프레임 <Dominion from Sea to Sea>의 가장 큰 미덕은 <방향의 전환>이다. 미국사를 동부 13개 식민지의 확장이 아니라, 서부와 태평양의 역류로 해석함으로써 독자들에게 완전히 새로운 지도를 그려준다. 특히 캘리포니아와 서부 해안이 단순한 <선샤인 스테이트>가 아니라, 미국의 제국적 힘을 생산하고 투사하는 거대한 엔진이라는 분석은 매우 설득력이 있다. 실리콘 밸리의 기원을 군산복합체와 연결하는 대목은 기술 낙관주의에 빠진 현대인들에게 서늘한 현실 감각을 제공한다.

나. 구조적 분석의 힘 커밍스는 인물 중심의 야사(野史)보다는 구조와 물적 토대에 집중한다. 철도, 항구, 군사 기지, 그리고 자본의 흐름이 어떻게 외교 정책을 결정했는지를 보여주는 유물론적 접근은 미국의 대외 정책이 <자유와 민주주의 확산>이라는 이상보다는 <시장의 확보와 군사적 우위>라는 현실적 목표에 의해 움직여왔음을 적나라하게 드러낸다. 이는 오늘날 미중 갈등을 이해하는 데에도 유효한 틀을 제공한다. 미국이 왜 그토록 필사적으로 태평양의 주도권을 놓지 않으려 하는지, 그 역사적이고 구조적인 뿌리를 이해할 수 있기 때문이다.

다. 비판적 검토: 과도한 결정론과 반감 하지만 이 책에도 약점은 존재한다. 브루스 커밍스는 한국 전쟁 수정주의 학파의 거두로서, 냉전 시기 미국의 역할에 대해 매우 비판적인 입장을 견지해 왔다. 이러한 성향은 이 책에서도 여실히 드러나는데, 때로는 미국의 팽창을 지나치게 악의적이거나 탐욕적인 것으로만 묘사하여 균형을 잃는 듯한 느낌을 준다. 또한, <대서양 대 태평양>이라는 이분법적 구도가 지나치게 도식적이라는 비판도 가능하다. 동부 엘리트들 역시 20세기 중반 이후 아시아의 중요성을 인지하고 개입해왔으며, 서부의 독자성을 지나치게 강조하다 보니 미국이라는 국가의 통합된 정책 결정 과정을 간과하는 경향이 있다. 책의 구성 또한 연대기적 서술보다는 에세이 모음집에 가까워, 흐름이 다소 산만하게 느껴질 수 있다.

4. 결론: 태평양 시대를 예견한 예언서

그럼에도 불구하고 이 책은 21세기가 <태평양의 세기>가 될 것임을, 그리고 미국은 이미 오래전부터 태평양 국가였음을 웅변하는 강력한 저작이다. 오바마 행정부의 <피벗 투 아시아(Pivot to Asia)>나 현재의 인도-태평양 전략이 나오기 훨씬 전부터, 커밍스는 미국의 무게 중심이 서쪽으로 이동했음을 갈파했다. 미국이라는 제국의 속살을 해부하고 싶은 독자, 그리고 현대 국제 정세의 핵심 무대가 된 태평양의 지정학적 기원을 알고 싶은 독자에게 이 책은 필수적인 독서 경험을 제공한다. 역사는 승자의 기록이라고 하지만, 커밍스는 그 승자가 감추고 싶어 했던 서쪽 뒷마당의 거친 풍경을 우리에게 똑똑히 보여준다.


브루스 커밍스의 관점을 요약해 드렸습니다. 이 책은 미국을 바라보는 시각을 <동부/대서양>에서 <서부/태평양>으로 뒤집어 준다는 점에서 매우 흥미롭습니다.

혹시 이 책에서 다루는 내용 중 '한국 전쟁'이나 '한반도'와 직접적으로 관련된 커밍스의 구체적인 서술 부분이 더 궁금하신가요?

===

===

<한국어: 1,000단어 내외 요약+평론>

<0) 서지 한 줄 정리>

사용자께서 “2010”으로 적으셨지만, 초판 서지에는 2009년(예: Yale University Press 표기)으로 나오는 경우가 많고, 2010년은 서평/온라인 공개 시점이나 판형(페이퍼백 등)과 겹쳐 보입니다.

<1) 요약>

브루스 커밍스의 <Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power>는 미국사를 “대서양(유럽-미국)” 중심으로 읽어 온 익숙한 시선을 뒤집고, “태평양을 향해 서쪽을 바라보는(faces West)” 관점에서 미국의 부상과 권력 형성을 다시 그리려는 거대한 ‘재배치’ 프로젝트다. 책의 출발점은 간단하다. 미국은 두 개의 거대한 대양(대서양·태평양)에 동시에 열려 있는 광대한 대륙국가이고, 이 지리적 조건과 서부로의 팽창이 미국의 산업·기술·군사·세계적 영향력을 만드는 핵심 동력이었다는 주장이다. 커밍스는 특히 “대서양주의자(Atlanticists)”가 유럽과의 관계에 과도하게 고정돼 왔다고 비판하며, 미국의 역사 형성에서 아시아 및 태평양 연안의 의미를 전면에 놓는다.

이 책의 큰 줄기는 “중서부에서 태평양으로 이어지는 서진(西進)의 연쇄”가 어떻게 미국의 ‘국가형태’를 바꿔왔는가이다. 커밍스는 서진을 단순한 개척 서사가 아니라, 국가권력·자본주의·기술체제·대학/연구·군사 인프라가 한데 얽혀 만들어낸 장기 프로젝트로 다룬다. Yale의 소개문이 요약하듯, 그는 서진이 미국의 “산업적·기술적·군사적·세계적 부상”을 형성했고, 국내사와 국제사, 국제관계, 정치경제를 통합해 설명하려 한다.

또 하나의 핵심은 “양안(兩岸) 경제(bicoastal national economy)”라는 관점이다. 커밍스는 기술 변화와 급격한 경제성장이 미국을 진정한 의미의 ‘양안 국가경제’로 만들었고, 이것이 1세기 이상 세계적 주도권과 연결돼 왔다고 주장한다. 이때 태평양 연안—특히 캘리포니아—은 단지 ‘한 지역’이 아니라, 미국의 산업·혁신·군사 및 대외정책이 결합되는 중심 무대로 제시된다.

태평양 관점에서 미국의 권력을 설명하기 위해, 커밍스가 강조하는 만남의 지점들은 멕시코, 필리핀, 그리고 동아시아 국가들과의 관계다. 그는 미국의 서부 확장과 태평양 세계(특히 동아시아)와의 접촉이 상호작용하면서 미국의 정체성과 정책 선택을 형성했다고 본다. 즉 “미국의 대외관계”가 국내 발전의 부록이 아니라, 서부 개발·이주·기술·무역·군사 전략과 한 덩어리였다는 것이다.

이 책은 한두 가지 인과로 정리되는 단정한 이론서라기보다, 방대한 소재를 동원해 “태평양-서부-미국 권력”을 한 서사로 꿰려는 통합사에 가깝다. Yale의 추천사(인용문)는 이 작업이 이주, 기술, 무역, 농업, 인종, 환경, 외교를 한 흐름으로 엮는 방식이라고 말한다. 그 결과, 미국의 부상은 워싱턴의 외교만으로도, 월가의 자본만으로도, 유럽과의 관계만으로도 설명되지 않고, 서부 개발과 태평양의 연결 속에서 다시 읽히게 된다.

<2) 평론: 강점>

  1. <미국사 “지도”를 다시 그리는 힘>
    이 책의 가장 큰 성취는 “대서양-유럽 중심의 익숙한 도식”에 균열을 내고, 태평양·아시아·서부를 미국사 설명의 중심축으로 끌어올린다는 점이다. 실제로 JSTOR에 실린 한 평은 이 책이 태평양 서사의 “중심성”을 끌어올리는 데 성공했다고 평가한다.

  2. <국내사·국제사·정치경제의 결합>
    커밍스는 서부 개척을 낭만화하지 않고, 기술·성장·국가인프라·군사와 결부된 정치경제로 해석한다. “서부의 내부 발전”과 “태평양을 둘러싼 외부 관계”가 서로를 만들어 왔다는 통합적 시각은, 지역사/외교사/경제사를 따로 읽을 때 놓치기 쉬운 연결을 보여준다.

  3. <현대 미국 권력의 ‘지리적 기원’에 대한 집요함>
    미국의 권력은 제도나 이념만이 아니라 ‘공간의 조직’과 깊이 관련되어 있다는 점(대륙 규모, 양 대양 접근성, 연안 경제의 결합)을 전면화한다. “미국이 왜 이런 형태의 세계권력이 되었는가”를 지리·산업·군사·대외관계의 접점에서 묻는 방식은, 특히 동아시아/태평양을 연구하는 독자에게 생산적이다.

<3) 평론: 한계와 비판적 독서 포인트>

  1. <‘모든 것을 넣는’ 통합사의 비용: 산만함과 과잉 일반화 위험>
    이 책은 장점이자 약점으로 ‘sprawling(방대하고 뻗어 나가는)’ 성격을 갖는다(학술 서평에서도 책의 규모와 성격을 그렇게 소개한다). 통합사가 주는 통찰이 큰 만큼, 개별 쟁점(예: 특정 시기 미·일/미·중 관계, 멕시코와의 구체적 국면, 필리핀의 내부 정치)을 깊게 파고드는 전문 연구와 비교하면, 세부가 “큰 틀을 위한 재료”로 처리되는 대목이 생길 수 있다.

  2. <캘리포니아/서부 중심성이 ‘다른 중심성’을 가릴 가능성>
    태평양 관점을 세우는 과정에서, 대서양·유럽 혹은 미국 동부의 역할이 ‘과소평가’될 수 있고, 반대로 캘리포니아가 너무 많은 설명을 떠안는 듯 보일 수도 있다. 이는 책의 전략적 선택이지만, 독자는 “대서양을 지웠기 때문에 태평양이 보인다”는 효과와 “대서양도 여전히 중요하다”는 반론을 함께 의식할 필요가 있다.

  3. <아시아를 ‘관계의 무대’로만 볼 위험>
    커밍스의 목표가 ‘미국 권력’의 기원을 설명하는 데 있는 만큼, 동아시아 사회들의 내부 동학(계급, 국가형성, 제국 경험, 민족주의)의 복잡성이 미국 서사의 배경으로 밀릴 수 있다. 동아시아 연구 관점에서는, 이 책이 제공하는 “미국 중심의 태평양 재구성”을 출발점으로 삼되, 현지사 중심 연구로 균형을 잡는 것이 좋다.

<4) 결론>

<Dominion from Sea to Sea>는 “미국 권력의 탄생과 전개”를 태평양과 서부에서 다시 보게 만드는 야심찬 통합사다. 대서양 중심 도식을 흔들어 미국사를 재배치하는 데 강력하지만, 그만큼 방대한 통합이 낳는 산만함과 지역/현지의 세부가 희생되는 위험도 함께 가진다. 핵심 가치는 ‘정답’이라기보다, 미국과 태평양의 관계를 읽는 <새 좌표계>를 제공한다는 데 있다.


<English: ~900–1,000 words summary + critique>

<0) Quick bibliographic note>

You wrote “2010,” but many listings treat the book as a 2009 Yale University Press publication; 2010 often appears as the date of major reviews or online publication.

<1) Summary>

Bruce Cumings’s <Dominion from Sea to Sea: Pacific Ascendancy and American Power> is an ambitious reinterpretation of U.S. history that asks readers to “face West” and rethink American power from the standpoint of the Pacific Coast rather than the Atlantic seaboard. The book starts from a structural proposition: the United States is uniquely positioned as a continental-scale power open to both the Atlantic and the Pacific, and this geographic fact—combined with the long process of westward expansion—helped generate America’s industrial, technological, military, and ultimately global ascendancy. Cumings explicitly challenges an “Atlanticist” lens that privileges U.S.–Europe relations and argues that America’s encounters with Asia and the Pacific world have been equally formative.

From there, Cumings builds a sweeping narrative in which westward movement is not simply a frontier romance but a sustained political-economic project. In the Yale description, he “chronicles” how movement from the Midwest to the Pacific shaped America’s rise across multiple dimensions (industry, technology, the military, and global influence). He aims to fuse domestic and international history with international relations and political economy—insisting that the internal development of the U.S. and its external projection of power are best understood together rather than as separate stories.

A major concept in the book is the emergence of a “truly bicoastal national economy.” Cumings links technological change and rapid economic growth to the integration of America’s two ocean-facing coasts into a single national system that, in his view, has underpinned U.S. leadership for more than a century. Within that bicoastal framing, the Pacific Coast—especially California—becomes a central stage where innovation, capital, state capacity, and military infrastructure interlock. The Pacific is therefore not a peripheral theater but a core arena through which American modernity and power were made.

Cumings also highlights specific “contact zones” that matter for a Pacific-centered U.S. history: Mexico, the Philippines, and the nations of East Asia. The argument is that U.S. domestic development on the western half of the continent and U.S. foreign relations across the Pacific were mutually constitutive. In other words, what Americans built at home—settlement patterns, industrial capacity, technological systems, universities and research, military bases and logistics, port economies and trade networks—cannot be cleanly separated from the geopolitical relationships and conflicts that unfolded in the Pacific world.

Stylistically and structurally, this is not a neat, hypothesis-testing monograph. It is a large, integrative synthesis that draws on many domains. Even Yale’s “praise” material describes it as unusually evocative in integrating frontier settlement with migration, technology, trade, agriculture, race, the environment, and foreign relations. The point of this breadth is cumulative: by the end, “America’s rise” appears less like an East-Coast-to-Europe story and more like a continent-and-Pacific story in which the West’s transformation and the Pacific’s connections are indispensable.

<2) Strengths>

  1. <Redrawing the map of American history>

The book’s most distinctive contribution is conceptual: it forces a reorientation. Many readers know the classic Atlantic narrative (Europe, immigration, finance, NATO, the “special relationship”), but Cumings asks what becomes visible when we treat the Pacific as equally central. A JSTOR review snippet captures this strength by calling the work “iconoclastic” and praising its success in elevating the Pacific story’s centrality to America’s rise.

  1. <Integration across scales and fields>

By deliberately mixing domestic history, international relations, and political economy, Cumings encourages readers to connect infrastructure, technology, and regional development to diplomacy and war. The “bicoastal economy” thesis is one expression of that integrative ambition: economic geography and technological change are not background conditions but active components of state power.

  1. <A productive lens for Pacific and East Asian studies readers>

For readers focused on East Asia, the book offers a helpful inversion: it treats U.S.–Asia relations as long-running and structurally significant rather than episodic “foreign policy chapters.” Even if one disagrees with parts of Cumings’s emphasis, the Pacific-first framing can generate new research questions and comparisons.

<3) Limitations and critical reading points>

  1. <The cost of synthesis: sprawl and overreach>

The book is vast and intentionally wide-ranging; academic review listings describe it as a major, large-scale work (hundreds of pages) and note its expansive character. That breadth can be exhilarating, but it also risks flattening the specificity of certain episodes or compressing complex debates into the service of a single overarching arc. Readers may want to pair it with more specialized studies (e.g., Philippine history, U.S.–Mexico borderlands scholarship, or detailed U.S.–Japan/U.S.–China histories) to test and refine the big claims.

  1. <West Coast centrality can become its own “centrism”>
    Cumings’s polemical target is Atlanticist bias, but a Pacific-centered correction can sometimes swing too far, underplaying the persistent importance of the Atlantic, Europe, and the U.S. East Coast. The argument works best when read as a rebalancing and a provocation, not as a replacement dogma.

  2. <Pacific societies can recede into the background>

Because the book’s primary subject is American power, Mexico, the Philippines, and East Asian countries can sometimes appear as “encounter sites” rather than fully theorized agents with their own internal political economies and historical trajectories. For an East Asia–centered reader, the book may function best as a U.S.-side synthesis to be complemented by local historiographies.

<4) Bottom line>

<Dominion from Sea to Sea> is a bold reorientation of American history that insists the Pacific Coast and Asia-facing relationships are foundational to U.S. power. It is strongest as a map-redrawing synthesis—an intellectual provocation that connects westward development, technology, political economy, and foreign relations into one story. Its weakness is the mirror image of its strength: the sprawling scope can trade depth for sweep, and the “Pacific correction” can risk becoming a new one-sidedness unless balanced with region-specific work.

===



No comments: