일본 천황
| 천황 | |
|---|---|
| 天皇 | |
Imperial | |
일본 천황기(天皇旗) | |
| 호칭 | 폐하 |
| 관저 | 황거 |
| 초대 | 진무 천황(전승) |
| 설립 | 기원전 660년 2월 11일 (전승) |
| 웹사이트 | (일본어) 궁내청 홈페이지 |
| 천황 | |
|---|---|
| 일본어식 한자 표기 | 天皇 |
| 현대 가나 표기 | てんのう |
| 역사적 가나 표기 | てんわう |
| 국립국어원 표준 표기 | 덴노 |
| 통용식 표기 | 텐노 |
| 한국 한자음 | 천황 |
| 헵번식 로마자 표기 | tennō |

천황(일본어: 天皇 덴노[주 1][*], 영어: Emperor of Japan)은 일본의 군주로, 일본 황실의 대표이자 일본의 상징적인 국가 원수이다.
일본국 헌법에서는 천황을 일본의 주권을 가진 일본 국민의 총의에 기반한 일본의 상징이자 일본 국민 통합의 상징이라고 규정하고 있다. 또한 일본 천황가는 현존하는 세계에서 가장 오래된 왕실 가운데 하나다.[1]
지위로서 천황의 기능에 대해서는 일본국 헌법 제1조부터 제7조에 명시되어 있다. 천황은 “일본국의 상징이며, 일본 국민 통합의 상징”(제1조)으로 규정되어 내각의 조언과 승인에 의해, 법률이나 조약의 공포, 국회가 지명한 내각총리대신의 임명, 국회의 소집 등의 국사행위로 제한된 권한(제7조)을 가진다.
일본 황실의 계보가 한 번도 끊어지지 않고 존속되었다고 주장하는 의미로 만세일계(萬世一系)라는 말이 있다. 일본 제국 때에는 세계의 만방이 모두 천황의 지배하에 있다는 팔굉일우(八紘一宇)라는 이념이 천황제 파시즘과 황국사관의 근본사상이 되었다. 한편 천황이 국가원수의 지위를 갖느냐와 관련하여서는 헌법에 명시되어 있지 않아서, 국가 원수라고 보는 견해와[2] 반대하는 견해가 대립한다. 현재는 제126대 천황인 나루히토가 황위에 있다.
호칭
일본에서의 호칭
헤이안 시대 이전
'천황'이라는 칭호가 생기기 이전에 고대 야마토에서 수장이라는 뜻의 칭호를 국내에서는 「오키미(大君)」(치천하대왕) 또는 천왕(天王)이라 불렀고, 대외적으로는 왜왕(倭王), 왜국왕(倭國王), 대왜왕(大倭王) 등으로 칭했다. 고대에는 스베라기(須米良伎), 스메라기(須賣良伎), 스메로기(須賣漏岐), 스메라미코토(須明樂美御德), 스메미마노미코토(皇御孫命) 등으로 불렸다.
'천황'이라는 칭호가 성립된 것은 7세기 후반의 일로 다이호 율령에서 「천황(天皇)」이라는 칭호를 법제화하기 직전인 덴무 천황 또는 지토 천황의 시대의 일로 보는 것이 통설인데, 시기상 7세기 후반은 중국의 당 고종이 '천황'이라는 칭호를 사용한 직후의 일이기도 했다.[3] 태평양 전쟁 이전의 사학자 쓰다 소키치는 스이코 천황 시대에 성립되었다는 설을 주장하기도 했다.
13세기 이후 「천황」이라는 칭호의 사용은 잠시 폐해지기도 했으나, 19세기 초에 다시 사용되기 시작되어 현재에 이르고 있다(후술).
일본 고대의 한자음 차자표기에서는 「덴와(てんわう)」로 표기된다. 「덴와」는 중세를 지나며 「덴노(てんのう)」로 변화되었다.
「천황」이라는 칭호의 유래에는 여러 가지 설이 있다.
- 고대 중국에서 북극성을 신격화하여 가리키던 도교의 용어 「천황대제(天皇大帝)」 또는 「부상대제동황부(扶桑大帝東皇父)」에서 따왔다는 설.
- 당 고종이 도교적 용어인 「천황」을 칭한 것을 일본에서도 수입해서 썼다는 설.
- 5세기경에 대외적으로 「가외천왕(可畏天王)」, 「귀국천왕(貴國天王)」 등 단순히 「천왕(天王)」 등으로 불리던 것이 스이코조(또는 덴무조)에 「천황」이 되었다는 설.
| 문서 ・ 금석문 | 연대 | 발췌 | 출전 | 현대의 평가 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 견당사의 국서 | 607년 | 日出處天子致書日沒處天子無恙 | 《수서》(636년 성립) | |
| 호류지 금당 약사여래상 광배명 (法隆寺金堂薬師如来像光背銘) | 607년 | 池辺大宮治天下天皇 | 실제로는 607년보다는 조금 뒤인 하쿠호 시대에 제작된 것으로 보인다. | |
| 쇼토쿠 태자가 수에 보낸 국서 | 608년 | 東天皇敬白西皇帝 | 《일본서기》(720년 성립) | 《일본서기》 외에는 보이지 않는다. |
| 호코지 장륙석가상 광배명 (法興寺丈六釈迦像光背銘) | 609년 | 多知波奈土與比天皇 | 겐코지 가람연기(元興寺伽藍縁起) 및 유기자재장(流記資財帳)(746년 성립) | 현재 유물 자체는 남아있지 않다. |
| 천황기(天皇記) | 620년 | (제목 자체에 「천황」이 포함되어 있음) | 《일본서기》 | 현재 전하지 않으며 《일본서기》 외에는 기록이 없다. |
| 천수국수장(天寿国繍帳) | 7세기 | 斯帰斯麻宮治天下天皇 悲哀嘆息白畏天皇前日啓 | 《상궁성덕법왕제설》(上宮聖徳法王帝説)(성립시기 불명) | 천수국수장은 파손된 부분이 많고 발췌된 부분도 「皇前日啓」 등의 부분만 존재. 나머지 전문은 《법왕제설》에서 전하는 것이다. 성립연대를 두고 논쟁이 있다. |
| 목간(木簡) | 677년 | 天皇聚露忽謹 | 아스카노이케(飛鳥池) 유적 출토 | 「천황」이라 기록된 가장 오래된 문자 기록 |
천황이라는 칭호는 율령(「의제령儀制令」)에 규정이 있는데, 《양로율령》(養老律令) 천자조(天子条)에 따르면 제제사에서는 ‘천자’(天子), 조서에서는 ‘천황’, 대외적으로는 ‘황제’, 신하가 직접 주달할 때에는 ‘폐하’, 황태자 등 후계자에게 양위한 경우에는 ‘태상천황’(太上天皇), 외출시에는 ‘승여’(乘輿), 행행시에는 ‘거가’(車駕) 등으로 부르는 7개의 호칭이 정해져 있었지만, 이러한 표현은 표기시에만 사용할 뿐, 어떻게 쓰더라도 읽는 것은 당시의 풍속을 따라 ‘스메미마노미코토’(すめみまのみこと)나 ‘스메라미코토’(すめらみこと) 등으로 칭한다(특히 제사 지낼 때에는 「天子」라 쓰고 「스메미마노미코토」로 읽었다). 천황의 죽음은 붕어(崩御)라 했고, 재위중인 천황은 금상 천황(今上天皇), 사망한 뒤 추시되는 시호가 정해질 때까지는 대행 천황(大行天皇)이라 불렸다. 배우자는 「황후」(皇后, 오오키사키). 천황 자신이 칭할 때는 「짐(朕)」, 신하들로부터는 「지존」(至尊)이라 불렸는데, 모두 중국의 제도를 답습한 것이었다.
나라 시대인 덴표호지(天平宝字) 6년에 진무 천황부터 지토 천황까지의 41명의 천황 및 겐메이 천황 ・ 겐쇼 천황에 대한 한풍(漢風) 시호가 오우미노 미후네에 의해 일괄적으로 바쳐졌음이 《속일본기》에 기술되어 있지만, 이것은 당대의 칭호와는 관계없는 시호일 뿐이다.
헤이안 시대부터 에도 시대까지 일본 천황은 '미카도'(御門, 帝)라거나 '긴리'(禁裏), '다이리'(内裏), '긴주'(禁中) 등의 여러 표현으로 칭해졌다. 가장 많이 쓰인 칭호는 '미카도'로, 고쇼(御所)에서 천황이 드나드는 문을 가리킨다. 긴리·다이리·긴주는 그 어소를 가리키는 말이다. 이러한 표현은 천황을 직접 지칭하는 것을 피하기 위한 표현이다. '폐하'도 마찬가지다.
또한 '주상'(主上, 오카미, 슈조)라는 표현도 이용되었다. '천조'(天朝)는 일본의 왕조를 가리키는 말이지만, 조정이나 국가, 또는 천황을 가리킬 때도 사용되었다. '스메라미코토', '스메로기', '스베라키' 등 또한 사용되었다. '황후'는 일본어 음독으로는 '고고' 또는 '오오키사키'이고, '중궁'(中宮)이라고도 불렸으며, 금상천황 또한 '당금의 제'(當今の帝, 도긴노미카도) 등으로 불리기도 했다. 태상천황은 '조코'(上皇), '센토'(仙洞), '인'(院)으로 불리기도 했으며, 출가한 경우에는 '법황'(法皇)이라고도 불렸는데, 이는 '선정법황'(禪定法皇)의 줄임말이다.
태상천황은 고카쿠 천황이 닌코 천황에게 양위한 이후에는 사실상 사라진 표현이며, 제국 시대 이후에는 제도적으로도 존재하지 않게 되었다. 이는 황실전범(옛 황실전범)이 퇴위에 대한 규정 없이, 천황의 붕어를 통해 황태자가 즉위한다고 규정하였고, 이후 개정된 현행 황실전범 역시 이를 따르고 있기 때문이다.
헤이안 시대 이후 천황을 가리키는 호칭으로 가장 많이 사용된 것은 '인'(院)이 가장 많이 쓰였다. 인은 원래 양위한 상황(태상천황)의 거처를 가리키던 말이었다. 헤이안 시대 후기에 태상천황 즉 양위하고 물러난 상황이 현직 천황을 대신해 정치를 행하게 되고 이것이 제도처럼 굳어지게 되면서 태상천황의 처소인 '인'을 천황 그 자체를 가리키는 말로 부르게 된 것이다.
심지어 천황이나 천황과 관련된 사물을 일컬어 '국왕' 또는 '왕'이라는 말을 써서 부르는 경우도 많았다. 일본의 율령제에서는 왕이라고 할 경우 친왕/내친왕(천황의 적자녀)의 아들 즉 천황의 손자 항렬에 해당하는 남녀 왕족(왕, 여왕)을 가리키는 말로 쓰였지만, 한 독립국의 군주를 가리키는 칭호로써 왕을 사용하여 천황을 부른 경우도 현존하는 당대 일본 문서와 군키모노가타리 등의 문학에서도 많이 발견되고 있다.
일본제국 헌법에서 처음으로 천황의 호칭이 ‘천황’으로 통일되었다. 그러나 외교 문서 등에서는 ‘일본국 황제’가 많이 이용되었으며, 국내의 공문서에서도 종종 사용되었다. 표기는 통일되어 있지 않았을 뿐만 아니라, 민간에서는 ‘천자님’(天子様)으로 불리기도 한 것으로 보인다.[주 2] 육해군의 통수권을 가졌다는 의미에서 ‘대원수’라고도 불렸다.
일반적으로는 일본 내의 각종 보도 등에서 천황의 경칭은 황실전범에 규정된 ‘폐하’를 채용하여 ‘천황폐하’로 칭한다. 궁내청 등의 공문서에서는 다른 천황과의 혼동을 막기 위해 ‘금상폐하’로 칭하기도 한다. 3인칭으로 경칭없이 ‘지금 천황’(今の天皇)이나 ‘현재 천황’(現在の天皇), ‘금상 천황’(今上天皇) 등으로 불리는 경우도 있지만, 근래에는 완곡한 표현을 이용하는 것은 극히 드물다.
영어권에서의 호칭
Emperor 즉 ‘황제’라고 부르고 있다. 현재 즉위 중인 세계의 군주 중에서 유일하게 Emperor로 불리는 군주이다.[4] 이는 20세기 이후 동서양의 왕정들이 대부분 철폐되어 사라지고(쿠데타 혹은 왕통 단절, 헌법 개정으로 인한 국체 변경) 얼마 남지 않게 된 상황에 기인하는 것이기도 하다.
또한 동양에서와는 달리 서양에서의 '황제'(엠퍼러)와 '왕'(킹)은 양자간 서열상 우열은 있을 망정 그것이 꼭 '엠퍼러'에 대한 '킹'의 신종(臣從)을 전제하는 것은 결코 아니며, 서양의 역사에서 로마 제국이 '공동 황제' 또는 '동서 정제 및 부제' 형식으로 두 명 이상의 황제를 두는가 하면(동양에서 '황제'란 원칙적으로 하나의 국가 안에 단 한 명만이 존재할 수 있다), 오스트리아 대공국의 '여대공'이면서 크로아티아-헝가리 동군연합의 '왕'을 모두 겸무했던 신성 로마 제국의 황후 마리아 테레지아나, 그 아들 요제프 2세처럼 신성 로마 제국의 '황제'이면서 오스트리아 대공국의 '대공'을 겸직하거나, 대영 제국의 빅토리아 여왕처럼 영국과 아일랜드의 '여왕'이면서 (영국령) 인도 제국의 '황제'까지 겸하면서(이 경우는 왕이 다스리는 '왕국'이 황제가 다스리는 '제국'을 왕국의 하부 식민지로 두고 있는 셈이다) '대영 제국 황제'라고 자처하는 등, 동군연합의 관점에서 왕이면서 황제를 겸하고 황제면서 공작까지 겸하는 등 동양에서라면 결코 있을 수 없는 사례까지 존재하기에 서양의 황제관(觀)과 동양의 황제관이 완벽하게 동일선상에 있는 것은 아니다.
한반도에서의 호칭
역사적으로 한반도에서는 일본이 '왜국'(야마타이국)으로 불리던 시절부터 교류가 있었고, 이 무렵의 기록에는 왜국의 정치적 지도자로써 한반도 국가(주로 신라와 백제)들과 외교적으로 교섭했던 상대를 가리키는 칭호인 '왜왕'(倭王)으로 등장한다. 그러다가 왜국이 '일본'으로 국호를 바꾼 뒤에는 '일본국왕'으로 등장하는데, 여기서 일본국왕이란 일본 천황 내지 일본 천황의 사자로써 국외에 파견되어 대외 업무를 수행하는 실무진의 최고 책임자를 가리키는 것으로 풀이된다.
다만 일본은 견당사 중지(894년) 이후 중국이나 한반도에 공식 외교 사절을 파견하지 않는 고립주의적 외교로 선회하였고, 천황은 외교 교섭의 일선에 나서는 경우가 없어서 태정관이나 고료칸이 위치한 다자이후에서 외교 업무를 전담하였기에 일본이라는 왕국의 외교적 최고 대표자로써의 '일본국왕'이라는 직함으로 중국이나 한반도와 교섭을 행하고자 사신을 파견하는 경우는 난보쿠초 시대에 규슈의 남조 세력인 정서부의 수장 가네요시 친왕이 명에 사신을 보내고 '일본국왕 양회'라는 이름으로 홍무제로부터 '일본국왕' 책봉을 받을 때까지 좀처럼 일어나지 않았다. 가마쿠라 막부 또한 지리적으로 동쪽에 치우쳐 있다는 점에 더해서 그 막부의 쇼군부터가 싯켄의 꼭두각시에 불과한 처지였기 때문에 외국과의 교섭에 나선다는 것은 생각도 할 수 없는 것이었다.
가네요시 친왕이 명에 사신을 보내어 '일본국왕'으로 책봉을 받은 뒤에 고려에서는 일본에 사신을 보내 북조 즉 무로마치 막부와 교섭을 행했는데, 명이나 고려나 모두 대일본 교섭에 있어서의 주요 현안은 당시 한반도 및 중국 남부 연안을 약탈하던 왜구에 대한 금압 문제였다. 이 과정에서도 천황이 아닌 막부의 실권자 즉 쇼군이나 그 권한을 위임받은 자들이 외교 현안을 대신했고, 천황은 그 외교 현안에 대한 결정에 별다른 개입을 하지 않았다. 막부 쇼군으로써 한반도 국가에서 외교 교섭 과정에서 '일본국왕'으로 인식된 것은 무로마치 막부의 세이이타이쇼군이었고, 초기에는 단순히 '일본국 상국'(日本國相國)으로 칭했을 뿐이었고 고려나 조선 또한 국왕으로 부르지는 않았다. 그러다 무로마치 3대 쇼군으로써 명으로부터 '원도의'라는 이름으로 일본국왕으로 책봉된 요시미츠가 사망(1407년)한 뒤, 조선 조정은 무로마치 쇼군을 일본의 최고 실권자로 인식하고 이들을 '일본국왕'으로 호칭하였으며, 신숙주의 《해동제국기》와 같은 경우에는 쇼군을 국왕으로 호칭하고, 천황은 국정과 무관한 존재로 이름만 기록하고 있다.
임진왜란 직전인 1590년에 일본에 파견된 통신사의 부사였던 학봉 김성일은 도요토미 히데요시에 대한 알현 형식에 대한 논의에서 ‘관백’(關白)을 ‘위황(僞皇)의 정승’으로 칭하고, 천황을 일본의 최고 통치자로 인식하였다. 다만 일본의 입장에서 지칭할 때는 ‘천황’이라고 지칭하여 호칭을 다르게 사용하고 있다. 분명한 것은 조선 조정에서 '천황'의 존재를 알고 있으면서도 천황을 종교적·의례적인 존재로 파악하고, 자리만 있을 뿐 정사에는 관여하지 않는 존재임을 파악하고 있었다는 것이다.[5] 조선 조정의 관료들은 일본에 '천황'이라는 존재가 있고 쇼군이 등장하기 전부터 일본이라는 나라를 다스렸던 진정한 '일본의 왕'이었음을 알고 있었지만 현재 시점에서는 실권자인 쇼군에게 밀려서 아무런 실권도 없다는 것을 알고 있었다. 조선 초기 성현의 《용재총화》에는 '아무 것도 가진 것이 없으면서 주위로부터 떠받들어지는 존재'를 얕잡아 부르는 말로 '왜황'(倭皇)이라는 말이 조선 시대에 퍼져 있었음을 전하고 있다.
한일 양국에서 천황의 존재감은 임진왜란은 물론 에도 시대까지도 그렇게 크지 않았다. 에도 막부의 쇼군이 조선 국왕의 국서에 대해 보내는 답서에서 스스로를 '일본국 대군'(日本國大君)이라고 불렀는데, 아라이 하쿠세키가 잠시 '일본국왕'으로 바꾸어 쓰게 했다가 하쿠세키가 실각한 이후에는 다시 '일본국 대군'으로 되돌렸으며, 막부가 사라진 뒤에는 이 '일본국 대군'이라는 칭호는 천황을 가리키는 비공식 칭호 가운데 하나가 되었다.
대한민국 정부의 외교 채널에서 공식적으로 명시한 호칭은 '천황'(덴노)이지만, 외교 채널에서 공식적으로 쓰고 있는 말이라고 해서 일반 대중 및 언론에서까지 그것을 사용할 것을 강제한다는 법은 없어서, 한국의 주요 언론 매체에서는 영국, 네덜란드, 스페인, 덴마크, 스웨덴 등 세계의 다른 왕정 국가의 국왕들을 다룰 때와 마찬가지로 '일왕'(日王) 또는 '일본 국왕'이라는 호칭을 사용한다. 이는 과거 '일본 황제' 또는 '일본 천황'이라는 말의 약칭인 '일황'(日皇)이 근대 일본 제국(조선과 류큐, 만주 및 동남아시아 일부를 식민지로 다스렸던)의 마지막 천황이었던 쇼와 천황(히로히토)이 사망(1989년)한 이후로 '황'이 '왕'으로 바뀐 것으로, 현대의 일본국은 과거의 일본 제국과는 다른 형태의 국가가 되었다는 것, 쇼와 천황이 사망한 뒤의 일본 천황은 그 '일본 제국의 황제'(The Emgeror)가 아닌 '일본국의 천황'(Emperor of Japan)으로써 일본이라는 나라 안에서의 군주이며, '천황'(Emperor)이라는 지위가 짐짓 영국이나 네덜란드, 덴마크 등지의 '왕'(King) 또는 룩셈부르크나 모나코의 '공'(Prince)과의 사이에(일본이 세계에서 유일하게 자국의 국왕을 '황제'라고 부르듯이 룩셈부르크와 모나코 역시 세계에서 유이하게 자국의 국왕을 '공' 또는 '대공'이라고 부르는 나라이기도 하다) 어떠한 서열상의 상하 내지 우열 관계가 존재하지 않는다는 것을 일반 대중들에게 환기하고 강조하기 위한 것이다.
국립국어원의 표준국어대사전에는 ‘천황(天皇)’을 ‘일본에서 그 왕을 이르는 말’로 설명되어 있으며, 국사편찬위원회에서 출간된 《한국사》에는 일본어 발음인 ‘덴노’로 표기되었다. 이밖에 한국 국내의 일본사 관련 학술대회 및 세계사 교과서에서는 학술적인 정밀함을 기하기 위해서 '천황'이라는 호칭을 사용한다. 조선민주주의인민공화국에서는 일본의 왕조 체제를 강조하기 위해 '천황'이라는 호칭을 사용한다.
역사
나라 시대(710년~794년)에 일본 조정에서 편찬한 《일본서기》와 이보다 앞서 성립된 《고사기》에 따르면, 일본 천황가의 시조는 진무 천황(神武天皇)이며, 기원전 660년에 즉위했다고 적고 있지만, 현대에는 진무 천황을 시작으로 2대 스이제이 천황부터 9대 가이카 천황까지는 실존하지 않았던 허구의 인물로 본다(결사팔대).
고대에는 오오키미(大君)라 불렸다. 645년 다이카 개신으로 처음 천황을 정점으로 하는 정치를 선포하였지만, 7세기 후반부터 중국을 모방한 율령제가 도입되고서야 일본에서는 동아시아 중국이나 한국과 같은 중앙집권국가의 성립을 이루었다. 701년에 다이호 율령이 일본 역사에서의 진정한 율령으로 평가된다. 710년 헤이조쿄(平城京)로 천도했다.
9세기부터 천황은 차츰 실권을 잃고 대신 유력 귀족층이 정치 권력을 장악하기 시작했다. 10세기에는 천황가와 혼인관계를 맺은 후지와라 북가가 '천황의 외척'이라는 지위를 내세워서 어린 천황의 정치를 보좌한다는 명목으로 조정의 정치를 좌우하는 셋칸 정치를 시작했다. 그리고 11세기 말에는 기존의 셋칸정치를 행하던 후지와라 셋칸케 대신 천황의 친아버지(내지 양아버지)인 상황(上皇)이 이른바 '치천의 군'(治天-君)으로써 어린 천황을 대신해 통치하며 후계 천황 계승자까지 지명하게 되는데(인세이) 이 과정에서 일본 역사에서 최초로 '무사'라는 계급이 중앙의 정치에 대두하였다.
일본 역사 최초의 막부(군사정권)를 세운 미나모토노 요리토모가 조정으로부터 세이이타이쇼군으로 임명되는 1192년을 일본 역사에서는 헤이안 시대가 끝나고 가마쿠라 시대가 시작되는 시점으로 분류하고 있다. 요리토모 사후 3대 쇼군 미나모토노 사네토모의 대까지 교토 조정과 가마쿠라 막부가 병립하는 이두정치가 이루어졌으나, 사네토모가 암살당해 요리토모의 대가 끊어지고 이를 호기로 여긴 고토바인(後鳥羽院)이 전국의 무사들에게 인젠을 내려 막부 타도를 명하였다. 그러나 무사들이 도리어 가마쿠라 호조 씨(겐지 쇼군의 외가)의 편을 들어 결집해 반격하면서 고토바인은 오키로 유배되었고, 막부가 왕위 계승까지 관여하게 되면서 교토의 조정은 정치적 실권을 잃고 막부에 종속되어 왕위 계승조차 막부에 관리당하는 지경에 이르게 되었다.
특히 가마쿠라 시대에는 '치천의 군' 지위 계승을 놓고 왕실이 지묘인 왕통과 다이카쿠지 왕통으로 분열되어 다툼을 벌였는데, 이에 대한 가마쿠라 막부의 조정은 이른바 '양통질립'이라 하여 두 왕통이 교대로 천황에 즉위하도록 중재하는 것이었다. 이는 왕통의 분열과 대립을 완벽하게 잠재우지는 못했고 도리어 막부에 대한 반감만을 키우는 계기가 되어, 다이카쿠지 왕통의 고다이고 천황이 가마쿠라 막부 타도를 모의하게 되었고, 여기 가와치의 호족 구스노키 마사시게 및 가마쿠라 막부의 고케닌이던 아시카가 다카우지와 닛타 요시사다의 호응으로 가마쿠라 막부를 멸망시키고(1333년) 천황 친정을 부활시켰다(겐무 신정).
그러나 천황의 친정이라는 이름으로 강행되는 현실과는 맞지 않는 정책과 이에 수반된 세금 부담, 나아가 기존의 무사 세력들에 대한 홀대가 이어지는 것에 대해 신정에 불만을 품은 무사들이 아시카가 타카우지를 중심으로 결집하면서 겐무 신정은 붕괴했고, 아시카가 타카우지가 고다이고 천황의 양위를 이끌어낸 뒤 지묘인 왕통의 고곤 천황을 옹립하고 새로운 막부를 선포하면서 막을 내렸는데(무로마치 막부) 고다이고 천황이 이를 인정하지 않고 교토를 탈출하여 나라의 요시노로 내려가 자신이 정통임을 선포하면서 교토의 북조-무로마치 막부와 요시노의 남조 세력이 양립하는 난보쿠초 시대로 이어졌다. 난보쿠초 시대의 동란이 막을 내린 것은 1392년 3대 쇼군 아시카가 요시미쓰에 의해서였다.
요시미츠는 일본국왕의 자격으로 명나라의 영락제에게 조공하는 명일무역을 시작했다. 1394년 요시미츠가 죽자 일본 조정은 그에게 '로쿠온인 태상법황'(鹿苑院太上法皇)이라는 칭호를 주었다.
아시카가 요시마사 시절 오닌의 난이 일어나며 센고쿠 시대가 시작되면서 무로마치 막부도 교토 조정도 쇠퇴했다. 이 시절의 천황은 무로마치 막부와 마찬가지로 일본이라는 나라의 유일무이한 국왕이라는 권위가 있었고, 그 권위를 살려서 오닌의 난 당시에도 다이묘들에게 전쟁을 그만두라고 말리는 이른바 '치벌윤지'를 내리기도 했지만, 쇼군에게도 천황에게도 이들을 견제할 실권은 아무 것도 없었다. 권력이 사라지면서 재력도 사라져서 고카시와바라 천황은 아버지 고쓰치미카도 천황이 붕어(1500년)했는데도 장의(葬儀)을 치르지 못해 시신이 40일 동안 다이리 안에 방치되기도 했고, 고카시와바라 천황 본인이나 고나라 천황은 즉위식을 치를 돈이 없어서 천황으로 천조(왕위를 이어받음)하고도 즉위식을 거행하지 못했다. 그나마 고나라 천황은 천조 후 10여 년이 지나서야 각지의 다이묘들로부터 '성금'을 받아 즉위식을 거행할 수 있었고, 고나라 천황 자신의 어필을 팔아서 재원으로 보탰다. 오기마치 천황도 천조 3년 뒤에야 주고쿠의 다이묘 모리 모토나리가 헌상한 황금 덕분에 즉위식을 거행할 수 있었다.
오다 노부나가, 도요토미 히데요시도 천황을 부정하지는 않았지만, 그렇다고 천황에 대한 경의를 보이지도 않았다. 도요토미 히데요시가 조선 침략을 벌일 때 당시의 천황이었던 고요제이 천황은 억지스러운 짓을 왜 하려 하느냐며 조선 침략을 그만둘 것을 명했지만[6] 히데요시는 듣지 않았다. 에도 막부 시기에 천황의 권위는 유지되었지만 금중병공가제법도로 통제되었다. 자의 사건에서도 볼 수 있듯 천황의 권력은 거의 없었다.
유교(성리학)가 점차 관학화되면서 패자인 관백(쇼군)이 아닌 왕자(王者)인 천황이 일본이라는 왕국의 정당한 주권자이자 통치자라는 존왕론이 미토 번을 중심으로 성장해나갔고, 미토학이라고 불리는 이 사상은 에도 막부 말기 존왕양이 운동으로 확대된다. 막부에 대한 반감으로 야기된 도막 운동의 한편으로 일본이라는 왕국의 정당한 주권자인 천황을 중심으로 뭉쳐서 외세를 배격하자는 정치 사상이었다. 요시다 쇼인의 일군만민은 평등사상처럼 받아들여졌고 막부의 권위를 흔들었다. 하지만 존왕양이파 지사 일부는 천황을 '옥'(玉)이라 부르며 정권 찬탈의 도구 정도로 간주했다.
메이지 유신으로 막부가 무너지고 나라 시대 이후 처음으로 태정관제로 돌아가는 왕정복고가 이루어졌다(왕정복고의 대호령). 메이지 신정부는 천황을 전국에 순행시키며 사람들 사이에서 천황의 권위를 확립해 나갔다.[7] 메이지 정부는 강력한 중앙집권 체제였고 사족 반란과 자유 민권 운동은 진압되었다. 메이지 정부는 의회를 열어 일본을 유럽의 입헌군주제처럼 만들려고 했다. 제국 시대 (1868년 ~ 1945년)에는 일본제국 헌법에는 “대일본제국은 만세일계의 천황이 통치한다.”라고 규정되었다.
근대 이전에는 연호가 국가적인 경조사 또는 재해에 의한 피해가 있을 때마다 바뀌어, 지금의 일세일원(一世一元)과는 달랐다.
1947년에 제정된 일본국 헌법부터는 “천황은 일본국의 상징이고, 일본 국민 통합의 상징이며, 이 지위는 주권을 가진 일본 국민의 총의에 기한다”라고 규정되었다.
지위

천황의 지위는 메이지 유신과 일본제국 헌법의 제정으로 일본에서 헌법으로 규정되었다. 그러나 일본제국 헌법과 제2차 세계대전 종전 이후에 제정된 일본국 헌법에서 언급되어 있는 천황의 지위와 권한을 비교하면 상당한 차이를 가진다. 전자의 경우에는 천황이 통치권자이자 신성한 존재로 규정되었음에 비하여, 후자의 경우에는 “천황은 일본국의 상징이고, 일본 국민 통합의 상징이며, 이 지위는 주권을 가진 일본 국민의 총의에 기한다”고 규정된 것이다.
일본제국 헌법 체제에서 천황의 지위는 아마테라스오미카미의 의사에 기초한 만세일계의 지위이다. 따라서 천황은 신성불가침의 존재였으며, 천황의 존엄을 침해하는 행위는 불경죄로 의율하여 중하게 처벌한다. 또한 천황은 천황대권으로 불리는 광범위한 권한을 가지고, 모든 통치권을 총람하는 존재였다. 즉 국가의 모든 작용을 통괄하는 권한을 가진다.
그에 비하여 제2차 세계대전 종전 이후의 일본국 헌법의 천황의 지위는 “주권을 가진 일본 국민의 총의에 기한” 것으로, 국민주권의 원리가 강하게 반영되어 있다. 따라서 천황제는 절대적인 것이라거나 불가변의 것이라고 할 수 없고, 국민의 총의에 기하여 가변될 수 있는 것이다. 니시다 쇼지는 이것이 이상하다면서 반대하기도 했다.[8] 권한의 면에서도 천황은 형식적이고 의례적인 “국사에 관한 행위”, 이른바 국사행위만을 행할 수 있다.[9]
천황의 국가원수 여부
일본국 헌법 제4조에서는 천황이 “헌법이 정한 국사에 관한 행위만을 행하며, 국정에 관한 권능은 갖지 않는다”라고 규정되어 있고, 국사 행위로 규정된 내용도 비준서 및 법률이 정하는 기타의 외교 문서를 인증하고, 외국의 대사 및 공사를 접수하는 등의 의례적인 행위에 해당해, 천황이 일반적인 ‘국가원수’인지에 대해서는 견해가 갈린다.
천황을 국가원수로 보는 견해는 “천황은 일본국의 상징이며, 일본 국민의 통합의 상징”(헌법 제1조)이라고 규정되어 있으며, 각각 국회와 내각의 지명에 근거하여 행정부(내각)의 수장인 내각총리대신과 사법권을 행사하는 최고재판소장관을 임명한다(제6조)는 내용에 근거한다. 또한 “국권의 최고 기관이며, 국가의 유일한 입법기관”인 국회를 소집(제7조 2호)·해산(제7조 3호)하는 등, 국정의 중요한 행위를 ‘국사행위’로 수행한다고 규정되어 있다(제7조, 다만 국사행위에는 내각의 조언과 승인에 의함). 또한 “전권위임장 및 대사, 공사의 신임장을 인증”(제7조 5호)하고, “비준서 및 법률이 정하는 기타 외교 문서를 인증”(제7조 8호)하며, “외국의 대사 및 공사를 접수”(제7조 9호)하는 등, 일반적으로 국가원수가 수행하는 외교상의 주요 행위를 천황이 실시하다고 정하는 등, 대내외적으로 천황이 국가원수라고 본다.[주 3]
일본국 정부의 공식 견해로는, ‘천황은 국가원수’라고 한 1990년 5월 14일 참의원의 내각법제국 장관 답변이 있었다. 또한 천황을 ‘나라의 상징이며, 또 일정 부분의 외교 관계에서 국가를 대표하는 지위’에 있는, 한정된 의미의 국가원수로 표현했다. 천황 플래카드 사건에서 도쿄 지방재판소는 ‘국가원수인 천황’이라고 표현하여 천황을 국가원수로 표현했다.
천황을 국가원수로 인정하지 않는 견해는 일반적으로 일본국 헌법 제4조에서는 천황이 “헌법이 정한 국사에 관한 행위만을 행하며, 국정에 관한 권능은 갖지 않는다”라고 규정되어 있고, 국사행위로 규정된 내용도 “비준서 및 법률이 정하는 기타의 외교 문서를 인증"하고, “외국의 대사 및 공사를 접수"하는 등의 의례적인 행위에 해당되어, 실질적인 ‘국가원수’로 인정하기는 어렵다는 것을 이유로 들고 있다.
황위 계승
| 일본 천황과 황족 |
|---|
황실전범에 따르면 황위는 황통에 속하는 남계의 남자가 다음 순서에 따라 계승한다. 그러나 역대 일본 천황 계보를 살펴보면 여자가 천황이 된 경우도 여러번 있었다. 특히 고교쿠 천황은 여자임에도 불구하고 두 번이나 천황에 즉위했다. 황위 계승 조건은 다음과 같다.
- 황장자
- 황장손
- 그 밖의 황장자의 자손
- 황차자와 그 자손
- 그 밖의 황자손
- 황형제와 그 자손
- 황백숙부와 그 자손
- 최근친 계통인 황족
다만 황사에게 정신이나 신체상 불치의 중환이 있거나 중대한 사고가 있을 때에는 황실회의의 협의를 거쳐 위의 순서에 따라 황위계승의 순서를 바꿀 수 있다. 그러나 역대 일본 천황 계보에 의하면 태어나자마자 즉위하여 8살에 사망하거나 3살에 즉위하여 19살에 선양하고 59살까지 살거나(고토바 천황) 즉위하자마자 제위에서 쫓겨나거나(고분 천황) 천황의 권좌에서 물러난 이후 '原'씨 성을 부여받고 황족의 신분에서 신하의 신분으로 강등당하거나 자신보다 나이가 많은 후계자에게 선양하거나 이미 선양을 하고 나서 다시 정권을 되찾아 재즉위하거나(한 예로 역대 일본 천황 중에 고교쿠 천황과 사이메이 천황이 동일인물이라는 점) 하는 등 문제점도 많았다.
현재 일본 황실에는 여자 후손이 많고 남자 후손이 매우 적어서, 국민들 사이에서도 여자 황족도 제위를 계승할 수 있어야 한다는 여론이 생겨나고 있다.
이러한 조건에 따라, 현재 황위 계승 서열 1위는 아키시노노미야 후미히토 친왕이다. 다음은 황위 계승 서열 1위부터 3위까지의 명단이다.
| 왕위계승서열 | 이름 | 사진 | 탄생 | 배우자 | 계승권리 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1위 | 아키시노노미야 후미히토 친왕 秋篠宮文仁親王 후미히토 | 1965년 11월 30일 고쿄 궁내청 병원 아키히토와 상황후 미치코의 아들 | 후미히토 친왕비 기코 고쿄 1990년 6월 29일 1남 2녀 | 나루히토의 동생 | |
| 2위 | 아키시노노미야 히사히토 친왕 秋篠宮悠仁親王 히사히토 | 2006년 9월 6일 아이쿠 병원 아키시노노미야 후미히토 친왕와 후미히토 친왕비 기코의 아들 | 나루히토의 조카 | ||
| 3위 | 히타치노미야 마사히토 친왕 常陸宮正仁親王 마사히토 | 1935년 11월 28일 고쿄 쇼와 천황과 고준 황후의 아들 | 마사히토 친왕비 하나코 고쿄 1964년 9월 30일 | 나루히토의 숙부 |
일본에서 여성 천황을 인정하지 않는 것은 유엔으로부터 성평등에 위배된다는 인권위 권고를 받기도 했다. 유엔 인권최고대표사무소 소속의 여성차별철폐위원회(CEDAW)는 2024년 10월 29일(현지시간) 유엔 스위스 제네바사무소에서 일본 정부의 여성 정책을 심사한 뒤, 남성 왕족만 천황으로 즉위할 수 있도록 한 기존 황실전범의 개정을 권고했다. 기존 황실전범이 남성으로 왕위 계승 자격을 한정지은 것은 성평등에 위배되는 정책인 만큼, 내친왕(공주) 등 여성 왕족도 계승권을 가지고 천황으로 즉위할 수 있도록 황실전범을 개정하라는 것이었다.[10]
이미 해당 심사 당시에도 일본 측은 "차별철폐위에서 황실전범을 다루는 것은 부적절하다"고 항의하면서 해당 부분의 삭제를 요구하는 등 불쾌함을 드러냈으며, 유엔 권고 이후 이와야 다케시 외무장관은 11월 1일 "(유엔 위원회가) 국가의 기본과 관련된 사안을 권고해 대단히 유감"이라고 밝혔으며, 하야시 요시마사 관방장관도 "(여성의 천황 계승권 문제는) 인권과 관련 없는 문제"라고 단언했고, 일본의 극우 정당인 일본유신회는 "(천황 계승 문제는) 나라의 문화와 역사 문제"라고 반박했다.[11] 나아가 이에 대한 항의 차원으로 일본 외무성은 2025년 1월 29일 유엔 인권최고대표사무소(OHCHR)에 해마다 일본 정부가 내던 갹출금(매년 2000만∼3000만엔)의 용도에서 여성차별철폐위원회를 제외하도록 결정하였다.[12][13]
역대 천황 목록
기타
같이 보기
각주
참고 문헌
- “보관된 사본”. 2020년 10월 14일에 원본 문서에서 보존된 문서. 2021년 5월 30일에 확인함.
- 衆議院憲法調査会事務局 編(참의원 헌법조사회 사무국, 편저) (2003년 2월). “象徴天皇制に関する基礎的資料(상징천황제에 관한 기초적 자료)” (PDF) (일본어). 2007년 3월 31일에 원본 문서 (PDF)에서 보존된 문서. 2007년 8월 3일에 확인함.
- 당 고종의 시호가 「천황대성대홍효황제(天皇大聖大弘孝皇帝)」였던 것 외에도 남한(南漢)의 초대 황제 유습(劉龑)이 붕어한 뒤 「천황대제(天皇大帝)」라는 시호로 기록된 것을 중국의 기록에서 찾아볼 수 있다. 또한 일본에서는 덴무 천황이 천황이라는 칭호를 사용한 최초의 인물로 다이호 율령에서 천황의 칭호가 법제화되고 덴무 천황이 붕어한 뒤에도 그러한 칭호가 세습되었다.
- Uyama, Takuei (2019년 10월 23일). “天皇はなぜ「王(キング)」ではなく「皇帝(エンペラー)」なのか” [The Title of the Monarch of Japan: not the "King" but the "Emperor"] (일본어). 2019년 10월 23일에 확인함.
- 〈조선시대 日本天皇觀의 유형적 고찰〉, 손승철, 《사학연구》 제50호, 한국사학회, 1995. 12, pp. 217 ~ 250
- 고요제이(後陽成) 천황 친필 칙명문서 - e국보(일본 국립문화재연구소 소장 문화재 데이터베이스)
- 中奥宏『皇室報道と敬語』三一新書
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enk9hKYo5VE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptkX1sm0G_k
- 이상 비교 아시베 노부요시(다카하시 가즈유키 보정), 《헌법(憲法) 제4판》, 이와나미 쇼텐, 2007년, 47~48쪽.
- “日本政府、国連委勧告に抗議 皇室典範改正勧告巡り”. 《日本經濟新聞》. 2024년 10월 30일.
- 류호 (2024년 11월 4일). “성평등 위배되는데... 일본 정부, 유엔 '여성의 왕위 계승' 권고에도 반발만”. 《한국일보》.
- 里見稔 (2025년 1월 29일). “政府、国連女性差別撤廃委への拠出停止へ 皇室典範の改正勧告に抗議”. 《朝日新聞》.
- 강구열 (2025년 1월 30일). “일본 정부, ‘왕위 계승 문제 지적’ UN 위원회 지원 배제 결정”. 《세계일보》.
외부 링크
- (일본어/영어) 일본 궁내청 공식 홈페이지
Emperor of Japan
| Emperor of Japan | |
|---|---|
| 天皇 | |
Imperial | |
| Incumbent | |
| Naruhito since May 1, 2019 | |
| Details | |
| Style | His Majesty[a][b] |
| Heir presumptive | Fumihito |
| First monarch | Jimmu (traditional) Yūryaku (historical) Tenmu (use of title)[c] |
| Formation | February 11, 660 BC; 2685 years ago (traditional)[d] c. 4th century- 1st century AD (historical) |
| Residence | Tokyo Imperial Palace (official residence) and Kyoto Imperial Palace[4] |
| Website | www.kunaicho.go.jp |
| This article is part of a series on |
The Emperor of Japan[e][f] is the hereditary monarch and head of state of Japan.[7][8] The emperor is defined by the Constitution of Japan as the symbol of the Japanese state and the unity of the Japanese people, his position deriving from "the will of the people with whom resides sovereign power".[9] The Imperial Household Law governs the line of imperial succession. Pursuant to his constitutional role as a national symbol, and in accordance with rulings by the Supreme Court of Japan, the emperor is personally immune from prosecution.[10] By virtue of his position as the head of the Imperial House, the emperor is also recognized as the head of the Shinto religion, which holds him to be the direct descendant of the sun goddess Amaterasu. According to tradition, the office of emperor was created in the 7th century BC, but the first historically verifiable emperors appear around the 3rd or 4th centuries AD.[11][12]
The role of the emperor of Japan has historically alternated between a largely ceremonial symbolic role and that of an actual imperial ruler. Since the establishment of the first shogunate in 1192, the emperors of Japan have rarely taken on a role as supreme battlefield commander, unlike many Western monarchs. Japanese emperors have nearly always been controlled by external political forces, to varying degrees. Between 1192 and 1867, the shōguns, or their shikken regents in Kamakura (1203–1333), were the de facto rulers of Japan, although they were nominally appointed by the emperor. After the Meiji Restoration in 1868, the emperor was the embodiment of all sovereign power in the realm, as enshrined in the Meiji Constitution of 1889; however, except for a period of parliamentary monarchy from approximately 1905 to 1932, the degree to which the Emperor exercised real power between the Restoration and the Surrender of Japan at the end of World War II is widely debated. Since the enactment of the 1947 constitution, the emperor has been relegated to an entirely ceremonial and representative role, without even nominal political powers. The emperor is the head of the Japanese honors system, conferring orders, decorations, medals, and awards in the name of the state and on behalf of its people in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet.
Since the mid-nineteenth century, the emperor and other members of the imperial family have resided at the Imperial Palace,[g] located on the former site of Edo Castle in the heart of Tokyo, the current capital of Japan. Earlier, emperors resided in Kyoto, the ancient capital, for nearly eleven centuries. The Emperor's Birthday (currently February 23) is a national holiday.
The emperor since May 1, 2019 is Naruhito, who ascended the Chrysanthemum Throne on the abdication of his father, Akihito. He is the only remaining monarch and head of state in the world who holds the title of emperor.
Constitutional role

Most constitutional monarchies formally vest executive power in the reigning monarch in their capacity as head of state. In turn, these constitutional monarchs are bound by either convention or statute to exercise their prerogatives on the advice of ministers responsible to the duly elected parliament.[13] Some monarchies codify this principle further by requiring royal acts to be countersigned by a minister in order to take effect, thus passing political and legal accountability from the reigning monarch to the minister tendering advice.[14][h] By contrast, Japan is one of only two such sovereign states where the monarch is not even the nominal chief executive; the other is Sweden.[23] Rather, Article 65 of the Constitution of Japan explicitly vests executive authority in the Cabinet, of which the prime minister is the leader.[24] The emperor is not the commander-in-chief of the Japan Self-Defense Forces either. Instead, the Japan Self-Defense Forces Act of 1954 explicitly vests supreme command and control in the prime minister.[25] Nevertheless, the emperor remains Japan's internationally recognized head of state.[26][27][28][29]
The emperor's fundamental role within the machinery of the Japanese constitution is to perform important representational functions as "…the symbol of the State and of the unity of the People, deriving his position from the will of the people with whom resides sovereign power."[30] He is limited to performing "acts in matters of state" as delineated by the Constitution, without even nominal powers related to government. Moreover, said acts are only exercised in accordance with the binding advice and consent of the Cabinet, which is collectively responsible to the Diet and thence to the electorate.[31] Nevertheless, the emperor enjoys the following rights in the conduct of state business: (a) the right to be consulted before acting on ministerial advice; (b) the right to encourage a given policy or course of administrative action; and (c) the right to warn the Cabinet against the same.[32] In these respects, the emperor personifies the democratic state, sanctions legitimate authority, ensures the legality of his official acts, and guarantees the execution of the public will.[33][34] These functions, when considered altogether, serve two purposes: foremost, to uphold the continuity and stability of Japanese democracy; and second, to foster a shared national identity and cultural heritage that transcends party politics.[35][36] In order to maintain his institutional neutrality as Japan's national symbol, he is barred from making political statements.[37][38]
It is the emperor's preeminent constitutional duty to appoint the prime minister as designated by the Diet and the chief justice as designated by the Cabinet. However, the emperor does not have the authority to decline the nominations.[39] The emperor's other responsibilities, laid down in Article 7 of the Constitution, concern the basic functioning of the state.[40] To this end, the emperor, on behalf of the Japanese people:
- Promulgates constitutional amendments, laws, cabinet orders, and treaties.
- Convokes sessions of the Diet.
- Dissolves the House of Representatives.
- Proclaims general elections for members of the Diet.
- Attests to the appointment and dismissal of ministers of state and other officials as provided for by law, and of full powers and credentials of ambassadors and ministers.
- Attests to general and special amnesty, commutation of punishment, reprieve, and restoration of rights.
- Awards state honors.
- Attests to instruments of ratification and other diplomatic documents as provided for by law.
- Receives the credentials of foreign diplomats.
- Performs ceremonial functions.
Regular ceremonies of the emperor with a constitutional basis are the Imperial Investitures (Shinninshiki) in the Tokyo Imperial Palace and the Speech from the Throne ceremony in the House of Councillors in the National Diet Building. The latter ceremony opens ordinary and extra sessions of the Diet. Ordinary sessions are opened each January and also after new elections to the House of Representatives. Extra sessions usually convene in the autumn and are opened then.[41][non-primary source needed]
Cultural role

The Tennō is regarded as the foremost Shintō priest in terms of religion. This sacred duty dates back to the Niiname-sai (新嘗祭, "tasting of new rice") imperial harvest festival. In this ritual, the emperor presents newly gathered rice to the gods. The celebration is known as Daijōsai (大嘗祭, "Great Tasting") and takes place in the first year after the emperor's accession to the throne. The historical text Nihonshoki, written in the year 720, has the first mention of this ceremony, whose beginnings are believed to date back even further. The event evolved through time to become the Day of Thanksgiving for Labour, a recognized official holiday today.
The office of the emperor is also cultural bearer and steward of tradition and culture. For example, the Utakai Hajime is the annual poetry reading competition convened by the emperor. The emperor is supported in this function by the empress and other members of the imperial family, who have honorary patronages of many associations and organisations. They travel extensively throughout the year within the country to uphold these roles.
In sports, the Emperor's Cup (天皇賜杯, Tennō shihai) is given to a number of competitions such as football, judo, volleyball, and the top division yūshō winner of a sumo tournament.
History
The title of "Emperor" (天皇, Tennō) is attested since the 7th century, alongside the word "Japan" (日本, Nihon).[42][43] Around the same time, the Japanese also adopted the Chinese title of "Son of Heaven" (天子, tenshi; or 天子様 tenshi-sama).[44] The title of "emperor" was borrowed from China, being derived from Chinese characters, and was retroactively applied to the legendary Japanese rulers who reigned before the 7th–8th centuries AD.[45]
Although the emperor has been a symbol of continuity with the past, the degree of power exercised by the emperor has varied considerably throughout Japanese history.
Origins
According to the traditional account of the 8th-century Nihon Shoki, Japan was founded by Emperor Jimmu in 660 BC, 2686 years ago. Most modern scholars agree in regarding Jimmu and at least the nine first emperors as mythical.[46] In fact, the year was deliberately chosen because it was meant to align with the beginning of a 1260-year cycle, or 21 cycles of 60 years (see Sexagenary cycle).[47] Most scholars agree that the third century AD is a more likely starting point for an imperial line in Japan.[48]
Most scholars are of the view that Emperor Sujin is the first verifiable emperor. The Nihon shoki lists him as the 10th emperor and places his death around 30 AD, while Kojiki places it around 258 AD; although 318 AD is more likely. [49] The first ruler to appear in contemporary sources is Yūryaku (r. 456–479), the 21st emperor, who is attested in the Inariyama and Eta Funayama Swords,[50][51] dated to either 471 or 534 AD.[50] As one argument, the reign of Kinmei (c. 509–571 AD), the 29th emperor, is the first for whom contemporary historiography is able to assign verifiable dates.[52][53]
According to Scott Morton, the ancestors to the imperial Yamato clan was a warlike clan that started in Kyushu then left the island around the first century AD. Morton states they probably left in order to find better land for agriculture and made their way gradually along the coast of the Inland Sea. According to Morton, the imperial clan may have been established as rulers in the Yamato region by third or fourth centuries.[54]
According to Chinese sources, the unification of Japan took place between the 2nd and 3rd centuries and was carried out by the rulers of Yamatai, which likely correspond to the Japanese kingdom of Yamato.[50][55]
Archaeological information about the earliest historical rulers of Japan may be contained in the ancient tombs known as kofun, constructed between the early 3rd century and the early 7th century AD. However, since the Meiji period, the Imperial Household Agency has refused to open the kofun to the public or to archaeologists, citing their desire not to disturb the spirits of the past emperors. Kofun period artefacts were also increasingly crucial in Japan as the Meiji government used them to reinforce their authority.[56] In 2016, the Imperial Household Agency reversed its position and decided to allow researchers to enter some of the kofun with limits on time and methods.
Disputes and instability (10th century)

The growth of the samurai class from the 10th century gradually weakened the power of the imperial family over the realm, leading to a time of instability. Emperors are known to have come into conflict with the reigning shogun from time to time. Some instances, such as Emperor Go-Toba's 1221 rebellion against the Kamakura shogunate and the 1336 Kenmu Restoration under Emperor Go-Daigo, show the power struggle between the Imperial Court in Kyoto and the military governments of Japan.
Factional control (530s–1867) and shōguns (1192–1867)
There have been seven non-imperial families who have controlled Japanese emperors: the Soga (530s–645), the Fujiwara (850s–1070), the Taira (1159–1180s), the Minamoto (1192–1199/1203), the Hōjō (1199/1203–1333), the Ashikaga (1336–1565), and the Tokugawa (1603–1867). However, every shogun from the Minamoto, Ashikaga, and Tokugawa families had to be officially recognized by the emperors, who were still the source of sovereignty, although they could not exercise their powers independently from the shogunate.
During the major part of 1192 to 1867, political sovereignty of the state was exercised by the shōguns or their shikken regents (1203–1333), whose authority was conferred by Imperial warrant. When Portuguese explorers first came into contact with the Japanese (see Nanban period), they described Japanese conditions in analogy, likening the emperor with great symbolic authority, but little political power, to the pope, and the shōgun to secular European rulers (e.g., the Holy Roman emperor). In keeping with the analogy, they even used the term "emperor" in reference to the shōguns and their regents, e.g. in the case of Toyotomi Hideyoshi, whom missionaries called "Emperor Taico-sama" (from Taikō and the honorific sama). A Dutch embassy report used similar terminology in 1691.[57] Empress Go-Sakuramachi was the last ruling empress of Japan and reigned from 1762 to 1771.[58] During the Sakoku period of 1639 to 1853, there was very limited trade between Japan and foreigners. The Dutch were the only westerners who had limited access to Japan.[57]
Kenmu Restoration (1333–1336)
Emperor Go-Daigo succeeded in 1333 to get back the direct authority directly to the emperor after overthrowing the Kamakura shogunate, with the help of Ashikaga Takauji, a defected Kamakura general. The short three-year period during which the power was directly in the hand of the emperor is called the Kenmu Restoration. The direct ruling of the emperor proved however inefficient and ultimately failed, with Takauji grabbing political power for himself.
Meiji Restoration (1868)

In July 1853, Commodore Perry's Black Ships of the US Navy made their first visit to Edo Bay. Japan lacked the military and industrial power to prevent it.[59][60] Unequal treaties coerced and took advantage of Japan.[59][60] Consequently, Japan was forcibly opened to foreign trade and the shogunate proved incapable of hindering the "barbarian" interlopers; Emperor Kōmei thus began to assert himself politically. By the early 1860s, the relationship between the Imperial Court and the shogunate was changing radically. Disaffected domains and rōnin began to rally to the call of sonnō jōi ("revere the emperor, expel the barbarians"). The domains of Satsuma and Chōshū, historic enemies of the Tokugawa, used this turmoil to unite their forces and won an important military victory outside of Kyoto against Tokugawa forces.[citation needed]
On November 9, 1867, the Shogun Tokugawa Yoshinobu formally stepped down to restore Emperor Meiji to nominal full power.[61] He issued the imperial decree of constitutionalism[62] on April 14, 1875. The Meiji Constitution was adopted on February 11, 1889.[63] The emperor of Japan became an active ruler with considerable political power over foreign policy and diplomacy which was shared with an elected Imperial Diet.[63] The Japanese subjects gained many rights and duties.
The constitution described the emperor (in Article 4) as: "the head of the Empire, combining in Himself the rights of sovereignty", and he "exercises them, according to the provisions of the present Constitution". His rights included to sanction and promulgate laws, to execute them and to exercise "supreme command of the Army and the Navy". The liaison conference created in 1893 also made the emperor the leader of the Imperial General Headquarters. On Meiji's death in 1912 and the accession of his son Taishō, who suffered from ill-health and various disabilities, many of these powers were assumed by the Imperial Diet in an era known as the Taishō Democracy.[64]
World War II (1937–1945)

Emperor Shōwa (Hirohito) was in power during the Pacific War; he was the de jure sovereign of the state and the grand marshal of the imperial forces.[65] However, the extant of his de facto role and powers have been heavily debated since the war's end.[66][67][68][69][70][71] The role of the emperor as head of the State Shinto religion was exploited during the war, creating an Imperial cult that led to kamikaze bombers and other manifestations of fanaticism. This in turn led to the requirement in the Potsdam Declaration for the elimination "for all time of the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into embarking on world conquest".[72]
In State Shinto, the emperor was believed to be an arahitogami (現人神) (manifest kami or incarnation of a deity).[73] Following Japan's surrender, the Allies issued the Shinto Directive separating church and state within Japan. In 1946, Emperor Shōwa was forced to proclaim the Humanity Declaration, but the declaration excludes the word arahitogami (現人神), including the unusual word akitsumikami (現御神; living god) instead. As such, some experts doubt whether his divinity was renounced.[74] Jean Herbert said it would be inadmissible to deny his divine origin as according to the Japanese tradition, the figure of the emperor would be "the extension in time" of the goddess Amaterasu and the previous emperors, representing a privileged moment in eternity.[74] Although akitsumikami is often translated as "divine" or "divinity", some Western scholars (including John W. Dower and Herbert P. Bix) have pointed out that its real meaning is "manifest kami" (or, more generally, "incarnation of a god"), and that therefore the emperor would still be, according to the declaration, an arahitogami ("living god"), although not an akitsumikami ("manifest kami").[70][71]
Emperor Shōwa was excluded from the postwar Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal. Scholars dispute the power he had and the role he played during WWII.[65] Emperor Shōwa's reign from 1926 until his death in 1989 makes him the longest-lived and longest-reigning historical Japanese emperor, and one of the longest-reigning monarchs in the world.
Contemporary (1978–present)
The Emperors of Japan have not visited Yasukuni Shrine since 1978.[75] Hirohito maintained an official boycott of Yasukuni Shrine after it was revealed to him that Class-A war criminals had secretly been enshrined. The boycott was continued by his son and grandson, Akihito and Naruhito.[75]
By 1979, Emperor Shōwa was the only monarch in the world with the monarchical title "emperor." Emperor Shōwa was the longest-reigning historical monarch in Japan's history and the world's longest reigning contemporary monarch until he was surpassed by King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand in July 2008.[76]
According to journalist Makoto Inoue of The Nikkei, Emperor Emeritus Akihito wanted to be closer to the people, rather than be treated like a god or robot.[77] Inoue believes that during his reign, he transformed the symbolic role of emperor into a human being.[77] In March 2019, the Mainichi reported 87% thought Akihito fulfilled his role as symbol of the state.[77]
On April 30, 2019, Emperor Akihito abdicated due to health issues and the Heisei era ended.[78] The previous time abdication occurred was Emperor Kōkaku in 1817. Akihito's eldest son, Naruhito ascended on May 1, 2019, referred to as Kinjō Tennō and Reiwa era started.
Current constitution
In 1947 the post-war Constitution of Japan (日本国憲法, Nihonkoku-Kenpō) became law when it received the emperor's assent on November 3, 1946.[79] It provides for a parliamentary system of government and guarantees certain fundamental rights. Under its terms, the emperor of Japan is "the symbol of the State and of the unity of the people" and exercises a purely ceremonial role without the possession of sovereignty.[80] It was drawn up under the Allied occupation that followed World War II and changed Japan's previous Prussian-style Meiji Constitution that granted the emperor theoretically unlimited powers.[81] The liberal constitution was inspired by several European states.[82] Currently, it is a rigid document and the oldest unamended constitution.[83]
Realm and territories
Historically, territorial designations are not a requirement for the position of Tennō (emperor). Rather it is the emperor's symbolic and religious power of authority.[84] Since the Kamakura shogunate, the emperor held de jure ownership of the realm. Throughout most of medieval Japan, the shogun's legitimate authority was based on being appointed and receiving the power from the emperor even though the shogun was the de facto ruler.[84][85] The emperor was considered a direct descendant of Amaterasu and of utmost importance in the Shinto religion and sentimental traditions.[84] Thus no shogun tried to usurp the emperor, instead they tried to keep the emperor under control and away from politics.[86] However, the emperor still had the power to "control time" via the Japanese Nengō which names eras on calendars after emperors.[86]
During the Kofun period the first central government of the unified state was Yamato in the Kinai region of central Japan.[87] The territory of Japan has changed throughout history. Its largest extent was the Empire of Japan. In 1938 it was 1,984,000 km2 (800,000 sq mi).[88]
The maximum extent including the home islands and the Japanese colonial empire was 8,510,000 km2 (3,300,000 sq mi) in 1942.[89] After its defeat in World War II the empire was dismantled. The contemporary territories include the Japanese archipelago and these areas. Regardless of territorial changes the emperor remains the formal head of state of Japan. During most of history, de facto power was with shoguns or prime ministers. The emperor was more like a revered embodiment of divine harmony than the head of an actual governing administration. In Japan, it was more effective for ambitious daimyo (feudal lords) to hold actual power, as such positions were not inherently contradictory to the emperor's position. The shoguns and prime ministers derived their legitimacy from the emperor. The parliamentary government continues a similar coexistence with the emperor.[citation needed]
The first recorded instance of the name Nihon 日本 was between 665 and 703 during the Asuka period.[90] This was several centuries after the start of the current imperial line.[91] The various names of Japan do not affect the status of the emperor as head of state.
Education
The emperors traditionally had an education officer. In recent times, Emperor Taishō had Count Nogi Maresuke, Emperor Shōwa had Marshal-Admiral Marquis Tōgō Heihachirō, and Emperor Akihito had Elizabeth Gray Vining as well as Shinzō Koizumi as their tutors.[92] Members of the imperial family were obliged to be educated at the Gakushūin (Peer's School) by the 1926 Act of Education for the Imperial family, which was abolished in 1947.[93]
Reference and naming
The Japanese language has two words equivalent to the English word "emperor": tennō (天皇; "heavenly sovereign"), which refers exclusively to the emperor of Japan, and kōtei (皇帝), which primarily identifies non-Japanese emperors. Sumeramikoto ("the imperial person") was also used in Old Japanese.
The title given posthumously to an emperor changed after the death of Emperor Murakami in 967, who was the last to receive the title tennō. From the death of Emperor En'yū in 991 onward, the title in (院) started to be used instead of tennō as the honorary title attached to the posthumous name (諡号, shigō).[94] The term in originally referred to both the residence and the honorific title of a retired emperor (太上天皇, Daijō Tennō). However, from the Heian period onward, as it became rare for emperors to die before abdicating, the in title became established as a posthumous title. An exception is Emperor Antoku, who died during his reign in 1187, and was posthumously given a title that included tennō.[94] Although tennō was not used for emperors from the 10th[95] or 12th century[96] to the 19th century,[97] it continued to be used for emperors who died before Juntoku abdicated due to the 1221 Jōkyū Rebellion.[98]
Historically, emperors would refer to themselves as chin (朕) (a first-person singular pronoun used solely by the emperor, first originating from Chinese emperor Qin Shi Huang), which functioned as the royal we, however this has fallen out of use since 1945, in favour of the more common watakushi (私).[99]
During their reign, the term tennō was only written in documents on limited occasions, such as when it was written as tennō but read as sumeramikoto in the imperial rescript of accession (即位宣命, sokui senmyō). Normally, out of respect, euphemistic expressions like kinri (禁裏), kinchū (禁中), or shujō (主上), which refer to the emperor's palace or supreme status, were used instead.[94]
However, as the use of the title in, which originally referred to retired emperors, gradually expanded over time to include members of the imperial family, shoguns, daimyos, and even commoners, it came to be seen as inappropriate for deceased emperors. The Edo period Confucian scholar Nakai Chikuzan (1730–1804) remarked, "The title in is used by everyone from feudal lords and nobles to samurai and commoners, so it lacks the supreme honor of the imperial title and is unworthy" (from Sōbō Kigen). He argued that deceased emperors should be referred to as "Era Name + Tennō."[94]
Amid this trend, when Emperor Kōkaku died in 1840, Emperor Ninkō consulted with the court nobles about reviving the title tennō and obtained permission from the Tokugawa shogunate. He then selected a posthumous name, and in 1841, bestowed the title and posthumous name Emperor Kōkaku (光格天皇, Kōkaku Tennō). From this point onward, the title tennō was once again used for deceased emperors.[94]
Other titles that were recorded to be in use were kō (皇), tei (帝), ō (王), all meaning "prince" or "emperor", and tenshi (天子), or "son of heaven".[100]
In English, the term mikado (御門 or 帝), literally meaning "the honorable gate" (i.e. the gate of the imperial palace, which indicates the person who lives in and possesses the palace; compare Sublime Porte, an old term for the Ottoman government), was once used (as in The Mikado, a 19th-century operetta), but this term is now obsolete.[6]
Japanese emperors take on a regnal name, which is the common and polite way to refer to the emperor as a person during their reign. Japanese regnal names are more precisely names for a period of time that begins with a historical event, such as the enthronement of an emperor. Since Emperor Meiji, it has been customary to have one era per emperor and to rename each emperor after his death using the name of the era over which he presided. Before Emperor Meiji, the names of the eras were changed more frequently, and the posthumous names of the emperors were chosen differently.[101]
The current emperor on the throne is typically referred to as Tennō Heika (天皇陛下, "His [Imperial] Majesty the Emperor"), Kinjō Heika (今上陛下, "His Current Majesty") or simply Tennō, when speaking Japanese. Emperor Akihito received the title Daijō Tennō (太上天皇, Emperor Emeritus), often shortened to Jōkō (上皇), upon his abdication on April 30, 2019, and is expected to be renamed Heisei Tennō (平成天皇) after his death and will then be referred to exclusively by that name in Japanese.
Origin of the title
Originally, the ruler of Japan was known as either 大和大王/大君 (Yamato-ōkimi, "Grand King of Yamato"), 倭王/倭国王 (Wa-ō/Wakoku-ō, "King of Wa", used externally) or 治天下大王 (Ame-no-shita shiroshimesu ōkimi or Sumera no mikoto, "Grand King who rules all under heaven", used internally) in Japanese and Chinese sources before the 7th century. The oldest diplomatic reference to the title 天子 (Tenshi, Emperor or Son of Heaven) can be found in a diplomatic document sent from Empress Suiko to the Sui dynasty of China in 607. In this document, Empress Suiko introduced herself to Emperor Yang of Sui as 日出處天子 (Hi izurutokoro no tenshi) meaning "Heavenly son of the land where the sun rises".[102][103] The oldest documented use of the title 天皇 (Tennō, heavenly emperor) appears on a wooden tablet, or mokkan, that was unearthed in Asuka-mura, Nara Prefecture in 1998 and dated back to the reign of Emperor Tenmu and Empress Jitō in the 7th century.[104][105]
Marriage traditions
This section needs more citations. (January 2021) |

Throughout history, Japanese emperors and noblemen appointed a spouse to the position of chief wife, rather than just keeping a harem or an assortment of female attendants.
The Japanese imperial dynasty consistently practiced official polygamy until the Taishō period (1912–1926). Besides his empress, the emperor could take, and nearly always took, several secondary consorts ("concubines") of various hierarchical degrees. Concubines were allowed also to other dynasts (Shinnōke, Ōke). After a decree by Emperor Ichijō (r. 986–1011), some emperors even had two empresses simultaneously (identified by the separate titles kōgō and chūgū). With the help of all this polygamy, the imperial clan could produce more offspring. (Sons by secondary consorts were usually recognized as imperial princes, too, and such a son could be recognized as heir to the throne if the empress did not give birth to an heir.)
Of the eight reigning empresses of Japan, none married or gave birth after ascending the throne. Some of them, being widows, had produced children before their reigns. In the succession, children of the empress were preferred over sons of secondary consorts. Thus it was significant which quarters had preferential opportunities in providing chief wives to imperial princes, i.e. supplying future empresses.
Apparently, the oldest tradition of official marriages within the imperial dynasty involved marriages between dynasty members, even between half-siblings or between uncle and niece. Such marriages were deemed to preserve better the imperial blood; or they aimed at producing children symbolic of a reconciliation between two branches of the imperial dynasty. Several imperial figures of the 5th and 6th centuries such as Prince Shōtoku (574–622) were children of half-sibling couples. Daughters of other families remained concubines until Emperor Shōmu (701–706)—in what was specifically reported as the first elevation of its kind—elevated his Fujiwara consort Empress Kōmyō to chief wife.
Japanese monarchs often sealed alliances with powerful chiefs through marriage. A repeated pattern saw an imperial son-in-law under the influence of his powerful non-imperial father-in-law. In the 6th century, the main family outside the Imperial clan that marriages were contracted with was the Soga lords. Beginning from the 7th and 8th centuries, emperors primarily took women of the Fujiwara clan as their highest-ranking wives – the most probable mothers of future monarchs. This was cloaked as a tradition of marriage between heirs of two kami (Shinto deities): descendants of Amaterasu with descendants of the family kami of the Fujiwara. (Originally, the Fujiwara descended from relatively minor nobility, thus their kami is an unremarkable one in the Japanese myth world.) To produce imperial children, heirs of the nation, with two-side descent from the two kami, was regarded as desirable – or at least it suited powerful Fujiwara lords, who thus received preference in the imperial marriage-market. The reality behind such marriages was an alliance between an imperial prince and a Fujiwara lord (his father-in-law or grandfather), the latter with his resources supporting the prince to the throne and most often controlling the government. These arrangements established the tradition of regents (Sesshō and Kampaku), with these positions held only by a Fujiwara sekke lord.
Fujiwara women often became empresses, while concubines came from less exalted noble families. In the last thousand years, sons of an imperial male and a Fujiwara woman have been preferred in the succession. The five Fujiwara families, Ichijō, Kujō, Nijō, Konoe, and Takatsukasa, functioned as the primary source of imperial brides from the 8th century to the 19th century, even more often than daughters of the imperial clan itself. Fujiwara daughters were thus the usual empresses and mothers of emperors. The Meiji-era Imperial House Law of 1889 made this restriction on brides for the emperor and crown prince explicit. A clause stipulated that daughters of Sekke (the five main branches of the higher Fujiwara) and daughters of the imperial clan itself were primarily acceptable brides. The law was repealed in the aftermath of World War II. In 1959 the future Emperor Akihito became the first crown-prince for over a thousand years to marry a consort from outside the previously eligible circle.
Three Sacred Treasures

In Japanese mythology, the sacred treasures were bestowed on Ninigi-no-Mikoto, the grandson of the goddess Amaterasu, at the advent of Tenson kōrin. Amaterasu sent him to pacify Japan by bringing the three celestial gifts that are used by the emperor.[106] The account of Ninigi being sent to earth appears in the Nihon Shoki. The Three Sacred Treasures were inherited by successive Japanese emperors, which are the same as or similar to the sacred treasures in mythology. These three gifts signify that the emperor is the descendant of Amaterasu. The three sacred treasures are:[107]
- Yata no Kagami (kept at the Ise Grand Shrine, with a replica at the central shrine of the Three Palace Sanctuaries)[107]
- Yasakani no Magatama (kept at the central shrine of the Three Palace Sanctuaries)[107]
- Kusanagi sword (kept at the Atsuta Shrine)[107]
During the succession rite (senso, 践祚), possessing the jewel Yasakani no Magatama, the sword Kusanagi and the mirror Yata no Kagami are a testament of the legitimate serving emperor.[108]
Succession

The origins of the Japanese imperial dynasty are obscure, and it bases its position on the claim that it has "reigned since time immemorial".[109] There are no records of any emperor who was not said to have been a descendant of another, yet there is suspicion that Emperor Keitai (c. AD 500) may have been an unrelated outsider, though the sources (Kojiki, Nihon-Shoki) state that he was a male-line descendant of Emperor Ōjin. However, his descendants, including his successors, were according to records descended from at least one and probably several imperial princesses of the older lineage.
Millennia ago, the Japanese imperial family developed its own peculiar system of hereditary succession. It has been non-primogenitural, more or less agnatic, based mostly on rotation. Today, Japan uses strict agnatic primogeniture, which was adopted from Prussia, by which Japan was greatly influenced in the 1870s.
The controlling principles and their interaction were apparently very complex and sophisticated, leading to even idiosyncratic outcomes. Some chief principles apparent in the succession have been:
- Women were allowed to succeed (but there existed no known children of theirs whose father did not also happen to be an agnate of the imperial house, thus there is neither a precedent that a child of an imperial woman with a non-imperial man could inherit, nor a precedent forbidding it for children of empresses). However, female accession was clearly much more rare than male.
- Adoption was possible and a much used way to increase the number of succession-entitled heirs (however, the adopted child had to be a child of another member agnate of the imperial house).
- Abdication was used very often, and in fact occurred more often than death on the throne. In those days, the emperor's chief task was priestly (or godly), containing so many repetitive rituals that it was deemed that after a service of around ten years, the incumbent deserved pampered retirement as an honored former emperor.
- Primogeniture was not used – rather, in the early days, the imperial house practiced something resembling a system of rotation. Very often a brother (or sister) followed the elder sibling even in the case of the predecessor leaving children. The "turn" of the next generation came more often after several individuals of the senior generation. Rotation went often between two or more of the branches of the imperial house, thus more or less distant cousins succeeded each other. Emperor Go-Saga even decreed an official alternation between heirs of his two sons, which system continued for a couple of centuries (leading finally to shogun-induced (or utilized) strife between these two branches, the "southern" and "northern" emperors). Towards the end, the alternates were very distant cousins counted in degrees of male descent (but all that time, intermarriages occurred within the imperial house, thus they were close cousins if female ties are counted). During the past five hundred years, however, probably because of Confucian influence, inheritance by sons – but not always, or even most often, the eldest son has been the norm.
Historically, the succession to the Chrysanthemum Throne has always passed to descendants in male line from the imperial lineage. Generally, they have been males, though over the reign of one hundred monarchs there have been nine women (one pre-historical and eight historical) as emperor on eleven occasions.
Over a thousand years ago, a tradition started that an emperor should ascend relatively young. A dynast who had passed his toddler years was regarded suitable and old enough. Reaching the age of legal majority was not a requirement. Thus, a multitude of Japanese emperors have ascended as children, as young as 6 or 8 years old. The high-priestly duties were deemed possible for a walking child. A reign of around 10 years was regarded a sufficient service. Being a child was apparently a fine property, to better endure tedious duties and to tolerate subjugation to political power-brokers, as well as sometimes to cloak the truly powerful members of the imperial dynasty. Almost all Japanese empresses and dozens of emperors abdicated and lived the rest of their lives in pampered retirement, wielding influence behind the scenes. Several emperors abdicated to their entitled retirement while still in their teens. These traditions show in Japanese folklore, theater, literature, and other forms of culture, where the emperor is usually described or depicted as an adolescent.
Before the Meiji Restoration, Japan had eleven reigns of reigning empresses, all of them daughters of the male line of the Imperial House. None ascended purely as a wife or as a widow of an emperor. Imperial daughters and granddaughters, however, usually ascended the throne as a sort of a "stop gap" measure – if a suitable male was not available or some imperial branches were in rivalry so that a compromise was needed. Over half of Japanese empresses and many emperors abdicated once a suitable male descendant was considered to be old enough to rule (just past toddlerhood, in some cases). Four empresses, Empress Suiko, Empress Kōgyoku (also Empress Saimei), and Empress Jitō, as well as the legendary Empress Jingū, were widows of deceased emperors and princesses of the blood imperial in their own right. One, Empress Genmei, was the widow of a crown prince and a princess of the blood imperial. The other four, Empress Genshō, Empress Kōken (also Empress Shōtoku), Empress Meishō, and Empress Go-Sakuramachi, were unwed daughters of previous emperors. None of these empresses married or gave birth after ascending the throne.
Article 2 of the Meiji Constitution (the Constitution of the Empire of Japan) stated, "The Imperial Throne shall be succeeded to by imperial male descendants, according to the provisions of the Imperial House Law." The 1889 Imperial Household Law fixed the succession on male descendants of the imperial line, and specifically excluded female descendants from the succession. In the event of a complete failure of the main line, the throne would pass to the nearest collateral branch, again in the male line. If the empress did not give birth to an heir, the emperor could take a concubine, and the son he had by that concubine would be recognized as heir to the throne. This law, which was promulgated on the same day as the Meiji Constitution, enjoyed co-equal status with that constitution.
Article 2 of the Constitution of Japan, promulgated in 1947 by influence of the U.S. occupation administration, provides that "The Imperial Throne shall be dynastic and succeeded to in accordance with the Imperial Household Law passed by the Diet." The Imperial Household Law of 1947, enacted by the ninety-second and last session of the Imperial Diet, retained the exclusion on female dynasts found in the 1889 law. The government of Prime Minister Yoshida Shigeru hastily cobbled together the legislation to bring the Imperial Household in compliance with the American-written Constitution of Japan that went into effect in May 1947. In an effort to control the size of the imperial family, the law stipulates that only legitimate male descendants in the male line can be dynasts, that imperial princesses lose their status as imperial family members if they marry outside the imperial family,[110] and that the emperor and other members of the Imperial Family may not adopt children. It also prevented branches, other than the branch descending from Taishō, from being imperial princes any longer.
Current status
Succession is now regulated by laws passed by the National Diet. The current law excludes women from the succession. A change to this law had been considered until Princess Kiko gave birth to Prince Hisahito.
Until the birth of Hisahito, son of Prince Akishino, on September 6, 2006, there was a potential succession problem, since Prince Akishino was the only male child to be born into the imperial family since 1965. Following the birth of Princess Aiko on December 1, 2001, there was public debate about amending the current Imperial Household Law to allow women to succeed to the throne. In January 2005, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi appointed a special panel composed of judges, university professors, and civil servants to study changes to the Imperial Household Law and to make recommendations to the government.
On October 25, 2005, the panel dealing with the succession issue recommended amending the law to allow females of the male line of imperial descent to ascend the Japanese throne. On January 20, 2006, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi devoted part of his annual keynote speech to the controversy, pledging to submit a bill allowing women to ascend the throne to ensure that the succession continues in the future in a stable manner. Shortly after the announcement that Princess Kiko was pregnant with her third child, Koizumi suspended such plans. As of 2025, her son, Prince Hisahito, is second in line to the throne under the current law of succession. On January 3, 2007, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced that he would drop the proposal to alter the Imperial Household Law.[111]
Another proposed plan is to allow unmarried men from the abolished collateral branches of the imperial family to rejoin through adoption or marriage. This would be an emergency measure to ensure stable succession. It does not revise the Imperial Household Law.[112] This does not restore the royalty of the 11 collateral branches of the Imperial House that were abolished in October 1947.
Crown Prince Akishino was formally declared first in line to the chrysanthemum throne on November 8, 2020.[113]
Burial traditions

During the Kofun period, so-called "archaic funerals" were held for the dead emperors, but only the funerary rites from the end of the period, which the chronicles describe in more detail, are known. They were centered around the rite of the mogari (殯), a provisional depository between death and permanent burial.[114]
Empress Jitō was the first Japanese imperial personage to be cremated (in 703). After that, with a few exceptions, all emperors were cremated up to the Edo period.[114] For the next 350 years, in-ground burial became the favoured funeral custom. Until 1912, the emperors were usually buried in Kyoto.[115] From Emperor Taishō onward, the emperors have been buried at the Musashi Imperial Graveyard in Tokyo.
In 2013, the Imperial Household Agency announced that Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko would be cremated after they die.[116]
Wealth

Until the end of World War II, the Japanese monarchy was thought to be among the wealthiest in the world.[117] Before 1911, no distinction was made between the imperial crown estates and the emperor's personal properties, which were considerable. The Imperial Property Law, which came into effect in January 1911, established two categories of imperial properties: the hereditary or crown estates and the personal ("ordinary") properties of the imperial family. The Imperial Household Minister was given the responsibility for observing any judicial proceedings concerning imperial holdings. Under the terms of the law, imperial properties were only taxable in cases where no conflict with the Imperial House Law existed; however, crown estates could only be used for public or imperially-sanctioned undertakings. Personal properties of certain members of the imperial family, in addition to properties held for imperial family members who were minors, were exempted from taxation. Those family members included the Empress Dowager, the Empress, the Crown Prince and Crown Princess, the Imperial Grandson and the consort of the Imperial Grandson.[118] As a result of the poor economic conditions in Japan, 117,059.07 hectares (289,259.25 acres) of crown lands (about 26% of the total landholdings) were either sold or transferred to government and private-sector interests in 1921. In 1930, the Nagoya Detached Palace (Nagoya Castle) was donated to the city of Nagoya, with six other imperial villas being either sold or donated at the same time.[118] In 1939, Nijō Castle, the former Kyoto residence of the Tokugawa shoguns and an imperial palace since the Meiji Restoration, was likewise donated to the city of Kyoto.
At the end of 1935, according to official government figures, the Imperial Court owned roughly 1,259,368 hectares (3,111,965 acres) of landed estates, the bulk of which (1,052,000 hectares (2,599,548 acres)) were the emperor's private lands, with the total acreage of the crown estates amounting to some 207,264 hectares (512,161 acres); those landholdings comprised palace complexes, forest and farm lands and other residential and commercial properties. The total value of the imperial properties was then estimated at ¥650 million, or roughly US$195 million at prevailing exchange rates.[note 1][118][119] This was in addition to the emperor's personal fortune, which amounted to hundreds of millions of yen and included numerous family heirlooms and furnishings, purebred livestock and investments in major Japanese firms, such as the Bank of Japan, other major Japanese banks, the Imperial Hotel and Nippon Yusen.[118]
Following Japan's defeat in the Second World War, all of the collateral branches of the imperial family were abolished under the Allied occupation of the country and the subsequent constitutional reforms, forcing those families to sell their assets to private or government owners. Staff numbers in the imperial households were slashed from a peak of roughly 6,000 to about 1,000. The imperial estates and the emperor's personal fortune (then estimated at US$17.15 million, or roughly US$800 million in 2024 terms) were transferred to either state or private ownership, excepting 2,760 hectares (6,810 acres) of landholdings. Since the 1947 constitutional reforms, the imperial family has been supported by an official civil list sanctioned by the Japanese government. The largest imperial divestments were the former imperial Kiso and Amagi forest lands in Gifu and Shizuoka prefectures, grazing lands for livestock in Hokkaido and a stock farm in the Chiba region, all of which were transferred to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Imperial property holdings have been further reduced since 1947 after several handovers to the government. Today, the primary imperial properties include the two imperial palaces at Tokyo and Kyoto, several imperial villas and a number of imperial farms and game preserves.[120]
As of 2017, Akihito has an estimated net worth of US$40 million.[121] The wealth and expenditures of the emperor and the imperial family have remained a subject of speculation and were largely withheld from the public until 2003, when Mori Yohei, a former royal correspondent for the Mainichi Shimbun, obtained access to 200 documents through a recently passed public information law. Mori's findings, which he published in a book, revealed details of the imperial family's US$240 million civil list (in 2003 values).[122] Among other details, the book revealed the imperial family employed a staff of over 1,000 people.[123] The total cost of events related to the enthronement of Emperor Naruhito was approximately 16.6 billion yen ($150 million) in 2019. This is 30% higher than Emperor Emeritus Akihito's accession (1990).[124]
See also
- Anti-monarchism in Japan
- Chrysanthemum taboo
- Controversies regarding the role of the Emperor of Japan
- Daijō Tennō
- Divine right of kings
- Emperor system
- Empress of Japan
- Family tree of Japanese monarchs
- Imperial House of Japan
- Japanese Air Force One
- Japanese honors system
- Japanese official state car
- List of emperors of Japan
- Reigning Emperor
- Sacred king
- State Shinto
References
Notes
- 陛下 (Heika)
- The emperor does not generally use the style "Imperial Majesty" because in modern Japanese protocol, the preferred title for the emperor is simply "Majesty". This style reflects a cultural understanding of the emperor's unique position as a symbolic figurehead within the country, not necessarily requiring the distinction of "Imperial" to denote his status above foreign monarchs. Instead, the Japanese term "Tennō Heika" (天皇陛下) is used, which roughly translates into English as "His Majesty the Emperor". This style of address is prescribed by law and used by the Imperial Household Agency.[1][2][3]
- First monarch contemporaneously documented as using the title "Tennō".
- This way of counting years is based on the ancient Japanese way, and does not necessarily match the current one. The actual date of the foundation of the Yamato House is not known; the first historical writings did not appear until the 8th century.
- Japanese: 天皇, romanized: Tennō; pronounced [tennoꜜː]; literally "ruler from heaven" or "heavenly sovereign"[5]
- In English, the use of the term Mikado (帝/御門; IPA: [mʲika̠do̞]) for the emperor was once common but is now considered obsolete.[6]
- initially Kyūjō (宮城), later Kōkyo (皇居)
- Sovereign states operating as constitutional monarchies which impose countersignature requirements on their monarchs are Belgium, Denmark, Jordan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Thailand.[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]
Informational notes
- Roughly US$23.2 billion in 2022, in terms of relative income value. Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "Seven Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount, 1790 to Present". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved February 22, 2023.
Citations
- "Article 23, Imperial House Law". Imperial Household Agency. Retrieved November 7, 2023.
- "About the status of the Emperor and Imperial Family Members". Imperial Household Agency. Retrieved November 7, 2024.
- "Activities of Their Majesties the Emperor and Empress". The Imperial Household Agency. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
- 国史教科書 257頁 竹田恒泰著 2026年1月5日閲覧
- "Tennō". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved August 12, 2021.
- Kanʼichi Asakawa. The early institutional life of Japan: a study in the reform of 645 A.D.. Tokyo: Shueisha (1903), p. 25. "We purposely avoid, in spite of its wide usage in foreign literature, the misleading term Mikado. If it be not for the natural curiosity of the races, which always seeks something novel and loves to call foreign things by foreign names, it is hard to understand why this obsolete and ambiguous word should so sedulously be retained. It originally meant not only the Sovereign, but also his house, the court, and even the State, and its use in historical writings causes many difficulties which it is unnecessary to discuss here in detail. The native Japanese employ the term neither in speech nor in writing. It might as well be dismissed with great advantage from sober literature as it has been for the official documents."
- Foakes, Joanne (February 2014). "Chapter 2: Head of State". The Position of Heads of State and Senior Officials in International Law. The Oxford International Law Library. Oxford University Press. pp. 29–109. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
- Protocol and Liaison Services: Department for General Assembly and Conference Management (September 26, 2024). List of Heads of State, Heads of Government, and Ministers for Foreign Affairs (PDF) (Report). United Nations. p. 25. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
- "The Constitution of Japan". Prime Minister's Office of Japan: Cabinet Public Affairs Office, Cabinet Secretariat. Retrieved July 8, 2021.
- 裁判例結果詳細 | 最高裁判所. Supreme Court of Japan. Retrieved August 30, 2026.
- 三訂版,世界大百科事典内言及, デジタル大辞泉,精選版 日本国語大辞典,改訂新版 世界大百科事典,日本大百科全書(ニッポニカ),百科事典マイペディア,山川 日本史小辞典 改訂新版,ブリタニカ国際大百科事典 小項目事典,デジタル版 日本人名大辞典+Plus,旺文社日本史事典. 崇神天皇(スジンテンノウ)とは? 意味や使い方. コトバンク (in Japanese). Retrieved January 9, 2026.
- 田中, 卓 (June 2012). 考古学・上代史料の再検討 [Reexamination of archaeological and ancient historical materials]. 国書刊行会. pp. 170–200.
- Anckar, Carsten (October 6, 2020). "Constitutional monarchies and semi-constitutional monarchies: a global historical study, 1800–2017". Contemporary Politics. 17 (1): 23-40. doi:10.1080/13569775.2020.1824360.
- Bulmer, Elliot (2017). Constitutional Monarchs in Parliamentary Democracies (PDF) (Report) (Second ed.). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. p. 6-9. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
- "Article 106, Constitution of Belgium". The Constitute Project. Retrieved December 3, 2023.
- "Article 14, Constitution of Denmark". The Constitute Project. Retrieved December 3, 2023.
- "Article 40 (1), Constitution of Jordan". The Constitute Project. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
- "Article 45, Constitution of Luxembourg". The Constitute Project. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
- "Article 47, Constitution of the Netherlands". The Constitute Project. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
- "Article 31, Constitution of Norway". The Constitute Project. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
- "Sections 56 (3) and 64, Constitution of Spain". The Constitute Project. Retrieved December 3, 2023.
- "Section 182, Constitution of Thailand". The Constitute Project. Retrieved December 3, 2023.
- Maartje De Visser and Andrew Harding (October 2022). "Monarchical Constitutional Guardianship and Legal Métissage in Asia". Asian Journal of Law and Society. 9 (3): 345–362. doi:10.1017/als.2022.29. Retrieved January 15, 2025.
- "Article 65, Constitution of Japan". The Constitute Project. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- Robert D. Eldridge and Musashi Katsuhiro (ed.). "The Japan Self-Defense Forces Law: Translation, History, and Analysis" (PDF). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- "Japan - The World Factbook". U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on January 5, 2021. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- "The Government of Modern Japan: The Branches and Their Functions". Asia for Educators. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- Young, Sarah (June 25, 2024). Sachin Ravikumar, Alexandra Hudson and Bill Berkrot (ed.). "UK's King Charles welcomes Japan's Emperor Naruhito for state visit". Reuters. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
- "Japan State Visit". The Royal Household. June 25, 2024. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
- "Article 1, Constitution of Japan". The Constitute Project. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- "Article 4, Constitution of Japan". The Constitute Project. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- Tsutsui Kiyotada (November 1, 2019). "A Turning Point for the System of Emperor as Symbol: Bagehot, Emperor Showa, and Fukuzawa's On the Imperial Family". Asia-Pacific Review. 26 (2): 26–36. doi:10.1080/13439006.2019.1688929. Retrieved October 7, 2024.
- Baker, Brandon (May 22, 2019). "Japan's modern monarchy: How it works". Penn Today. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- "Fundamental Structure of the Government of Japan". Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet. October 25, 2021. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- Knowledge at Wharton Podcast (May 6, 2019). "How Modern Monarchies Are Evolving". Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved November 7, 2024.
- Kawanishi Hideya (October 25, 2021). "The Emperor as a Symbol: The Meaning of the Unity of the People Has Evolved with Time". Nippon Communications Foundation. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- "Japan's new Emperor Naruhito pledges unity". BBC News. May 1, 2019. Retrieved May 2, 2019.
- Maizland, Lindsay (April 26, 2019). "The Japanese Emperor's Role in Foreign Policy". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved November 7, 2024.
- "Article 6, Constitution of Japan". The Constitute Project. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- "Article 7, Constitution of Japan". The Constitute Project. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
- The formal investiture of the Prime Minister in 2010, the opening of the ordinary session of the Diet in January 2012 and the opening of an extra session of the Diet in the autumn of 2011. The 120th anniversary of the Diet was commemorarated with a special ceremony in the House of Councillors in November 2010, when also the Empress and the Prince and Princess Akishino were present.
- Holcombe, Charles (January 2001). The Genesis of East Asia: 221 B.C. – A.D. 907. University of Hawaii Press. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-8248-2465-5.
- Vogel, Ezra F. (2019). China and Japan: Facing History. Harvard University Press. pp. 15–17. ISBN 9780674240766.
- Boscaro, Adriana; Gatti, Franco; Raveri, Massimo, eds. (2003). Rethinking Japan: Social Sciences, Ideology and Thought. Vol. II. Japan Library. p. 300. ISBN 978-0-904404-79-1.
- Holcombe, Charles (January 2001). The Genesis of East Asia: 221 B.C. – A.D. 907. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 198–. ISBN 978-0-8248-2465-5.
- Shillony, Ben-Ami (2008). The Emperors of Modern Japan. BRILL. p. 15. ISBN 978-90-04-16822-0.
- Murdoch, James (1996) [1903]. A History of Japan. Routledge. pp. 53–56. ISBN 978-1-317-85427-2.
- Barnes 2007, p. 203.
- Henshall 2004, p. 15–16.
- Conlan, Thomas Donald (2022). Samurai and the Warrior Culture of Japan, 471–1877: A Sourcebook. Hackett Publishing. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-1-64792-057-9.
- Bentley, John R. (2020). The Birth of Japanese Historiography. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-29569-6.
- Henshall, Kenneth (2013). Historical Dictionary of Japan to 1945. Scarecrow Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-8108-7872-3.
- Hoye, Timothy. (1999). Japanese Politics: Fixed and Floating Worlds, p. 78, Prentice Hall; "According to legend, the first Japanese emperor was Jinmu. Along with the next 13 emperors, Jimmu is not considered an actual, historical figure. Historically verifiable Emperors of Japan date from the early sixth century with Kinmei."
- Morton 2005, p. 11.
- Hendry, Joy (2012). Understanding Japanese Society. Routledge. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-136-27918-8.
- Edgington-Brown, Luke (May 2016). The International Origins of Japanese Archaeology: William Gowland and His Kofun Collection at the British Museum (Ph.D.). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia. OCLC 1079148109. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global 2164566112.
- Schirokauer, Conrad; Lurie, David; Gay, Suzanne (1978). A Brief History of Japanese Civilization. Cengage Learning. p. 147. ISBN 978-0495913252.
- Titsingh, pp. 411–412.
- Dower, John (2010). "Black Ships and the Samurai: Commodore Perry and the Opening of Japan (1853–1854)". Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved June 15, 2019.
- Takekoshi, pp. 285–86
- Totman, Conrad (1966). "Political Succession in The Tokugawa Bakufu: Abe Masahiro's Rise to Power, 1843–1845". Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 26: 102–124. doi:10.2307/2718461. JSTOR 2718461.
- 御誓文ノ趣旨ニ基ク立憲政體樹立ニ關スル詔書(明治八年四月十四日):文部科学省. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Retrieved March 19, 2024.
- "Meiji Constitution | 1889, Japan". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
- Ishida, Takeshi; Kraus, Ellis S, eds. (1989). Democracy in Japan. University of Pittsburgh Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0822954149.
- Kawamura, Noriko (2016). Emperor Hirohito and the Pacific War. Seattle. ISBN 978-0-295-80631-0. OCLC 922925863.[page needed]
- "Hirohito "uncomfortable" with war but powerless to stop". Japan Wire by Kyodo News. July 20, 2017. Retrieved September 20, 2026.
- Times, Susan Chira, Special To the New York (January 22, 1989). "Post-Hirohito, Japan Debates His War Role". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 20, 2026.
- Author, No. "Diary tells of Emperor Hirohito's anguish in final years over blame for war | The Japan Times". The Japan Times. Archived from the original on May 29, 2019. Retrieved September 20, 2026.
{{cite news}}:|last=has generic name (help) - Landers, Peter (August 19, 2019). "Japan's Wartime Emperor Showed Remorse Over Nanjing Massacre". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved September 20, 2026.
- Bix, Herbert P., Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, HarperCollins, 2000, pp. 550–553.
- Dower, John W., Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II, W. W. Norton & Company, 1999, pp. 310–318.
- Villa, Brian Loring (January 1976). "The U.S. Army, Unconditional Surrender, and the Potsdam Declaration". The SHAFR Guide Online. doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim130130102. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
- Nihon Shoki, Chapter 7
- Herbert, Jean (1964). Aux sources du Japon: Le Shinto. Parigi: Albin Michel.[page needed]
- "Explainer: Why Yasukuni shrine is a controversial symbol of Japan's war legacy". Reuters. August 14, 2021.
- "King Bhumibol's reign". The New York Times. May 21, 1989. Archived from the original on October 22, 2019. Retrieved February 23, 2020.
- "Japanese emperor, a state symbol with scant political power". April 30, 2019. Archived from the original on May 1, 2019.
- Enjoji, Kaori (December 1, 2017). "Japan Emperor Akihito to abdicate on April 30, 2019". CNN. Tokyo. Archived from the original on April 30, 2019. Retrieved December 1, 2017.
- "Text of the Constitution and Other Important Documents". National Diet Library. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved June 8, 2015.
- Oda, Hiroshi (2009). "Sources of Law". Japanese Law. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232185.001.1. ISBN 978-0-19-923218-5.
- Takemae 2002, p. 270.
- Takemae 2002, p. xxxix.
- "The Anomalous Life of the Japanese Constitution". Nippon.com. August 15, 2017. Archived from the original on August 11, 2019. Retrieved August 11, 2019.
- Roth, 2007:103.
- "Shogun". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved November 19, 2014.
- Fiévé & Waley, 2003:235.
- Henshall, Kenneth (2012). A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 15–16. ISBN 978-0-230-34662-8.
- Harrison, Mark (2000). The Economics of World War II: Six Great Powers in International Comparison. Cambridge University Press. p. 3. ISBN 9780521785037. Retrieved October 2, 2016.
- James, David H. (November 1, 2010). The Rise and Fall of the Japanese Empire. Routledge. ISBN 9781136925467. Archived from the original on July 6, 2019. Retrieved September 11, 2018.
by 1942, this 'Empire' covered about 3,285,000 square miles
- Fogel, Joshua A. (April 29, 2015). The Cultural Dimensions of Sino-Japanese Relations: Essays on the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Routledge. p. 140. ISBN 978-1317457671.
- Nussbaum, Louis Frédéric et al. (2005). "Nihon" in Japan encyclopedia, p. 707., p. 707, at Google Books; n.b., Louis-Frédéric is pseudonym of Louis-Frédéric Nussbaum, see Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Authority File Deprecated link archived May 24, 2012, at archive.today.
- Smith, Dinitia (December 1, 1999). "Elizabeth Vining, Tutor to a Future Emperor, Dies at 97 (Published 1999)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
- 皇族就学令 大正15年10月21日皇室令第8号 [Royal school enrollment order (October 21, 1918 Imperial Ordinance No. 8)]. National Diet Library. 2019.
- Fujita, Satoru (2018). 天皇の歴史6 江戸時代の天皇 [History of the Emperors 6: Emperors of the Edo Period]. Kodansha Academic Library (in Japanese). Kodansha. pp. 288–290. ISBN 978-4-065-11640-1.
- Patricia Buckley Ebrey, Anne Walthall (2013). East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History. Cengage Learning. p. 120. ISBN 9781285528670.
- Charles Holcombe (2017). A History of East Asia. Cambridge University Press. p. 159. ISBN 9781107118737.
- Screech, (2006). Secret Memoirs of the Shoguns: Isaac Titsingh and Japan, 1779–1822, p. 232 n4.
- Joshua A. Fogel (2005). The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State: Japan and China. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 225. ISBN 9780812238204.
- As seen in the Hirohito surrender broadcast (1945): 朕󠄂深ク世界ノ大勢ト帝國ノ現狀トニ鑑ミ非常ノ措置ヲ以テ時局ヲ收拾セムト欲シ茲ニ忠良ナル爾臣民ニ吿ク
- Engelbert Kaempfer; Beatrice M. Bodart-Bailey (1999). Kaempfer's Japan: Tokugawa Culture Observed. University of Hawaii Press. p. 88. ISBN 9780824863227.
- Sieg, Linda. "Japan new imperial era name, Reiwa - Origins, Selection, Meaning". Reuters. Retrieved March 20, 2024.
- Huffman, James (2010). Japan in World History. p.15. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-979884-1.
- Satoshi Yabuuchi, 時代背景から知る 仏像の秘密, The Nikkei, October 10, 2019
- Ooms, Herman (2009). Imperial Politics and Symbolics in Ancient Japan: The Tenmu Dynasty, 650–800. pp.154–156. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-3235-3.
- Masataka Kondo, ご存知ですか 3月2日は飛鳥池遺跡で「天皇」木簡が出土したと発表された日です, March 2, 2018.
- Ashkenazi, Michael (2003). "Ninigi-no-Mikoto". Handbook of Japanese mythology. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 222. ISBN 9781576074671.
- Jones, Anna (April 27, 2019). "Akihito and Japan's Imperial Treasures that make a man an emperor". BBC News. Archived from the original on March 24, 2022.
- ご即位・立太子・成年に関する用語. Imperial Household Agency. Archived from the original on May 9, 2021. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
- Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko (1991). "The Emperor of Japan as Deity (Kami)". Ethnology. 30 (3): 199–215. doi:10.2307/3773631. ISSN 0014-1828.
- Martin, Alex, "Imperial law revisited as family shrinks, Emperor ages", Japan Times, December 16, 2011, p. 3.
- "Report: Japan to drop plan to allow female monarch". USA Today. McLean, VA: Gannett. Associated Press. January 3, 2007. ISSN 0734-7456. Retrieved October 20, 2011.
- "Report: Japan lawmakers eye restoration of ex-imperial members for succession". The Mainichi. October 23, 2019. Archived from the original on October 24, 2019. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- "Crown Prince Akishino formally declared first in line to the throne". Japan Times. November 8, 2020. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020.
- Macé, François. "The Funerals of the Japanese Emperors".
- Seidensticker, Edward. (1990). Tokyo Rising, p. 20.
- "Emperor, Empress plan to be cremated". The Japan Times. Retrieved November 21, 2013.
- "Legacy of Hirohito". The Times. May 3, 1989.
- "Japan – The Imperial Court". The Japan-Manchoukuo Year Book. The Japan-Manchoukuo Year Book Co. 1938. pp. 50–51.
- "Exchange and Interest Rates", Japan Year Book 1938–1939, Kenkyusha Press, Foreign Association of Japan, Tokyo. pp. 332–333.
- Reed, Christopher (October 5, 1971). "Few personal possessions for reigning monarch". The Times.
- "Akihito Net Worth 2017: How Rich Is Japanese Emperor As Parliament Passed Historic Law For His Abdication". The International Business Times. June 9, 2017. Archived from the original on August 5, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2018.
- "British Pound to US Dollar Spot Exchange Rates for 2003 from the Bank of England". PoundSterling Live. Archived from the original on July 31, 2020. Retrieved May 27, 2018.
- "Book lifts the lid on Emperor's high living". The Daily Telegraph. September 7, 2003. Archived from the original on May 11, 2019. Retrieved May 27, 2018.
- "Q&A;: How are the imperial family's money and property managed?". Kyodo News. May 4, 2019. Archived from the original on September 27, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
General and cited references
- Morton, Scott (2005). Japan: Its history and culture (Fourth ed.). McGraw Hill. ISBN 0-07-141280-8.
- Barnes, Gina Lee (2007). State Formation in Japan: Emergence of a 4th-century Ruling Elite. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-59628-2.
- Asakawa, Kan'ichi (1903). The Early Institutional Life of Japan. Tokyo: Shueisha. OCLC 4427686. Online, multi-formatted, full-text book at openlibrary.org.
- Henshall, Kenneth G. (2004). A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower (PDF). Archived from the original on October 29, 2004.
- Bar-On Cohen, Einat (2012–12). "The Forces of Homology—Hirohito, Emperor of Japan and the 1928 Rites of Succession". History and Anthropology. 23 (4): 425–443. doi:10.1080/02757206.2013.726990. ISSN 0275-7206.
- Brinkley, Francis (1911). . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 252–273.
- "Japan's Emperor Is a Prisoner in His Own Palaces". The Economist. Vol. 433, no. 9165. October 19, 2019. p. 37 (US edition). Retrieved December 12, 2020. Alternate link (subscription required).
- Fiévé, Nicolas; Waley, Paul (2003). Japanese Capitals in Historical Perspective: Place, Power and Memory in Kyoto, Edo and Tokyo. Routledge. ISBN 0-4154-0581-5.
- Large, Stephen S. (1992). Emperor Hirohito and Shōwa Japan: A Political Biography. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-585-44734-9. OCLC 52419479.
- Kawamura, Noriko (January 27, 2016). Emperor Hirohito and the Pacific War. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-80631-0. OCLC 922925863.
- Pye, Lucian W.; Keene, Donald (2002). "Emperor of Japan: Meiji and His World, 1852-1912". Foreign Affairs. 81 (5): 217. doi:10.2307/20033332. ISSN 0015-7120.
- Roth, Andrew (March 15, 2007). Dilemma in Japan. Roth Press. ISBN 978-1-4067-6311-9.
- Screech, Timon (2006). Secret Memoirs of the Shoguns: Isaac Titsingh and Japan, 1779–1822. London: RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN 0-7007-1720-X; ISBN 978-0-7007-1720-0.
- Shillony, Ben-Ami (2008). The Emperors of Modern Japan. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-474-4225-7. OCLC 592756372.
- Takemae, Eiji (2002). Inside GHQ: The Allied Occupation of Japan and its Legacy. Translated by Ricketts, Robert; Swann, Sebastian. New York: Continuum. ISBN 0826462472. OCLC 45583413.
- Titsingh, Isaac (1834). Nihon Ōdai Ichiran Annales des empereurs du Japon pp. 411–412, Paris: Royal Asiatic Society, Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland.
External links
- The Imperial Household Agency
- Emperor of Japan – World History Encyclopedia
- List of the Emperors, accompanied with the regents and shoguns during their reign and a genealogical tree of the imperial family
- The Emperor of Japan, explanation of the title of Emperor in the context of western terminology
- Japan opens imperial tombs for research
- Emperor of Japan's New Year Address 2017 (YouTube)







No comments:
Post a Comment